[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13444736#comment-13444736
]
Alex Harui commented on FLEX-33177:
---
Checked in MXML file changes from patches 8, 9 and
Well, there is one failure:
[java] mx/effects/MaskEffect/Props/MaskEffect_Properties
MaskEffect_xFrom_Play Failed AssertPixelValue(body:step 2) testImage pixel
at (60,60) FF != 0x3E48CC
I'll look into it tomorrow unless someone else wants to fix it. 1754 test
pass. Checked in as SVN 13
Oops! Hit send too soon.
[java]
/Users/aharui/Work/apache/flex/mustella/tests/mx/styles/AdvancedStyleClient/
SWFs/ADV_flex_component_global_main.swf Failed Timed out
You can see it just mentions the SWF, no actual test or test step.
On 8/29/12 10:38 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
> Here's a S
Here's a SWF timeout:
On 8/29/12 8:56 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/29/12 7:14 PM, "Kiel" wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> 1. What will I see on the error log If the fail is timeouts
>> ... will it be like "property_scriptTimeLimit_test1 Failed"?
> It depends on what kind of timeout.
Update: I think I fixed the remaining failures. I'm doing a full run on my
machine now.
On 8/29/12 3:07 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
> By simply changing the embedAsCFF in Glow, Fade, Dissolve and Blur I'm down
> to 49 failures.
>
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.ado
On 8/29/12 5:51 PM, "ysma...@yahoo.com" wrote:
> My perhaps naive vision of what FalconJS would do (at least in the first
> version), was that it would grab some kind of HTML5 canvas element; and do
> everything in that rectangle: all drawing and event handling would occur in
> that element. I
On 8/29/12 7:14 PM, "Kiel" wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> 1. What will I see on the error log If the fail is timeouts
> ... will it be like "property_scriptTimeLimit_test1 Failed"?
It depends on what kind of timeout. Here is a step timeout from the console
output:
[java] gumbo/components/Radio
Greetings,
1. What will I see on the error log If the fail is timeouts
... will it be like "property_scriptTimeLimit_test1 Failed"?
2. Is there a way to check that the Embedded Fonts are working in Mustella?
Mustella is something very new for me and I'm very much interested in
learning.
Very
My perhaps naive vision of what FalconJS would do (at least in the first
version), was that it would grab some kind of HTML5 canvas element; and do
everything in that rectangle: all drawing and event handling would occur in
that element. It's a 'simple' way to put a foot in the door of the HT
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Michael A. Labriola <
labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
> >BTW, FalconJS uses Google's closure compiler to optimize the generated
> javascript.
>
> I am not sure that is accurate... in fact, pretty sure it is not. The code
> generated by FalconJS, when it was be
>Flex is compiled ahead of time and we control the compiler. Whereas with
>HTML5, the browser interprets it. We cannot make changes to HTML5 and expect
>all browsers to understand it.
Flash Player understands byte code which is generated ahead of time. Browsers
understand JavaScript which is
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Michael A. Labriola <
labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
> >Whereas with HTML(5) there is nothing in the standard that will let us do
> specialization (via inheritance or composition) I cannot dream up new
> elements and expect a browser to understand it out of
>BTW, FalconJS uses Google's closure compiler to optimize the generated
>javascript.
I am not sure that is accurate... in fact, pretty sure it is not. The code
generated by FalconJS, when it was being used to cross-compile a test Flex app,
was put into closure-compiler to try to make it smaller
>In flash player there is nothing but a text field and the ability to make some
>rectangles how did we get to Flex?
In case I am not being clear, Flash player doesn't understand new element types
you create. At the end of the day you are operating on DisplayObject. In truth,
had Flex operat
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Alain Ekambi wrote:
> GWT generates overbloated JavaScript ?
> Where do you have that one from ?
>
> GWT's Java to JavaScript compiler is one the best out there (The closure
> compiler beeing imho the best).
> And GWT 2.5 just added the closure compiler as a compil
>Whereas with HTML(5) there is nothing in the standard that will let us do
>specialization (via inheritance or composition) I cannot dream up new
>elements and expect a browser to understand it out of the box.
