Problem with new bwn driver on -CURRENT

2010-02-28 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
et this to attach at boot time? Thanks. Joe -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gn...@freebsd.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Problem with new bwn driver on -CURRENT

2010-03-01 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 15:37 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote: > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 03:24:28PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > I was extremely pleased to see this driver, so I could get off of the > > flaky NDIS version. I have a Dell Vostra 2510 with a LP bwn mini-PCI > &

Re: Problem with new bwn driver on -CURRENT

2010-03-03 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On 3/3/10 5:04 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:50:43PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >> On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 15:37 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote: >>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 03:24:28PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >>>> I was extremely pleased

Re: Problem with new bwn driver on -CURRENT

2010-03-03 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
out 30 minutes ago. Thanks for looking into this. http://www.marcuscom.com/downloads/salami.dmesg Joe -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gn...@freebsd.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Problem with new bwn driver on -CURRENT

2010-03-05 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On 3/5/10 3:53 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote: > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:12:02AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:14 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote: >>>> When it occurs again, I will get you the details and the full dmesg. Do >>>> you want a

Re: Problem with new bwn driver on -CURRENT

2010-03-06 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 16:16 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 04:44:34PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On 3/5/10 3:53 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:12:02AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > >> On Wed, 2010-03-03

Re: Problem with new bwn driver on -CURRENT

2010-03-13 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 17:33 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote: > Thank you for dmesg. It looks you are right that your device in PIO > mode doesn't work. Specially RX path is weird that it was good until > the status is changed to RUN but after querying DHCP requests (or > another) there were no more RX

Re: VM_METER no longer defined?

2003-01-17 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 12:42, Scott Long wrote: > Conrad Sabatier wrote: > > > Pardon me if I missed something, but what's become of the definition of > > VM_METER? It is nowhere to be found under /usr/include. This breaks > > a few > > ports, kdebase3 being one of the most notable. > > > I've g

Re: VM_METER no longer defined?

2003-01-18 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 15:20, Scott Long wrote: > Hiten Pandya wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:39:42PM -0700, Scott Long wrote the words > > in effect of: > > > > >Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > > > > > > > >>On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:26:10AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>>Of

Re: Cisco vpnclient

2003-01-31 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 20:28, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > Cisco is offering a VPN client for Linux. I wonder if it would be > > possible to run this under FreeBSD. An extra linux kernel module is > > being built. Is this already the 'ruled out'? > > > > If this won't work, I'm afraid I will have to

Re: patch for the nVidia driver and -CURRENT

2003-02-25 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 23:45, Patrick Hartling wrote: > Does anyone have this working with GDM 2.4.1.3 on -current? I've found > that I can use the nvidia driver with Maxime's patch on a freshly built > -current system as long as I don't use GDM. If I start up GDM, the > system freezes as soon

Re: Gnome2 terminal will not work right

2003-03-07 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 00:15, Tom Parquette wrote: > People have been saying that 5.0-CURRENT problems belong here. > I don't know if this is Gnome2 or Xfree86... Both work fine for me in -CURRENT. > > I noticed tonight that the Gnome2 desktop terminal stopped working. What changed between the l

[PATCH] Add support for the Intel 852 chipset

2003-07-27 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
Here is a bad that adds i852 support to the AGP system. This seems to work fine on my Dell 5150. Others may want to double-check this first since this isn't my area of expertise. Joe -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --- src/sys/pci/agp_intel.c.origSat Jul 26 00:28:34 200

Re: gconftool-2 failing

2003-07-30 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-07-20 at 18:59, Rik wrote: > I have recently run into a problem with the gconftool-2 service that > comes with gnome2. > > When I go into X I get a gcond process that runs out of control. > > If I try to install ports that require the gconftool-2 to run the port > will fail to instal

Re: Mozilla V1.3.1 crashing on FreeBSD 5.1-C (older cvsup level)

2003-08-02 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 16:20, Tom Parquette wrote: > Periodically, Mozilla V1.3.1 will appear to crash on some web sites. > I finally got the following messages out of it. It's not much but I was > hoping someone might have an idea. > > This was from an attempt to point at www.historychannel.com.

