Thanks Scott, I will link the Spoon page to the wiki page.
Cheers
Igor Costa
www.igorcosta.com
www.igorcosta.org
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Guthmann, Scott wrote:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Status+of+Project
> > Changed to Status of
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Status+of+Project
> Changed to Status of Project
Igor - Thank you for posting about the status of the project.
Second, the Open Spoon foundation has also been doing some of the community
organization work and keeping the stake holders receiving in
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Status+of+Project
Changed to Status of Project
Regards
Igor Costa
www.igorcosta.com
www.igorcosta.org
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Omar Gonzalez
wrote:
> On Monday, August 13, 2012, Carol Frampton wrote:
>
> >
On Monday, August 13, 2012, Carol Frampton wrote:
>
>
> On 8/11/12 12 :37PM, "Igor Costa" >
> wrote:
>
> >I've setup a page in wiki to other developers see what's going on with
> >committers.
> >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Roadmap
> >
> >Roadmap is subject of change, any decis
On 8/11/12 12 :37PM, "Igor Costa" wrote:
>I've setup a page in wiki to other developers see what's going on with
>committers.
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Roadmap
>
>Roadmap is subject of change, any decision we make for next release, we
>should add on this page.
I had the
I agree with Omar. Igor, please change your use of the word "Roadmap".
An interesting thing to do might be to devise a survey to find out what is
important to our different segments of potential users and focus on
non-features like having some sort of forecast or roadmap is really
important, or i
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Igor Costa wrote:
> A pre stablish software that is commercially available needs a Road Map,
> software that is still engaging on community needs work in progress.
>
> By far, Road Map point to the decisions so far and History.
>
>
>
>
A pre stablish software that is commercially available needs a Road Map,
software that is still engaging on community needs work in progress.
By far, Road Map point to the decisions so far and History.
Igor Costa
www.igorcosta.com
www.igorcosta.org
On Sat, Aug 11,
On Saturday, August 11, 2012, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
> On Saturday, August 11, 2012, Igor Costa wrote:
>
>> I've setup a page in wiki to other developers see what's going on with
>> committers.
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Roadmap
>>
>> Roadmap is subject of change, any decisi
On Saturday, August 11, 2012, Igor Costa wrote:
> I've setup a page in wiki to other developers see what's going on with
> committers.
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Roadmap
>
> Roadmap is subject of change, any decision we make for next release, we
> should add on this page.
>
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:30 AM, jude wrote:
> ...I'd love to see a live or frequently updated status sheet / page / app that
> shows what's being worked on (general topics or Jira issues) , progress,
> participation count and so on if some how we can gather and show this
> information...
I'm sure
> I've been on this list long enough to know people will work on whatever the
> heck they want but that idea is and was hard to accept and plan for.
This is the Apache Way. The survey has no official purpose and carries no
official weight in the project. Each person who participates in this open
Anyone on this list will tell you I like more organization than less but I
have a couple of concerns with the survey. I don't remember if there was an
"Other" category in the list of items but I think, because of surveys in
past experiences*, that it gives the impression that if it isn't on the
lis
On 8/7/12 8:24 AM, "dharfl...@yahoo.com" wrote:
> Alex,
>
> with respect to Gravity, when you say "won't happen unless " is the
> reasoning behind this related to the amount of effort involved in
> 're-packaging' for Apache and legal compliance ?
>
>
> dan
Yes. I think Adobe's re
below
On 8/7/2012 8:52 AM, Daniel Harfleet wrote:
Mike's statement "I am sure there are customers using it" has reminded me a
thought I had about the 'survey' which I wanted to share...
Many members on this list have probably felt an impact on their livelihood as a
result of the changes relat
> Although the survey attempts to get to the bottom of feature priorities, I
> can't help feeling that we should be including parties other than this
> mailing list to take part in the survey. Although many of this list's
> participants including myself have an exposure > to a subset of the corp
Mike's statement "I am sure there are customers using it" has reminded me a
thought I had about the 'survey' which I wanted to share...
Many members on this list have probably felt an impact on their livelihood as a
result of the changes relating to Adobe's actions around Flex. My primary
moti
;flex-dev@incubator.apache.org"
Sent: Friday, 3 August 2012, 17:09
Subject: Re: [ROADMAP] Apache Flex Steering Survey - Revised component status
On 8/3/12 8:51 AM, "Keith Sutton" wrote:
> Based on Alex's email this is a revise component list to go into survey
Right! I was thinking that it refers to the granite piece.
