On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > > Okay. If that's the plan, then I don't have any objections. > > > > I do hate the idea of having to reimplement samba because of the licensing > > though - it already does quite a good job at SMB serving, it seems a waste > > to duplicate the effort instead of just adding kernel support to the > > existing code. > > SAMBA implements an SMB/CIFS server. We're talking about client support. It also does that (smbclient), though not as an FS, and there's sharity-light for a (n)fs interface. Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- RE: NetWare client in -current Daniel O'Connor
- Re: NetWare client in -current Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Boris Popov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Boris Popov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Kris Kennaway
- Re: NetWare client in -current Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: NetWare client in -current Kris Kennaway
- Re: NetWare client in -current Matthew N. Dodd
- RE: NetWare client in -current Kris Kennaway
- RE: NetWare client in -current Boris Popov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Peter Wemm
- Re: NetWare client in -current Boris Popov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Mike Smith
- RE: NetWare client in -current Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: NetWare client in -current Peter Wemm
- Re: NetWare client in -current Daniel O'Connor
- Re: NetWare client in -current Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: NetWare client in -current Daniel O'Connor
- Re: NetWare client in -current Parag Patel