ACPI battery state and resume not working on Inspiron 5150

2003-08-06 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
I've read a lot of the recent Dell Inspiron posts on current@, and even tried the Dell AML patch (doesn't apply on the 5150, Stijn). Most things seems to be working for ACPI except for battery status and suspend/resume (the laptop suspends, but never comes back). Here is what dmesg reports for AC

Re: ACPI battery state and resume not working on Inspiron 5150

2003-08-06 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 15:56, Barney Wolff wrote: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 03:31:01PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed > > [\\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.BAT1._STA] (Node 0xc6137640), AE_NOT_EXIST > > I would not expect BAT1 to ex

Re: ACPI battery state and resume not working on Inspiron 5150

2003-08-09 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 10:31, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > From: Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 16:01:37 -0400 > > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --=-MHp9eSkqmbnyoWl+2a1w > > Content-Type: text/plain > > C

Problem using USB 2.0 device under -CURRENT

2003-08-12 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
I'm running: FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #18: Sat Aug 9 16:53:59 EDT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GYROS And I just bought one of those 256 MB USB JumpDrives. The drive works fine under -STABLE and in USB 1.1 slots on -CURRENT: umass0: LEXAR MEDIA JUMPDRIVE PRO, rev 2.00/0.00, addr

Re: ACPI battery state and resume not working on Inspiron 5150

2003-08-14 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 12:20, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > From: Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 12:06:30 -0400 > > > > > > --=-IkHq9Jbph/9SXjiWOYnQ > > Content-Type: text/plain > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quote

Re: Mozilla V1.3.1 crashing on FreeBSD 5.1-C (older cvsup level)

2003-08-14 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
> pkg_info indicates I have "flashplugin-mozilla-0.4.10_2 A GPL standalone > Flash (TM) plugin for Mozilla web browser" > installed. I have not checked to see if the plugin needs to be > upgraded yet because I'm looking for a misconfigure for the plugins. I would remove

Re: ACPI battery state and resume not working on Inspiron 5150

2003-08-14 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 16:01, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 15:56, Barney Wolff wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 03:31:01PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed > > > [\\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.BAT1._STA] (Nod

[UPDATE] Inspiron 5150 and FreeBSD

2003-08-22 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
After a lot of bad luck with ACPI and my new Inspiron 5150, something good happened today. I went to Dell's site, and they had a BIOS update for my machine that took it to rev A23. This was actually an update from PhoenixBIOS to DellBIOS. Once I got that installed, I went to Stijn Hoop's Dell pa

Re: databases/mysql323-client fails to build

2003-08-29 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 13:00, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:38:04AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > > On a 5.1-release box, I tried to install databases/mysql323-client > > and was told: > > > > configure: error: Your compiler cannot convert a longlong value to a > > float! > > I

Re: HEADS UP! ATAng committed

2003-08-29 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 15:53, Glenn Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 06:41:17PM +0200, Thomas Quinot wrote: > > > Le 2003-08-29, Glenn Johnson écrivait : > > > > > When I have atapicam enabled in my kernel config (-current, as of > > > Aug 28, 2003; 11:00 PM CDT), my system locks up when tr

Re: databases/mysql323-client fails to build

2003-08-29 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 16:02, Dan Langille wrote: > On 29 Aug 2003 at 13:29, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > This is due to a bug in the configure script - the patch was posted to > > > this list several times over the last few months. Unfortunately the > >

Re: databases/mysql323-client fails to build

2003-08-29 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 16:56, Dan Langille wrote: > On 29 Aug 2003 at 13:29, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > This is due to a bug in the configure script - the patch was posted to > > > this list several times over the last few months. Unfortunately the > >

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-20 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 00:22, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 02:03:40PM +1000, John Birrell wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 07:24:07PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > 3) You, John Birrell, and whoever else is interested in fixing these > > > ports can work on them at your own pa

Re: GNOME 2 port is broken?

