Achim Gratz writes:
> The package description is loaded, buth then it doesn't install because
> the description vector is wrong. I've pushed a correction that at least
> works with a local copy of the archive directory.
I will test this on the server -- thanks!
--
Bastien
Achim Gratz writes:
> I haven't tested it yet, but the files are up already.
The package description is loaded, buth then it doesn't install because
the description vector is wrong. I've pushed a correction that at least
works with a local copy of the archive directory.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz writes:
> There is an error in the float element (the ":" after "right" should
> really be a ";").
Fixed, thanks.
> Also I would really appreciate if the CSS didn't specify absolute font
> sizes.
I did improve things a bit. Please provide a patch if things are
still no
Bastien writes:
>> Have you pushed it? Coz' I don't see it just yet…
>
> Yes -- see the commits here:
Thanks. Gitk apparently refused to update its display even though I'd
already updated the remotes. I haven't tested it yet, but the
files are up already.
BTW, can you check the CSS for the Org
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz writes:
> Bastien writes:
>> I went "bold" (wikipedia style) and made the change.
>>
>> See the commits related to mk/server.mk.
>
> Have you pushed it? Coz' I don't see it just yet…
Yes -- see the commits here:
http://orgmode.org/w/org-mode.git?p=org-mode.git;a=commit;h=
Bastien writes:
> I went "bold" (wikipedia style) and made the change.
>
> See the commits related to mk/server.mk.
Have you pushed it? Coz' I don't see it just yet…
> I think this is good enough for now, but if you have a better
> solution, let me know. I'll ask Jason to install Emacs 24.2
> if
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz writes:
> Although it should be possible to produce the package description
> vectors manually at the moment, I would like to avoid that.
I went "bold" (wikipedia style) and made the change.
See the commits related to mk/server.mk.
I think this is good enough for now, bu
Hi,
Achim Gratz writes:
> Yes, archive-contents is not currently produced. AFAIK the server is
> still running Emacs�23 and I don't know if package-x is available.
> Although it should be possible to produce the package description
> vectors manually at the moment, I would like to avoid that.
>
Eric Schulte writes:
> So is there some server-side action which needs to be taken for these
> packages and the archive-contents file to begin appearing online?
Yes, archive-contents is not currently produced. AFAIK the server is
still running Emacs 23 and I don't know if package-x is available.
Bastien writes:
> Achim Gratz writes:
>
>> Bastien writes:
However I suggest to lose the plural
and just use `org-plus-contrib´.
>>>
>>> Yes, that's fine for me. Thanks,
>>
>> Implemented and pushed.
>
> Thanks!
So is there some server-side action which needs to be taken for these
pa
Achim Gratz writes:
> Bastien writes:
>>> However I suggest to lose the plural
>>> and just use `org-plus-contrib´.
>>
>> Yes, that's fine for me. Thanks,
>
> Implemented and pushed.
Thanks!
--
Bastien
Bastien writes:
>> However I suggest to lose the plural
>> and just use `org-plus-contrib´.
>
> Yes, that's fine for me. Thanks,
Implemented and pushed.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
Waldorf MIDI Implementation & additional documentati
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz writes:
> However I suggest to lose the plural
> and just use `org-plus-contrib´.
Yes, that's fine for me. Thanks,
--
Bastien
Bastien writes:
> Thinking again of it, I find "orgplus" confusing in this case.
>
> If a longer name is not a problem, I suggest "org-with-contribs", it
> clearly state that this is org with contribs. There are dired+ and
> friends that are just extensions to dired (and friends), so orgplus
> wou
Hi Eric,
Eric Schulte writes:
> Agreed, this would simply mean generating an archive-contents file on
> the Org-mode site which lists the latest org and orgplus archive. I'm
> not sure which elisp function is used to generate this file, but it
> could be done directly from the server.mk file wi
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz writes:
> I've just pushed a first implementation of an orgplus ELPA archive.
thanks a lot and sorry to be late on this.
