On Mon, 10 May 1999, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> Peter Wemm wrote:
> >If you had old "vector xxxintr", it will now cause a syntax error rather than
> >a warning.
>
> What is the new method of specifying a non-standard interrupt
> function? I have some code (currently on 2.x, but I was hoping to be
>
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Brian Feldman wrote:
> Is anyone planning on upgrading the binutils gas to a later version so that we
> can get 3DNow! support? I'd like to use it, but I can't seem to get binutils
> to work right manually.
I will update binutils when/if 2.9.2 comes out.
--
Doug Rabson
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Mon, 10 May 1999, Brian Feldman wrote:
>
> > Is anyone planning on upgrading the binutils gas to a later version so that
> > we
> > can get 3DNow! support? I'd like to use it, but I can't seem to get binutils
> > to work right manually.
>
> I will up
On Sun, 9 May 1999, Seamus Wassman wrote:
> I was quite surprised the First Time I got SPAM through this mailing
> list, I thought for sure there would be someone to moderate it so
> that no garbage gets through, I personally find it quite offensive
> to get SPAM on a help based mailing list, I ha
On the -CURRENT cvsup'ed two hours ago:
===> sys/modules/svr4
echo "#define COMPAT_43 1" > opt_compat.h
@ -> /usr/src/sys
machine -> /usr/src/sys/i386/include
touch opt_vmpage.h
sh /usr/src/sys/modules/svr4/../../kern/vnode_if.sh
/usr/src/sys/modules/svr4/../../kern/vnode_if.src
cc -c -O2 -pipe -m
Mike Smith wrote:
> I engaged in part of a sweep of this sort with Andrzej a while back,
> but he never committed any of the changes. I'm not quite sure why.
I've stumbled across this some time ago.
See
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=569013+573412+/usr/local/www/db
/text/1998/fre
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> On the -CURRENT cvsup'ed two hours ago:
> cc -O2 -pipe -march=pentium -mpentium -DKERNEL -DCOMPAT_SVR4 -DKERNEL
> -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual
> -fformat-extensions -ansi -DKLD_MODULE
On Sat, May 08, 1999 at 03:32:33PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> m = m_get(M_WAIT, ...)
> m->m_len = something.
>
> looking at the code, it seems that m_get() _can_ return a NULL pointer
> even if one specifies M_WAIT.
>
> Could this be a potential weakness, and in this case, how shuld
Could someone give the attached patch a try in -current? It fixes the
file descriptor leak that the KKIS.05051999.003b exploit causes. This
fix seems to work fine in -stable. I'd like to commit it to the current
tree and merge it into -stable before the 3.2 code freeze.
Index: uipc_usrreq.c
=
I lost that file due to fatfingering a cleanup :)
I can see that several people has downloaded it from my ftp-site
so does anybody still have it, and could mail/ftp me a copy ??
Thanks
-Søren
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of
> Hmm, so you did a make world?
>
> I assume you mean "cdcontrol" above, and not "cdrecord". You can't pause,
> play, etc., cds with cdrecord. cdcontrol uses the ioctl interface to the
> cd driver, and so it shouldn't be affected.
yes :(
> Well, can you send me the output of the following comm
Eric Hodel wrote...
> > Hmm, so you did a make world?
> >
> > I assume you mean "cdcontrol" above, and not "cdrecord". You can't pause,
> > play, etc., cds with cdrecord. cdcontrol uses the ioctl interface to the
> > cd driver, and so it shouldn't be affected.
>
> yes :(
>
> > Well, can you se
On 10 May, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>> /usr/include/cam/scsi/scsi_pass.h:
>> $Id: scsi_pass.h,v 1.2 1999/05/06 20:16:07 ken Exp $
(137) r...@ttyp3 # ident /usr/include/cam/scsi/scsi_pass.h
/usr/include/cam/scsi/scsi_pass.h:
$Id: scsi_pass.h,v 1.2 1999/05/06 20:16:07 ken Exp $
>> > ls -l
> From: Seamus Wassman
> Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 20:31:00 -0700
>
> I was quite surprised the First Time I got SPAM through this mailing list, I
> thought for sure there would be someone to moderate it so that no garbage gets
> through, I personally find it quite offensive to get SPAM on a help
Hi,
It looks like most of the compilation problems from the last few
days have been cleaned up pretty well... The last one I'm seeing
now is:
cc -nostdinc -O -pipe -DKERNEL -DCOMPAT_SVR4 -DKERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-ari
On Sun, May 9, 1999, Brian Somers wrote:
> [.]
> >I'm using the 3.1R PPP right now, until the problem is
> > resolved. I'm sending a problem report, as well.
>
> It should be resolved now. A NULL mbuf value is valid - it just
> means that there's nothing in it. I changed fsm_Input() wi
"Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
> So I'm a little confused here. Does camcontrol work? Try this:
>
> camcontrol devlist
camcontrol: error sending CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl: Inappropriate ioctl for
device
> camcontrol tur -n da -u 0 -v
camcontrol: cam_lookup_pass: CAMGETPASSTHRU ioctl failed
cam_lookup_pas
Eric Hodel wrote...
