Re: svn commit: r1428687 - /incubator/flex/utilities/trunk/installer/RELEASE_GUIDE

Justin, This seems rather complicated. The Apache script sign_and_hash.sh just needs to be run on the files in the release directory. We have a copy of the script in the sdk/trunk/build directory. cd release ./path/to/sign_and_hash.sh Carol On 1/3/13 7 :43PM, "jmcl...@apache.org" wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC2

minor issues with current code For the Portuguese locale, the BROWSE button is SELEC. and the NEXT button is PROX. In RuntimeLocale.as I see content["BTN_LABEL_BROWSE"]=" "; content["BTN_LABEL_NEXT"]="PROX."; For the Greek locale, the text for the license agreements are in Englis

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC2

On 1/4/13 1 :12AM, "flexcapaci...@gmail.com" wrote: >I've read through some of the previous threads on this and the config xml >and I don't know what was decided if anything. What I'd want to see in it >is default to downloading the latest Flash Player, AIR and playerglobal >swc. Is there are a

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 RC1

On 1/2/13 10 :44AM, "Om" wrote: >On Jan 2, 2013 6:37 AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote: >> >> flex/utilities/trunk/installer/build.properties needs updating >> >> FLEX_HOME_MAC still points to 4.8.0 >> >> >> and FLEX_HOME_WIN points

Re: Editing SDK within Flash Builder

On 1/2/13 10 :16AM, "Matt Hughes" wrote: >I did add the variable in the compiler options. That got things >compiling, >but then I was missing assets. I added the source file for the *binary* >distribution (for some reason, they aren't in the source distribution). > That got me past that hurdl

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 RC1

Just gave this a try. Here are my comments regarding the installation and use: 1. When I tried to install it I got that "there is something wrong" AIR error which is really unhelpful but I knew it meant I had to uninstall the old installer first. Why can't the old installer and the new installe

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 RC1

flex/utilities/trunk/installer/build.properties needs updating FLEX_HOME_MAC still points to 4.8.0 and FLEX_HOME_WIN points to ApacheFlex4.9.0 (I'm not sure where this name comes from but the formatting seems odd - I dislike names with spaces but given the rest of the path why not Apache Flex 4.

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33329) Popup with TextInput never garbage collected

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13538445#comment-13538445 ] Carol Frampton commented on FLEX-33329: --- According to the bug you linked to thi

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33328) Merge Adobe.next changes into spark DataGrid

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13538329#comment-13538329 ] Carol Frampton commented on FLEX-33328: --- The existing mustella tests also pas

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33328) Merge Adobe.next changes into spark DataGrid

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13538276#comment-13538276 ] Carol Frampton commented on FLEX-33328: --- Here is a small sample program:

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33328) Merge Adobe.next changes into spark DataGrid

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13538263#comment-13538263 ] Carol Frampton commented on FLEX-33328: --- Once the DataGrid has focus, use the

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33328) Merge Adobe.next changes into spark DataGrid

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13538260#comment-13538260 ] Carol Frampton commented on FLEX-33328: --- Author: cframpton Date: Fri Dec 21 1

[jira] [Created] (FLEX-33328) Merge Adobe.next changes into spark DataGrid

Carol Frampton created FLEX-33328: - Summary: Merge Adobe.next changes into spark DataGrid Key: FLEX-33328 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33328 Project: Apache Flex Issue

Re: [Component] Spacer

On 12/21/12 12 :08PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Don't you still need a class to have the name Spacer in ActionScript? I >think the manifest trick only works in MXML. > True. Carol > >On 12/21/12 9:05 AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote: > >> I

Re: [Component] Spacer

I'm not commenting on whether or not there should be a s:Spacer but you don't need a new class - you just need a new manifest entry to do the mapping. If you look in frameworks/spark-manifest.com you will see others there. Carol On 12/21/12 9 :44AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" wrote: > Just curious

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Flex_SDK_build #402

On 12/20/12 6 :43PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Fairly certain clean and not a super-clean, looking at the script it does >the following: > >ant clean main source-release Then it shouldn't be downloaded the files every time. Does it start with a clean directory and fetch everything from s

