It is better. To really stress it, I tried a two-row table: #+begin_src clojure :results table [[:ny :nj :ct] [ 7 9 4]] #+end_src
#+RESULTS: | :ny | :nj | :ct | | 7 | 9 | 4 | On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Bastien <b...@gnu.org> wrote: > Eric Schulte <schulte.e...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Try evaluating the following and see how it works. > > It works fine for me: > > ,---- > | #+BEGIN_SRC clojure :results table > | (map #(* %1 3) '(1 2 3)) > | #+END_SRC > | > | #+RESULTS: > | | 3 | 6 | 9 | > `---- > > > This simply copies > > the results handling from the slime backend to the cider backend (which > > currently does not appear to have any results handling). While you're > > at it the nrepl results handling looks broken to me as well. > > Yep. > > Greg, please test Eric's function above for all your use cases and let > us know if it covers them all -- then I'll fix this and the nrepl case > too. > > Thanks Eric! > > -- > Bastien > >