2003-10-02 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 15:06, Rossam Souza Silva wrote: > The gnome2 port is broken? I updated the ports tree two time today, but > the result is: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports/x11/gnome2> sudo make install clean > ===> Installing for gnome2-2.4.0 > ===> gnome2-2.4.0 depends on file: /usr/X11

PANIC with tonight's -CURRENT

2003-10-10 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
I just upgraded my PIII 750 to tonight's -CURRENT, and it panics right after creating GEOM disks for da0 and cd0: Waiting 8 seconds for SCSI devices to settle GEOM: create disk cd0 dp=0xc5174600 GEOM: create disk da0 dp=0xc516ec50 panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy Here is the stack trace (copied

Re: panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy

2003-10-11 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 02:02, Don Lewis wrote: > On 11 Oct, Steve Kargl wrote: > > Upgrade tonight (7pm PST) and received the following > > on rebooting > > > > panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy > > > > Unfortunately, this system does not have a serial > > console and the panic locked it up tight.

Re: panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy

2003-10-12 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 02:41, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 02:35:21AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 02:02, Don Lewis wrote: > > > On 11 Oct, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > Upgrade tonight (7pm PST) and received the

Re: FYI, I've switched my primary desktop to AMD64.

2003-10-17 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 13:17, Peter Wemm wrote: [snip] > I've been working on getting mozilla-firebird up and running but that is > easier said than done because the core infrastructure (nspr, xpcom etc) > haven't got official support for amd64 yet. There are patches in the > bugzilla database tho

Re: Question on freeBSD (5.1-CURRENT) portupgrade of Perl 5.8 andlibiconv 1.9.1_3

2003-10-21 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 01:14, Scott W wrote: > Hey all. In doing a portupgrade -RvN for windowmaker, Perl and libiconv > were recompiled. I saved the log output and noticed several oddities I > was wondering if anyone can explain? > > 1..several settings come up as undefined during the Perl bui

Re: Approval for Hotfix needed for portscanner (was Re: Error assigning master socket: Too many open files)

2003-10-22 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 11:31, Andreas Klemm wrote: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 03:30:41PM +0100, Peter Edwards wrote: > > The patch applied by the port appears bogus. It adds braces around an > > "if" that stops it executing the way it was intended. I've a sneaking > > suspicion that the braces were

Recent ATA drivers giving problems with SATA

2003-11-26 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
About a month ago, I bought a new SATA controller and a 160 GB Seagate SATA drive for my -CURRENT machine. All was working fine until about a week ago. Then, the drive started experiencing hard, unrecoverable DMA errors. I RMA'd the drive, then bought a new Maxtor 80 GB SATA drive (just yesterda

Re: Recent ATA drivers giving problems with SATA

2003-11-26 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 13:28, Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > atapci1: port > > 0x14b0-0x14bf,0x14c0-0x14c3,0x14c8-0x14cf,0x14c4-0x14c7,0x14d0-0x14d7 > > mem 0xe800a000-0xe800a1ff irq 9 at device 16.0 on pci0 > > GEOM: create disk ad4 dp=

Re: Recent ATA drivers giving problems with SATA

2003-11-26 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 13:28, Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > atapci1: port > > 0x14b0-0x14bf,0x14c0-0x14c3,0x14c8-0x14cf,0x14c4-0x14c7,0x14d0-0x14d7 > > mem 0xe800a000-0xe800a1ff irq 9 at device 16.0 on pci0 > > GEOM: create disk ad4 dp=

Re: Western Digital WD360GD SATA disk on -CURRENT

2003-11-29 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 23:56, Will Andrews wrote: > Hi, > > Ever since I found the set of commits which broke probing this > disk on/about September 1, I have attempted to boot a JPSNAP > about once a week. Up to this day, on which I tried 5.2-BETA > (official ISO), it has never again probed this

Re: Western Digital WD360GD SATA disk on -CURRENT

2003-11-30 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 02:00, Will Andrews wrote: > On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 01:49:14AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > I have a host controller with the same chipset. I was having frequent > > data corruption problems, so I asked about it on current@ a few days > > ago.