El lunes, 6 de agosto de 2012, John Fletcher escribió:
> Why did they give it two names? Why not just call it CCF? This isn't a
> new OS release.
>
> The "Gravity" name is a bit unfortunate as Granite DS message push
> framework is also c
Why did they give it two names? Why not just call it CCF? This isn't a
new OS release.
The "Gravity" name is a bit unfortunate as Granite DS message push
framework is also called Gravity (and has been for years). So now we
have two Gravities in Flex.
John
2012/8/3 Keith Sutton :
> There have be
Agree with the idea of not using the term "roadmap". Since actually,
what we are talking about is not a roadmap at all in the conventional
sense, and is much better described with the title you mention below
Keith. In this sense it might be apropriate for the actual Flex site -
but then you would d
Yeah, it's Monocle. OK I just saw the your post on Gravity further down. I
could use something like this on a project I'm working on now.
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Keith Sutton wrote:
> Good on Squiggly Jude, Gravity below, can't find anything on Telemetry -
> did this become Monocle?
>
Good on Squiggly Jude, Gravity below, can't find anything on Telemetry -
did this become Monocle?
On 8/5/2012 1:27 AM, jude wrote:
Squiggly is an Action Script spell checking library for developers who work
in Adobe® Flash® Professional, Adobe Flex® Builder™, or other IDEs that
support ActionSc
>I don't know what Gravity is either. Is it Telemetry? BTW What happened to
>Telemetry?
Gravity is a framework which, in theory, solves the problems associated with
multiple domain applications using the Marshall plan by providing a structure
to work within. While my opinion may be somewhat con
Squiggly is an Action Script spell checking library for developers who work
in Adobe® Flash® Professional, Adobe Flex® Builder™, or other IDEs that
support ActionScript. The Squiggly package contains six .swc files – three
of which integration convenience classes called SpellUI, one for Flex 3,
ano
Ok thanks for the info
It's a relief to know at least somebody is maintaining and advancing it :)
It's a rather crucial piece for most video related apps.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Michael A. Labriola <
labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
> >About OSMF. What is the status of OSMF? Is it
>About OSMF. What is the status of OSMF? Is it being actively maintained and
>developed by Adobe?
OSMF is still being actively maintained and expanded by Adobe, that is probably
part of the reason we won't see it soon/ever without some work on our part.
>
>
>>> All are in progress, TLF will probably be next.
>>
>> Squiggly
>>> * OSMF*
>>> Gravity
>>>
>> Won't happen unless we hear lots of people want it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
About OSMF. What is the status of OSMF? Is it being actively maintained and
developed by Adobe?
By "Won't happen...
Alex/Carol,
Awesome, thanks
We will role that back into the survey
On 8/3/2012 9:09 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
On 8/3/12 8:51 AM, "Keith Sutton" wrote:
Based on Alex's email this is a revise component list to go into survey
(PLEASE identify anything missing or in wrong place):
Available in 4.
On 8/3/12 8:51 AM, "Keith Sutton" wrote:
> Based on Alex's email this is a revise component list to go into survey
> (PLEASE identify anything missing or in wrong place):
>
> Available in 4.8
> 4.6 automation libraries
> 4.6 fabridge
> 4.6 flash-integration
> 4.6 samples
>
On 8/3/12 11 :51AM, "Keith Sutton" wrote:
>Based on Alex's email this is a revise component list to go into survey
>(PLEASE identify anything missing or in wrong place):
>
>Available in 4.8
>4.6 automation libraries
>4.6 fabridge
>4.6 flash-integration
>4.6 samples
>Flex MXM
Based on Alex's email this is a revise component list to go into survey
(PLEASE identify anything missing or in wrong place):
Available in 4.8
4.6 automation libraries
4.6 fabridge
4.6 flash-integration
4.6 samples
Flex MXML compiler source code
Yet to be donated
? 4.6 missing
The survey/roadmap are definitely in line with your guidance and will
likely be called "Community Objectives and Priorities for Apache Flex"
and would be posted on the Spoon website. Although it cannot be binding
it does act as:
1) An expression of the community and their collective input to wha
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> ...There nothing saying we can't have roadmaps (AFAIK) and several other
> Apache projects do have them.
> For example http://subversion.apache.org/roadmap.html...
Agreed - it''s just that such roadmaps can easily fail, if they're too
ambiti
A roadmap is fine so long as we don't use it to tell someone else what they
should be working on. OTOH if the vast majority of users are interested in a
particular set of features those will get implemented without a roadmap. :)
Sent from my mobile device.
