But it seems that theres very little differences between the two.
IMO Adobe will drop FXG sooner or later.
Why should they keep with it if they don't keep Flex in their main strategy?
I think we will have to get back to an SVG based solution (with SVG
extension ?)
Le 05/10/2012 17:47, Alex Harui a écrit :
On 10/5/12 6:44 AM, "sébastien Paturel" <sebpatu.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
After Alex mentioned FXG, one important question comes to light:
should Apache Flex keep use FXG as skining tool?
For now, yes.
as FXG is tightly linked to Adobe and its tools, can we count on Adobe
to continue to maintain the use of it? especially in Creative suite tools?
Adobe has made no promises about FXG support into the future.
by the way, why Adobe chose to use new FXG, instead of SVG? (i bet the
answer as already been given a few times, sorry for asking again)
I wasn't involved in that decision, but I think I recall overhearing some
discussions about the mapping of SVG to Flash display objects. FXG files
can be compiled very well into Flash SWF DefineXXX.