Re: Western Digital WD360GD SATA disk on -CURRENT

2003-11-30 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 02:07, Derek Ragona wrote: > I have a server that uses the same chipset with a maxtor drive, no RAID > just a single drive. My hardware exact hardware is: > Adaptec SATA 1210SA (SiI 3112 SATA150 controller in non RAID mode with a > single drive) and a Maxtor 6Y120M0 120 GB

Re: Western Digital WD360GD SATA disk on -CURRENT

2003-11-30 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 03:52, Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > I agree. I really needed to be up and running ASAP, so I opted for the > > new controller. Søren, if you're listening, and need an SiI controller > > for testing, you're free

Re: SiI3112 SATA controller problems - status

2003-11-30 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 09:43, HaggeL wrote: > Hi Guys :) > > Sorry if i waste your time. IŽm a freeBSD noob and need some help. > I want to install freeBSD in januar and have some problems. I want to > buy me a new harddrive, a serial ATA one, because i got the "Silicon > ImageR Sil 3112A-Controlle

Re: SiI3112 SATA controller problems - status

2003-11-30 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 14:40, Robert Watson wrote: > On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 09:43, HaggeL wrote: > > > Hi Guys :) > > > > > > Sorry if i waste your time. I®m a freeBSD noob and need some help. > > &

Re: vfs.usermount=1, bug?

2004-02-07 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 15:18, Didier Wiroth wrote: > Hi, > using freebsd5.2-release > I've set vfs.usermount=1 in sysctl.conf. > Normal user get permission denied when trying to > mount an ntfs permission (slice ars01), until root > has mount and umount it at least once. > See the following >

Re: gnome 2.30 slow startup (Could not ask session manager if shut down is available)

2010-07-26 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
t; > setenv GNOME_SESSION "/usr/local/bin/ck-launch-session > /usr/local/bin/gnome-session" > env LC_ALL=zh_CN.UTF-8 xmodifie...@im=ibus startx $GNOME_SESSION > > I also found that if login user is root, it works very well. > > The question is why the g_object_get c

Re: Gnome2 terminal will not work right

2003-03-08 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 19:39, Tom Parquette wrote: > >What changed between the last known working date and tonight? > > > > > Joe, Nothing that I know of. I did a make buildworld/buildkernel on > this machine that was NFS mounted on another but I have not installed it > on this machine yet.

Re: [Fwd: HELP GDM XFree86]

2003-03-20 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 03:59, CARTER Anthony wrote: > I can use XDM no problem, so I guess this is really a GDM problem... > > It is a temporary solution, but it will do. However, it isn't pretty and > I would like to use GDM... You cannot start gdm2 out of /etc/ttys. You need to read the gdm2 pk

Re: Gdk-Warning

2003-06-17 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 14:48, Blaise Takoudjou wrote: > Hello, > how can i resolv this warning ? > Gdk-WARNING **: Missing charsets in FontSet creation > > i have starting and reciving message with "gaim" This really isn't appropriate to the current@ mailing list. However, this might be fixed by

Re: Xft-2.1.2 fails to build under 5.1 release

2003-06-17 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 15:31, Eli K. Breen wrote: > Xft-2.1.2 fails to build under 5.1 release - Any hints or should I try and get a > hold of the Xft port maintainer? You need XFree86-4.3.0 to build Xft-2.1.2. If you don't want to upgrade X, then don't upgrade Xft. The older version should get

Re: Mozilla 1.0 error

2002-06-07 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 10:52, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > At Fri, 7 Jun 2002 12:43:27 + (UTC), > John Angelmo wrote: > > (cd /usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dist/bin; /usr/bin/env > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=. ./regxpcom; echo > > skin,install,select,classic/1.0 >> chrome/inst

Re: Mozilla 1.0 error

2002-06-14 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 14:36, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: > Hello, Kris Kennaway! > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 02:02:52PM -0700, you wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 04:56:45PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 10:52, Jun Kuriyama wrote: &g

[PATCH] sed is broken in -CURRENT

2002-06-15 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
After the recent round of -i fixes to sed, certain ports will no longer make configure (gaim being a prime example). The problem is that mf_fgets() is unnecessarily overwriting sp->len. The attached patch corrects the problem while still allowing -i to work on multiple files. As a ports committ

Re: The -current state of mozilla affairs

2002-06-20 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 02:21, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > > I supped a -CURRENT system 3 days ago and am still having the problem > > > described here, but the gcc that's in the base system is 3.1 at this > > > point. I'm installing gcc32 now and will try building this again > > > using a newer ver

Re: The -current state of mozilla affairs

2002-06-20 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 13:25, David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 11:21:35PM -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > -#if defined(__FreeBSD_cc_version) && \ > > + #if defined(__FreeBSD_cc_version) && (__FreeBSD_cc_version < 53) && \ > > (__FreeBSD_cc_version < 42 || __FreeBSD_cc_v