FW: Build failed in Jenkins: Flex_SDK_build #402

>Š. >osmf-check: > >osmf-download: > >ask-osmf: > >download-osmf-zip: > [get] Getting: >http://sourceforge.net/projects/osmf.adobe/files/OSMF%201.0%20%28final%20s >ource%2C%20ASDocs%2C%20PDF%20guides%2C%20and%20release%20notes%29/OSMF_1.0 >.zip/download > [get] To: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 RC5

On 12/20/12 4 :48PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Well if you built in the tree you had an empty.properties in each locale >> directory which you don't have on the kit. > >Found the issue the stage-locales target is removing all empty.properties >files - anyone know why? My guess is the th

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 RC5

On 12/20/12 4 :09PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> In the binary kit, frameworks/build.xml does not build cleanly. > >Odd because a ant -f build-framework.xm works fine. I'll take a look at >it. Well if you built in the tree you had an empty.properties in each locale directory which you don

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 RC5

And if you decide to rekit I think you should mention in the README that although we have graduated we are still using incubator urls - which will redirect after we've been moved. Carol On 12/20/12 3 :38PM, "Carol Frampton" wrote: >In the binary kit, frameworks/build.xml does

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 RC5

In the binary kit, frameworks/build.xml does not build cleanly. Š apache_rb: [compc] Loading configuration file /Users/cframpto/Downloads/apache-flex-sdk-4.9.0-bin/frameworks/flex-config. xml [compc] /Users/cframpto/Downloads/apache-flex-sdk-4.9.0-bin/frameworks/locale/en_US /apache_rb.s

Re: [OT] Education version of Flash Builder

On 12/19/12 6 :51PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > >On 12/19/12 3:31 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >> >> So is there any education pricing for FB at all? >The PM for FB is already out for the year. Remind me again next year and >I >will ask him. Adobe has a company wide shutdown (at least in the U

Re: svn commit: r1423863 - /incubator/flex/sdk/branches/develop/frameworks/projects/charts/src/mx/charts/DateTimeAxis.as

On 12/19/12 5 :40PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> I don't think that's the right change. I'm guessing the intent is to >>change >> a local variable, not the instance's height property? > > >Nice catch. Calling a variable the same as a local property is probably a >bad idea. Best fix here I

Re: svn commit: r1423863 - /incubator/flex/sdk/branches/develop/frameworks/projects/charts/src/mx/charts/DateTimeAxis.as

ator/flex/sdk/branches/develop/frameworks/projects/charts/src/mx/c >>>harts/DateTimeAxis.as >>> >>> The error in OLAPDatagrid.as was >>> >>> Error: Implicit coercion of a value of type IOLAPAxisPosition to an >>> > unrelated type Function. >>&

Flex just became a TLP (top-level project) with Alex as our VP

On 12/19/12 4 :00PM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: >The December board meeting took place on the 19th. > >The following directors were present: > > Rich Bowen > Doug Cutting > Bertrand Delacretaz > Roy T. Fielding > Ross Gardler > Jim Jagielski > Brett Porter > Sam Ruby > Greg Stein > >The fol

Re: svn commit: r1423863 - /incubator/flex/sdk/branches/develop/frameworks/projects/charts/src/mx/charts/DateTimeAxis.as

svn commit: r1423864 looks like it falls in the same category and should be reverted Carol On 12/19/12 3 :07PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >HI, > >> +var parseFunction:Function = this.parseFunction; > > >Wouldn't it be better to fix Flacon rather than change the SDK in this >way? Seems a

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

t is never dispatched the timeout doesn't matter. Carol > >Thanks, >Fred. > >-Original Message- >From: Carol Frampton [mailto:cfram...@adobe.com] >Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:31 PM >To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Relea

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

_currencySymbol_default_script_t >est15 >spark/formatters/CurrencyFormatter/Fallback/CF_Fallback_format_Main_tester > CF_Fallback_format_currencyISOCode_CNY_currencySymbol_valid_script_test16 > >-Original Message- >From: Carol Frampton [mailto:cfram...@adobe.com] >Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:10 PM &g