I'll test this after tomorrow (I'm offline tomorrow), I'll try to set
this up on the server then. If there are any direction you can think
of, please
Eric Schulte writes:
> Please do go ahead and revert that commit.
Done, implemented in maint and merged back to master.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSampl
Achim Gratz writes:
> Eric Schulte writes:
>> Agreed, this would simply mean generating an archive-contents file on
>> the Org-mode site which lists the latest org and orgplus archive. I'm
>> not sure which elisp function is used to generate this file, but it
>> could be done directly from the s
Eric Schulte writes:
> Agreed, this would simply mean generating an archive-contents file on
> the Org-mode site which lists the latest org and orgplus archive. I'm
> not sure which elisp function is used to generate this file, but it
> could be done directly from the server.mk file with something
>> I'm not sure what "providing the link" entails. Does this mean
>> coordinating with elpa.gnu.org so that orgplus becomes available through
>> the gnu elpa? That sounds ideal.
>
> I was actually thinking of using orgmode.org as the package repository
> for orgplus. I don't think it is a good i
Eric Schulte writes:
> I'm not sure what "providing the link" entails. Does this mean
> coordinating with elpa.gnu.org so that orgplus becomes available through
> the gnu elpa? That sounds ideal.
I was actually thinking of using orgmode.org as the package repository
for orgplus. I don't think i
>> I vote we begin building the orgplus package daily and hosting it on
>> orgmode.org.
>
> When the server pulls up to that revision it should automatically start
> to produce the orgplus archive. It is then a matter of providing the
> link so that it actually becomes accessible.
>
I'm not sure
Jambunathan K writes:
> Package manager will download and upgrade the dependency if needed.
Yes.
> Bundle the exporters in to say org-extras*.tar or org-devel-*.tar and
> then have that package depend on the right version of org-*.tar.
That would work if the package was missing. I've looked and
Eric Schulte writes:
> This looks great, I can confirm that building and installing this
> package locally allows me to build other ELPA package that depend on
> functionality in contrib/.
Thanks for testing.
> I vote we begin building the orgplus package daily and hosting it on
> orgmode.org.
W
Achim Gratz writes:
> Bastien writes:
>>> Hmm… I'd rather avoid that since "+" is a reserved character in file
>>> names on some systems. How about orgplus?
>>
>> Looks fine to me.
>
> I've just pushed a first implementation of an orgplus ELPA archive.
>
This looks great, I can confirm that bui
Bastien writes:
>> Hmm… I'd rather avoid that since "+" is a reserved character in file
>> names on some systems. How about orgplus?
>
> Looks fine to me.
I've just pushed a first implementation of an orgplus ELPA archive.
> Publishing new packages only when maint has been changed will already
>
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz writes:
> Bastien writes:
>> Let's take the easy road then.
>
> I'll work on that in maint, is this OK?
Yes.
Also, we currently build a new ELPA package each day, resulting in
having a new ELPA version every day. We should have a new ELPA version
each time there is a com
Jambunathan K writes:
> Bundle the exporters in to say org-extras*.tar or org-devel-*.tar and
> then have that package depend on the right version of org-*.tar.
Or taking some cue from debian, call it org-*-unstable-*.tar and/or
org-*-testing-*.tar.
Achim Gratz writes:
> Bastien writes:
>> Let's take the easy road then.
>
> I'll work on that in maint, is this OK?
>
>> I'd suggest org+ as the name of the package.
>
> Hmm… I'd rather avoid that since "+" is a reserved character in file
> names on some systems. How about orgplus?
>
>> Hosting
Bastien writes:
> Let's take the easy road then.
I'll work on that in maint, is this OK?
> I'd suggest org+ as the name of the package.
Hmm… I'd rather avoid that since "+" is a reserved character in file
names on some systems. How about orgplus?
> Hosting it on something like orgmode.org/pkg/
Jambunathan K writes:
> 1. There is no need to do download and M-x package-install-file RET if
> the publishing server has a `archive-contents' file.
>
> Org's daily tars are already pushed to Orgmode.org and then later
> pulled by GNU's ELPA servers.
