Re: [Evolution] Evo 3.46: work week calendar display wrong?

2022-11-16 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2022-11-16 at 13:52 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > And finally, the midnight date is not tomorrow (17th) but rather > Tuesday (15th)... maybe because the first day shown in my work week > is Monday (14th)?  Seems like an odd choice. Did that fix address this bit too? Or i

Re: [Evolution] Evo 3.46: work week calendar display wrong?

2022-11-16 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2022-11-16 at 19:58 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > it's this one: > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/-/issues/2097 Oh yes, so it is. Thanks Milan! ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your lis

[Evolution] Evo 3.46: work week calendar display wrong?

2022-11-16 Thread Paul Smith
I'm using flatpak Evolution 3.46.1 on Ubuntu 20.04 and I'm seeing something extremely odd in the calendar, on the "Work Week" display. Today is Wednesday Nov 16th at 1:45pm. If I use "Day" view and select today (via the "Select Today" button) then it shows correctly: I get the correct day, the re

Re: [Evolution] Evolution segfault

2022-11-15 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 15:08 -0600, Tim McConnell via evolution-list wrote: > I'm on Evolution version 3.46.1-1 & Libsoup version 3.74.3- > 1(testing). I don't think there's any such thing as libsoup 3.74.3. The most recent libsoup released is 3.2.2. Did you mean *2*.74.3? ___

Re: [Evolution] Have I pushed Evolution beyond where it is designed to go?

2022-11-14 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 20:09 +0100, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list wrote: > it was pointed out several times that Evolution downgrades are > sometimes a problem regarding the user data/settings. Downgrades of > any software can suffer from this issues. Of course. I didn't mean to suggest that som

Re: [Evolution] Have I pushed Evolution beyond where it is designed to go?

2022-11-14 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 09:19 -0600, Anonymous Japhering via evolution- list wrote: > The 3.46.x flatpak series has been a total disaster for me. > Mysterious segfaults after 15 or so actions. This is (probably) due to the bug in libsoup, which has been fixed but that fix has not made it to the rele

Re: [Evolution] Have I pushed Evolution beyond where it is designed to go?

2022-11-08 Thread Paul Smith
It's clear that no one has any actual pros/cons that they want to discuss in a serious way. So, this is my last message on this topic. I simply urge people to not take these "it's horrible" statements, without any reference to actual problems that anyone has ever had in real life and very little

Re: [Evolution] Have I pushed Evolution beyond where it is designed to go?

2022-11-08 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 17:07 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > the only tricky part is to run it in the flatpak sandbox. It's easy > once you know how to do it: > >   $ flatpak run --command=sh org.gnome.Evolution Yes, I am familiar with this since I used it to help you debug the issue

Re: [Evolution] Have I pushed Evolution beyond where it is designed to go?

2022-11-08 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 09:33 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > I know this is getting way of topic, but this is primarily why I shy > away from Flatpak. You download a blob of "stuff" and you have no > real idea what is in that - it could be some ancient bug-ridden > library that the dev has decided to use

Re: [Evolution] Have I pushed Evolution beyond where it is designed to go?

2022-11-07 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 16:17 -0600, Tim McConnell via evolution-list wrote: > On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 16:34 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > > I'm not sure I understand this comment.  The whole point of flatpak > > (and snap) is that it's not _supposed_ to need to worry about th

Re: [Evolution] Have I pushed Evolution beyond where it is designed to go?

2022-11-07 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 15:15 -0600, Tim McConnell wrote: > Your problem with using the flathub version is because the Flatpack > doesn't honor the dependencies of the distribution. I'm not sure I understand this comment. The whole point of flatpak (and snap) is that it's not _supposed_ to need to

Re: [Evolution] Have I pushed Evolution beyond where it is designed to go?