In flash player there is nothing but a text field and the ability to make some
recta
Hi Alain,
maybe I was talking too much without own knowledge or experience. I
never use GWT and was talking about what other colleges told me of
their experience and what I read...
so can't really say nothing. Sorry again.
Carlos
2012/8/30 Alain Ekambi :
> You dont see the relevance of Google
I meant I cant see the relevance of making open source the framework
regarding the comparison with how Flex could be cross-compiled to JS.
Since there is a core of developers in the community who would like to work
on this, discussing where Flex should be used in their topic is slightly
wrong.
My
You dont see the relevance of Google making GWT opensource ?
Use the right tool for the right job.
Why use GWT for a small app ?
This is the same for Flex. I see people using Flash/Flex where they should
not then complain about performance.
If you are not targeting AIR or the Desktop browser yo
>From my experience, using it for a simple site or a small app would
possibly create overbloated js indeed. But when it comes to middle or large
scale apps the code is heavily optimized and the end result makes sense in
terms of size and complexity.
Regarding Google making the framework fully open
GWT generates overbloated JavaScript ?
Where do you have that one from ?
GWT's Java to JavaScript compiler is one the best out there (The closure
compiler beeing imho the best).
And GWT 2.5 just added the closure compiler as a compilation option.
2012/8/30 Carlos Rovira
> AFAIK Google has made
AFAIK Google has made the same with GWT as Adobe with Flex. But GWT
has the problem to generate overbloated JS code...
2012/8/30 Nick Tsitlakidis :
> Hello guys, I'm following all the topics here but I post rarely because
> most of the times someone else has said something that I agree with 100%.
Hello guys, I'm following all the topics here but I post rarely because
most of the times someone else has said something that I agree with 100%.
This time though, I was trying to think about similar technologies which
are either compiled to js or they are converted in js in some other way.
So I t
By simply changing the embedAsCFF in Glow, Fade, Dissolve and Blur I'm down
to 49 failures.
On 8/29/12 2:49 PM, "Jose Barragan" wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> As Carlos says, we use github to host and share our patch, in order to we
> awaiting to Git real repo.
>
> So just a mini fix on the patch syn
I copy the file from Air SDK. But I get a new error: "Directory does not
contain a Flex SDK"
Thanks
Mark
> > >
> > > All the details are here:
> http://incubator.apache.org/flex/download.html
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Om
> > >
> >
>
Hi Peter,
As Carlos says, we use github to host and share our patch, in order to we
awaiting to Git real repo.
So just a mini fix on the patch syntax
[1].
If using Mac: curl -O https://github.com/apache/flex/pull/19.patch
If using Linux: wget https://github.com/apache/flex/pull/19.patch
[2]. p
You need to read the README file for instructions:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/4.8.0-incubating/README, or you
can use the installer here
http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex/
Note that the installer is not yet released and is currently in
development.
Thanks,
Om
O
Hi Om,
Thanks.
I download windows binary successfully.
But I get the error "adt.jar not found in classpath c:\flex4.8" when I
install it on FB4.7.
Please give me a idea how to fix this.
Thanks
Mark
>
>
> All the details are here: http://incubator.apache.org/flex/download.html
>
> Thanks,
>
Ok, whatever https://github.com/apache/flex/pull/19.patch is exactly equal to 8
+ 9 + 17, and FTE is in 20, even in 19 I include mustella/mx/effects/Effect fix
too.
I'll revert 20 and 21 on my working copy, and I still working on it.
Thanks,
-Jose.
On Aug 29, 2012, at 11:08 PM, Alex Harui w
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Mark Shen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please give me the url for download 4.8 SDK.
>
> I download one binary code, but I can not unzip it.
>
> Thanks
>
> Mark
>
All the details are here: http://incubator.apache.org/flex/download.html
Thanks,
Om
Peter,
you don't need git actually. We are waiting for this 2-4 weeks to get
real Git on Apache Flex.
Meanwhile Jose and I are using SVN and copy-paste the modifications in
our respective fork in github
since the layout folder is the same (actually).
