> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Jean-
> Baptiste Kempf
> Sent: Monday, January 3, 2022 6:32 AM
> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] 5.0 release
>
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2021, at 20:40, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> &g
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 09:29:40PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 9:14 PM Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 08:25:44PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 7:58 PM Michael Niedermayer <
> > mich...@niedermayer.cc>
> > > wrote:
> > >
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 9:14 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 08:25:44PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 7:58 PM Michael Niedermayer <
> mich...@niedermayer.cc>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 07:04:48PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > > > O
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 08:25:44PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 7:58 PM Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 07:04:48PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 6:18 PM Hendrik Leppkes
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 5:1
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 7:58 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 07:04:48PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 6:18 PM Hendrik Leppkes
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 5:14 PM Michael Niedermayer
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 05:14:13PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 06:31:37AM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Dec 2021, at 20:40, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > >> It would be nice to have a public date set a few days into the future.
> > >
> > > yes, i
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 07:04:48PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 6:18 PM Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 5:14 PM Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 06:31:37AM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 31 Dec 2021,
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 6:18 PM Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 5:14 PM Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 06:31:37AM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> > > On Fri, 31 Dec 2021, at 20:40, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > >> It would be nice to have a pub
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 6:17 PM Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>
> Unfortunately the patch was also never on the ML for discussion or review.
>
Sorry, I was blind, it was in fact on the ML. I must've been thinking
of something else..
- Hendrik
___
ffmpeg-devel
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 5:14 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 06:31:37AM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Dec 2021, at 20:40, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > >> It would be nice to have a public date set a few days into the future.
> > >
> > > yes, i intended
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 06:31:37AM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2021, at 20:40, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> It would be nice to have a public date set a few days into the future.
> >
> > yes, i intended to do that, unless people wanted a ASAP/NOW branch
>
> So what are th
On Fri, 31 Dec 2021, at 20:40, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> It would be nice to have a public date set a few days into the future.
>
> yes, i intended to do that, unless people wanted a ASAP/NOW branch
So what are the open topics, besides the Audio Channel Layout API?
Best,
--
Jean-Baptiste Ke
On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 11:29:18PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 07:12:54PM +0100, Lynne wrote:
> > 2 Jan 2022, 18:11 by mich...@niedermayer.cc:
> >
> > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 05:28:24PM +0100, Lynne wrote:
> > >
> > >> 2 Jan 2022, 16:52 by z...@zanevaniperen.com:
On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 07:12:54PM +0100, Lynne wrote:
> 2 Jan 2022, 18:11 by mich...@niedermayer.cc:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 05:28:24PM +0100, Lynne wrote:
> >
> >> 2 Jan 2022, 16:52 by z...@zanevaniperen.com:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 3/1/22 01:09, James Almer wrote:
> >> >
> >> Re
2 Jan 2022, 18:11 by mich...@niedermayer.cc:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 05:28:24PM +0100, Lynne wrote:
>
>> 2 Jan 2022, 16:52 by z...@zanevaniperen.com:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On 3/1/22 01:09, James Almer wrote:
>> >
>> Reverting something in the release branch is already going to be dirty
>>
On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 05:28:24PM +0100, Lynne wrote:
> 2 Jan 2022, 16:52 by z...@zanevaniperen.com:
>
> >
> >
> > On 3/1/22 01:09, James Almer wrote:
> >
> Reverting something in the release branch is already going to be dirty
> no matter what, because we do a minor bump to ensure the
2 Jan 2022, 16:52 by z...@zanevaniperen.com:
>
>
> On 3/1/22 01:09, James Almer wrote:
>
Reverting something in the release branch is already going to be dirty
no matter what, because we do a minor bump to ensure the release has its
own soname. Right now that'd mean 5.0 will be lavf
On 3/1/22 01:09, James Almer wrote:
Reverting something in the release branch is already going to be dirty
no matter what, because we do a minor bump to ensure the release has its
own soname. Right now that'd mean 5.0 will be lavf 59.13, while lacking
a demuxer available in lavf 59.12
Depe
On 1/2/2022 11:50 AM, Zane van Iperen wrote:
On Monday, 3 January 2022 12:29:02 AM AEST James Almer wrote:
There were some disagreements on IRC a few days ago about what should
and should not go into the release because of insufficient fuzzing and
the danger of introducing security issues.