2022-11-06 Thread Paul Smith
On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 06:07 +, Mike wrote: > I purged evolution from the PC, deleted the .config/evolution > folders, deleted the trash, rebooted, reinstalled at 12:36 and ran it > at 12:37. I did not import the backup file, so that isn't the > problem. > > None of these errors are in the VM i

Re: [Evolution] What do I do now? V2

2022-11-02 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2022-11-02 at 16:18 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I think that should be possible here as well, no? > > Not sure how that works. Was that email addressed directly to you, or > was it a general post to the list? I am also on the network-manager list. What happened was that someone

Re: [Evolution] Another new mailing list

2022-10-28 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2022-10-28 at 11:05 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list wrote: > IMO we should wait for the "official unofficial" new mailing list. If > the time until the end of life of this list on gnome.org shouldn't be > enough time, to get the new "official unofficial" mailing list, we > probably s

Re: [Evolution] New mailing list

2022-10-23 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2022-10-24 at 00:51 +0800, Bret Busby wrote: > For those who are interested, see > https://groups.io/g/evolution-users > > It is now, up to you to decide what you want to do. I have no problems with people signing up to whatever they want, of course, but I have to say that I'm on one or t

Re: [Evolution] What do I do now?

2022-10-22 Thread Paul Smith
On Sat, 2022-10-22 at 13:55 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > So the way to get it working as a proper mailing list is by turning > off Mailing List Mode. So intuitive. Agreed it's really poorly named. I think the idea is that if you enable it then it's as if the entire Discourse site becomes o

Re: [Evolution] What do I do now?

2022-10-22 Thread Paul Smith
On Sat, 2022-10-22 at 13:42 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > I seem to be getting them now. Trouble is, I'm also getting stuff > that has absolutely nothing to do with Evolution, despite having set > a tag (or whatever it's called) to "Evolution". If you set "Mailing list mode" in your Discours

Re: [Evolution] Oh for heavens sake ....

2022-10-21 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 21:26 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list wrote: > As long as nobody succeeded, there is nobody who can help other to > replicate success. It's at least my {,mis}understanding that nobody > succeeded. I overwhelmed by all the email about this topic and just deleted it all.

Re: [Evolution] Automatic tagging as "important"

2022-10-20 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 19:29 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > I had assumed it would be something like that. But what is the header > that controls it I believe that checkbox adds this email header: Importance: high ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-

Re: [Evolution] Automatic tagging as "important"

2022-10-20 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 19:17 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > That announcement email seems to have been automatically tagged as > "important" on my systems (Evo 3.44.4).  I've noticed it happening > before but largely ignored it.  What is doing it? Is it a general > "feature" of something in Evolution or

[Evolution] Evolution doing a lot of network traffic to/from Exchange

2022-10-12 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all; Every so often I notice that there is a huge amount of network traffic to/from my system, it can last for quite a while (hour+) I started up nethogs and I can see that the traffic is between Evolution and the Exchange server on my system, via port 443 (HTTPS) of course. I mean, things li

Re: [Evolution] Crashing Evolution 3.46.0 ?

2022-10-10 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2022-10-10 at 09:46 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > Do you have enabled sender's photos, or RSS, or remote content > loading, or... I do not know off head what all can call libsoup in > the evolution process while viewing messages, I'm sorry. Remote content loading is set to

Re: [Evolution] Crashing Evolution 3.46.0 ?

2022-10-07 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2022-10-07 at 15:27 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > I just installed org.gnome.Sdk.Debug flatpak, maybe that has the > right stuff in it? I suspect that was it because when I attached to Evolution via GDB this time, it took about 3 minutes to load all the stuff and get me to a (gdb)

Re: [Evolution] Crashing Evolution 3.46.0 ?

2022-10-07 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 10:17 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 08:26 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list > wrote: > > Some info on the debugging of the Flatpak apps is here: > > https://docs.flatpak.org/en/latest/debugging.html > > Hopefully the next time

Re: [Evolution] Crashing Evolution 3.46.0 ?

2022-10-06 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 08:26 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > Some info on the debugging of the Flatpak apps is here: > https://docs.flatpak.org/en/latest/debugging.html Thanks for that info. I started evolution in the background inside a flatpak --devel container, then attached to it

[Evolution] Crashing Evolution 3.46.0 ?

