On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 04:16:00PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> That's its purpose, to provide a mini-kenrel for the loader so we can write the
> loader in C and not assembly. (gcc doesn't do well with generating code for
> real mode).
can't you do it at the moment ? write client in C
A start it is. It's starting to shape up. Something is indeed better than
nothing.
Do think you might want to keep upa in a separate bus directory? It's probably
not worth the effort as all sparc64's of interest are UPA based.
The next hard steps will be Psycho or Simba support and all the mass
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010723 19:47] wr
> ote:
> > Hello
> > I am experimenting with kernel modules and am trying to write to a file.
> > This is the syscall function (sorry of my terminology is messed up)
> >
> > static int write_f
* Jake Burkholder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010724 00:34] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Below are links to the sparc64 port I've been working on, which
> I'd like to commit.
>
> The way I started the port was to make stub versions of all the
> machine dependent functions in the kernel, which panic with an
> in
Hello,
Below are links to the sparc64 port I've been working on, which
I'd like to commit.
The way I started the port was to make stub versions of all the
machine dependent functions in the kernel, which panic with an
informative message when called. Given minimal startup code and
console suppo
Hi,
In case you are talking about mbuf clusters, then you will find the size
mentioned in sys/mbuf.h. ( Just curious, why would you want to change the
cluster size ?)
Cheers
__srp
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, [iso-8859-1] vishwanath pargaonkar wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > in freebsd can we change the cluste
++ 23/07/01 18:21 -0700 - Romain Kang:
| I've been using this in a PLIST:
|
| 1 @exec test -d %D/var/run/procstates || mkdir -p %D/var/run/procstates
| 2 @exec chown root.wheel %D/var/run/procstates && chmod 1775 %D/var/run/procstates
[nitpick: you should use chown root:wheel]
|
| The rational
Dear Friends
I'm incorporating the Real Time Protocol RTP (rfc 1889) to
FreeBSD 4.0 kernel.
Months ago, I compiled successfully the RTP Library API developed
by Lucent into the FreeBSD kernel with the right logical and technical
adjustments for the BSD kernel of course (copyin, copyout, mall
On 23 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> static int write_file(struct proc *p, void *arg) {
> struct write_args *wstructure;
> struct open_args *ostructure;
>
> ostructure->path="/tmp/blehfile";
> ostructure->flags = O_CREAT;
> ostructure->mode = 0;
> wst
I've been using this in a PLIST:
1 @exec test -d %D/var/run/procstates || mkdir -p %D/var/run/procstates
2 @exec chown root.wheel %D/var/run/procstates && chmod 1775 %D/var/run/procstates
The rationale for each line:
- 1 Install: make sure that the directory exists, avoiding error messages
i
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010723 19:47] wrote:
> Hello
> I am experimenting with kernel modules and am trying to write to a file.
> This is the syscall function (sorry of my terminology is messed up)
>
> static int write_file(struct proc *p, void *arg) {
> struct write_args *
Hello
I am experimenting with kernel modules and am trying to write to a file.
This is the syscall function (sorry of my terminology is messed up)
static int write_file(struct proc *p, void *arg) {
struct write_args *wstructure;
struct open_args *ostructure;
ostructure->p
Hello
I am experimenting with kernel modules and am trying to write to a file.
This is the syscall function (sorry of my terminology is messed up)
static int write_file(struct proc *p, void *arg) {
struct write_args *wstructure;
struct open_args *ostructure;
ostructure->p
On 23-Jul-01 Evan Sarmiento wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm writing a system call which requires a function pointer as an argument,
> In syscalls.master, it is specified as such:
The kernel has no business executing untrusted code from userland. Use a
kernel module to add code to the kernel. Either th
On 23-Jul-01 Weiguang SHI wrote:
> Thanks.
> I think I've found it in btx.s:
>
> 213 mov %eax,%cr0 #
> 214 ljmp $SEL_SCODE,$init.8 # To 32-bit code
> 215 .code32
> 216 init.8: xorl %ecx,%ecx
Hello,
I'm writing a system call which requires a function pointer as an argument,
In syscalls.master, it is specified as such:
366 STD BSD { int prfw_inject_fp(int sl, int synum, pid_t pi
d, int (*fp)() ); }
However, when I try compiling the kernel, sysproto complains
In file incl
I think what you need is
http://current.jp.FreeBSD.org/tour/
--
FUJISHIMA Satsuki
At Mon, 23 Jul 2001 00:04:15 -0700,
Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> At one stage at whistle we had the kernel fully cross-referenced
> using the 'global' program (now in ports) which produced
> a website that could b
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 03:10:56PM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Stephane E. Potvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010722 07:57] wrote:
> > I tought that some might be interested by this:
> >
> > Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project.
> > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1
Thanks.
I think I've found it in btx.s:
213 mov %eax,%cr0 #
214 ljmp $SEL_SCODE,$init.8 # To 32-bit code
215 .code32
216 init.8: xorl %ecx,%ecx # Zero
And there IS this "ljmp".
Wel
* Leo Bicknell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010723 15:58] wrote:
>
> A number of new chips have been released lately, along with some
> enhancements to existing processors that all fall into the same
> logic of parallelizing some operations. Why, just today I ran
> across an article about http://www.the
You are talking about CMP (chip multi-processor) or SMT (Simultaneous
Multi-Threading)!!