> "Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
> > So I'm a little confused here. Does camcontrol work? Try this:
> >
> > camcontrol devlist
>
> camcontrol: error sending CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl: Inappropriate ioctl for
> device
>
> > camcontrol tur -n da -u 0 -v
>
> camcontrol: cam_lookup_pass:
"Jonathan M. Bresler" wrote:
> with volunteers, we could moderate the list(s). mail transfer
> would be slower as we wait for the moderator(s) to approve each piece
> of email. if we use more than one moderator per list, the
> time-sequence of email would be lostwe would get some very
>
"Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
>
> Eric Hodel wrote...
> > "Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
> > > So I'm a little confused here. Does camcontrol work? Try this:
> > >
> > > camcontrol devlist
> >
> > camcontrol: error sending CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl: Inappropriate ioctl for
> > device
> >
> > > camcontrol tur -n
A spammer could simply become a list member and then SPAM. They won't care
if they are removed once they have perpetrated their abuse.
Tom Veldhouse
ve...@visi.com
-Original Message-
From: Mark Murray
To: Jonathan M. Bresler
Cc: curr...@freebsd.org
Date: Monday, May 10, 1999 3:17 PM
S
< said:
> Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are
> there difficulties that make this impossible?
Yes, there are.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
"Thomas T. Veldhouse" wrote:
> A spammer could simply become a list member and then SPAM. They won't care
> if they are removed once they have perpetrated their abuse.
Yes, but is stops the scrape 'n spammers who get the easy-to-reach
addresses off the web page. The subscribed spammers at least h
Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are
> > there difficulties that make this impossible?
>
> Yes, there are.
Content-free answer. Please elaborate?
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubsc
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Mark Murray wrote:
> "Jonathan M. Bresler" wrote:
> > with volunteers, we could moderate the list(s). mail transfer
> > would be slower as we wait for the moderator(s) to approve each piece
> > of email. if we use more than one moderator per list, the
> > time-sequence of
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> A spammer could simply become a list member and then SPAM. They won't care
> if they are removed once they have perpetrated their abuse.
The could, but most wouldn't, wouldn't even know how. It wouldn't be
a sure cure, but it would sure help. D
Chuck Robey wrote:
> > Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are
> > there difficulties that make this impossible?
>
> There might be some resistance to this for all lists, but how about
> just, say, current and committers? Hackers == maybe?
I can imagine that there cou
As Chuck Robey wrote ...
> I was thinking about Peter Wemm's recent change to the kernel Makefile,
> making a way to install multiple kernels without fragging your last
> known good kernel, and it got me to thinking, scragging kernel.old, now
> that we have good kld's, isn't the only way to find yo
As Doug Rabson wrote ...
> On Sun, 9 May 1999, Khaled Daham wrote:
>
> > Hello folks
> >
> > I cvsupped,made world, built a kernel today and from now on the de
> > interfaces only comes up in 100BaseTX, what causes it not to negotiate ?
> > My Apr_29 kernel doesnt behave like this.
> >
> > The l
The first item is of interest to FreeBSD. Somebody should suggest to
Mindcraft to include FreeBSD in the "Death Match". The last item is about
Ken Thompson thrashing Linux.
--Carlos
Linux Watch: Mindcraft Proposes Linux-NT Death Match; Microsoft Accepts the
Challenge
Mindcraft, in an attempt to s
I have received more email today related to SPAM than I have actual SPAM
in the last month+ What has triggered this solution looking for a problem?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> > "Jonathan M. Bresler" wrote:
> > > with volunteers, we could moderate the list(s). mail transfer
> > > would be slower as we wait for the moderator(s) to approve each piece
> > > of email. if we use more than one moderator per list, the
> > > time-sequence of email would be lostwe would
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> A spammer could simply become a list member and then SPAM. They won't care
> if they are removed once they have perpetrated their abuse.
I think most won't bother. Probably a good number of them are
mailing automatically to a list of mailing li
< said:
> Yes, but is stops the scrape 'n spammers who get the easy-to-reach
> addresses off the web page.
It also stops perfectly legitimate users who are subscribed to a local
mailing-list exploder, read the lists through Usenet, or for other
reasons are subscribed with a different address from
Dmitrij Tejblum wrote:
>
> > > "Jonathan M. Bresler" wrote:
> > > > with volunteers, we could moderate the list(s). mail
> > > > transfer would be slower as we wait for the moderator(s)
> > > > to approve each piece of email. if we use more than one
> > > > moderator per list, the time-seq
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > Yes, but is stops the scrape 'n spammers who get the easy-to-reach
> > addresses off the web page.
>
> It also stops perfectly legitimate users who are subscribed to a local
> mailing-list exploder, read the lists through Usenet, or for
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 10:29:16PM +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > < said:
> >
> > > Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are
> > > there difficulties that make this impossible?
> >
> > Yes, there are.
>
> Content-free answer. Please elaborate?
On Sun, 9 May 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> As Doug Rabson wrote ...
> > On Sun, 9 May 1999, Khaled Daham wrote:
> >
> > > Hello folks
> > >
> > > I cvsupped,made world, built a kernel today and from now on the de
> > > interfaces only comes up in 100BaseTX, what causes it not to negotiate ?
