And thus spake Matthew N. Dodd, on Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 02:07:12PM -0400:
> Clean it up and add perl bindings to it. Thats something that perl sorely
> misses. Come to think of it, libedit could use perl bindings... Hummm...
>
> Kevin? :)
Bleah, one thing at a time :) Once I finish with my
On 10-Sep-99 Jamie Bowden wrote:
> :Umm.. welll I'd like to know to enable sub folder support in it then..
> :Haveing multiple accounts on different machines would be nice too (then it
> :could do what xfmail can)
> In 'Incoming Folders' type 'a' and it will ask you for the server name to
> add
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Is there any reason to not have it as a port?
> >
> IMHO, only the basic IPX/SPX functionality should be included into the
> source tree. Anything else could be available as ports/net/nw-utils.
I tend to agree. If we bring in all of this stuff (ev
On 10-Sep-99 Daniel J. O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 10-Sep-99 Jamie Bowden wrote:
>> :Umm.. welll I'd like to know to enable sub folder support in it then..
>> :Haveing multiple accounts on different machines would be nice too (then it
>> :could do what xfmail can)
>> In 'Incoming Folders' type 'a' a
> Attached is an article from the Wall Street Journal Online Edition.
-hackers may be the wrong place for this, but I'll follow up
and note that this article is the headline article in the second section
("Marketplace" or "Marketing", I forget) in today's regular old print
version of the WSJ.
Pe
Dirk GOUDERS wrote:
>
> > There is a short but sweet[1] article on ZDNet today regarding FreeBSD:
> >
> > http://www.zdnet.com/zdtv/screensavers/answerstips/story/0,3656,2324624,00.html
>
> Hmm, can't find that sweet thing -- typo?
Nope, it worked fine for me. Given how short it is, this ar
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I tend to agree. If we bring in all of this stuff (even though I
> appreciate it's very useful) we should also bring in samba into the
> base tree by symmetry.
Thats the idea. Once Boris gets a chance to finish cifsfs the plan is to
import it into the
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > I tend to agree. If we bring in all of this stuff (even though I
> > appreciate it's very useful) we should also bring in samba into the
> > base tree by symmetry.
>
> Thats the idea. Once Boris gets a c
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > Thats the idea. Once Boris gets a chance to finish cifsfs the plan is to
> > import it into the tree the same as the Netware client stuff.
>
> Okay. If that's the plan, then I don't have any objections.
>
> I do hate the idea of having to reimplemen
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> > Okay. If that's the plan, then I don't have any objections.
> >
> > I do hate the idea of having to reimplement samba because of the licensing
> > though - it already does quite a good job at SMB serving, it seems a waste
> > to duplicate the effor
On 09-Sep-99 Andrew Reilly wrote:
> XFMail isn't acceptable, because I've got 130M of mbox mail
> boxes in a deep directory hierarchy, and I'd like to keep them
> that way. The last time I looked at XFMail it insisted on an
> un-nested mh-directory style of mailbox. Is it still the case?
It su
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > any idea on how to force ATX power supplies to restart after a power
> > outage without having someone press the 'power' button on the front
> > panel ? All the motherboards i can find now have their bios with two
> > options:
> >
> > Disabled
> >
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