To
On Monday, 3 January 2022 12:29:02 AM AEST James Almer wrote:
> > There were some disagreements on IRC a few days ago about what should
> > and should not go into the release because of insufficient fuzzing and
> > the danger of introducing security issues.
> >
> > To avoid conflicts around this
On 1/2/2022 11:12 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2021-12-31 20:40:24)
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 10:45:46PM +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
On 2021-12-31 10:22 pm, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 12:55:14AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 20
Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2021-12-31 20:40:24)
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 10:45:46PM +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2021-12-31 10:22 pm, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 12:55:14AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 05:44:42PM +010
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 10:45:46PM +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-12-31 10:22 pm, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 12:55:14AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 05:44:42PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 22 Dec 2021, at
31 Dec 2021, 17:52 by mich...@niedermayer.cc:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 12:55:14AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 05:44:42PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>> > On Wed, 22 Dec 2021, at 15:05, James Almer wrote:
>> > > Is the December target to get into the featur
On 2021-12-31 10:22 pm, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 12:55:14AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 05:44:42PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2021, at 15:05, James Almer wrote:
Is the December target to get into the feature freez
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 12:55:14AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 05:44:42PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Dec 2021, at 15:05, James Almer wrote:
> > > Is the December target to get into the feature freeze schedule from
> > > distros?
> >
> > No, it
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 05:44:42PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2021, at 15:05, James Almer wrote:
> > Is the December target to get into the feature freeze schedule from
> > distros?
>
> No, it was set by me, in order to get the distro freezes from January.
>
> We can mis
On Wed, 22 Dec 2021, at 15:05, James Almer wrote:
> Is the December target to get into the feature freeze schedule from
> distros?
No, it was set by me, in order to get the distro freezes from January.
We can miss the target a bit this year, and then make it better for 2022.
BEst,.
--
Jean-Ba
On 12/22/2021 11:03 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 07:05:07PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, at 16:25, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
If you know of any major issues which need to be done before the release do them
now. If you know of any issues wh
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 07:05:07PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, at 16:25, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > If you know of any major issues which need to be done before the release do
> > them
> > now. If you know of any issues which are release-blocking list them in a
>
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 04:08:43PM +0100, Diederick C. Niehorster wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 3:52 PM Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 05:42:01PM +0100, Diederick C. Niehorster wrote:
> > > Hi Michael,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 5:19 PM Mi
Hi Michael,
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 3:52 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 05:42:01PM +0100, Diederick C. Niehorster wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 5:19 PM Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > The patches do not say in their commit mess
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 05:42:01PM +0100, Diederick C. Niehorster wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 5:19 PM Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:27:33PM +0100, Diederick C. Niehorster wrote:
> > > Hi Michael,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 4:26 PM Mi
Hi Michael,
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 5:19 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:27:33PM +0100, Diederick C. Niehorster wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 4:26 PM Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > If you know of any major issues which need to be
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:27:33PM +0100, Diederick C. Niehorster wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 4:26 PM Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> >
> > If you know of any major issues which need to be done before the release do
> > them
> > now. If you know of any issues which are releas
On 12/14/2021 5:44 AM, Marton Balint wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Marton Balint (2021-12-13 22:30:25)
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, at 16:25, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
If you know of any major issues which need to be
Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, at 16:25, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> previous unused suggestions where:
>> Von Neumann, Lorentz, Poincaré, Desitter, De Broglie, Gauss,
>> Galois, Viterbi, Darwin
>
>I'd love a "Lorentz" release :)
+1
"Bayer", the inventor of a filter mosaic ..
