3.34.3 (by Flathub.org) Mint Cinnamon 19.3
When I try to print an email I get the following options
Print to file
Print to LPR
My printer is not shown which is an HP OfficejetPro 8600
In Firefox and other apps my printer is shown and works fine except for
scanning
Any ideas?
I'm a new Linux user
install the supported version whilst leaving the Flatpack one
intact? I'm guessing this option may cause a lot of issues.
Thanks
On Sun, 2020-02-16 at 17:53 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-02-16 at 16:45 +, Paul wrote:
> > 3.34.3 (by Flathub.org)
On Sun, 2020-02-16 at 22:43 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-02-16 at 21:49 +0000, Paul wrote:
> > Thank you for your reply, I chose flatpack as I had read it would
> > be
> > the most up to-date version.
> > Am I right in thinking that I just
Coming from Windows Live Mail one feature I miss a lot is the ability
to see the inboxes of all my accounts as one. Win Live Mail gives the
usual choice of viewing individual accounts or 'See all' which lists
all emails in all accounts as one big list which I view by date. Is
there anyway that Evo
Earlier topic Andrea Vai advised using Google.
IF contacts re-appearing are Google/Yahoo contacts, believe may now need
log into Google/Yahoo to edit/remove contact details.
Paul.
On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 10:01 +0200, Andrea Vai wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 28/08/2015 alle 09.42 +0200, Dario Le
Some spam contains images that I cant block. I assume its javascript.
I'm getting increasingly concerned about these image confirming my
email address to spammers.
Occasionally I receive such messages and know they are spam before I
open them. I would like to delete these messages without opening
like to know if there is a design
enforced here so I can trust my filters in the future.
Kind regards
Paul
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman
I have a number of users running evolution on the same machine. However
one user always has evolution set to 'offline' on opening. The others
open with the 'online' flag set. How can I change this?
Regards
Paul
___
Evolution-list ma
Perhaps I should have explained more carefully. The machine which has
evolution running is a desktop (running Debian) which talks to a server
(with a POP server) on a home network. What puzzles me is that most
users, on the same machine, open Evolution online, but only one opens
offline.
Paul
On
Hi
Since my upgrade my emails are not marked as read any more when I read
them
What can I do to rectify this
Paul
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
On Fri, 2022-10-28 at 11:05 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
wrote:
> IMO we should wait for the "official unofficial" new mailing list. If
> the time until the end of life of this list on gnome.org shouldn't be
> enough time, to get the new "official unofficial" mailing list, we
> probably s
On Wed, 2022-11-02 at 16:18 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I think that should be possible here as well, no?
>
> Not sure how that works. Was that email addressed directly to you, or
> was it a general post to the list?
I am also on the network-manager list.
What happened was that someone
On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 06:07 +, Mike wrote:
> I purged evolution from the PC, deleted the .config/evolution
> folders, deleted the trash, rebooted, reinstalled at 12:36 and ran it
> at 12:37. I did not import the backup file, so that isn't the
> problem.
>
> None of these errors are in the VM i
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 15:15 -0600, Tim McConnell wrote:
> Your problem with using the flathub version is because the Flatpack
> doesn't honor the dependencies of the distribution.
I'm not sure I understand this comment. The whole point of flatpak
(and snap) is that it's not _supposed_ to need to
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 16:17 -0600, Tim McConnell via evolution-list
wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 16:34 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> > I'm not sure I understand this comment. The whole point of flatpak
> > (and snap) is that it's not _supposed_ to need to worry about th
On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 09:33 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> I know this is getting way of topic, but this is primarily why I shy
> away from Flatpak. You download a blob of "stuff" and you have no
> real idea what is in that - it could be some ancient bug-ridden
> library that the dev has decided to use
On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 17:07 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> the only tricky part is to run it in the flatpak sandbox. It's easy
> once you know how to do it:
>
> $ flatpak run --command=sh org.gnome.Evolution
Yes, I am familiar with this since I used it to help you debug the
issue
It's clear that no one has any actual pros/cons that they want to
discuss in a serious way. So, this is my last message on this topic.
