2 Jan 2022, 16:52 by z...@zanevaniperen.com: > > > On 3/1/22 01:09, James Almer wrote: > >>>> Reverting something in the release branch is already going to be dirty >>>> no matter what, because we do a minor bump to ensure the release has its >>>> own soname. Right now that'd mean 5.0 will be lavf 59.13, while lacking >>>> a demuxer available in lavf 59.12 >>>> >>> >>> Depends on what you mean by "lacking a demuxer"... One (hacky) option would >>> be to replace it with a stub implementation that always fails. >>> >> >> Or tag it as experimental. >> > > That's much better. If we're not willing to wait, then I suggest we do this. >
I'd rather have it reverted in master, branch 5.0, and add it back and bump minor again. I'm not willing to wait for a month to get fuzzing, the release is way overdue as-is. We generally don't put experimental on decoders or demuxers. >> Also, unless ossfuzz compiles with libxml2 enabled, we're not going to see >> any kind of fuzzing for imf from it. >> > > I just checked - it doesn't. I'm adding it and will send a PR. > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
