On 12/21/12 12 :08PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>Don't you still need a class to have the name Spacer in ActionScript? I
>think the manifest trick only works in MXML.
>
True.
Carol
>
>On 12/21/12 9:05 AM, "Carol Frampton" <cfram...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm not commenting on whether or not there should be a s:Spacer but you
>> don't need a new class - you just need a new manifest entry to do the
>> mapping. If you look in frameworks/spark-manifest.com you will see
>>others
>> there.
>>
>> Carol
>>
>> On 12/21/12 9 :44AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" <mark.kessler....@usmc.mil>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Just curious if we could add a simple component that used to exist in
>>> MX but not in Spark. The spacer component was just a simple UI
>>> extension. We can do the exact same thing now with the s:Rect
>>> (primitive), but it doesn't have an intuitive name. I think it would
>>>be
>>> nice to add the spacer back in.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <s:Rect width="100%" />
>>>
>>> --Same as--
>>>
>>> <s:Spacer width="100%" />
>>>
>>>
>>> Class:
>>>
>>> //Declare package.
>>> package spark.components
>>> {
>>> //Create child class of the Rect class.
>>> public class Spacer extends Rect
>>> {
>>> //----------------------------------------
>>> // Constructor
>>> //----------------------------------------
>>>
>>> public function Spacer()
>>> {
>>> super();
>>> }
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Mark
>>
>
>--
>Alex Harui
>Flex SDK Team
>Adobe Systems, Inc.
>http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
