Alex, with respect to Gravity, when you say "won't happen unless .... " is the reasoning behind this related to the amount of effort involved in 're-packaging' for Apache and legal compliance ?
dan ________________________________ From: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org> Sent: Friday, 3 August 2012, 17:09 Subject: Re: [ROADMAP] Apache Flex Steering Survey - Revised component status On 8/3/12 8:51 AM, "Keith Sutton" <ke...@spoon.as> wrote: > Based on Alex's email this is a revise component list to go into survey > (PLEASE identify anything missing or in wrong place): > > Available in 4.8 > 4.6 automation libraries > 4.6 fabridge > 4.6 flash-integration > 4.6 samples > Flex MXML compiler source code > > Yet to be donated > ? 4.6 missing embedded font support Probably won't be donated, but in theory the one part we need (CFF Embedding) is not too hard for us to re-write in Apache. > 4.6 ViewStack (listed in Flex White Paper - protoype) > 4.6 Accordion (listed in Flex White Paper but does not exist) > 4.6 DateField (listed in Flex White Paper - protoype) > 4.6 DataChooser (listed in Flex White Paper - protoype) > 4.6 Enhanced DataGrid (listed in Flex White Paper - protoype) These just got signed off yesterday. > BlazeDS/BlazeDS.NET > 3.x Flex SDK > TLF All are in progress, TLF will probably be next. > Squiggly > OSMF > Gravity Won't happen unless we hear lots of people want it. > FXG - will this continue to be supported beyond CS6? Support is in the compiler, but there is no guarantee that Adobe apps will continue to export it. > Falcon (2012 Q4) In legal audit now. -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