On Aug 3, 2012, at 6:56 AM, Justin Mcl
Hi,
There nothing saying we can't have roadmaps (AFAIK) and several other Apache
projects do have them. For example http://subversion.apache.org/roadmap.html
I think knowing what features SDK users see as important is useful and could
help shape direction and help get committers and contrubito
If Spoon have organisation and/or heirarchy, and Apache accepts
contribution from anyone, then it might be simple: the Spoon
Foundation creates a Spoon Roadmap - what they hope to deliver to Flex
and when. They can post it on their Spoon.as website. Those that want
to be part of an organised/guided
Exactly - Strangely enough I was just asking for hepl and directions for
building the SDK in Linux for FDT5
~a~
www.ayobinitie.com
http://mrbinitie.blogspot.com
On 2 August 2012 14:13, João Fernandes
wrote:
> Ayo,
>
> what do you refer to? Like building the SDK in a linux environment?
>
>
> --
>
Ayo,
what do you refer to? Like building the SDK in a linux environment?
--
João Fernandes
As far as roadmaps go - I'd like to know what the support plans for Linux
are
~a~
www.ayobinitie.com
http://mrbinitie.blogspot.com
On 2 August 2012 11:34, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> > There is no hierarchy in the engineering. Nobody gets to tell anyone
> else
> > what to do. Committers can veto y
> There is no hierarchy in the engineering. Nobody gets to tell anyone else
> what to do. Committers can veto your work, but for technical reasons, not
> because it wasn't on the roadmap or a high enough priority.
Maybe they should have referred to it not as "Roadmap" but as
"Contribution Sugges
On 8/2/12 12:26 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>>> Some direction (agreed upon
>>> by all the project leads, to be sure) will help get things off the
>>> ground, or at least move along at something more than a glacial
>>> pace...
>> But there are no project leads. Just a bunch of committers and l
>> Some direction (agreed upon
>> by all the project leads, to be sure) will help get things off the
>> ground, or at least move along at something more than a glacial
>> pace...
> But there are no project leads. Just a bunch of committers and lots of
> other folks on the mailing list.
I'm not be
On 8/1/12 11:23 PM, "ranboleelan" wrote:
> not all mx components have their spark equivalent ones, so i guess more spark
> components in future version would be nice.
>
The prototypes we have are waiting VP signature then they will be checked
in.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, I
not all mx components have their spark equivalent ones, so i guess more spark
components in future version would be nice.
ranboleelan
From: Alex Harui
Date: 2012-08-02 14:14
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ROADMAP] Apache Flex Steering Survey
On 8/1/12 10:25 PM, "Er
On 8/1/12 10:25 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>> next. No consensus has to be reached on what will be worked on. Folks are
>> free to do what they want.
>
> Free to create a roadmap and try to give some direction to people
> looking to contribute, but not sure where to begin, or which
> featur
Keith,
I'm sorry I did not respond to your first roadmap email. Honestly, I
stopped reading after your first bullet point raising FUD about whether
Adobe would live up to its commitments without any quoting of the statements
behind your logic. I almost responded, but when nobody else did, I just
The component list was developed reviewing the emails on the mailing
list as we as the Flex White Paper. The component list was provided
earlier with the request for corrections but none were forthcoming.
Given that Adobe's resource commitment is not indefinite it would be
most appropriate to d
> next. No consensus has to be reached on what will be worked on. Folks are
> free to do what they want.
Free to create a roadmap and try to give some direction to people
looking to contribute, but not sure where to begin, or which
features/bug fixes would benefit the end users the most, like my
On 8/1/2012 8:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
Keith,
I appreciate the effort, and more data is welcome, but I don't think Apache
projects have roadmaps or make commitments on what is going to be delivered
next. No consensus has to be reached on what will be worked on. Folks are
free to do what they w
Keith,
I appreciate the effort, and more data is welcome, but I don't think Apache
projects have roadmaps or make commitments on what is going to be delivered
next. No consensus has to be reached on what will be worked on. Folks are
free to do what they want.
I also don't understand the items o
4.8 does not have FABridge support ?
That s really bad
2012/7/25 Keith Sutton
> With the successful release of 4.8.0-incubating it would be timely to have
> a discussion/consensus around the priorities going forward.
>
> A couple of fundamental factors should be considered in this discussio
52 matches
Mail list logo
