On 10/5/2012 7:20 PM, Charles Monteiro wrote:
Not getting this air is very much cross platform , running on desktops ,
android , ios, it seems win surface rtf
It depends on your delivery mechanism. If you need "Cross platform"
browser based apps that have to work on an iPad or iPhone; then
Not getting this air is very much cross platform , running on desktops ,
android , ios, it seems win surface rtf
On Oct 5, 2012 12:21 PM, "FORMER 03 | Robert Brendler" <
robert.brend...@former03.de> wrote:
> I'd also like to drop some comment on this ...
>
> I don't know how it is with you guys,
I think it's a good long term investment. There is a lot already invested
in it. FXG is more like SVG 4.0. Also, there has been work done on the
compiler that produces optimized FXG. FXG is Flex' friend.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Yvon Sauvageau wrote:
> Don't convert your FXG to SVG for re
ASC 2.0 is getting lots of bug fixes and enhancements. See the release notes at:
http://labsdownload.adobe.com/pub/labs/flashplatformruntimes/air3-4/air3-4_p3_sdk_asc2_releasenotes.pdf
Is it correct that ASC 2.0 is a fork of Falcon?
Is it possible that Adobe will be committing these same fixes to
Don't convert your FXG to SVG for real though. The last time I tried SVG in FB
4.6, I got compile warnings that basically told me that SVG was a thing of the
past and that I should use FXG.
-Original message-
From: Jeffry Houser
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: "sébastien Paturel"
"I would expect / hope that adobe is a partner of apache flex"
To easily answer to this recurrent question or reaction,
Someone could write a new wiki entry to explain once and for all in what
and how Adobe is contributing to flex
and clarifying in what and how Adobe is publicly engaged (get the
Ok thanks ALex.
So its not as simple as it seemed at first place about proprietary code.
It make sens now.
I agree that starting from scratch is the way to go further then.
Le 05/10/2012 18:24, Alex Harui a écrit :
On 10/5/12 6:47 AM, "sébastien Paturel" wrote:
Is it definitive that Adobe
But it seems that theres very little differences between the two.
IMO Adobe will drop FXG sooner or later.
Why should they keep with it if they don't keep Flex in their main strategy?
I think we will have to get back to an SVG based solution (with SVG
extension ?)
Le 05/10/2012 17:47, Alex Har
Great news, thanks Alex :)
Le 05/10/2012 16:27, Alex Harui a écrit :
FalconJS is not under development. A prototype was built several months
ago, but no serious work has been done on it since. I should be able to
start on its legal review next week.
On 10/5/12 7:06 AM, "filippo dipisa" wrot
On 10/5/12 7:00 AM, "Charles Monteiro" wrote:
> I would expect / hope that adobe is a partner of apache flex
Adobe is investing in Apache Flex, otherwise I and others wouldn't be paid
to be involved.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
On 10/5/12 6:47 AM, "sébastien Paturel" wrote:
> Is it definitive that Adobe will not donate the DV code to Apache?
Never say Never. But at this point, trying to change minds at Adobe is not
a priority for me, because I think the code isn't the right design. I would
rather start over.
> I t
I'd also like to drop some comment on this ...
I don't know how it is with you guys, but most of the projects I am
getting nowadays are required to be cross platform ... or better said
... "can you make it run on my iPad? do I really need another app for
it, I already got like 3 million of the
On 10/5/12 6:44 AM, "sébastien Paturel" wrote:
> After Alex mentioned FXG, one important question comes to light:
> should Apache Flex keep use FXG as skining tool?
For now, yes.
> as FXG is tightly linked to Adobe and its tools, can we count on Adobe
> to continue to maintain the use of it? e
+0
I've been using Flex for a while now and must admint I never really used
DV, because whenever I opened it, some of my custom components weren't
displayed right or manipulating an object by mouse destroyed some of my
percentage widths somewhere in the code, also dragging new components
into
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> On 10/5/2012 9:44 AM, sébastien Paturel wrote:
>
>>
>> by the way, why Adobe chose to use new FXG, instead of SVG? (i bet the
>> answer as already been given a few times, sorry for asking again)
>>
>
> There has been some talk about that in
On 10/5/2012 9:44 AM, sébastien Paturel wrote:
by the way, why Adobe chose to use new FXG, instead of SVG? (i bet the
answer as already been given a few times, sorry for asking again)
There has been some talk about that in the past. The general gist--as
I understand it--was that they decid
FalconJS is not under development. A prototype was built several months
ago, but no serious work has been done on it since. I should be able to
start on its legal review next week.
On 10/5/12 7:06 AM, "filippo dipisa" wrote:
> FOr what I understand falco js is still under development and ther
If someone registers as a Google Webmaster, adds the correct google marker html
file to the site and then requests it then google will rescan within a day.
Regards,
Dave
On Oct 3, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> My sources say it was fixed last week and is due to be re-checked by google
>
FOr what I understand falco js is still under development and there is just
one resource on it so don't hope on it.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Here there is a good solution if you want to use as to create js apps
http://www.jangaroo.net/home/
On 5 October 2012 14:53, sébastien Paturel w
I would expect / hope that adobe is a partner of apache flex
On Oct 5, 2012 9:52 AM, "sébastien Paturel" wrote:
> No war between HTML5 and AIR here.
> You already can run on AIR.
> The fact that Flex don't run on HTML5 at all (even with lightweight
> version) is a big drawback in the framework wa
Following the HTML5 targetting discussion
is there any news about the FalconJS donation, as we now have Falcon
donated, it shoudl be next?
Le 05/10/2012 15:46, Charles Monteiro a écrit :
I'm wondering if most in this group are more interested about targeting
html5 than air because it seems to
No war between HTML5 and AIR here.
You already can run on AIR.
The fact that Flex don't run on HTML5 at all (even with lightweight
version) is a big drawback in the framework war.
And AIR is not safe for long term future for Apache Flex because of
Adobe dependency.
And i don't see why is would
Is it definitive that Adobe will not donate the DV code to Apache?
I thought there were no legal issues to do it, as it was a full air app?
(not like Catalyst)
Maybe we could start to try to obtain it before starting something else
from scratch.
At least it worse to get a deep look at how it was
I'm wondering if most in this group are more interested about targeting
html5 than air because it seems to me it would be hard to do both well.
I want to run on AIR.
On Oct 5, 2012 9:38 AM, "sébastien Paturel" wrote:
> I agree with others that you should abandone the idea that Adobe could get
>
After Alex mentioned FXG, one important question comes to light:
should Apache Flex keep use FXG as skining tool?
as FXG is tightly linked to Adobe and its tools, can we count on Adobe
to continue to maintain the use of it? especially in Creative suite tools?
by the way, why Adobe chose to use
I agree with others that you should abandone the idea that Adobe could
get Catalyst back from the dead.
They have been pretty clear about it, and the open sourcing is not an
option because of code dependencies.
Your only chance to see catalyst come back from Adobe, is to make Apache
Flex te be
@Omar ... You are right! A poll about an interaction
design tool for Apache Flex might be more exciting
for us. Hopefully you'll find time to take part in the
other poll. Thx!
Sincerely Yours,
Sebastian Mohr
Apache Flex Developer (PPMC),
Interaction Designer & Musician
http://www.linkedin.co
27 matches
Mail list logo