So you only need to :
1) dowload the patch us
On 8/29/12 1:57 PM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to git and while I've been reading about it, this will be my first
> time using it and I'm having trouble understanding what I'm supposed to do
> to apply this patch. Here's what I've done so far:
>
I've been working with the .patch fi
On 8/29/12 12:57 PM, "Jose Barragan (JIRA)" wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi
> n.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13444363#comment-134
> 44363 ]
>
> Jose Barragan commented on FLEX-33177:
> --
Hi,
I'm new to git and while I've been reading about it, this will be my first
time using it and I'm having trouble understanding what I'm supposed to do
to apply this patch. Here's what I've done so far:
1. git clone https://github.com/apache/flex
2. git checkout -b FLEX-33177
Now I have a bran
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13444363#comment-13444363
]
Jose Barragan commented on FLEX-33177:
--
My actual scenario is based of these news pu
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Michael A. Labriola <
labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
> >Can you please elaborate?
>
> >The point I was trying to make was that HTML5 language itself is not
> designed to be extensible. Using Javascript does not really count (in this
> >context)
>
> >As far
Sorry for my misinformation,
My actual scenario is based of these news pull-requests:
https://github.com/apache/flex/pull/19
https://github.com/apache/flex/pull/20
https://github.com/apache/flex/pull/21
I did activate the MX FTE Text compiler option in order to get the new font
family in mx com
Oh yes, I forgot to mention that the very first time, you need to run "ant
get-as3commons.swc" from the installer directory. This will download the
required swc and save it to libs folder after which you are set to go.
I will make sure that this goes in the readme file.
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Aug 2
I'll put you down for Formatters. I don't recall about generic loader, I
will have to look.
--peter
On 8/29/12 3:25 PM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
>Hi Peter,
>
>great :). For "Formatters" I run the test some days ago and was
>successful with 0 errors, and "genericLoader" seems to be not a test,
>is
I have not applied Jose's patches. I did find the warnings in the log
files, though. I have just modified the code and I want to see what
happens.
--peter
On 8/29/12 3:23 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>On 8/29/12 12:03 PM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
>
>> I got no warnings in the output, just bitmap com
Hi Peter,
great :). For "Formatters" I run the test some days ago and was
successful with 0 errors, and "genericLoader" seems to be not a test,
is like a part to use in other code, isn't it?
2012/8/29 Peter Ent :
> Hi,
>
> I have taken another stab at organizing the Mustella Test Journal section
On 8/29/12 12:03 PM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
> I got no warnings in the output, just bitmap compare failures. I'm going
> to run it again to be certain, though.
>
I don't see the EmbeddedFontRegistry warnings in the output of the test
engine. It might be in the log file. But I definitely see it i
Hello Om
I just wanted to follow up on your links to the common and installer
projects you mentioned below, when I attempt to use them in Flash Builder
(after putting together the SDK) I had some missing references to the
Zip/ZipEvent and ZipFile classes.
import org.as3commons.zi
>Can you please elaborate?
>The point I was trying to make was that HTML5 language itself is not designed
>to be extensible. Using Javascript does not really count (in this
>context)
>As far as using the DOM, I assume you mean the Microdata format. This results
>in non-standard HTML most of t
On 8/29/12 11:59 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
> I'd love to be able to target HTML5 with an OOP language...even better
> if it's Flex...but HTML5+JS+CSS has poor performance itself (remember
> that even Facebook kill his HTML5 app for iOS in favor of a native
> one). I imagine that it should be
I got no warnings in the output, just bitmap compare failures. I'm going
to run it again to be certain, though.
--peter
On 8/29/12 2:53 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>On 8/29/12 11:19 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
>
>> I should have been clearer. I figured the embedAsCFF=true might be a
>>cause
>> for fa
Hi,
I have taken another stab at organizing the Mustella Test Journal section
on the Mustella wiki page. All of the top-level tests are now listed (with
TBD if no one is working on them). Those tests that have lots of parts
have been broken out into their tables. I've color coded some of the notes
I'd love to be able to target HTML5 with an OOP language...even better
if it's Flex...but HTML5+JS+CSS has poor performance itself (remember
that even Facebook kill his HTML5 app for iOS in favor of a native
one). I imagine that it should be hard to get there.
2012/8/29 :
> Quoting Alex Harui :
>
On 8/29/12 11:19 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
> I should have been clearer. I figured the embedAsCFF=true might be a cause
> for failures but does that explain the discrepency with the total number
> of tests run?