Re: The -current state of mozilla affairs

2002-06-20 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 02:21, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > > I supped a -CURRENT system 3 days ago and am still having the problem > > > described here, but the gcc that's in the base system is 3.1 at this > > > point. I'm installing gcc32 now and will try building this again > > > using a newer ver

Re: The -current state of mozilla affairs

2002-06-21 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 15:59, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > Why not to use GCC version itself to distinguish between > thunked/non-thunked vtable implementations? The full comments in the header file illustrate why the Mozilla teamed keyed off of the internal compiler revision. Basically, almost all

Re: KSE status report

2002-07-02 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 16:07, Julian Elischer wrote: > ok, so you are saying that GNOME stuff works fine? > What do yuo have running and is there still anything that does the wrong > thing? I just did an update of -CURRENT about 4 hours ago, and everything in GNOME works fine except nautilus. Nau

Re: KSE status report

2002-07-02 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 16:42, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Wesley Morgan wrote: > > > KDE is working fine. GIMP & GNUCash are the only two "gnome" apps I am > > using, and they both work. "Everybuddy" now works... In short, it all > > seems to work. I am using rev 1.225 of pr

Re: gcc-3.1 Mozilla Build Fails

2002-07-11 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 03:13, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > On (2002/07/10 19:15), Dirk Engling wrote: > > > Maybe this would be more interesting to > > the mozilla guys but mozilla compiles on > > 2.95.3, so I think, the problem is related > > to gcc-3.1 > > As far as I know, ports/lang/gcc31 is still

Re: mozilla regchrome problem is back?

2002-08-29 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 09:58, Hidenori Ishikawa wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 16:46:56, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Yes, I've built mozilla 1.0 package yesterday and it went fine, only > > to find today that it's updated to 1.1 and then there's ./regchrome > > problem.. > > It seems th

Re: mozilla regchrome problem is back?

2002-08-29 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 12:17, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On 29 Aug 2002, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > Yes, this was my fault. The thunks bug was fixed in the Mozilla > > development tree, and _not_ rolled into 1.1 despite my understanding. > > Th

Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.2 in progress

2002-09-01 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Martin Blapp wrote: > > Hi, > > > totally wrong, and this won't break things. I'm just a bit startled that > > this appears out of nowhere (I sure don't recall it being discussed) and > > just happens, with 10 minutes warning. > > The 2.95.3 -> 3.1 prerelease upgrade was a big

Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.2 in progress

2002-09-01 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Sun, 1 Sep 2002 18:52:04 -0400 (EDT) > Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Actually, if 3.2 doesn't use thunks, it's likely to break Mozilla > > again. This is really not that big of a deal. I&#

Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.2 in progress

2002-09-01 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > > > totally wrong, and this won't break things. I'm just a bit startled that > > > > this appears out of nowhere (I sure don't recall it being discussed) and > > > > just happens, with 10 minutes warning. > > > > > > The 2.95.3 -> 3.1 prerelease upgr

Re: KDE broken on CURRENT (with gcc3.2)

2002-09-03 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 19:01, Alan E wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 02:29:12PM -0700, Will Andrews wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 11:30:02PM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote: > >> > ports/devel/fam > >> > --- > >> > > >> > c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -DCONFIG_ETC_CONFIG_

Threads issue after latest buildworld

2002-09-17 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
I just cvsup'd -CURRENT two hours ago, built world and kernel, then rebooted...same as always. Now, nautilus-2.0.7 fails to start with a thread abort. Fatal error '_pq_insert_head: prioq not protected!' at line 185 in file /usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_priority_queue.c (errno = 22) Fatal e

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-18 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 00:32, Edwin Culp wrote: > I just realized that slapd dumps core with: > > Fatal error '_pq_insert_head: prioq not protected!' at line 185 in file > /usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_priority_queue.c (errno = 22) > Abort (core dumped) > > I have recompiled openldap and d

Re: mozilla busted?

2002-09-19 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 23:22, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : Is it statically linked? > > Yup. You'll need to rebuild against the new libc_r, then. Joe > > Warner > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PRO

Re: mozilla busted?