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

On 12/19/12 11 :05AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >Running Mustella tests on the develop branch - FP11.4 / AIR3.4 / en_US > >1- ant -> build success >2- ant other.locales -> build success >3- ant checkintests -> pass >4- sh mini_run.sh -all -> Fails: 16 [1] (some of them [2] are probably >relative

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 4

On 12/18/12 7 :31PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Compiles on OSX, make SDK for both FB6 and FB7 with no issues. Tested >against a few small projects and one large project with no obvious issues. > >However it a -1 from me as RC4 currently fails to compile with other >locales (issue with exp

Re: New README for RC5

On 12/18/12 10 :03PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >I've just checked in a new version of the README file containing >information on using different locales and Flash Player versions. Before >I make another release candidate I'd appreciate some feedback. I just checked in some spelling correc

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 4

On 12/18/12 5 :34PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > >On 12/18/12 11:15 AM, "Om" wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Carol Frampton >>wrote: >> >>> -1 The SDK is almost there but now that the README mentions the >>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 4

On 12/18/12 4 :48PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> -1 The SDK is almost there but now that the README mentions the >>installer >> I will vote -1 until the installer is ready to go out at the same time. >I thought the process would be to vote on both and when both are accepted >release them.

Re: We need your help testing Flex 4.9 with various Flash Player versions

On 12/18/12 3 :30PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > >On 12/18/12 12:21 PM, "Om" wrote: > >> >> >> If we want to just get it out the door (I am not sure why we'd want to >>do >> it that way), we should update the README to not say we support these >>other >> flash player versions. >> >I was thin

Re: We need your help testing Flex 4.9 with various Flash Player versions

> >Also, right now I think that there might be some changes to mustella in >the >develop branch that haven't been sync'd over to release 4.9. Step 0 in >the >future should be to run mustella on the develop branch before cutting the >release branch. > >My recipe (on Win, will try to run Mac tonight

Re: We need your help testing Flex 4.9 with various Flash Player versions

On 12/18/12 1 :32PM, "Om" wrote: >On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > >> >> >> >> On 12/18/12 9:50 AM, "Om" wrote: >> >> > In theory, yes. But the RCs are changing so fast that it is hard to >>keep >> > track of. Since the next RC is going to be cut from the release >>branc

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

On 12/17/12 7 :10PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Ok. Compiling is easy and quick. >About 20 min or so by my count and the check in tests only take a few >minutes to run. > >Just add your name to the wiki page to the version you are testing so we >don't get everyone running the same tests.

Re: We need your help testing Flex 4.9 with various Flash Player versions

On 12/18/12 12 :50PM, "Om" wrote: >In theory, yes. But the RCs are changing so fast that it is hard to keep >track of. Since the next RC is going to be cut from the release branch, I >think testing the release branch should be fine. Since there is an open VOTE thread out there I agree with Al

[jira] [Created] (FLEX-33314) framework/build_framework.xml has not been kept up-to-date with new swcs and bundles

Carol Frampton created FLEX-33314: - Summary: framework/build_framework.xml has not been kept up-to-date with new swcs and bundles Key: FLEX-33314 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33314

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 4

-1 The SDK is almost there but now that the README mentions the installer I will vote -1 until the installer is ready to go out at the same time. I built the src kit and I built frameworks in the binary kit. I built FB SDKs with both directories using ide/flashbuilder/makeApacheFlexForFlashBuild

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

we should be checking the manifest of all our jar files. Carol > >-Nick > >On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Carol Frampton >wrote: > >> >> >> On 12/18/12 7 :46AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: >> > >> >On Tue, Dec 18, 2012

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

Hi, I'm sorry I don't understand why you are annoyed. It looks like checkintests did what it was supposed to do. It detected a trace statement that was left in the code someplace. Carol On 12/18/12 10 :17AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >Hi, > >I'm a little annoyed now, what I did not do well ?

