melpa with same
result)
Emacs : GNU Emacs 28.2 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.37,
cairo version 1.16.0)
Package: Org mode version 9.6.6 ( @ /home/wolf/.emacs.d/elpa/org-9.6.6/)
current state:
==
(setq
org-link-elisp-confirm-function 'yes-or-no-p
org-bibtex-
Hi,
I recently switched from having several Graphviz files to inlining
them via Babel in my source Org file. However, I noticed something
that might either be strange, or might just mean I don't yet
understand some stuff (as a relative newbie): I usually follow this
pattern to include my graphics:
Gunnar Wolf dijo [Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:58:30PM -0600]:
> I currently commented out the #+begin_center and #+end_center
> statements, but I'd really like to have them back. Or, at least, to
> find a more proper way to mark the images (and captions!) as material
> that should
Ken Williams dijo [Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 04:26:54PM +]:
> Hi all,
>
> When exporting to HTML I always add some extra CSS to my org-mode
> config, for the purpose of identifying which chunks are input
> vs. output, and for identifying the language of the code in code
> chunks. Language is ident
Gunnar Wolf dijo [Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:25:43AM -0600]:
> > When exporting to HTML I always add some extra CSS to my org-mode
> > config, for the purpose of identifying which chunks are input
> > vs. output, and for identifying the language of the code in code
> > chunks.
Hi,
I have the following (partial) target as a publishing declaration:
(setq org-publish-project-alist
'(("notas-html"
:base-directory "~/vcs/sistemas_operativos/notas/"
:base-extension "org"
:publishing-directory "~/vcs/sistemas_operativos/html"
:recursi
Bastien dijo [Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 02:42:27PM +0100]:
> > When I export a single file (i.e. with C-c C-e p), the file gets
> > generated with the specified filename and included in the resulting
> > PDF. However, when I do it via org-publish-all (or
> > org-publish-project), the code does not get e
Hi,
I'm not very specific in this mail, but am wondering…
I have some nontrivial documents written in Org-mode. My main use case
for Org is mostly to author texts, rather than using its time-tracking
features. I fear that with the new exporter, several of my documents'
features will no longer wor
Hi,
As mostly everything for my class work is handled through org-mode, I
am trying to use it also for tracking attendance. And it almost works
(given my quite-probably-wrong way to solve it) — Can you help me
pinpoint what am I doing wrong?
In case it's not obvious, I'm a complete Lisp newbie.
Suvayu Ali dijo [Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:25:19AM +0200]:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 06:57:53PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > #+CAPTION: Attendances for April
> > |-+---+---+---+---+---++---|
> > | Account | Name | 1 | 3
42 147 dijo [Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:10:07AM -0400]:
>
> Hello mailing list,
>
> This might be considered off-topic.
>
> The question is the title: have you been able to convert many people to
> Emacs / org-mode? Are converts all programmers, or those versed in
> programming? -- Or have you conv
Nick Dokos dijo [Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 11:31:14PM -0400]:
> You can turn on formula debugging with C-c { and then you'd
> see that in Pancho's case, the list is ("") i.e. a list containing the
> empty string - a list of length 1. That might qualify as a bug (or not) but
>
> you can easily work aro
Michael Brand dijo [Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:40:06PM +0200]:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> > You can turn on formula debugging with C-c { and then you'd
> > see that in Pancho's case, the list is ("") i.e. a list containing the
> > empty string - a list of length 1. That mig
(Quoting in full to preserve mail readability without resorting to too
much context)
> > > #+CAPTION: Attendances for April
> > > |-+---+---+---+---+---++---|
> > > | Account | Name | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 10 | Total |
> > > |-+---+---
Nick Dokos dijo [Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 12:03:33PM -0400]:
> Ah, OK - I guess Gunnar will not be able to avoid an upgrade to something
> more recent.
>
> And yes, the eq/equal subtleties strike once again:
>
> (eq "" "")
> t
> (eq "0" "0")
> nil
> (equal "0" "0")
> t
Yay - Thanks to you all :-) Ye
Hi,
I am using the *old* exporter (the packaged version in Debian Wheezy),
I don't know if this behaviour keeps happening with the new one. I
have come up with a minimal case that exhibits this problem — Might be
my fault for using this feature wrongly, but it *feels* as a parser
error.
