Chuck Robey wrote:
>
> Garrett's points are why I sugggested that it would not be a useable
> approach for -questions, newbies, and mabye hackers, 'cause they all get
> a fair amount of posts like what Garrett describes. Current and
> committers do NOT get such an audience, and the argument doesn't hold
> for those lists, which do get spammed.
1) It *DOES* hold for committers, since it's closed subscription.
For example, Matthew Dillon would be left out.
2) It *DOES* hold for -current, since many committers find it's
signal/noise ratio too low. For instance, Robert Nordier (the boot
guy).
--
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
d...@newsguy.com
d...@freebsd.org
"Proof of Trotsky's farsightedness is that _none_ of his
predictions have come true yet."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
