On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 11:29:18PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 07:12:54PM +0100, Lynne wrote: > > 2 Jan 2022, 18:11 by mich...@niedermayer.cc: > > > > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 05:28:24PM +0100, Lynne wrote: > > > > > >> 2 Jan 2022, 16:52 by z...@zanevaniperen.com: > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On 3/1/22 01:09, James Almer wrote: > > >> > > > >> >>>> Reverting something in the release branch is already going to be > > >> >>>> dirty > > >> >>>> no matter what, because we do a minor bump to ensure the release > > >> >>>> has its > > >> >>>> own soname. Right now that'd mean 5.0 will be lavf 59.13, while > > >> >>>> lacking > > >> >>>> a demuxer available in lavf 59.12 > > >> >>>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Depends on what you mean by "lacking a demuxer"... One (hacky) > > >> >>> option would > > >> >>> be to replace it with a stub implementation that always fails. > > >> >>> > > >> >> > > >> >> Or tag it as experimental. > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > That's much better. If we're not willing to wait, then I suggest we do > > >> > this. > > >> > > > >> > > >> I'd rather have it reverted in master, branch 5.0, and add it back and > > >> bump minor > > >> again. I'm not willing to wait for a month to get fuzzing, the release > > >> is way > > >> overdue as-is. We generally don't put experimental on decoders or > > >> demuxers. > > >> > > > > > > I think if we dont want it in the release either as you suggest > > > revert in master or mark as experimental in master before the branch > > > > > > having special cases in the release branch feels a bit iffy > > > > > > > Okay, I can live with an experimental flag on it for the time being. > > Ok, please add that experimental flag then
disregard that, just saw antons patch thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Republics decline into democracies and democracies degenerate into despotisms. -- Aristotle
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