The probl
It is better. To really stress it, I tried a two-row table:
#+begin_src clojure :results table
[[:ny :nj :ct]
[ 7 9 4]]
#+end_src
#+RESULTS:
| :ny | :nj | :ct |
| 7 | 9 | 4 |
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Bastien wrote:
> Eric Schulte writes:
>
> > Try evaluating the fol
How may I use an Org document to illustrate Clojure src blocks that produce
Clojure data structures -- particularly maps -- as pretty-printed text? I
think I am using Org "master" in Emacs 24.3.
#+BEGIN_SRC clojure :results value <>
(zipmap
["Peru" "Paris" "Sankt-Peterburg" "Philadelphia" "Plat
How can a Clojure source block contribute its standard-output results as an
example block? I tried ":results output org" but it expressed the standard
output as a quoted string with \n's where I expected newlines. For a point
of comparison, org-python seems to be able to do what I want, if "begin
ob-clojure.el should use separate cider functions for value and output
results, in order to avoid expressing standard output as some kind of
programming-language string with embedded \n notation. I experimentally
adjusted my copy of ob-clojure (obtained from git clone -b master today)
like this:
I am getting a strange effect from ":results pp" and ob-clojure. "It\n
looks\n like\n this.\n" I built Emacs 24.4.50 from trunk and cloned
ob-clojure from git today. clojure-mode is 20140331 from ELPA. cider is
20140411 from ELPA.
Two examples follow.
1. uses =:results pp= ("and\n looks\n lik
Yes, perfect!
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Oleh wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Could you test my last commit? Your case should be working now.
>
> regards,
> Oleh
>
e newly created entry.
I guess, this is not how it is meant to work. How would I define
- The second problem is that when invoked with content fron an active region
(the %i flag), then the %A flag won't ask me for a link description and the
%i contents are used as description.
Any ideas what might be wrong here?
--
Josef Wolf
j...@raven.inka.de
On Di, Mai 06, 2014 at 11:57:34 +0200, Josef Wolf wrote:
> I am new to org-mode, and am currently working through
> http://members.optusnet.com.au/~charles57/GTD/gtd_workflow.html and am stuck
> a little bit the the caprure mode.
>
> My first question is: org-capture seems to
am missing here?
--
Josef Wolf
j...@raven.inka.de
y
> DEADLINE: <2014-05-12 Tue +1y>
By setting it to the current year, I'd loose track of the original year when
the event happened.
I _really_ like the idea of "XXX is %d years old", like it is shown in the
org-anniversary example!
--
Josef Wolf
j...@raven.inka.de
s to work better.
But still no way for something like "Married %d years ago!" like its shown in
the org-anniversary example on orgmode.org/manual/Weekly_002fdaily-agenda.html
--
Josef Wolf
j...@raven.inka.de
On Di, Mai 13, 2014 at 05:07:19 +0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> Josef Wolf writes:
> Ah, for that you'll want (setq org-agenda-include-diary t). I assume you
> don't have that set right now?
Yes, it works with this setting. Thanks!
I was confused by this paragraph:
| If you
Hello list,
I'm quite impressed posting on this list of genious coders who brought
such a powerful tool as org-mode. Not honey-licking your shoes.
Being allergic to linear time and its implementation (calendars,
clocks...), I found org-mode of great help when dealing with normal
people.
Using th
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 06:09:36PM -0400, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>
> I would defined the SEQ_TODO in the file with #+TODO: TODO NEXT | DONE
> (or whatever is appropriate for that file). That overrides any global
> todo settings.
>
*** Thank you for your suggestions, Bernt!
> All of my gory setup de
Wow, thank you Sven...
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 08:41:22AM +0200, Sven Bretfeld wrote:
>
> The third level is for the physical actions of the project. As you see,
> only the first has a todo keyword (NEXT). The others are dependent from
> the first (cannot be done before the first is done) and hav
31 matches
Mail list logo