> > >
As Kenneth D. Merry wrote ...
> Eric Hodel wrote...
> > "Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
> > > So I'm a little confused here. Does camcontrol work? Try this:
> > >
> > > camcontrol devlist
> >
> > camcontrol: error sending CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl: Inappropriate ioctl for
> > device
> >
> > > camcontrol tu
Peter, Poul,
cvsup from cvsup2 at 1215 pst 10 may 99.
make buildworld yields (wrapped to <80 char lines)
===> usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor
cc -O2 -pipe -DDEBUG -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c \
/usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor/main.c
gzip -cn /usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor/isdnmonitor.8
Wilko Bulte wrote...
> As Kenneth D. Merry wrote ...
> > Eric Hodel wrote...
> > > "Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
> > > > So I'm a little confused here. Does camcontrol work? Try this:
> > > >
> > > > camcontrol devlist
> > >
> > > camcontrol: error sending CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl: Inappropriate ioctl fo
> Delivered-To: j...@hub.freebsd.org
> Cc: curr...@freebsd.org
> References: <19990510173115.0aaf815...@hub.freebsd.org>
> Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 22:14:56 +0200
> From: Mark Murray
>
> "Jonathan M. Bresler" wrote:
> > with volunteers, we could moderate the list(s). mail transfer
> > would be
>
> < said:
>
> > Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are
> > there difficulties that make this impossible?
>
> Yes, there are.
>
i forgot to mention that such a policy creates a single
"allowed" address per user...not good.
jmb
> -GAWollman
>
>
To Un
> Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 13:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "Steven P. Donegan"
>
> I have received more email today related to SPAM than I have actual SPAM
> in the last month+ What has triggered this solution looking for a problem?
>
that is an eloquent statement of the situat
To Unsu
I am running 4.0-current SMP as of Apr 29.
I cvsup'ed this morning and at about 0950, started
'make -j12 world > log.file'.
I returned to find the machine frozen and the console blank. Pressing
a key resulted in a high-pitched squeal and no other response. Could
not ping the machine. Power
Chuck Robey scribbled this message on May 10:
> On Mon, 10 May 1999, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
>
> > A spammer could simply become a list member and then SPAM. They won't care
> > if they are removed once they have perpetrated their abuse.
>
> The could, but most wouldn't, wouldn't even know ho
<
said:
> a fair amount of posts like what Garrett describes. Current and
> committers do NOT get such an audience, and the argument doesn't hold
> for those lists,
Yes they do.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of t
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Mon, 10 May 1999, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
>
> > A spammer could simply become a list member and then SPAM. They won't care
> > if they are removed once they have perpetrated their abuse.
>
> The could, but most wouldn't, wouldn't even know how.
> I was thinking of doing this, the same as alpm and intpm:
>
> case 0x:
> #if NUHCI > 0
> return NULL;
> #else
> return "VIA blah USB controller";
> #endif
It depends on old-config, so poor mechanism. newconfig already
implimented best match probe/attach.
--
NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa
> > Is anyone planning on upgrading the binutils gas to a later version
> > so that we can get 3DNow! support? I'd like to use it, but I can't
> > seem to get binutils to work right manually.
> I will update binutils when/if 2.9.2 comes out.
I've seen some post-2.9.1 patches from the Debian folks
Hello!
Makeworld failed at isdnmonitor:
===> usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor
cc -Os -pipe -mpentium -DDEBUG -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c
/usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdn
monitor/main.c
/usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor/main.c:103: `major' redeclared as
different kind of symbol
/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/
On Tue, 11 May 1999, oZZ!!! wrote:
>
> Hello!
> Makeworld failed at isdnmonitor:
>
> ===> usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor
> cc -Os -pipe -mpentium -DDEBUG -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c
> /usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdn
> monitor/main.c
> /usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor/main.c:103: `major' rede
In a new kernel, I can no longer unload the Vinum kld: I get a panic
in module_release:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xc014460e in module_release (mod=0xc0f5a600) at ../../kern/kern_module.c:163
163 TAILQ_REMOVE(&mod->file->modules, mod, flink);
(kgdb) bt
#0
I sent a patch for this about 8 hours ago. No one seems
to read -current.
oZZ!!! wrote:
>
> Hello!
> Makeworld failed at isdnmonitor:
>
> ===> usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor
> cc -Os -pipe -mpentium -DDEBUG -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c
> /usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdn
> monitor/main.c
> /usr/s
Chuck Robey wrote:
>
> Garrett's points are why I sugggested that it would not be a useable
> approach for -questions, newbies, and mabye hackers, 'cause they all get
> a fair amount of posts like what Garrett describes. Current and
> committers do NOT get such an audience, and the argument doesn
> On Sun, May 9, 1999, Brian Somers wrote:
> > [.]
> > >I'm using the 3.1R PPP right now, until the problem is
> > > resolved. I'm sending a problem report, as well.
> >
> > It should be resolved now. A NULL mbuf value is valid - it just
> > means that there's nothing in it. I changed
56 matches
Mail list logo