>
> So only thing needed is
Jambunathan K writes:
>> 1. There is no need to do download and M-x package-install-file RET if
>> the publishing server has a `archive-contents' file.
>>
>> Org's daily tars are already pushed to Orgmode.org and then later
>> pulled by GNU's ELPA servers.
>>
>> So only thing nee
Hi Jambunathan,
Jambunathan K writes:
> What this mean is that there is no need for Tromey's repo or marmalade
> repo. Orgmode itself is a repo and can be used in `package-archives'.
Indeed -- that's something we may consider.
> Since release tars are already made available on Orgmode.org ser
> 1. There is no need to do download and M-x package-install-file RET if
> the publishing server has a `archive-contents' file.
>
> Org's daily tars are already pushed to Orgmode.org and then later
> pulled by GNU's ELPA servers.
>
> So only thing needed is a public URL on Orgmode
1. There is no need to do download and M-x package-install-file RET if
the publishing server has a `archive-contents' file.
Org's daily tars are already pushed to Orgmode.org and then later
pulled by GNU's ELPA servers.
So only thing needed is a public URL on Orgmode.org for pac
Hi,
Achim Gratz writes:
> I was talking about the hypothetical possibility to offer another
> archive that is compatible with package manager and either packages Org
> including contrib or just contrib (so that it could be installed
> alongside the "normal" Org ELPA archive).
>
> Of these two op
Eric Schulte wrote:
> This first option of a combined org+contrib package in a non-GNU ELPA*
> does sound like the easiest to implement and most likely to succeed (for
> the reasons Achim mentions above). Is there a downside to such a
> combined package which I am missing?
>
> Perhaps such a p
Achim Gratz writes:
> Bastien writes:
>> Are you both talking about the same thing?
>
> I'm not sure, but we'll find out.
>
>> (I use ELPA* to denote other ELPA archives than GNU ELPA.)
>>
>> If this is about a org-*.tar ELPA* package containing both
>> *core* and *contrib*, I disagree.
>>
>> I
Bastien writes:
> Are you both talking about the same thing?
I'm not sure, but we'll find out.
> (I use ELPA* to denote other ELPA archives than GNU ELPA.)
>
> If this is about a org-*.tar ELPA* package containing both
> *core* and *contrib*, I disagree.
>
> If this is about a org-contrib*.tar
Hi Eric and Achim,
Eric Schulte writes:
> Achim Gratz writes:
>
>> Bastien writes:
>>> I'm afraid the only recommendation here is to try to stick to one
>>> installation method -- or to reinstall a fresh package/repo with a
>>> fresh contrib/lisp/ *after* any ELPA upgrade.
>>
>> Well, we could
MELPA looks better; like ELPA 2.0 :)
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>
> On Aug 30, 2012, at 8:35 PM, Eric Schulte wrote:
>
> > Achim Gratz writes:
> >
> >> Bastien writes:
> >>> I'm afraid the only recommendation here is to try to stick to one
> >>> installation method -- o
On Aug 30, 2012, at 8:35 PM, Eric Schulte wrote:
> Achim Gratz writes:
>
>> Bastien writes:
>>> I'm afraid the only recommendation here is to try to stick to one
>>> installation method -- or to reinstall a fresh package/repo with a
>>> fresh contrib/lisp/ *after* any ELPA upgrade.
>>
>> Well,
Achim Gratz writes:
> Bastien writes:
>> I'm afraid the only recommendation here is to try to stick to one
>> installation method -- or to reinstall a fresh package/repo with a
>> fresh contrib/lisp/ *after* any ELPA upgrade.
>
> Well, we could make an ELPA package that includes contrib. It just
Bastien writes:
> I'm afraid the only recommendation here is to try to stick to one
> installation method -- or to reinstall a fresh package/repo with a
> fresh contrib/lisp/ *after* any ELPA upgrade.
Well, we could make an ELPA package that includes contrib. It just
can't be distributed via GNU
Hi Robert,
thanks for the detailed explanations, it also helped me find the
problem in my own setup.
