Nick Dokos dijo [Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 12:03:33PM -0400]: > Ah, OK - I guess Gunnar will not be able to avoid an upgrade to something > more recent. > > And yes, the eq/equal subtleties strike once again: > > (eq "" "") > t > (eq "0" "0") > nil > (equal "0" "0") > t
Yay - Thanks to you all :-) Yes, it finally works fine for me with (delete "0" [...]) Of course, at some point I will upgrade. We shall see if the world breaks and hell ensues. But right now, I'm happy and satisfied. And I'll study a bit more into the relative addressing you posted, as it surely looks better suited.