I simply urge people to not take these "it's horrible" statements,
without any reference to actual problems that anyone has ever had in
real life and very little
On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 09:19 -0600, Anonymous Japhering via evolution-
list wrote:
> The 3.46.x flatpak series has been a total disaster for me.
> Mysterious segfaults after 15 or so actions.
This is (probably) due to the bug in libsoup, which has been fixed but
that fix has not made it to the rele
On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 20:09 +0100, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
wrote:
> it was pointed out several times that Evolution downgrades are
> sometimes a problem regarding the user data/settings. Downgrades of
> any software can suffer from this issues.
Of course. I didn't mean to suggest that som
On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 15:08 -0600, Tim McConnell via evolution-list
wrote:
> I'm on Evolution version 3.46.1-1 & Libsoup version 3.74.3-
> 1(testing).
I don't think there's any such thing as libsoup 3.74.3. The most
recent libsoup released is 3.2.2.
Did you mean *2*.74.3?
___
I'm using flatpak Evolution 3.46.1 on Ubuntu 20.04 and I'm seeing
something extremely odd in the calendar, on the "Work Week" display.
Today is Wednesday Nov 16th at 1:45pm. If I use "Day" view and select
today (via the "Select Today" button) then it shows correctly: I get
the correct day, the re
On Wed, 2022-11-16 at 19:58 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> it's this one:
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/-/issues/2097
Oh yes, so it is. Thanks Milan!
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your lis
On Wed, 2022-11-16 at 13:52 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> And finally, the midnight date is not tomorrow (17th) but rather
> Tuesday (15th)... maybe because the first day shown in my work week
> is Monday (14th)? Seems like an odd choice.
Did that fix address this bit too? Or i
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 08:49 +0200, Gary Curtin wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-08-19 at 22:59 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > Gary, perhaps it just happened by accident, when you trimmed the
> > quote, but the quote is not marked as a quote.
> >
> > This happens regularly with Evolution when changing from HT
On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 17:16 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> It all depends on your distro. LTS or Enterprise versions tend not
> to majorly update things for stability. But whereas most such distros
> are happy to update minor versions because they are usually bug
> fixes, Ubuntu, for some reason, seem
On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 12:33 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> All that being said, there is currently an upgrade to Evolution 3.28.5
> in the Ubuntu 18.04 "proposed" repo.
FYI as of this morning Evolution 3.28.5 hit the "bionic-updates"
repository in Ubuntu 18.04 so everyone o
On Sat, 2019-07-20 at 13:00 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-07-20 at 01:25 +0100, James Freer via evolution-list
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-07-19 at 13:24 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> >
> > > this is a list for Evolution development.
> >
>
On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 16:52 +0100, Thomas Prost wrote:
> The question that might annoy you: Which distro usually comes with
> the latest evolution version at the moment ?
I think Fedora usually has the most up-to-date versions of Gnome and
Evolution, the most quickly after they are released.
Foll
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 09:16 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous via evolution-
list wrote:
> {
> "name": "bogofilter",
> "buildsystem": "simple",
> "build-commands": [
> "cd ./bogofilter/ && echo \"# Skip for Flatpak
> build\" > doc/Makefile.am &&
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 16:41 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 09:16 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous via
> evolution-list wrote:
>
> > My apologies for assuming [...] the Evolution dev team had followed
> > the rest of the software development world in moving away th
viour by obvious means of
configuration.
Any advice would be appreciated, thank you all!
Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or uns
AGS.SILENT (\DELETED)'
I can find the copied mail in the Deleted Items folder but, as you
presumed, it is still there in my inbox (after refresh).
Is there a way to find out what is issuing this copy action (Currently
I'm filtering the debug output of Evolution with grep -E --line-
buff
. Turning off the
real Trash is not what I intend to do on the long run. I like my real
trash. :) Maybe I'll have to mention, that I'm cooming from Thunderbird
and use this configuration with the real trash folder there (out of the
box) and it's working pretty fine when it comes to
uffered
'EXPUNGE|COPY|MOVE|DELETE'
to filter the otherwise quite verbose log to see what is happening. Any
additional information which I could possibly filter is very welcome.
Thank you!
Am Freitag, den 30.10.2020, 12:36 +0100 schrieb Milan Crha via
evolution-list:
> On Fri, 2020-10-30
:A] I/O: 'A00224 OK [COPYUID 957418 9786 11329] COPY completed.'