2022-10-05 Thread Paul Smith
Yesterday I updated my flatpak to Evolution 3.46.0 (from Evolution 3.44.x) and I'm having something of a hard time adjusting. I'm running it on Ubuntu 20.04 which has native Gnome 3.36.8. The biggest issue is that this version of Evolution has crashed twice on me, so far in two days. I was runni

Re: [Evolution] Flatpak Evolution Query

2022-06-07 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2022-06-07 at 18:21 +0100, Steve Percival wrote: > I am currently running Evolution from my Distro's(Ubuntu) Repo but > want to start using the flatpak version. Is there any documentation > on migrating from a 'native' version to flatpak? > > I am especially interested in how to migrate th

[Evolution] Bad bug in Evolution 3.44.1

2022-05-22 Thread Paul Smith
I don't have any hope that anyone can actually make something useful from this report, but here goes anyway: I'm on Ubuntu 20.04 but I'm using the Evolution 3.44.1 flatpak to get a modern version. I've been using this for a number of months without problems, including sending other email to this

Re: [Evolution] Foreground font color?

2022-03-30 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2022-03-30 at 16:52 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2022-03-30 at 10:06 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > > So, I'm using Ubuntu 20.04 but to get a newer version of Evolution > > I'm using flatpak.  Just yesterday I installed the latest flatpak > > for Ev

Re: [Evolution] Foreground font color?

2022-03-30 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2022-03-30 at 10:06 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > So, I'm using Ubuntu 20.04 but to get a newer version of Evolution > I'm using flatpak.  Just yesterday I installed the latest flatpak for > Evolution 3.44 and now I'm seeing something odd: Hm. I might have to drop bac

[Evolution] Foreground font color?

2022-03-30 Thread Paul Smith
So, I'm using Ubuntu 20.04 but to get a newer version of Evolution I'm using flatpak. Just yesterday I installed the latest flatpak for Evolution 3.44 and now I'm seeing something odd: I use dark mode on my system and when HTML messages are shown in the message preview, the background is dark but

Re: [Evolution] gmail imapx extremely slow?

2021-05-18 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 22:58 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Do you have IMAPX enabled for the account? Yes, it's an "imapx" account type and I have Quick Resync enabled (I don't know of gmail supports it though) and also "listen for server change notifications" is checked. I have "Check for n

Re: [Evolution] gmail imapx extremely slow?

2021-05-18 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 22:11 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Click on Folder->Subscriptions and uncheck the Sent folder. You may > also want to disable that folder in Gmail's IMAP settings. I thought about that but then I'd have to resubscribe it by hand to use it. I do actually use my Sent fo

[Evolution] gmail imapx extremely slow?

2021-05-18 Thread Paul Smith
Has anyone else noticed that accessing gmail via imapx from Evolution has gotten extremely slow a number of times over the last week or so? Sometimes it's fine, then it will be unbearable for a few hours (or more), then it seems fine again. Probably it doesn't matter but FYI, I'm using Ubuntu 20.0

Re: [Evolution] Evolution where did it move on git naming ?

2020-07-21 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 16:41 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list wrote: > On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 09:16 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous via > evolution-list wrote: > > > My apologies for assuming [...] the Evolution dev team had followed > > the rest of the software development world in moving away th

Re: [Evolution] Evolution where did it move on git naming ?

2020-07-21 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 09:16 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous via evolution- list wrote: > { > "name": "bogofilter", > "buildsystem": "simple", > "build-commands": [ > "cd ./bogofilter/ && echo \"# Skip for Flatpak > build\" > doc/Makefile.am &&

Re: [Evolution] Latest Evo version

2020-03-27 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 16:52 +0100, Thomas Prost wrote: > The question that might annoy you: Which distro usually comes with > the latest evolution version at the moment ? I think Fedora usually has the most up-to-date versions of Gnome and Evolution, the most quickly after they are released. Foll

Re: [Evolution] New user - please clarify Expunge

2019-07-20 Thread Paul Smith
On Sat, 2019-07-20 at 13:00 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2019-07-20 at 01:25 +0100, James Freer via evolution-list > wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-07-19 at 13:24 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > > > > > this is a list for Evolution development. > > >

Re: [Evolution] Evolution & Gmail not working correctly

2018-09-24 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 12:33 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > All that being said, there is currently an upgrade to Evolution 3.28.5 > in the Ubuntu 18.04 "proposed" repo. FYI as of this morning Evolution 3.28.5 hit the "bionic-updates" repository in Ubuntu 18.04 so everyone o