2002-09-19 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 23:38, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 23:22, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : >

Re: sys/sys/proc.h 1.250 breaks devel/libgtop2 port

2002-09-27 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 21:02, Lars Eggert wrote: > Hi, > > commenting out p_kse in sys/sys/proc.h rev 1.250 broke the > devel/libgtop2 port (which still uses that field in > sysdeps/freebsd/proctime.c). > > What's the new way of getting at this info? I'll take a stab at fixing > the port if so

Re: sys/sys/proc.h 1.250 breaks devel/libgtop2 port

2002-09-27 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 21:54, Lars Eggert wrote: > Juli Mallett wrote: > > * De: Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-09-27 ] > > [ Subjecte: sys/sys/proc.h 1.250 breaks devel/libgtop2 port ] > > > >>commenting out p_kse in sys/sys/proc.h rev 1.250 broke the > >>devel/libgtop2 port (w

Re: GNOME 2.0 DOES NOT COMPILE

2002-10-04 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 10:39, Lars Eggert wrote: > The Gupta Age wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I was trying to compile GNOME 2.0 on a freebsd current > > machine on which the world was recently cvsuped, built > > and installed. CVSUP-ed on 09/22/2002 > > > > the gnome compilation breaks while trying to

Re: GNOME 2.0 DOES NOT COMPILE

2002-10-04 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
emove the old code) Yep, my patches cover 4.x as well. I modeled things after ps a bit. You're right, I could have just removed all the non-FreeBSD code. However, doing it this way will make things easier to get back into the libgtop tree. Joe > > On 4 Oct 2002, Joe Marcus Clarke wr

Re: gnome2 make install failure help

2002-10-05 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 23:42, suken woo wrote: > get the following errmsg . help , please > cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -g -Wall -Wpointer-arith > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -o gdmaskpass gdmaskpass.o > -lintl -liconv -lpam -L/usr/local/lib -liconv > /usr/libexec/elf/ld: Dwarf E

Re: mozilla-devel problems

2002-10-23 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 10:20, Ollivier Robert wrote: > Hello, > > I've recently recompiled mozilla-devel on a 4.7-STABLE system, no problem, > all fonts and everything work fine. > > Trying the same on CURRENT : > > - the Makefile is broken for CURRENT's sh/make, the attached patch is > needed.

Re: libgtop port and v_tag changes

2002-10-24 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 19:13, Nate Lawson wrote: > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > > Speaking of v_tag, can you fix the devel/libgtop port on current? > > This is the patch I used to get it building the other day: > > > > > cat patch-sysdeps_freebsd_procmap.c > > --- sysdeps/freebsd/pro

Re: failure to make ORBit2 in CURRENT

2002-10-17 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 20:42, Daniel Flickinger wrote: > Sent: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 05:25:36 +0200 Clement Laforet wrote: > > + On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 02:39:51 + (GMT) > + Daniel Flickinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > + > + > running CURRENT from slice at 1200 GMT 16 Oct 2002: > + > > + > system is T

Re: libgtop port and v_tag changes

2002-10-25 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 14:15, John Baldwin wrote: > Well, here's the thing. If libgtop is intended to be used only with live > kernels then it might be a better idea to use xvnode's that you get with > from the kernel. Alternatively, you could grab the inode and dev number > the same way the sysct

Re: libgtop port and v_tag changes

2002-10-28 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 16:27, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 28-Oct-2002 Terry Lambert wrote: > > John Baldwin wrote: > >> I mean, do you know what libgtop is used for? It's used to draw > >> little applets that display load averages and other silly system > >> monitor stuff in small spaces in GUI's.

Re: libgtop port and v_tag changes

2002-10-28 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 16:37, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 28-Oct-2002 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 16:27, John Baldwin wrote: > >> > >> On 28-Oct-2002 Terry Lambert wrote: > >> > John Baldwin wrote: > >> >> I mean,

Re: libgtop port and v_tag changes

2002-10-28 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 16:37, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 28-Oct-2002 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 16:27, John Baldwin wrote: > >> > >> On 28-Oct-2002 Terry Lambert wrote: > >> > John Baldwin wrote: > >> >> I mean,

Re: X problems

2002-11-17 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 22:39, wsk wrote: > if set the locale with zh_CN.EUC ,error occured > --xconsole: > pid 492 (bonobo-activation-s), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) > pid 494 (bonobo-activation-s), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) > pid 496 (bonobo-activation-s), uid 1001

Re: GTK problem after updating system

2002-11-22 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 19:26, David Holm wrote: > Hi, > I updated my CURRENT system today, previously I was running on a one week old > build. > After I updated I can no longer run xmms, it returns with the following > messages: > > Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library > Gdk-WARNING

Re: bonobo-activation core dump help

2002-11-27 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 20:25, suken woo wrote: > hi, all: > setting the env with zh_CN.EUC ,and run X but got the following errors. > pid 495 (bonobo-activation-s), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) > pid 497 (bonobo-activation-s), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) > pid 499

Re: DP-2 and Nvidia Geforce 4

2002-12-04 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 17:04, Rob wrote: > Is there any solution to the above combo other than just waiting? I think you've seen my how-to at http://www.marcuscom.com/g2g-xfree86/article.html. Did it not work for your card, or are you referring to GeForce 4 with accelerated 3D support? Joe >

Re: DP-2 and Nvidia Geforce 4

2002-12-04 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 22:46, Rob wrote: > Rob wrote: > > > > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 17:04, Rob wrote: > > > > Is there any solution to the above combo other than just waiting? > > > > > > I th

Re: DP-2 and Nvidia Geforce 4

2002-12-06 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 23:25, Rob wrote: > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 22:46, Rob wrote: > > > Rob wrote: > > > > > > > > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 17:

Re: /usr/ports/graphics/lcms fails test on current with P4

2002-12-06 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 13:41, James Satterfield wrote: > The lcms port fails it's build time tests on current with a P4. I believe > this builds on non-P4 systems running current. Same thing as your mozilla-devel issue. Like Marc mentioned, don't use -march=pentium4. I think I recall hearing it's

Re: /usr/ports/graphics/lcms fails test on current with P4

2002-12-06 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 13:59, James Satterfield wrote: > lcms still fails build tests when compiled with CPUTYPE?=i686 and no CFLAGS > set. It builds just fine on my P4 at work. I have nothing CFLAGS or CPUTYPE related in /etc/make.conf. It builds with -O -pipe and -march=pentiumpro. Joe -- PG

Re: Repeatable panic from nautilus2

2002-12-08 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 20:56, Sean Kelly wrote: > On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 06:01:49PM -0600, Alan L. Cox wrote: > > Please remove ENABLE_VFS_IOOPT from your kernel configuration. This > > code has never been safe for general use. > > Just for the sake of clusure, that did in fact fix it. Thank yo

Re: Current issues

2002-12-10 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 15:48, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:01:08PM +, Paul Richards wrote: > > > 3) The compiler won't build some C++ packages, evolution being the > > particular one bothering me at the moment. Is this a known issues > > that the 5.0 compiler won't build al

WEIRD! div() broken on -CURRENT?

2002-12-20 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
Okay, I must be losing my mind. Does anyone know why the following program compiled with stock gcc-3.2.1, stock CFLAGS, and no CPUTYPE produces: ddy.quot = 1 ddy.rem = -1077937744 on -CURRENT, and: ddy.quot = 8 ddy.rem = 0 On -stable? #include #include main(void) { div_t ddy; int d

Re: Ports broken by OpenPAM

2002-03-25 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Mon, 2002-03-25 at 10:00, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Joe Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Really? I never received it. Please send it again. Thanks. > > Here's an updated (but untested) version. Thanks. As soon as I finish get my -current machine built, I'll test these out. Joe

Re: Ports broken by OpenPAM

2002-03-31 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Mon, 2002-03-25 at 10:00, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Joe Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Really? I never received it. Please send it again. Thanks. > > Here's an updated (but untested) version. > I think I found why pam_ldap wouldn't work with OpenPAM on -CURRENT. Attached is my

Re: Patch for -CURRENT (share/dict/tech -> freebsd repo-copy)

2002-04-01 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 11:01, David Wolfskill wrote: > Untested as yet; just fired up the "make -DNOCLEAN buildworld after the > breakage ("Don't know how to make tech" in /usr/src/share/dict): phk just submitted a patch to fix this. Yours looks suspiciously like it ;-). Joe > > Index: share/d