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

On 12/18/12 7 :46AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: > >On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski >wrote: > >> echo >> == Apache Batik 1.7 build file >> echo >> >> echo >> JAVA_HOME: ${env.JAVA_HOME} >> echo >> VM: 20.6-b01,

Re: [MUSTELLA] How to run without compiling the tests

On 12/18/12 3 :18AM, "Om" wrote: >I had to abort right after the compilations. Is there any way to run >without recompiling all the swfs? > >I tried ./mini_run.sh -rerun > >But I get this: > >$ ./mini_run.sh -rerun >Nothing was found to include. Will exit > >Is -rerun supposed to be used only

Re: Apache 4.9 checkin tests and different locales

On 12/18/12 1 :13AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >I'm not sure you can run checkintests and mustella with different locales. >The number of baselines would become unmanageable. > >I think there are some locale specific tests in mustella/tests/LangPacks, >but I don't know how well they work. I believe

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

On 12/17/12 7 :10PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Ok. Compiling is easy and quick. >About 20 min or so by my count and the check in tests only take a few >minutes to run. > >Just add your name to the wiki page to the version you are testing so we >don't get everyone running the same tests. >

Re: [VOTE] Opps!!

Justin - please rename the README to READme so it shows up with the rest of the files. Carol On 12/17/12 7 :41PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Well that's embarrassing I managed to accidentally send the Vote email >out too soon before I had put the release candidate up. > >Please hold off vot

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

On 12/17/12 5 :30PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> If you could publish the steps for compiling and testing against a >> particular version of the Flash Player, I (and hopefully a few others) >>can >> chip in and test all the versions. > >Just edit build.properties and change this line to th

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

On 12/17/12 2 :25PM, "Om" wrote: >On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Carol Frampton >wrote: > >> >> >> On 12/17/12 3 :00AM, "Om" wrote: >> >> >I was thinking of adding a dropdown box for the various Flash Players >>swcs >

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

Justin, * The README has to be updated to AIR 3.4. Carol On 12/16/12 12 :49AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >The release candidate can be found here; >http://people.apache.org/~jmclean/Apache%20Flex%204.9.0%20Release%20Candid >ate%203/ > >Fixed in this release candidate: >- Can compile on OSX

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

On 12/17/12 12 :41AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Does FB4.7 recognize Apache Flex 4.8? >Sadly no. It cold be a config issue on my machine or an OSX issue, so if >anyone else has it and can give it a try with 4.8 or the 4.9 RC3 I'd >appreciate it. In ide/flashbuilder/README_integration_w

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

On 12/17/12 3 :00AM, "Om" wrote: >I was thinking of adding a dropdown box for the various Flash Players swcs >(11.1 through 11.5) and AIR SDK versions (3.1 through 3.5) - so that it is >easy for users to chose the runtimes they want to target. I would not do this unless you are prepared to do

Re: Flex release and build version number issue

On 12/16/12 6 :34PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Think I've solved the build version number issue. The release is correct, >but the the process/instructions for building a SDK for the framework >need to be clearer. In order to run >ide/flashbuilder/makeApacheFlexForFlashBuilder.sh you need t

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 RC 2

Justin, I worked on the kit this morning. Here is where I am leaving it: 1. The build number was not set in RC2 when you build it. You can see this because the build number is not set in flex-sdk-description.xml (and there none of the Version.as files). See build/build_release.sh for how I di

Re: Flash Builder issues and 4.9 release candidate

On 12/14/12 10 :12AM, "Greg Reddin" wrote: >On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Justin Mclean >wrote: > >> - Flash Builder 4.6 and 4.7 not able to use the SDK if it compiled >>against >> Java 1.7 (on OSX not tested on windows) >> > >Could you set the compile target to create 1.6-compatible binarie

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 RC 2

Fix this. Author: cframpton Date: Fri Dec 14 15:04:19 2012 New Revision: 1421915 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1421915&view=rev Log: Add target to build textLayout_rb.swc. Modified: incubator/flex/sdk/branches/release4.9/frameworks/build_framework.xml On 12/14/12 9 :48AM, &q

