On 09-Sep-99 Andrew Reilly wrote: > XFMail isn't acceptable, because I've got 130M of mbox mail > boxes in a deep directory hierarchy, and I'd like to keep them > that way. The last time I looked at XFMail it insisted on an > un-nested mh-directory style of mailbox. Is it still the case? It supports both mbox and mh mailboxes now. --- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://www.cslab.vt.edu/~jbaldwin/ PGP Key: http://www.cslab.vt.edu/~jbaldwin/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: X mailers (was Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux ABI... Jamie Bowden
- Re: X mailers (was Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux ABI... Daniel J. O'Connor
- Re: X mailers (was Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux ABI... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: X mailers (was Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux ABI... Bruce A. Mah
- Re: X mailers (was Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux ABI/SDK... Walter Hafner
- RE: X mailers (was Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux ABI/SDK sta... Gennady Sorokopud
- Re: X mailers (was Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux ABI/SDK sta... Markus Stumpf
- Re: X mailers (was Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux ABI/SDK... Harold Gutch
- Re: X mailers (was Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux ABI/SDK... Andrew Reilly
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux ABI/SDK standards for OpenGL/M... John Baldwin
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux ABI/SDK standards for OpenGL/Mesa (... Nicolas Souchu