Re: [Evolution] Evolution & Gmail not working correctly

2018-09-07 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 17:16 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > It all depends on your distro. LTS or Enterprise versions tend not > to majorly update things for stability. But whereas most such distros > are happy to update minor versions because they are usually bug > fixes, Ubuntu, for some reason, seem

Re: [Evolution] Deleting Messages

2018-08-20 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 08:49 +0200, Gary Curtin wrote: > On Sun, 2018-08-19 at 22:59 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > Gary, perhaps it just happened by accident, when you trimmed the > > quote, but the quote is not marked as a quote. > > > > This happens regularly with Evolution when changing from HT

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.28.1: Incorrect quoting of text emails

2018-08-05 Thread Paul Smith
at 18:10 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > Hi all; I recently upgraded my system to Ubuntu 18.04 which provides > Evolution 3.28.1 (from Evolution 3.26). > > I've noticed an annoying issue: quoting of quoted messages is broken > when replying to plain text email in HTML mode. For examp

Re: [Evolution] Disable Digests? [was: evolution-list Digest, Vol 156, Issue 61]

2018-07-28 Thread Paul Smith
On Sat, 2018-07-28 at 07:01 -0400, Peter M Buck wrote: > > I like getting one post per day. This allows me to quickly scan the > > day's topics without being interrupted multiple times per day. I > > just signed up for the list last week (and asked for the digest). > > If the digest is eliminated,

Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared

2018-07-18 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 14:31 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 14:51 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 14:41 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 14:15 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > > > > That's already the case for a string entered in the "Search

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.28.1: Incorrect quoting of text emails

2018-07-03 Thread Paul Smith
d64 2.4.11-3ubuntu3 On Sun, 2018-06-17 at 18:10 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > Hi all; I recently upgraded my system to Ubuntu 18.04 which provides > Evolution 3.28.1 (from Evolution 3.26). > > I've noticed an annoying issue: quoting of quoted messages is broken > when replyi

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.28.1: Incorrect quoting of text emails

2018-06-19 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 15:17 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Sun, 2018-06-17 at 18:10 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > > Has anyone else run into this with Evolution 3.28? > > Which exact WebKitGTK version is used? I'm using these versions: $ dpkg -l \*webkit\* | grep ^i ii gir1

[Evolution] Evolution 3.28.1: Incorrect quoting of text emails

2018-06-17 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all; I recently upgraded my system to Ubuntu 18.04 which provides Evolution 3.28.1 (from Evolution 3.26). I've noticed an annoying issue: quoting of quoted messages is broken when replying to plain text email in HTML mode. For example if I receive a plain text email and it includes some quoted

Re: [Evolution] Compiling on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS?

2018-04-10 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 20:36 +0200, Bjørn T Johansen wrote: > An alternative is to just use a distro with better support for > > Evolution (e.g. Fedora), which also meets your VMware requirement. > > OTOH Ubuntu *may* improve general Gnome support in the future now > > that it has abandoned Unity.

Re: [Evolution] Some keys not enterable in search?

2018-01-01 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2018-01-01 at 15:36 -0500, andré via evolution-list wrote: > > > > Ubuntu seems to ship an ancient version. > > > > > > "Ancient version"? This release is less than three months old. > > > I wouldn't call that "ancient". > > > > Maybe "outdated" is a better word in English. > > This ex

Re: [Evolution] Some keys not enterable in search?

2017-12-31 Thread Paul Smith
Thanks for the pointer Andre. On Sun, 2017-12-31 at 21:14 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > > I'm using Ubuntu 17.10 / Evolution 3.26.1. > > Ubuntu seems to ship an ancient version. "Ancient version"? This release is less than three months old. I wouldn't call that "ancient". In the past Ubuntu h

[Evolution] Some keys not enterable in search?