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 RC 2

Another issue for the RC2 list is the the frameworks/build.xml file in the binary kit does not build cleanly. This file is build_framework.xml in the tree. spark_rb: [echo] Compiling frameworks/locale/en_US/spark_rb.swc [compc] Loading configuration file /Users/cframpto/Downloads/apache-

Re: Flash Builder issues and 4.9 release candidate

On 12/14/12 2 :24AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Currently with Apache Flex 4.9 RC2 we have teh following issues: >- Flash Builder 4.6 and 4.7 not able to use the SDK if it compiled >against Java 1.7 (on OSX not tested on windows) >- Flash Builder 4.7 not recognising Apache Flex 4.9 RC I us

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 RC 2

On 12/13/12 4 :16PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >It looking to me that we're unable to support Java7 compiled version of >the SDK when using FB 4.6/4.7 (on OSX at least). > >Can anyone confirm the same issue exist on Windows with RC 2? This morning I got back from the FB team: We have not

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 RC 2

It is possible to use FlashBuilder as an Eclipse plug-in. In that case I would expect the -vm option to work but I haven't tried it. Carol On 12/13/12 4 :16PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >It looking to me that we're unable to support Java7 compiled version of >the SDK when using FB 4.6/4.7

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33288) Numeric Stepper value once NaN does not change to any number user sets or increments

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13531117#comment-13531117 ] Carol Frampton commented on FLEX-33288: --- Your code sets the NumericSteppe

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 RC 2

Justin, I went thru all the same steps yesterday. I sent mail to the FlashBuilder team in India before I left yesterday with essentially all the info you have in your email. I was hoping to find a response this morning but I did not. If I don't hear back by tomorrow I will ask again. I suspect

Re: Apache Flex graduation and clutch page

On 12/12/12 6 :24PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Do we need to do anything here? >http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html > >I notice that number of new committers is incorrect. It is getting that number from here K: numberCommittersNew - new committers added since establishment (gathered

Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9

On 12/12/12 3 :54PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> I'm not sure what you mean by "last fixes". I forgot to start a >>mustella >> run on the changes I have pending last night. I have moved the changes >>over >> to my Windows computer and am setting up to run mustella against RC2 >>(now >> t

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 RC 2

On 12/12/12 3 :17PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> I'm not sure what you're asking. This files are for internal use if you >> want to use your development tree as a FB SDK. I use the make-sdk >>target >> for either FB 4.6 or 4.7. These files aren't on the kit are they?-sdk > >The make-sd

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33295) Flash player will go into an infinite loop on certain cases of trying to wrap text.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13530159#comment-13530159 ] Carol Frampton commented on FLEX-33295: --- In that case Alex is right. This

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33295) Flash player will go into an infinite loop on certain cases of trying to wrap text.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13530132#comment-13530132 ] Carol Frampton commented on FLEX-33295: --- @Alex I don't think this is the

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 RC 2

On 12/12/12 2 :21AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >I've made a RC 2 release build, it compiles and passes the checkin tests. > >It can be found here: >http://people.apache.org/~jmclean/Apache%20Flex%204.9.0%20Release%20Candid >ate%202/ > >However I've run into a couple of issues. > >1. ant cre

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33295) Flash player will go into an infinite loop on certain cases of trying to wrap text.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13529995#comment-13529995 ] Carol Frampton commented on FLEX-33295: --- If your app doesn't embed the

Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9

I think the next installer should install just Apache Flex 4.9. Both the SDK and the installer should be released the same day. If the release approvals don't happen at the same time then we should hold back the first piece, presumably the SDK, until the installer is approved. The installer work

Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9

Did we decide we are going to try to release this right after we (hopefully) become a top-level-project? If so we should remove the -incubating from the kit name now, remove the DISCLAIMER file and probably some other stuff. It would be highly desirable for the installer to release at the same ti

Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9

my build failed so I guessed what was wrong and checked the unzipped directory and didn't see textLayout (and I saw it was excluded from the source packaging). I always unzip in my Downloads directory and build there so I'm not in my normal development area (on purpose when checking out a kit). C

Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9

On 12/11/12 1 :15PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > >On 12/10/12 9:21 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > >> HI, >> >>> The top-level build.xml has the basedir set to some folder on your >>>computer. >> Opps that change shouldn't of been checked in. I'll correct that. >> >On Windows (haven't tried Mac)

Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9

The source kit is missing the textLayout directory so it doesn't build (aside from the basedir issue). Carol On 12/10/12 9 :17PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >This is a just a test release to see that it been packaged, signed and >everything is where it should be and signed correctly. I'd ap

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33293) Prompt not displayed when component is inside a PopUpAnchor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13529183#comment-13529183 ] Carol Frampton commented on FLEX-33293: --- Or another workaround is to set to

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

On 12/11/12 3 :45AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >> I have fixes for all failures that aren't related to ADG, Charts or >ResourceManager. It required some changes to the SDK so a full mustella >run >needs to happen tonight to verify. > >Great news :) > >Could you please tell what you did, I'm rea

Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9

On 12/10/12 9 :17PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >This is a just a test release to see that it been packaged, signed and >everything is where it should be and signed correctly. I'd appreciate if >someone can take a look and give me some feedback. > >Note that this test release has not been t

Re: svn commit: r1418709 - in /incubator/flex/sdk/branches/develop/frameworks/projects: rpc/build.xml spark/build.xml spark_dmv/build.xml

12 4 :18PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >I think Justin was worried about the RSL names when creating an RC. How >do >the RSLs get their names? Doesn't the TLF RSL have a different version >appended to its name? Don't the other RSLs go from having a .0.0.0 to >some >

Re: svn commit: r1418709 - in /incubator/flex/sdk/branches/develop/frameworks/projects: rpc/build.xml spark/build.xml spark_dmv/build.xml

As far as I know the sdk build isn't using the build.number files (the installer has one which is being used). build.number is a "magic" file which the ant build number task uses. There is a build.number property in the top-level build.properties file which is overridden with the svn rev for rele

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

On 12/10/12 9 :06AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote: > > >On 12/9/12 12 :25AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > >>I would ignore AdvancedDataGrid and Charts. The tests are newly donated >>and >>I'm not sure they have been proven to work on both platforms.

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

On 12/9/12 12 :25AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >I would ignore AdvancedDataGrid and Charts. The tests are newly donated >and >I'm not sure they have been proven to work on both platforms. The AdvancedDataGrid and Chart tests pass for me on both Windows and Mac using the develop branch and player 11

Re: svn commit: r1418451 - in /incubator/flex/sdk/branches/develop: ./ build.properties

You need to commit from root to get the merge info. If you use the command line that means you can't have any other work. If you use SmartSVN you can uncheck other pending changes but it is way slower than the command line. Carol On 12/7/12 2 :32PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Hmm. Better, but st

Re: Release build - another TLF issue

Author: cframpton Date: Fri Dec 7 20:25:58 2012 New Revision: 1418463 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1418463&view=rev Log: Fix doc and other.locales targets for release build. There were several issues. textLayout could not build doc because there wasn't a valid textLayout_rb.swc to upda

Re: Release build - another TLF issue

On 12/7/12 1 :37PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >Hi, > >I don't know if it has been discussed already but what about having >Jenkins >jobs (for the main target and other.locales) at commit time, is it >possible >to set up our CI ? Probably because no one has done it. I don't think a whole kit

Re: Release build - another TLF issue

27;m working on all of these. > >Great, keep in touch pls as soon it's done. > > >What you committed yesterday is all the chart tests they are ? > > >- Fred. > > >-Message d'origine- >From: Carol Frampton >Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 5:09 PM

Re: Release build - another TLF issue

I'm working on all of these. In the future I suggest we do a full kit build before we branch for the release and fix up issues like this. As I said before I was working on the kit build a few weeks ago and I knew there were issues. Unfortunately I didn't get thru a full build before I got distra

FW: svn commit: r1418050 - /incubator/flex/tlf/branches/3.0/textLayout/src/flashx/textLayout/elements/ParagraphElement.as