[imapx:A] I/O: '* 1171 FETCH (UID 11329 FLAGS (\Seen \Recent))'
* 1171 FETCH (UID 11329 FLAGS (\Seen \Recent))
From these logs, can you tell what issued the COPY of 11322 and why I
don't see it in my INBOX
7;s regular log does not
show any errors or warnings.
Thanks for any advice!
Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscr
Has anyone else noticed that accessing gmail via imapx from Evolution
has gotten extremely slow a number of times over the last week or so?
Sometimes it's fine, then it will be unbearable for a few hours (or
more), then it seems fine again.
Probably it doesn't matter but FYI, I'm using Ubuntu 20.0
On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 22:11 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Click on Folder->Subscriptions and uncheck the Sent folder. You may
> also want to disable that folder in Gmail's IMAP settings.
I thought about that but then I'd have to resubscribe it by hand to use
it. I do actually use my Sent fo
On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 22:58 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Do you have IMAPX enabled for the account?
Yes, it's an "imapx" account type and I have Quick Resync enabled (I
don't know of gmail supports it though) and also "listen for server
change notifications" is checked.
I have "Check for n
So, I'm using Ubuntu 20.04 but to get a newer version of Evolution I'm
using flatpak. Just yesterday I installed the latest flatpak for
Evolution 3.44 and now I'm seeing something odd: I use dark mode on my
system and when HTML messages are shown in the message preview, the
background is dark but
On Wed, 2022-03-30 at 10:06 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> So, I'm using Ubuntu 20.04 but to get a newer version of Evolution
> I'm using flatpak. Just yesterday I installed the latest flatpak for
> Evolution 3.44 and now I'm seeing something odd:
Hm. I might have to drop bac
On Wed, 2022-03-30 at 16:52 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-03-30 at 10:06 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > So, I'm using Ubuntu 20.04 but to get a newer version of Evolution
> > I'm using flatpak. Just yesterday I installed the latest flatpak
> > for Ev
I don't have any hope that anyone can actually make something useful
from this report, but here goes anyway:
I'm on Ubuntu 20.04 but I'm using the Evolution 3.44.1 flatpak to get a
modern version. I've been using this for a number of months without
problems, including sending other email to this
On Tue, 2022-06-07 at 18:21 +0100, Steve Percival wrote:
> I am currently running Evolution from my Distro's(Ubuntu) Repo but
> want to start using the flatpak version. Is there any documentation
> on migrating from a 'native' version to flatpak?
>
> I am especially interested in how to migrate th
Yesterday I updated my flatpak to Evolution 3.46.0 (from Evolution
3.44.x) and I'm having something of a hard time adjusting. I'm running
it on Ubuntu 20.04 which has native Gnome 3.36.8.
The biggest issue is that this version of Evolution has crashed twice
on me, so far in two days. I was runni
On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 08:26 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> Some info on the debugging of the Flatpak apps is here:
> https://docs.flatpak.org/en/latest/debugging.html
Thanks for that info. I started evolution in the background inside a
flatpak --devel container, then attached to it
On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 10:17 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 08:26 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list
> wrote:
> > Some info on the debugging of the Flatpak apps is here:
> > https://docs.flatpak.org/en/latest/debugging.html
>
> Hopefully the next time
On Fri, 2022-10-07 at 15:27 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> I just installed org.gnome.Sdk.Debug flatpak, maybe that has the
> right stuff in it?
I suspect that was it because when I attached to Evolution via GDB this
time, it took about 3 minutes to load all the stuff and get me to a
(gdb)
On Mon, 2022-10-10 at 09:46 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> Do you have enabled sender's photos, or RSS, or remote content
> loading, or... I do not know off head what all can call libsoup in
> the evolution process while viewing messages, I'm sorry.
