Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:43 AM, Martin Heidegger wrote: > ...I fixed the missing logo entries, set the maximum size to 50% and added > some > visual helpers. > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19407988/apache-flex/flex-logos.html Thanks! There's a lesson here I think: publishing an ugly page like mine u

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

Awesome Betrand! I fixed the missing logo entries, set the maximum size to 50% and added some visual helpers. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19407988/apache-flex/flex-logos.html yours Martin.

Re: [MENTOR Help Requested] Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

Sent from my mobile device. On Jan 18, 2012, at 8:58 PM, Doug Arthur wrote: > Two last question before kicking this off. > > 1) For the Mentor: Is this something I should submit as a draft > proposal for review first? Or just kick it off? I'm not hearing any major objections. I think we have

Re: [MENTOR Help Requested] Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

Oh... I don't understand the whole multiple round proposals. My impression was that each round would only include a subset of the full logos, which didn't make sense to me. If that understanding is correct, then we should go through all rounds so every entry gets considered. On 1/18/2012

Re: [MENTOR Help Requested] Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote: > On 1/18/2012 9:58 PM, Doug Arthur wrote: >> >> 2) For everyone, if a single logo gets more than 50% of the votes, >> should that automatically be named the winner, or should it be 60% or >> 70%? I personally think 50% is good enough, but want

Re: [MENTOR Help Requested] Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

On 1/18/2012 9:58 PM, Doug Arthur wrote: 2) For everyone, if a single logo gets more than 50% of the votes, should that automatically be named the winner, or should it be 60% or 70%? I personally think 50% is good enough, but want to be sure we all agree. I don't think we need to decide anythi

[MENTOR Help Requested] Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

Two last question before kicking this off. 1) For the Mentor: Is this something I should submit as a draft proposal for review first? Or just kick it off? 2) For everyone, if a single logo gets more than 50% of the votes, should that automatically be named the winner, or should it be 60% or 70%?

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

On Jan 18, 2012 4:09 PM, "Chris Martin" wrote: > > Nvm, on my request. Forgive mi ignorance :) I researched a little > bit about the PPMC :) I'm new to this list, and i don't know where > this thread would surface. if anyone could pass that along that'd be > great :) No worries, it hasn't sur

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

> > -Original Message- > From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 5:09 PM > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs > > (PPMC hat) I did a quick review of last week's thread. > > Do we

RE: [Discuss] Logo Designs

+1 -Original Message- From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 5:09 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs (PPMC hat) I did a quick review of last week's thread. Do we have general consensus on the foll

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

When the thread has been created, could we also get a link in the mailing list? I'm new and don't have this PPMC bookmarked yet. Chris On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Greg Reddin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >>> If the first round produces a clear winner do we

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

On Jan 18, 2012, at 2:50 PM, Doug Arthur wrote: > Are you going to start the voting thread, Dave? Not immediately. I'm out of town and have some plans. If no one else has started the thread. I'll kick it off, but I may not do it for another 10 hours. I think Jeffry made a good start and Bertra

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> If the first round produces a clear winner do we need additional rounds? > > A clear winner is a the majority I described? If so, then yes. I'm not sure :-) My thinking is if we have 01 gets 100 votes 05 gets 12 votes 06 gets 9 votes then

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

Are you going to start the voting thread, Dave? - Doug

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

On Jan 18, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Greg Reddin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> (1) Vote is 5 points to be distributed to 1 to 5 of the logos as the voter >> determines. > > I like this approach. > >> >> (2) Vote is open to everyone, but PPMC votes are binding and ta

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

Agreed on the 5 points. I'm ready to vote. On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Jonathan Campos wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Marcus Fritze > wrote: > >> I fully agree with dave, sounds good to me. Let's start voting! >> >> Maybe we should vote how we vote. ;-) >> > > I agree, let's get

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Marcus Fritze wrote: > I fully agree with dave, sounds good to me. Let's start voting! > > Maybe we should vote how we vote. ;-) > I agree, let's get this going. -- Jonathan Campos

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

I fully agree with dave, sounds good to me. Let's start voting! Maybe we should vote how we vote. ;-) Marcus Am 18.01.2012 um 23:08 schrieb Dave Fisher: > (PPMC hat) I did a quick review of last week's thread. > > Do we have general consensus on the following: > > (1) Vote is 5 points to be d

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Greg Reddin wrote: > If the first round produces a clear winner do we need additional rounds? > > If not then we pick the top 5 or so and do additional rounds? I agree with all points made prior, and definitely this one. Limit it to a small subset if we need round

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > (1) Vote is 5 points to be distributed to 1 to 5 of the logos as the voter > determines. I like this approach. > > (2) Vote is open to everyone, but PPMC votes are binding and tabulated > separately from the community. The PPMC is advised t

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

I think this sounds like a reasonable conclusion what's been discussed. We can throw out alternative voting scenarios for days, but I think we should just take this one, agree to accept or decline it and start the vote. If we agree on using this as the guide to determining the winner I'll start a [