I realized when I sync'd my release4.9 branch that the change that was made to TLF to fix asdocs went into the TLF 3.0 branch which contains the code that was already released by Adobe as 3.0.33. Technically we shouldn't modify this branch but we may decide this is trivial enough that we can over

Re: Release build and spaces in path

On 12/6/12 4 :46PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Seems the unzip ant task dislike spaces even when escaped. So I had to >come up with another solution. Just curious. Are you using a Unix shell on Windows and escaping Unix style? Carol > >You can create another directory (without spaces) t

Re: Draft release notes for Apache Flex 4.9

On 12/6/12 12 :42PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >HI, > >> why asdoc is broken. > >In ParagraphElement.as there's a getter name the same as the private >variable, this causes asdoc to fail. > >The getter it not actually used anywhere (that I could find) and is in >the tlf_internal namespace so I thin

Re: Draft release notes for Apache Flex 4.9

On 12/6/12 12 :53PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> IMO, not too late to check in the pending fixes. > >Yep agree. Just need to decide if you check into the release branch (and >we merge back into the develop later) OR provide patch files to apply to >the release branch. I would check into t

Re: Draft release notes for Apache Flex 4.9

On 12/6/12 11 :16AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >>> 13 - Apache Flex SDK can can be compiled for any version of the Flash >>> Player from 10.2 to 11.5 >> >> "can can" should be fixed. And is this really true? Have all versions >> been tested? > >As far as I'm aware the Mustellla tests ha

Re: [ASJS] Some information on "templates"

On 12/6/12 7 :49AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >Mike, > >After I'm done fixing the mess I made in SVN, I'll start work on the >'template', but here is the basic idea to get you started: I would >like the compiler to output "intermediate" JS, by which I mean "human >readable". My Publisher then take

Re: Draft release notes for Apache Flex 4.9

BTW most projects include a list of the fixed bugs right in the release notes. Also as part of the release, all those resolved bugs need to be closed. Ideally they would be verified first. We got away with not doing that last time but I think it is part of the standard Apache release process whi

Re: Draft release notes for Apache Flex 4.9

Differences from Apache Flex 4.8.0: > 13 - Apache Flex SDK can can be compiled for any version of the Flash >Player from 10.2 to 11.5 "can can" should be fixed. And is this really true? Have all versions been tested? > 16 - New version of the TLF (Text Layout Framework), the TLF 3.0.33 >s

Re: Flex version numbers

Carol > >Thanks, >-Alex > > >On 12/5/12 10:48 AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote: > >> >> >> >> On 12/5/12 1 :41PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Also Version.as (in mx.core) contains a VERS

Re: make release failing

On 12/5/12 9 :33PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Did a make release and it almost get to the end but fails like so: > >frameworks-rsls: >[unzip] Expanding: /Users/justinmclean/Documents/Adobe Flash Builder >4.6/Apache Flex SDK/frameworks/libs/textLayout.swc into >/Users/justinmclean/Docum

Re: Flex version numbers

On 12/5/12 1 :41PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Also Version.as (in mx.core) contains a VERSION constant currently set to >"4.9.0.0". The script takes care of this and every other Version.as file in frameworks. > >Justin

Re: Flex version numbers

There is a script, build/set-version.xml which does it. There are two files which need to be edited by hand but it reminds you of this. Also the README needs to be updated. Carol On 12/5/12 1 :33PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >I notice that the Flex version in build.release has already be

Re: Working towards a 4.9 Release Candidate

On 12/5/12 11 :43AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Justin - I thought develop would be merged to trunk and we'd release from >> there yet I see you made another branch. > >My understanding of the gitflow model[1] is that you need to create a >release branch and work in that, once it's all working th

Re: Working towards a 4.9 Release Candidate

What version of FP and AIR are you planning to use for the release? I will check in the chart tests before the end of the week. We got permission from the Adobe VP to do so. I am working on integrating the adobe.next changes into develop. I've submitted about 80-90% of the bug fixes already. R

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >