On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > I tend to agree. If we bring in all of this stuff (even though I > > appreciate it's very useful) we should also bring in samba into the > > base tree by symmetry. > > Thats the idea. Once Boris gets a chance to finish cifsfs the plan is to > import it into the tree the same as the Netware client stuff. Okay. If that's the plan, then I don't have any objections. I do hate the idea of having to reimplement samba because of the licensing though - it already does quite a good job at SMB serving, it seems a waste to duplicate the effort instead of just adding kernel support to the existing code. Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- NetWare client in -current Boris Popov
- RE: NetWare client in -current Daniel O'Connor
- Re: NetWare client in -current Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Boris Popov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Boris Popov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Kris Kennaway
- Re: NetWare client in -current Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: NetWare client in -current Kris Kennaway
- Re: NetWare client in -current Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: NetWare client in -curre... Kris Kennaway
- RE: NetWare client in -current Boris Popov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Peter Wemm
- Re: NetWare client in -current Boris Popov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Mike Smith
- RE: NetWare client in -current Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: NetWare client in -current Peter Wemm
- Re: NetWare client in -current Daniel O'Connor
- Re: NetWare client in -current Matthew N. Dodd