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

(PPMC hat) I did a quick review of last week's thread. Do we have general consensus on the following: (1) Vote is 5 points to be distributed to 1 to 5 of the logos as the voter determines. (2) Vote is open to everyone, but PPMC votes are binding and tabulated separately from the community. The

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

Hi Bertrand, On Jan 18, 2012, at 1:12 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote: >> ... Then here is the non random list... > >> 1 http://s.apache.org/af-logo-01 >> 2http://s.apache.org/af-logo-02 >> 3http://s.apache.org/af-logo-03... > >

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

Quoting Doug Arthur : Mike started the entire voting process and has taken charge of it the entire time. I will put my trust in him to initiate a voting process and define the rules based on feedback received so far from everyone. I would at least, suggest to Mike, that he post a pre-proposal t

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

Mike started the entire voting process and has taken charge of it the entire time. I will put my trust in him to initiate a voting process and define the rules based on feedback received so far from everyone. I would at least, suggest to Mike, that he post a pre-proposal to the voting process, and

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote: > ... Then here is the non random list... > 1     http://s.apache.org/af-logo-01 > 2    http://s.apache.org/af-logo-02 > 3    http://s.apache.org/af-logo-03... I've put up an ugly page at http://dl.dropbox.com/u/715349/tmp/flex-logos.html whi

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

Am 18.01.2012 um 21:59 schrieb Jeffry Houser: > On 1/18/2012 3:45 PM, Marcus Fritze wrote: >> Am 18.01.2012 um 21:18 schrieb Doug McCune: >> >>> Someone should just whip up a quick hot-or-not app that shows you a logo >>> and you click +1 or skip, on to the next one, and then you do that >>> 50-

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > As far as a program to help: I think we need an html form which uses a > little javascript to build a mailto that includes a subject and generated > body. If we discuss a voting program I still think we should do uservoice[1] The issue with

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

Hi, I just went through the list to pick out a few of my personal favorites. Several of these have two entries that are very similar. Does it make sense to give contestants a chance to withdraw entries? Just a thought. (PPMC hat) As far as a program to help: I think we need an html form which

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

On 1/18/2012 3:45 PM, Marcus Fritze wrote: Am 18.01.2012 um 21:18 schrieb Doug McCune: Someone should just whip up a quick hot-or-not app that shows you a logo and you click +1 or skip, on to the next one, and then you do that 50-something times and you're done. Not it. Here is my suggestion:

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

Of course, such an app needs to be built in flex, and open-sourced on github. :) Shan On Jan 18, 2012, at 2:47 PM, Omar Gonzalez wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Jonathan Campos wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Doug McCune wrote: >> >>> Someone should just whip up a quic

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Jonathan Campos wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Doug McCune wrote: > > > Someone should just whip up a quick hot-or-not app that shows you a logo > > and you click +1 or skip, on to the next one, and then you do that > > 50-something times and you're do

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

Am 18.01.2012 um 21:18 schrieb Doug McCune: > Someone should just whip up a quick hot-or-not app that shows you a logo > and you click +1 or skip, on to the next one, and then you do that > 50-something times and you're done. Not it. Here is my suggestion: you can vote here: http

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

On 1/18/2012 3:19 PM, Jonathan Campos wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Jeffry Houser > wrote: Maybe you're right; and I Struggled with randomizing it or not. Are the URLs on the site randomized? I assumed they were in the order received. I can

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Doug McCune wrote: > Someone should just whip up a quick hot-or-not app that shows you a logo > and you click +1 or skip, on to the next one, and then you do that > 50-something times and you're done. Not it. > >From what the Facebook movie tells me I just need a

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

Someone should just whip up a quick hot-or-not app that shows you a logo and you click +1 or skip, on to the next one, and then you do that 50-something times and you're done. Not it.

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

On 1/18/2012 3:02 PM, Jonathan Campos wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Jeffry Houser > wrote: [I randomized the list too; since the short URL has a number they aren't that randomized] ugh. this is just going to cause confusion. when I say 1 am I tal

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

#3http://s.apache.org/af-logo-07* +1 ** * On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Willy Ci wrote: > Can you include all the logo images? > No way I am going click all the links. > * > > > > Thanks! > > Willy Ci* > * > * > *e: will...@gmail.com * > *c: 617-606-3437

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

Can you include all the logo images? No way I am going click all the links. * Thanks! Willy Ci* * * *e: will...@gmail.com * *c: 617-606-3437 * -- 6 X 9 = 42 meaning of life

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

> > ugh. this is just going to cause confusion. > I cast 3 votes for #4 logo-28 :P

Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote: > [I randomized the list too; since the short URL has a number they aren't > that randomized] ugh. this is just going to cause confusion. when I say 1 am I talking about jeffrey's ID 1 or URL 1? I'd say the anonymous URL is enough. -- Jonat

[Discuss] Logo Designs

So, while we try to figure out the exact voting procedure; I put together "anonymous" list of all the logos. [I randomized the list too; since the short URL has a number they aren't that randomized]. I created this thread with the intent of discussing the pros and cons for each logo. So,