Remote content loading is set to
Hi all;
Every so often I notice that there is a huge amount of network traffic
to/from my system, it can last for quite a while (hour+)
I started up nethogs and I can see that the traffic is between
Evolution and the Exchange server on my system, via port 443 (HTTPS) of
course. I mean, things li
On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 19:17 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> That announcement email seems to have been automatically tagged as
> "important" on my systems (Evo 3.44.4). I've noticed it happening
> before but largely ignored it. What is doing it? Is it a general
> "feature" of something in Evolution or
On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 19:29 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> I had assumed it would be something like that. But what is the header
> that controls it
I believe that checkbox adds this email header:
Importance: high
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-
On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 21:26 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
wrote:
> As long as nobody succeeded, there is nobody who can help other to
> replicate success. It's at least my {,mis}understanding that nobody
> succeeded.
I overwhelmed by all the email about this topic and just deleted it
all.
On Sat, 2022-10-22 at 13:42 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I seem to be getting them now. Trouble is, I'm also getting stuff
> that has absolutely nothing to do with Evolution, despite having set
> a tag (or whatever it's called) to "Evolution".
If you set "Mailing list mode" in your Discours
On Sat, 2022-10-22 at 13:55 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> So the way to get it working as a proper mailing list is by turning
> off Mailing List Mode. So intuitive.
Agreed it's really poorly named. I think the idea is that if you
enable it then it's as if the entire Discourse site becomes o
On Mon, 2022-10-24 at 00:51 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> For those who are interested, see
> https://groups.io/g/evolution-users
>
> It is now, up to you to decide what you want to do.
I have no problems with people signing up to whatever they want, of
course, but I have to say that I'm on one or t
ps aux | grep evolution # get process ID
$ gdb --pid thepid
(gdb) set logging on /tmp/20141115--evolution--backtrace.txt
(gdb) t a a bt full
(gdb) exit
Make sure the log does not contain your passwords (it shouldn’t, but
better be safe than sorry) and paste that to t
FYI,
my system: openSUSE 13.2 (Harlequin) (x86_64)
shows:
Repository: Main Repository (OSS)
Name: evolution
Version: 3.12.7-1.1
Arch: x86_64
Vendor: openSUSE
Paul.
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list
Dear Evolution folks,
with Debian Sid/unstable and Evolution 3.12.9~git20141130.241663-1 using
the sign – in the subject line, it is incorrectly shown in the message
list, but correctly shown in the message view. Let’s see if you can
reproduce this.
Thanks,
Paul
signature.asc
Description
Am Sonntag, den 21.12.2014, 13:40 +0100 schrieb Andre Klapper:
> On Sun, 2014-12-21 at 12:55 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > with Debian Sid/unstable and Evolution 3.12.9~git20141130.241663-1 using
> > the sign – in the subject line, it is incorrectly shown in the message
> >
aces attached to the bug reported in the GNOME
Bugzilla [1].
Thanks,
Paul
PS: I have not submitted a bug report to the Debian BTS yet, as I do not
know if it is a bug in Evolution or SQLite 3 and I want to avoid a false
assignment as done by myself in [3].
[1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_
Am Montag, den 29.12.2014, 16:37 +0100 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS):
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > using Debian Sid/unstable and upgrading from libsqlite3-0 3.8.7.2 to
> > 3.8.7.4, Evolution 3.12.9 started to crash with a bus error [1].
>
> Ju
tion `/var`.
I’ll rebuild SQLite now with the fix applied [2] and try to reproduce
the issue by filling up `/var` intentionally.
Thank you for the awesome support so far!
Thanks,
Paul
[1] https://packages.debian.org/corekeeper
[2] https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/776648412c30dce206f1024ff849c2
Am Dienstag, den 30.12.2014, 16:15 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Am Dienstag, den 30.12.2014, 08:21 -0500 schrieb Richard Hipp:
> > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 10:37 AM, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>
> > > > it’s not obvious that these might cause such a regression.
> &
Am Freitag, den 09.01.2015, 21:04 -0500 schrieb Richard Hipp:
> On 1/9/15, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 30.12.2014, 16:15 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> >
> > With still around 1.3 GB free on the partition mounted to `/var/`,
> > Evolution crashed with t
Hi all. I'm trying to push to get some kind of resolution to the
"bogofilter problem" put into Ubuntu 15.04, if possible. I'm using
Ubuntu GNOME as my distro for now and the only real issue I have is that
Evo's bogofilter plugin is not supported:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evoluti
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 17:36 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> I would revert part, or whole, commit [1]. If I read it properly, then
> the only reason is to get the bogofilter path during configure,
> instead of having it hard-coded.