2017-12-31 Thread Paul Smith
Here's something super-strange: I can't type the numbers 0-5 into the search bar (the one at the top of the vertical view showing both subjects and message preview) in Evolution!! Can anyone else see this? I can enter all the alphabetic and special characters that I tried, plus the numbers 6, 7, 8

[Evolution] Allow URLs in "Location" fields to be clickable

2017-11-12 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all; I filed https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=790263 requesting that URLs in Calendar Location fields be made clickable. These days more and more meetings are happening online and so Location fields very often have URLs in them; it's a pain to have to copy/paste them separately into a

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Reports Many Errors

2017-11-11 Thread Paul Smith
On Sat, 2017-11-11 at 16:47 -0800, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > Does anyone know what's going in? Is it anything to worry about? Is > there any obvious problem to be fixed? What version of Evolution are you using? What distribution of GNU/Linux? Is your mail server using a standard IMAP service o

Re: [Evolution] "You have Unsent Messages"

2017-11-03 Thread Paul Smith
Sorry, ignore me. Reading comprehension failure. On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 13:09 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 16:57 +, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote: > > Just re-enabled it and yes there were indeed three messages sitting > > in the Outboxnot sure why they

Re: [Evolution] "You have Unsent Messages"

2017-11-03 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 16:57 +, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote: > Just re-enabled it and yes there were indeed three messages sitting in > the Outboxnot sure why they were... Go to Edit -> Preferences and under Mail Accounts select the email account you're sending mail with and click "Edit".

Re: [Evolution] Bug 738247 - unwanted information disclosure in message headers

2017-10-10 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 19:10 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 19:56 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > > > I don't really want to comment on the bug) but would err on the > > > side of leaving things as they are - it just looks less spammy. > > > > Is 'err' a typo? I'm afraid I do

Re: [Evolution] Automatization Outlook Users migrations to Evolution

2017-09-25 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 07:55 -0500, Len Philpot wrote: > > the 3.18.5 is truly old. There had been added some > > autoconfiguration > > That's the version in the *buntu repositories, from what I've seen, > nothing newer. It's what I'm running now. Maybe you mentioned before what version of Ubuntu

Re: [Evolution] Subfolders under Inbox suddenly disappeared

2017-05-27 Thread Paul Smith
On Sat, 2017-05-27 at 10:17 -0400, Dr. John H. Lauterbach wrote: > RE: Evolution 3.20.5 running under Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit > > Between the time my secretary left the past Wednesday and when she > started work Friday noon (PC running all the time, APC UPS on incoming > power line) Evolution lost the

[Evolution] Evo 3.22.3: Inoperable horizontal scroll?

2016-12-22 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all.  I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 with the latest Evo 3.22.3 from the "Ubuntu Proposed". However, this problem happened with Evo 3.22.1 as well. I have an issue where sometimes in the Preview pane when the content of the message (html message) is too wide to fit in the pane I get a horizontal scrol

Re: [Evolution] Exchange Calendar Stopped Syncing since 3.22.3

2016-12-22 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 10:23 -0500, Benjamin Selzer wrote: > Updated to 3.22.3, and (I believe) since that update, my Exchange (EWS) > calendar no longer syncs. [...] > Nor will they show up in Gnome Calendar, nor in my Shell drop down top > bar calendar. So perhaps the problem is more widespread. I

Re: [Evolution] Gmail integration w. Evolution

2016-11-02 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2016-11-02 at 11:56 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-02 at 06:19 -0400, benjamin.sel...@gmail.com wrote: > > The most important folder in Gmail (namely ALL MAIL) is one of these > > stupid subs. As is SENT, which I often use. It's just annoying. No big > > deal though. >

Re: [Evolution] Gmail integration w. Evolution

2016-11-01 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 19:39 -0400, Benjamin Selzer wrote: > I understand. He doesn't want the Gmail folders as a SUB of Gmail. He > wants them on the same level as Inbox, etc. It's annoying they're in a > sub called Gmail. The only folders under [Gmail] are Gmail's special folders like Spam, Trash

Re: [Evolution] Gmail integration w. Evolution

2016-11-01 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 16:37 +0100, Bart Vliegen wrote: > Thunderbird has its own implementation > of Gmail-style IMAP. You can read about it here: > https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/thunderbird-and-gmail I may have lost some context, but my Evo GMail accounts look _exactly_ like the pictures o

