On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 16:37, John Baldwin wrote:
> 
> On 28-Oct-2002 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 16:27, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> 
> >> On 28-Oct-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
> >> > John Baldwin wrote:
> >> >> I mean, do you know what libgtop is used for?  It's used to draw
> >> >> little applets that display load averages and other silly system
> >> >> monitor stuff in small spaces in GUI's.  It seems to work quite
> >> >> happily w/o any inode numbers or dev_t's for non-UFS filesystems.
> >> >> I just don't see why some little graphical applet displaying a load
> >> >> average or disk usage or ethernet device usage needs the inode
> >> >> number and dev_t of vnode's in the kernel.  I mean, geez.
> >> > 
> >> > To build little applets that activate a flashing red light when
> >> > certain files are written?
> >> 
> >> Why do you need the inode number to do that.  Just kqueue on the
> >> file itself using a regular fd, and in that case you can stat(2)
> >> the file if you really need the i-node number.  You don't need
> >> to use libkvm to actually go read the kernel to find this info!
> > 
> > You're probably right.  But without waiting to re-architect libgtop, I
> > think the immediate problem needs to be fixed.  Shall I just commit my
> > original patch that uses libkvm?
> 
> Use v_cachedid and v_cachedfs for all VREG vnodes.  Then you don't
> need to even go near v_tag.  This is fewer kvm_read()'s.  If stable
> has the v_cachedid then it should be using that instead of reading
> in UFS inodes as well.

-stable doesn't have those members :-(.  So the ifdef's would need to
remain.

Joe

> 
> -- 
> 
> John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
> "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/
> 
-- 
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to