>https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution/commit/?id=b46da7735a5f58c3
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 13:11 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 17:36 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> > I would revert part, or whole, commit [1]. If I read it properly, then
> > the only reason is to get the bogofilter path during configure,
> > instead of
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 14:28 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> Actually, looking at this more it seems like you can set the
> BOGOFILTER environment variable to any value and it's used verbatim
> without checking if it exists.
I did create the patch below while looking at things... it allo
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 17:36 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> I would revert part, or whole, commit [1]. If I read it properly, then
> the only reason is to get the bogofilter path during configure,
> instead of having it hard-coded.
Well, life is never simple. It looks like after the change you pointe
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 08:15 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> I agree with you, I'm also not aware of the reason why the change in
> plugins was done, the requirement of having it installed during build
> time looks odd to me too. The only similarity I might see there is the
> rpath (or what's that call
Dear Evolution folks,
running Evolution under the Valgrind [1] generates a lot of messages,
where some of them are false positives or expected and therefore could
be omitted using a suppressions file.
Could you please share the ones you use?
Thanks,
Paul
[1] https://wiki.gnome.org
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 08:15 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> Please file a bug report against evolution to (partially) revert the
> two commits, and name them, plus attach your patch there as well.
Milan! You rock! I was laid up in the hospital for a few days and I
get out and find BOTH
https://bugz
On Sun, 2015-02-22 at 15:17 +0100, Jörg Jenetzky wrote:
> Anyway, that's the newest out of the Ubuntu repositories.
The newest _for your release of Mint_ (you don't say which release
you're using, but it seems pretty old). If you update to a newer
version of Mint, you'll get a newer version of Ev
On Sun, 2015-02-22 at 20:12 +0100, Jörg Jenetzky wrote:
> am 22.02.2015 um 19:26 schrieb Paul Smith:
> > On Sun, 2015-02-22 at 15:17 +0100, Jörg Jenetzky wrote:
> >> Anyway, that's the newest out of the Ubuntu repositories.
> >
> > The newest _for your re
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 12:32 +, jug...@ekit.com wrote:
> I am using evolution 3.10.04 on 64-bit Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS and MATE 1.8.1.
>
> Spam filtering has never worked since I upgraded to 14.04. I now see
> that the options to install either Bogofilter or Spam-Assassin are
> missing from the pl
On Sat, 2015-03-07 at 16:23 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> jug...@ekit.com wrote:
> > I am at a loss to understand why Evolution - which has worked pretty
> > much perfectly ever since I moved over to Ubuntu nearly a decade ago -
> > should suddenly start falling over. Has the age-old engineering maxi
0 Mar 9
> 11:47 /var/spool/mail/jonrysh
>
> Anyone know what's going on or how to fix?
Very strange. Hopefully somebody else can help.
Thanks,
Paul
PS: It’d be awesome, if you would just send plain text messages to
mailing list with no HTML p
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 14:22 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> But again, it's common sense on most lists
It's not "common sense", in any way. Someone who's never used mailing
lists before will not just inherently understand this without needing
instruction.
Rather, it's a learned behavior that is obt
Hi all. This has bugged me for years but never enough to complain about
it (until now, I guess :)). I wonder if it's just me, or just my setup,
or what. I'm currently using Evolution 3.12.10 but I've seen this for a
number of releases (maybe always?)
I order my folders by Received (Ascending) s
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 11:31 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> It's never been completely clear to me what these ordering really mean
> when combined with threading.
I'm not so worried about the order in which different threads are
displayed. But within a single thread it seems to me that whatev
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 16:56 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I don't have a custom sort order, and I also see the saner behaviour
> you describe, Patrick. If I delete a message, focus moves to the next
> message below it in the display. Not the next newer message in the
> mailbix which may be els
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 07:52 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> it uses the tree, basically what you see in UI, positioning based on
> the selected row index. There is some influence of collapsed threads,
> usually above the selected message. I recall a bug with a race
> condition on the positioning, two
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 10:20 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> The most recent version of this thread from a couple of weeks ago
> starts
> here:
>
> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2015-March/msg00032.html
Just a note, Iain submitted a patch this week for this for the next
Ubuntu 15.04 re
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 07:50 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> I'll follow up if/when I get any fresh detail.