[Evolution] Evo 3.22: Can't connect to Google calendars

2016-10-16 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all; I just updated to Ubuntu GNOME 16.10 yesterday, which contains Evolution 3.22.0. Things are working fine with Email, but none of my Google calendars work anymore either in gnome-calendar or in Evolution. Looking at error logs I get a ton of instances of these sorts of errors: Oct 16 08:5

Re: [Evolution] Message display width too large

2016-09-06 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 16:35 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > that's https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=739955 Thanks Milan.  I've not had a buildable version of Evo here for a number of years so currently I'm not able to try the patch, but I've added myself as a CC on the bug. __

Re: [Evolution] Message display width too large

2016-09-06 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 08:36 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > One thing that is annoying me supremely with Evo these days is how wide > the display of HTML messages is. Gak.  I'm using Evolution 3.20.5 on Ubuntu GNOME 16.04.1.  Sorry :-(. ___ evo

[Evolution] Message display width too large

2016-09-06 Thread Paul Smith
One thing that is annoying me supremely with Evo these days is how wide the display of HTML messages is.  It's very often wider than the preview window I use (which is plenty wide enough... probably about 45% of my wide-screen display) which means text is filled to that width and I'm constantly scr

Re: [Evolution] Endless "Empty cache file" errors

2016-08-11 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 13:26 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > I have seen, but only rarely, a different problem where the message > cannot be displayed in the preview pane and instead I get an error > there.  I don't have error message details unfortunately but next > time I see one

Re: [Evolution] Endless "Empty cache file" errors

2016-08-11 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 20:03 +0300, Robert Munteanu wrote: > I am no longer able to reproduce the bug, since this bug motivated me > to finally implement mail filtering server-side using sieve and I > gave up the evolution filters. I have no filtering rules on my system and see it all the time.  I

Re: [Evolution] Endless "Empty cache file" errors

2016-08-10 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2016-08-10 at 22:02 +0300, Robert Munteanu wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Adam Tauno Williams > wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-08-10 at 11:40 -0700, fmouse wrote: > >> I'm having the same problem with evolution 3.18.5.2. It happens when > >> new mail comes in while evolution is open an

Re: [Evolution] All folders have disappeared

2016-06-13 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 16:29 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > I invariably do updates while logged in and using stuff. I then > decide what needs to be restarted, or if I have to log out, or the > system needs to be rebooted. On Fedora there's a useful utility > called tracer that helps decide th

Re: [Evolution] Bogofilter stopped working suddenly?

2016-03-30 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 16:33 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > But as above, I see all spam email being determined inconclusive: > > Sender 'Wireless Security Camera Options < > wirelesssecuritycameraopti...@croakita.top>' in book? 0 > Junk filter classification: inconc

Re: [Evolution] Bogofilter stopped working suddenly?

2016-03-24 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 09:31 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > to properly do any spam filtering evolution needs to download whole > message and pass it to the spam-detection software > (bogofilter/spamassassin). The error says that the message download > failed, though the reason ("junk-test") is rather m

Re: [Evolution] Bogofilter stopped working suddenly?

2016-03-23 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 15:50 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > Now all of a sudden Bogofilter is no longer working. Spam is not > filtered out of my inbox and I can see that the timestamp on my > bogofilter wordlist does not change when I fetch new email. I can > still mark messages as junk

[Evolution] Bogofilter stopped working suddenly?

2016-03-23 Thread Paul Smith
I'm using Evo 3.16.5 on Ubuntu GNOME 15.10. I have 2 GMail accounts and one IMAP (ISP) account configured. Yesterday I noticed that I had a message in one of my GMail accounts that wouldn't go away from Evo and if I tried to delete it Evo went into some kind of constant download loop. I decided

Re: [Evolution] Evolution crashes on startup

2015-12-07 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 11:19 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 12:03 +0100, Tom wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 06.12.2015, 22:17 -0500 schrieb David Elwell: > > (...) > > > > > > Replaced Ubuntu 14.04 with 15.10 (Evolution 3.16.5) yesterday. All > > > appears Ok. Thank you all

Re: [Evolution] Need config help on Evolution email client

2015-12-03 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:08 -0500, Mark Foley wrote: > Yes, I quite understand about the whole version/package delay thing. > I've also used Slackware for years which is even more dramatic in this > respect. However, I though I was using the "latest" stable version. > > The http://www.ubuntu.com/d

Re: [Evolution] Need config help on Evolution email client

2015-12-03 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 13:26 -0500, Mark Foley wrote: > > As others have said, it appears that 3.10 on Ubuntu 14.04 is broken in > > various ways (it's to do with the Ubuntu packaging - 3.10 was fine on > > other systems). 3.10 is also very old now and unsupported. > > So, your recommendation? Sho

Re: [Evolution] HTML email always using fixed-width fonts?

2015-12-02 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 09:11 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 14:56 +0100, Tomas Popela wrote: > > It's exactly as you said. It was already fixed for Evolution 3.18., > > see > > [0]. > > > > [0] - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cg

Re: [Evolution] Fwd: Mail in Evolution disappearing - mystery deepens

2015-12-02 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 15:19 -0500, dave boland wrote: > My isp has a 90 day limit that I did not know about. The only > alternative is tw, and I doubt that the will be a big improvement. Ugh. I'm not sure why you're restricted to only those two alternatives, but that's a bummer. You could try g

Re: [Evolution] Fwd: Mail in Evolution disappearing - mystery deepens

2015-12-02 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 14:45 -0500, dave boland wrote: > This may be what I do, but for now (and rest of a very busy December), > I'm looking for an easier way. I guess that may be a monthly combing > my email to see what needs to be saved, then copying it to a folder. > I admit, I have been fat

Re: [Evolution] Fwd: Mail in Evolution disappearing - mystery deepens

2015-12-02 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 13:48 -0500, dave boland wrote: > Thanks for the insight. There is an IMAP option in Evolution to > synchronize the email, but I have not found much info about this > option. > Does anyone know what it does and the pros/cons? > > My objective is to have a local copy (on my

Re: [Evolution] Fwd: Mail in Evolution disappearing - mystery deepens

2015-12-02 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 13:21 -0500, dave boland wrote: > Am I correct in thinking POP did download the messages for local > storage? Correct. This is the major difference between POP and IMAP. POP is a simple delivery facility for email: when you access it it downloads the entire mailbox from the

Re: [Evolution] HTML email always using fixed-width fonts?

2015-11-23 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 14:56 +0100, Tomas Popela wrote: > It's exactly as you said. It was already fixed for Evolution 3.18., > see > [0]. > > [0] - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753702 OK thanks I'll file a Launchpad bug and hopefully this can be backported to 3.16. _

Re: [Evolution] HTML email always using fixed-width fonts?

2015-11-23 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 11:40 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > evolution 3.16.x is the first release with the WebKitGTK+ based > composer, the previous old GtkHTML composer had been replaced. One > consequence is that the HTML messages understand CSS also in the > composer. Yeah, I remember that. > I cur

Re: [Evolution] HTML email always using fixed-width fonts?

2015-11-22 Thread Paul Smith
On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 19:18 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > Overall everything is fine but there is one bizarre thing that I don't > remember hearing about: even when I send an email in "HTML" mode, the > font is always fixed-width. This is in "Normal" paragrap

[Evolution] HTML email always using fixed-width fonts?

2015-11-22 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all; I've just upgraded to Ubuntu GNOME 15.10 which comes with GNOME 3.16 inlcuding Evolution 3.16.5. Overall everything is fine but there is one bizarre thing that I don't remember hearing about: even when I send an email in "HTML" mode, the font is always fixed-width. This is in "Normal" par

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.18.x and Ubuntu 15.10

2015-11-20 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 17:34 -0200, Jorge wrote: > Thank you for the information. Have you enabled gnome3-staging? I haven't. In fact, I've just this week upgraded my system from Ubuntu GNOME 15.04 to Ubuntu GNOME 15.10, so I've just moved to GNOME 3.16. If I did decide to go to staging the only

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.18.x and Ubuntu 15.10

2015-11-20 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 16:26 -0200, Jorge wrote: > I am waiting for Gnome 3.18 to arrive in the regular gnome3 PPA. Just to keep your expectations in perspective, that almost never happens. In my experience the gnome3 PPA just has newer/fixed versions of the same level of Gnome package. For examp