>
I hope not. But any SWF timeout will make a difference. Did you get any of
those?
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Omar Gonzalez
wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 29, 2012, Erik Lundgren wrote:
>
> >
> > 29 aug 2012 kl. 14:51 skrev "Michael A. Labriola" <
> > labri...@digitalprimates.net >:
> >
> > > It's not that HTML is less extensible.
> >
> > How would one go about extending i
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Michael Schmalle
wrote:
> My code is in no shape for public consumption at the moment and I don't
> even know if my implementation is close to correct (it works fine).
Due to the nature of some of my work I've had to create many multi-touch
components. However u
I should have been clearer. I figured the embedAsCFF=true might be a cause
for failures but does that explain the discrepency with the total number
of tests run?
--peter
On 8/29/12 2:14 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>
>On 8/29/12 10:44 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
>
>> Well, I have different results.
On 8/29/12 10:44 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
> Well, I have different results. I have 741 passes and 50 failures, all
> bitmap compares. Using ImageDiffAIR, the pixel differences minor, almost
> like bold fonts in one and regular in another, but the font family looks
> the same.
>
> I'm not sure w
Well, I have different results. I have 741 passes and 50 failures, all
bitmap compares. Using ImageDiffAIR, the pixel differences minor, almost
like bold fonts in one and regular in another, but the font family looks
the same.
I'm not sure what to make of this.
--peter
On 8/29/12 12:41 PM, "Jose
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012, Erik Lundgren wrote:
>
> 29 aug 2012 kl. 14:51 skrev "Michael A. Labriola" <
> labri...@digitalprimates.net >:
>
> > It's not that HTML is less extensible.
>
> How would one go about extending it?
>
> /Erik
>
JavaScript and the DOM.
-omar
Right, I figured this answer, I was just wondering if I would get
anybody actually responding about multi-tocuh components.
My code is in no shape for public consumption at the moment and I
don't even know if my implementation is close to correct (it works
fine).
I also wasn't trying to "
Quoting Alex Harui :
I'm certain that we should explore a way to allow someone to use MXML-like
markup and an OO language to create apps to target apps on multiple devices.
Remember that we could simply become a front-end to PhoneGap/Cordova on the
way to getting native apps on devices. But w
I'm going to run those tests now and see what I get.
--peter
On 8/29/12 12:41 PM, "Jose Barragan" wrote:
>Hi Alex, Peter,
>
>After review the bad images using ImageDiffAir, I understand that all of
>their failed by the different font body, and measure used now.
>
>Passing the mustella/mx test us
Hi Alex, Peter,
After review the bad images using ImageDiffAir, I understand that all of their
failed by the different font body, and measure used now.
Passing the mustella/mx test using -createImages I got these results:
[java] mx/utils/MediaQueryParser/integration/MediaQueryParser_Integra
On 8/29/12 8:13 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
> 2012/8/29 Alex Harui :
>>> One thing I never understood was Adobe not helping to open source
>>> Flash Player
>> My understanding is that one major factor is that key aspects of the player
>> depend on 3rd party works.
>
> We should learn of what o
29 aug 2012 kl. 14:51 skrev "Michael A. Labriola"
:
> It's not that HTML is less extensible.
How would one go about extending it?
/Erik
2012/8/29 Alex Harui :
>> One thing I never understood was Adobe not helping to open source
>> Flash Player
> My understanding is that one major factor is that key aspects of the player
> depend on 3rd party works.
We should learn of what others did in the past and those kind of
problems can be ov
On 8/29/12 6:30 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
>
> One thing I never understood was Adobe not helping to open source
> Flash Player
My understanding is that one major factor is that key aspects of the player
depend on 3rd party works.
> or transforming it to help to be the industry standard.
I
I don't see that the fonts are different. This one comparison I have.
--peter
On 8/29/12 10:44 AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote:
>ProgressBar_Skinning2 has minor bit differences and all the others have
>font differences - sans-serif vs serif
>
>
>Carol
>
>On 8/29/12 10 :40AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Michael Schmalle
wrote:
> Is there anybody working on this? I am creating an audio/synth/sequencer
> framework for use with Android/Java and Android/AIR and I have built a
> number of lightweight multi-touch buttons, dials, sliders etc using some of
> the spark bas
Quoting "Michael A. Labriola" :
It's not that HTML is less extensible, I used to think that too.
