On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Is there any reason to not have it as a port? > > > IMHO, only the basic IPX/SPX functionality should be included into the > source tree. Anything else could be available as ports/net/nw-utils. I tend to agree. If we bring in all of this stuff (even though I appreciate it's very useful) we should also bring in samba into the base tree by symmetry. Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- NetWare client in -current Boris Popov
- RE: NetWare client in -current Daniel O'Connor
- Re: NetWare client in -current Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Boris Popov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Boris Popov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Kris Kennaway
- Re: NetWare client in -current Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: NetWare client in -current Kris Kennaway
- Re: NetWare client in -current Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: NetWare client in -curre... Kris Kennaway
- RE: NetWare client in -current Boris Popov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Peter Wemm
- Re: NetWare client in -current Boris Popov
- Re: NetWare client in -current Mike Smith
- RE: NetWare client in -current Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: NetWare client in -current Peter Wemm