Don't convert your FXG to SVG for real though. The last time I tried SVG in FB 4.6, I got compile warnings that basically told me that SVG was a thing of the past and that I should use FXG.
-----Original message----- From: Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: "sébastien Paturel" <sebpatu.f...@gmail.com> Sent: Fri, Oct 5, 2012 14:34:04 GMT+00:00 Subject: Re: Is FXG a good long term choice for Apache Flex? On 10/5/2012 9:44 AM, sébastien Paturel wrote: > > by the way, why Adobe chose to use new FXG, instead of SVG? (i bet the > answer as already been given a few times, sorry for asking again) There has been some talk about that in the past. The general gist--as I understand it--was that they decided it would be better to create something which was closer to the Flash Player rending model. FXG and SVG are very close; as I understand it. I thought the Flex compiler supported SVG too? It may be an interesting experiment to convert all the FXG elements (and related skins) to SVG. -- Jeffry Houser Technical Entrepreneur 203-379-0773 -- http://www.flextras.com?c=104 UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready! -- http://www.theflexshow.com http://www.jeffryhouser.com http://www.asktheflexpert.com -- Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust
