I fully agree with dave, sounds good to me. Let's start voting! Maybe we should vote how we vote. ;-)
Marcus Am 18.01.2012 um 23:08 schrieb Dave Fisher: > (PPMC hat) I did a quick review of last week's thread. > > Do we have general consensus on the following: > > (1) Vote is 5 points to be distributed to 1 to 5 of the logos as the voter > determines. > > (2) Vote is open to everyone, but PPMC votes are binding and tabulated > separately from the community. The PPMC is advised to reconsider if the > community's opinion differs. > > (3) If multiple vote emails are received from any individual then the last > one is counted and previous votes discarded. > > (4) There will be multiple rounds of voting. > > What criteria do we use to remove logos from next rounds? A suggestion. The > bottom half of logos are removed. If there are an odd number of logos then > the median is kept. (if 27 left then #14 is kept.) If any remaining logos > (including the median) have less than N/2 votes where N is the number of > voters then remove those too. > > (5) When do we declare a winner? A simple majority of the votes points cast. > > (6) How long is each round? A minimum of 72 hours. > > Regards, > Dave > > On Jan 18, 2012, at 1:29 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote: > >> Quoting Doug Arthur <dougart...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Mike started the entire voting process and has taken charge of it the >>> entire time. I will put my trust in him to initiate a voting process >>> and define the rules based on feedback received so far from everyone. >>> >>> I would at least, suggest to Mike, that he post a pre-proposal to the >>> voting process, and if no one absolutely rejects, then proceed. The >>> pre-proposal really shouldn't be a discussion, but rather a semi-vote >>> (but not really a vote) to poll if there are any critical rejections >>> whereas the majority don't agree with his direction. >>> >>> My 2 cents... >>> - Doug >>> >> >> Heh, >> >> I'm going to be honest here, this should have been concluded last week. I >> tried to get a consensus just for the plain reason of order, it didn't >> happen and you have this thread. >> >> I really don't think I want the target aimed at me on this. I tried my best >> to keep order up to this point(website, entires managed) but I really don't >> feel like making any decisions/proposals when this should have been agreed >> to last week. >> >> To many cooks in the kitchen people. I have also stayed away from this >> because of the polarity of PPMC votes to community votes. >> >> So now, whoever is louder take the baton and run! >> >> Mike >> >> >
