Take charge of your career by utilizing www.marblejar.com. We offer IT
professionals like you all of the services you require to find the most
challenging positions in the IT industry. * $500 Signing bonus
when you get job through us* Dedicated recruiters to help you identify the
best job
I'm trying to implement wiping of freed swap pages inside swap_pager.
I'm using 2.2-branch, here is my thoughts and steps:
I have a (starting) block number of swapped page, i know page size, and i
know that i have to use some pool of buffers inside kernel. So i get
buffer with getpbuf(), then f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello there!
I've stumbled accross the following in sys/netinet/ip_input.c (v.1.173)
- --- lines 470-477 ---
if (m == NULL) {/* Packet discarded by firewall */
static int __debug=10;
if (__debug >0) {
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24 October 2001 16:53, Alexey V.Neyman wrote:
> What is the meaning of this construct? Isn't it functionally equivalent to
Oops, sorry for the post. I haven't noticed `static' there at first glance :\
Regards,
Alexey.
- --
<--
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 04:53:12PM +0400, Alexey V . Neyman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello there!
>
> I've stumbled accross the following in sys/netinet/ip_input.c (v.1.173)
>
> - --- lines 470-477 ---
> if (m == NULL) {/* Packet discarded by fire
"Broken pipe" generally means that your socket connection to the server
has either been torn down or hasn't been setup at all. Check to see if
this is really the case, and also check errno (you might get EBADF or
EPIPE depending upon the circumstances).
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Anjali Kulkarni wrote
Well, the question is rather simple... i am running some experiments
on system with severe load on the PCI bus (basically a router with 4 interfaces
trying to forward 2..4 streams of 64-byte packets at 100Mbit/s (i.e. 144kpps
on each stream), and from low level timing i notice that the
time to acc
* Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011024 14:03] wrote:
> Well, the question is rather simple... i am running some experiments
> on system with severe load on the PCI bus (basically a router with 4 interfaces
> trying to forward 2..4 streams of 64-byte packets at 100Mbit/s (i.e. 144kpps
> on each
An updated fxp driver patch for bundling receive interrupts, thus saving
a noticeable amount of CPU overhead for interrupt processing, can be
found at http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/BSD/fxp/. New features include:
- control of microcode parameters through sysctl variables
- activation/deactivation of m
I am trying to get two identical 3C589 pc cards working simultaneously on my
laptop. This was accomplished with FreeBSD 4.3 by adding lines like this to
/etc/defaults/pccard.conf :
config auto "ep0" 10
config auto "ep1" 15
(everything else for that cards entry is left the same)
However, th
I am not an official FreeBSD commiter, so I can't tell really...
Therefore jlemon was in cc: (he is the fxp driver maintainer), so it is
his call.
Nevertheless, I think this patch needs a little bit more testing - there
are many 8255* chipset revisions out there, and as the code is *very*
chipset
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Marko Zec wrote:
> An updated fxp driver patch for bundling receive interrupts, thus saving
> a noticeable amount of CPU overhead for interrupt processing, can be
> found at http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/BSD/fxp/. New features include:
I haven't reviewed the code and don't have
Mike Silbersack wrote:
> That being said, I thought I should check on one thing: In your original
> post, you mentioned that these techniques came from the linux drive for
> these cards. In the process of writing this patch, did you copy any
> section of code from the Linux driver? If possibl
Has anyone out there tried to get C++ code running in the freebsd kernel
(like as a .ko)? I have a piece of code that I got working in userland,
and would like to port it in the kernel (I had anecdotal evidence that
it worked). The major problem is that the library, when in kernel, uses
a whol
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 03:28:25PM -0700, Denis Serenyi wrote:
> Has anyone out there tried to get C++ code running in the freebsd kernel
> (like as a .ko)? I have a piece of code that I got working in userland,
have a look at what the Click team did
http://www.pdos.lcs.mit.edu/click/
> Well, the question is rather simple... i am running some experiments
> on system with severe load on the PCI bus (basically a router with 4 interfac
> es
> trying to forward 2..4 streams of 64-byte packets at 100Mbit/s (i.e. 144kpps
> on each stream), and from low level timing i notice that the
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Marko Zec wrote:
> The microcode should work on many revisions - if not all - of
> Intel 8255* chipset, but the BSD driver is currently tested only
> on 82558-B0, so I would really appreciate any feedback on driver
> functionality/stability on other chipset revisions.
Chalk
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>I am not an official FreeBSD commiter, so I can't tell really...
>Therefore jlemon was in cc: (he is the fxp driver maintainer), so it is
>his call.
>Nevertheless, I think this patch needs a little bit more testing - there
>are many 8255* chipset revisions
Has anyone enumerated the hardware platforms that the spkr(4)
device works on? And for those platforms where it doesn't work,
are there suggestions for (and documentation on) alternative
interfaces?
--lyndon
>What about all the people who hoarded tonnes of spam in their bunkers?
I hoard spam o
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 07:45:11PM +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
>
> I get the feeling this - inappropriate - setting of a _program
> variable is due to my misguided suggestion in PR conf/20202
> which verbatimly made it into the FreeBSD start scripts. If it
> doesn't fit the usual rules feel free
NOTE: THIS IS A STRAWMAN PROPOSAL! Take it all with a grain of
salt!
For a long while now I've been running with the bwk version of awk
in preference to the GNU gawk shipped in the base OS. Nothing has
broken as a result of the change, therefore I'm starting to wonder
if a NO_AWK macro for make.c
[ On a related somewhat anti-GNU thread ... ]
18 months ago we had a conversation on the mailing list about g77
vs. f77 as the canonical command name for the FORTRAN compiler.
The crux of the argument was that f77 was the canonical BSD name
for the command, and that's what it has been since. Ther
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>Done. I tested on my -current (compiled on Oct 22) the patch you can
>find at http://labs.gr/~charon/patches/diff.04.ipf-rc-U
>It is functionally equivalent to our current rc.network behavior, but
>it uses the variables you proposed, and it moves all th
Hello,
We are using from 1993 Fiskars UPS 0.8 A UPS unit (Type UPS 1008A-
10EU, PartNo: 10 02 891 Rev A1, SerNo: 119355 9345, Made in Finland)
and few days ago the Battery failure control light started blinking.
We replaced accus (5 pcs 12V 4Ah) and we charged them for 48 hours
but the control
i have the follow problem:
i use etinc in one FreeBSD box (4.2). it works fine.
this freebsd make bridge (one interface in switch), and another cross
over to router. in the conection to router, there are one colision led,
that are almost always up! i did put one rule for bridge only ip in rl0
(s
25 matches
Mail list logo