Aha! Interesting! I just got it to happen again and noticed something
important. I had a thread like this:
--> Joe v help with thisToday 00:57
Bob hel
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 15:18 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > In the above situation, I use C-d to delete the current message. I
> > thought the problem was that the cursor then skipped the next message
> > but what happens is more subtle than that: the cursor does correctly go
> > to the next message
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 10:04 -0700, Tim Wescott wrote:
> Paul: I'm not sure how much influence you have, but I'm (a) very much
> interested in seeing this fix applied to 14.04, and (b) using 14.04
> specifically because it's an LTS version and not just to be a jerk: I
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 12:39 -0700, Tim Wescott wrote:
> Paul, I can no longer even figure out how to navigate to a spot to
> report a bug in the new Ubuntu site.
>
> Can you post a link to the bug listing? I'll get to find out if my
> login still works, and I can squeak in ha
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 18:28 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> Finally, there are some pages out there giving you hints on how to
> build Evo from source. Paul Smith has a page here
>
> http://mad-scientist.net/welcome-to-the-lab/gnome-evolution-from-source/
>
> but I think it hasn&#x
On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 13:36 -0400, a.gnome wrote:
> Is there a best-guess release date for Evolution 3.16?
It was released last week; I guess Milan forgot to CC this list:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-hackers/2015-March/msg1.html
> Hello,
> this is just a notice that evo
Dear coreboot folk,
with Debian Sid/unstable, self-built Evolution and Evolution Data Server
3.12.10 still crashes regularly. Instead of using Valgrind, which is too
slow, could you please tell me, how I can build Evolution with
`-fsanitize=address` [1]?
Thanks,
Paul
[1] https
Am Freitag, den 01.05.2015, 21:37 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Dear coreboot folk,
>
>
> with Debian Sid/unstable, self-built Evolution and Evolution Data Server
> 3.12.10 still crashes regularly. Instead of using Valgrind, which is too
> slow, could you please tell me, how I c
anks for any assistance.
Could you try a live system with a newer Evolution version and see if
it’s fixed there, please?
Thanks,
Paul
PS: Please just send plain text messages with no HTML part to mailing
lists. Thank you!
[1] https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Evolution/Debugging#CalDAV
signatu
Dear Evolution folks,
is running Evolution 3.16 with GNOME 3.14 supported, that means tested
by someone? Will all futures work?
I am thinking about if it’s feasible to put Evolution 3.16 in Debian
Backports [1] for Debian 8 (Jessie), which has GNOME 3.14 packaged.
Thanks,
Paul
[1] http
Dear Joakim,
Thank you for your quick response.
Am Samstag, den 02.05.2015, 11:58 + schrieb Joakim Tjernlund:
> You need to set LDFLAGS too
Unfortunately it still fails to build when passing
`LDFLAGS='-fsanitize=address'`.
Thanks,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: This i
I'm using Evolution 3.12.11 (on Ubuntu GNOME 15.04). I used Gnome's
Online Accounts to add two different GMail accounts plus a traditional
IMAP account at my ISP. All are using IMAPX types in Evo.
Up until today, all was fine. However, suddenly most of my previous
email in the two gmail account
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 08:16 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> the only left option I can think of is that the missing messages are
> marked either as Junk or as Deleted. These messages are not shown in
> regular folders.
>
> You can View->Show Deleted Messages, but the Junk messages are shown
> in the Ju
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 16:31 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> You might want to turn off junk processing for Gmail accounts.
I checked and it's off. It could be that when I first started Evolution
it was on and it munged all my email (I created the accounts first using
Gnome's online account ma
Dear Tom,
Am Dienstag, den 05.05.2015, 15:40 +0200 schrieb Tom:
> Am Dienstag, den 05.05.2015, 07:51 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> > is running Evolution 3.16 with GNOME 3.14 supported, that means tested
> > by someone? Will all futures work?
> >
> > I am thinking ab
1 - 100 of 742 matches
Mail list logo