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Marton Balint (2021-12-13 22:30:25)
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, at 16:25, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
If you know of any major issues which need to be done before the release do them
now. If you kn
Quoting Marton Balint (2021-12-13 22:30:25)
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, at 16:25, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> If you know of any major issues which need to be done before the release
> >> do them
> >> now. If you know of any issues which
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 8:48 PM Anton Khirnov wrote:
>
> > - The request to wait for a new string handling API to land and be used
> > for the relevant functions in this set. This has not seen opposition
> > from anyone yet, but it's not very feasible if said new API is not yet
> > in a state beyo
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, at 16:25, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
If you know of any major issues which need to be done before the release do them
now. If you know of any issues which are release-blocking list them in a reply
here please.
Maybe the a
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 4:26 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
>
> If you know of any major issues which need to be done before the release do
> them
> now. If you know of any issues which are release-blocking list them in a reply
> here please.
Not major, but
https://ffmpeg.org/piperm
James Almer (12021-12-13):
> I wholly agree. Hence me suggesting using AVBPrint in the meantime. It
> certainly beats a uint8_t* + size_t combination, and it's trivial to do.
There are a few misunderstanding here.
For the per-channel label, I insist on at least a string, but a plain C
string, eve
Lynne (12021-12-13):
> Consensus was reached. A 16-bit opaque identifier, which users can
> simply use as an index into their own frame opaque structure, if they
> want, and a 16-bit channel identifier, which would result in a 32-bit
> structure, which is pretty acceptable.
No, consensus was not r
Quoting James Almer (2021-12-13 21:05:30)
>
>
> On 12/13/2021 5:01 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > Quoting James Almer (2021-12-13 20:51:05)
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/13/2021 4:47 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> >>> Quoting James Almer (2021-12-13 20:04:34)
>
>
> On 12/13/2021 3:05 PM, Jean-Bap
On 12/13/2021 5:01 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting James Almer (2021-12-13 20:51:05)
On 12/13/2021 4:47 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting James Almer (2021-12-13 20:04:34)
On 12/13/2021 3:05 PM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, at 16:25, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
If yo
Quoting James Almer (2021-12-13 20:51:05)
>
>
> On 12/13/2021 4:47 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > Quoting James Almer (2021-12-13 20:04:34)
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/13/2021 3:05 PM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, at 16:25, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> If you know of any majo
On 12/13/2021 4:47 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting James Almer (2021-12-13 20:04:34)
On 12/13/2021 3:05 PM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, at 16:25, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
If you know of any major issues which need to be done before the release do them
now. If you kn
Quoting James Almer (2021-12-13 20:04:34)
>
>
> On 12/13/2021 3:05 PM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, at 16:25, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> If you know of any major issues which need to be done before the release
> >> do them
> >> now. If you know of any issues which are
13 Dec 2021, 20:04 by jamr...@gmail.com:
>
>
> On 12/13/2021 3:05 PM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, at 16:25, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>
>>> If you know of any major issues which need to be done before the release do
>>> them
>>> now. If you know of any issues which are
On 12/13/2021 3:05 PM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, at 16:25, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
If you know of any major issues which need to be done before the release do them
now. If you know of any issues which are release-blocking list them in a reply
here please.
Maybe the
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, at 16:25, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> If you know of any major issues which need to be done before the release do
> them
> now. If you know of any issues which are release-blocking list them in a reply
> here please.
Maybe the audio channel layout would be nice to settle bef
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, at 16:25, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> previous unused suggestions where:
> Von Neumann, Lorentz, Poincaré, Desitter, De Broglie, Gauss, Galois,
> Viterbi, Darwin
I'd love a "Lorentz" release :)
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 06:19:32PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> just wanted to remind everyone of the plan (suggested by jb) to make the
> 5.0 release in december
> i dont know if that will work out but please avoid introducing
> risky changes until the release branch splits off
54 matches
Mail list logo