It's that HTML enforces a separation between form and function that
we tried to consider with Spark, but didn't make it far enough.
Having solid AS to JS support would make ActionScript a very
ProgressBar_Skinning2 has minor bit differences and all the others have
font differences - sans-serif vs serif
Carol
On 8/29/12 10 :40AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote:
> [java] =
> [java]Failed:
> [java]
[java] =
[java] Failed:
[java] =
[java]
components/ProgressBar/Integration/ProgressBar_Integration_mirroring
ProgressBar_Integration_mirroring_rtl Failed CompareBitmap(bo
On 8/29/12 6:22 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are the fails from timeouts? If so, reboot your machine and try again.
> There is an issue with LocalConnection and I recall that Alex put a change
> into Mustella to deal with it, but it might not fix it all the time (be
> sure to sync mustell
Updated to use vectors, changed some naming convention, reduced a bit of
redundant code, updated the example to better display the internal arguments
and allow minor modification.
Attachments have an additional extension of .txt just to keep them from getting
stripped.
//
// public propertie
Maybe the major problem for Flex in the future is the Flash Player
dependency. Some time ago I thought Adobe and Flash will be a solid
platform, but nowadays we can not trust anymore in Adobe taking into
account that from one day to another they shift objetives in such
radikal way. Such change brin
Hi,
Are the fails from timeouts? If so, reboot your machine and try again.
There is an issue with LocalConnection and I recall that Alex put a change
into Mustella to deal with it, but it might not fix it all the time (be
sure to sync mustella/as3 from the develop branch). Having so many
failures
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13444040#comment-13444040
]
Emmanuel Jacquier commented on FLEX-33143:
--
I had a custom skin that extended the
>I had in mind writing in a subset of ActionScript that cross-compiles cleanly
>to JavaScript, which is basically the idea of FalconJS. But, not having worked
>on FalconJS, I never understood what it did with Flash classes like >Sprite
>that are implemented in native code in the player.
The way
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13444004#comment-13444004
]
Al Birdy commented on FLEX-33143:
-
So you basically just removed the skinclass allocation
And FalconJS or a ActionScript to JavaScript cross-compiler should
definitely be separate project.
In the case of OpenLaszlo, the decision was made to use JavaScript 2
as the main language for integration. OpenLaszlo has separate sprite
implementation for the HTML5/DHTML runtime and ActionScript 3.
tags in OpenLaszlo are objects without a visual representation (not in
the display list). When a
Quoting Carlos Rovira :
Hi Michael,
you probably are right and we should continue to evolve Flex to
continue going ahead of other technologies like HTML. Maybe FalconJS
could have sense as a new project to develop in OOP and output HTML5
based apps...something that HTML5 needs urgently since is
Greetings,
I'm having these results.
First run:
./mini_run.sh tests/Application
=
Passes: 233
Fails: 50
=
2nd run:
./mini_run.sh -createImages tests/Application
==
Hi Michael,
you probably are right and we should continue to evolve Flex to
continue going ahead of other technologies like HTML. Maybe FalconJS
could have sense as a new project to develop in OOP and output HTML5
based apps...something that HTML5 needs urgently since is its main
problem IMHO. But
Hey,
Sorry if this has been asked, I have been absent awhile.
Is there anybody working on this? I am creating an
audio/synth/sequencer framework for use with Android/Java and
Android/AIR and I have built a number of lightweight multi-touch
buttons, dials, sliders etc using some of the spar
This is pretty much my opinion as well and I should have just said it. :)
After seeing the last year or so and HTML5, I probably wouldn't spend
an ounce of time developing something like this(FalconJS). I really
have to agree with this post, well written.
I'm looking at a use case of Apache
Hi Alex,
You was right, I finally fix the environment of mx tests, and i taking these
results:
[java] Wrote file:
/Users/pepebarragan/Developer/apache/flex/sdk/branches/develop/mustella/tests/mx/effects/effectClasses/HideShowEffectTargetFilter/SWFs/../usability/baseline/HideShowEffectTarge
83 matches
Mail list logo
