On 3/1/22 01:09, James Almer wrote:
Reverting something in the release branch is already going to be dirty
no matter what, because we do a minor bump to ensure the release has its
own soname. Right now that'd mean 5.0 will be lavf 59.13, while lacking
a demuxer available in lavf 59.12
Depends on what you mean by "lacking a demuxer"... One (hacky) option would
be to replace it with a stub implementation that always fails.
Or tag it as experimental.
That's much better. If we're not willing to wait, then I suggest we do this.
Also, unless ossfuzz compiles with libxml2 enabled, we're not going to see any
kind of fuzzing for imf from it.
I just checked - it doesn't. I'm adding it and will send a PR.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