Please look at the design of IBM Power4.
Rayson
--- Leo Bicknell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A number of new chips have been released lately, along with some
> enhancements to existing processors that
A number of new chips have been released lately, along with some
enhancements to existing processors that all fall into the same
logic of parallelizing some operations. Why, just today I ran
across an article about http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/20576.html,
which bosts 128 ALU's on a sin
Filtrar el agua de bebida incrementa nuestra calidad de vida.
La mayoria de los malos sabores, olores y turbidez presente en el agua potable son causados por la presencia de cloro y materiales orgánicos.
El cloro utilizado muy eficazmente para potabilizar el agua de bebida, es causal del mal s
On 21-Jul-01 Weiguang SHI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please forgive me if this seems too easy.
>
> "http://people.freebsd.org/~jhb/386htm/s10_03.htm"; says:
>
> Immediately after setting the PE flag, the initialization code must
> flush the processor's instruction prefetch queue by
> executing a J
Hi, I just received shipping notification from UPS that my net4501 is in
the shipping pipeline; can't wait for it to arrive.
On a practical note: is there a mailing list or some other forum which
will host net4501 users? Since it's likely that there will be a bunch of
different operating syste
Make sense. But there are other things in the UPAGES.
-Zhihui
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Weiguang SHI wrote:
> I guess this is it (/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/locore.s):
>
> 348 /* now running relocated at KERNBASE where the system is linked to
> run */
> 349 begin:
> 350 /* set up
I guess this is it (/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/locore.s):
348 /* now running relocated at KERNBASE where the system is linked to
run */
349 begin:
350 /* set up bootstrap stack */
351 movl_proc0paddr,%esp/* location of in-kernel
pages */
352 a
You must be asking why the mbuf cluster size is chosen as 2048, right? It
is probably a tradeoff between memory efficient and speed.
-Zhihui
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, [iso-8859-1] vishwanath pargaonkar wrote:
> Hi,
> in freebsd can we change the cluster size from 2048
> bytes.If yes how can we do t
Just out of curiosity, Linux's kernel stack is one page. Where in the
kernel source code that says that we can have two pages instead of one
page kernel stack?
-Zhihui
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Eugene L. Vorokov wrote:
> > > I call this function with (curproc, PATH_MAX+1), and everything is fine
>
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 11:01:27AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Jul 23), vishwanath pargaonkar said:
> > in freebsd can we change the cluster size from 2048 bytes.If yes how
> > can we do that? do we have to configure in some file?
>
> Actually, the block size is 8192 bytes by
Hi,
in freebsd can we change the cluster size from 2048
bytes.If yes how can we do that?
do we have to configure in some file?
TIA
vishwanath
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 12:37:55PM +0100, vishwanath pargaonkar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thx for ur reply.
> i wanted to know in side kernel is there any limit to
> the malloc that a user can do.what you told in ur
> previous mail is that at a time user can malloc 4k.but
No. You _can_ malloc ov
> > I call this function with (curproc, PATH_MAX+1), and everything is fine
> > when I have just a few local variables defined in the caller (it all
> > works on MOD_LOAD only). However, if I have 2 buffers, 4096 bytes each,
> > as local variables and then try to allocate userspace memory the same
Jonathan Chen wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 02:38:07PM -0400, Michael Sinz wrote:
> > I had been meaning to ask if there was a reason why NFS mounts happened
> > before NFS servers were started but life kept getting in the way :-)
>
> If /usr was nfs mounted on a machine, then /usr needs to
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 12:56:04AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > Julian Elischer wrote:
> > >
> > > Dima Dorfman wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > * A cross reference of the FreeBSD kernel
> > >
> > > well I have the source code of course, but the second is what I'm
> > > looking for except th
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 12:56:04AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> > Dima Dorfman wrote:
> [...]
> > > * A cross reference of the FreeBSD kernel
> >
> > well I have the source code of course, but the second is what I'm
> > looking for except that it stopped bein
Hi,
thx for ur reply.
i wanted to know in side kernel is there any limit to
the malloc that a user can do.what you told in ur
previous mail is that at a time user can malloc 4k.but
suppose i am doing 2k memory allocations. how many
such mallocs i can do?
is there any configuration we can do depen
Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> Dima Dorfman wrote:
[...]
> > * A cross reference of the FreeBSD kernel
>
> well I have the source code of course, but the second is what I'm
> looking for except that it stopped being updated October 2000.
>
> I'm looking for a current one.
oh yeah, and that on
Thanks to all who answered my question about
libpcap and pthreads. I forgot to say that I want
to have the answer on the same question for
OpenBSD and NetBSD (for all *BSD, which
my port sysutils/ipa supports), but the answer for
FreeBSD is enough.
An idea to call pcap_dispatch() in a separate
si
Dima Dorfman wrote:
>
> Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > At one stage at whistle we had the kernel fully cross-referenced
> > using the 'global' program (now in ports) which produced
> > a website that could be browsed to find
> > 'all the callers of xxx()' etc.
> >
> > does anyone
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At one stage at whistle we had the kernel fully cross-referenced
> using the 'global' program (now in ports) which produced
> a website that could be browsed to find
> 'all the callers of xxx()' etc.
>
> does anyone have such a site online at the mome
41 matches
Mail list logo