Re: [Evolution] DEB files 3.18.1 from https://launchpad.net/~tista/+archive/ubuntu/wayland/+build/8104779

2015-10-16 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 20:44 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >Usually if you just put them all on the command line (or run "dpkg -i > >*.deb") then dpkg will figure it out. > > Only if all dependencies are already installed. If the dependencies > are not installed, than dpkg will not install the packa

Re: [Evolution] DEB files 3.18.1 from https://launchpad.net/~tista/+archive/ubuntu/wayland/+build/8104779

2015-10-16 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 14:18 -0400, John Lauterbach wrote: > In what order do the following DEB files need to be installed? Usually if you just put them all on the command line (or run "dpkg -i *.deb") then dpkg will figure it out. ___ evolution-list ma

Re: [Evolution] Bug 749712 - Undo/Redo in composer doesn't work right

2015-10-13 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 12:54 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > > What is the difficulty to remove the bugs > > The difficulty is that manpower is limited. Your patches are highly > welcome to fix problems faster. The best thing to do is to go help the WebKit folks, and/or follow the bug there as menti

Re: [Evolution] evolution 3.10 not sending messages from one of my mail acounts

2015-09-25 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 16:15 +0200, Tom wrote: > ... or better ask them to continuously upgrade to a recent version > even in LTSs ! That's not possible. Evolution is a Gnome application, and relies extensively on the Gnome infrastructure. It's not like Thunderbird or Firefox, for example, or eve

Re: [Evolution] Ubuntu 15.10 Gnome and Evolution

2015-07-20 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 10:12 -0400, John Lauterbach wrote: > I posted on this list as the Ubuntu variant I tested is the one reportedly > built by the Gnome-3 team, and it uses the Gnome desktop, not the desktop > favored by Ubuntu developers. Also, unlike the regular Ubuntu distros that > come

Re: [Evolution] Ubuntu 15.10 Gnome and Evolution

2015-07-20 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 09:42 -0400, John Lauterbach wrote: > Over the weekend, I was able to get the i386 version of Ubuntu 15.10 > Gnome to install on a hp-compaq dx2200 minitower (2007 vintage). This > distribution came with Evolution 3.12.11 already installed. Gnome > version is 3.16.2. I real

Re: [Evolution] Why does not copy & paste work in separate monitor setup?

2015-07-16 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 13:52 +0200, Bjørn T Johansen wrote: > Yes, I know it's not the "normal" way but it's the way I have always > done it... :) I am a developer and I run my IDE on one desktop on > display 2 and my web browser on a different desktop on the same > display, databaseadmin app on y

Re: [Evolution] 3.16.3 on Ubuntu 15.10

2015-07-14 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 12:29 +0200, Herr Oswald wrote: > > As far as I'm aware the Ubuntu maintainers for Evolution haven't worked > > on getting 3.16 into the latest version. The last email exchange I had > > with them implied it was some amount of work (I'm not really sure why > > but mostly seem

Re: [Evolution] 3.16.3 on Ubuntu 15.10

2015-07-10 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 09:38 -0400, John Lauterbach wrote: > I apologize for not putting my question in the correct format. So, is > anyone on this list successfully using 16.3.3 on Ubuntu 15.10? I want to > make > sure that I am not pursuing a dead-end if no one else has been successful. > I

Re: [Evolution] compile my own --- in addition to: Authentication Issues with Exchange Web Services

2015-06-09 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 00:33 +0400, Emre Erenoglu wrote: > > For me, it's less stable than the latest 3.12.x. > Depends on use case as I said. 3.12 does not support Webkit2 HTML > composing so not possible to use it at work for me. 3.16 may have bugs > but it has less on EWS and does webkit

Re: [Evolution] compile my own --- in addition to: Authentication Issues with Exchange Web Services

2015-06-09 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 00:09 +0400, Emre Erenoglu wrote: > If you are not experienced in compiling stuff, I strongly recommend > you to upgrade to Ubuntu 15.04 and then simply add the PPA I've given > to use 3.16 which is pretty OK. It's great to have this PPA, but Evo 3.16.0 has some pretty signif

  1   2   3   4   5   >