I'm afraid the only recommendation here is to try to stick to one
installation method -- or to reinstall a fresh package/repo with a
fresh contrib/lisp/ *after* any ELPA upgrade.
Best,
--
Bast
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 08:00:18PM +0200, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Achim,
>
> Achim Gratz writes:
>
> > Achim Gratz writes:
> >> Can we see the full output, please?
> >
> > I got a mail from Robert (apparently not sent to the list) that the
> > error was related to his use of some stuff in contrib/,
Achim Gratz writes:
> Robert said he removed the contrib stuff and things start to work for
> him — apparently he's away for a few days so we may not hear from him
> until he's back.
All right, thanks for the details! If I can reproduce the problem,
I'll definitely ping Tom Tromey.
Best,
--
Bastien writes:
>> I got a mail from Robert (apparently not sent to the list) that the
>> error was related to his use of some stuff in contrib/, resulting in a
>> mixed installation.
>
> How the use of stuff in contrib/ can prevent the ELPA package from
> loading correctly? I'm interested in ha
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz writes:
> Achim Gratz writes:
>> Can we see the full output, please?
>
> I got a mail from Robert (apparently not sent to the list) that the
> error was related to his use of some stuff in contrib/, resulting in a
> mixed installation.
How the use of stuff in contrib/ ca
Achim Gratz writes:
> Can we see the full output, please?
I got a mail from Robert (apparently not sent to the list) that the
error was related to his use of some stuff in contrib/, resulting in a
mixed installation. So everyone else who sees that problem, could you
please check if you are maybe
2012/8/26 Robert Horn :
>
> I decided to try ELPA to upgrade in place for the first time, and used
> it to upgrade to the latest org 7.9. No apparent errors there. (good
> work BTW).
>
> Tests:
> - proper org-version? yes 7.9, no problems reported
> - [f8] to trigger a capture I get the error:
Robert Horn writes:
> Tests:
> - proper org-version? yes 7.9, no problems reported
Can we see the full output, please?
> - [f8] to trigger a capture I get the error:
>
> org-capture-select-template: Symbol's function definition is void:
> org-contextualize-keys
>
> In my .emacs I've got
>
> (de
A bug, perhaps ELPA related. Sorry to be so brief but I've got to run
soon to the station. I'm going to be tied up for the next week, but if
it's not figured out by then, I'll have time to look in more detail.
I confirmed this on Linux, Mac, and Windows, all emacs 24.1. All
respond the same.
I'm delighted to hear of the new release, and will upgrade today via git.
However... might I suggest that those who are commenting on the release,
please refrain from quoting the entire changelog? It's rather unpleasant
for digest readers.
It's one of the reasons why computers have Delete keys :-
Hi Bastien,
Bastien writes:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
>
>> I'm using Org from Elpa (which is neat). When I updated and refreshed
>> Org, I got the following error:
>>
>> Loading
>> /Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/Resources/lisp/org/org-w3m.elc...done
>> Loading /
Hi Bastien,
with all the new features and changes for each release, we might
really need a release-party
or better a release-workshop. 1-2 days to get introduced to all the
great new stuff ;)
Kudos to all the org developers.
Torsten
On 25 August 2012 00:48, Bastien wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'
Hi Bastien,
Le vendredi 24 aoû 2012 à 17:48:42 (+0200), Bastien a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I've released Org 7.9.
>
> http://orgmode.org/org-7.9.zip
> http://orgmode.org/org-7.9.gz
> http://orgmode.org/org-mode-download.html
>
> After 1885 commits since Org 7.8, it was about time.
>
> See t
Moritz Ulrich writes:
> The second link seems dead to me. Maybe it should read
> 'org-7.9.tar.gz'?
Err... yes, indeed -- here it is:
http://orgmode.org/org-7.9.tar.gz
--
Bastien
Hi Eric,
Eric Schulte writes:
> Will the new ELPA package include org-element.el and org-export.el, or
> would those require separate packaging?
We will move org-export.el into core as soon as there is no conflict
with the current export variables/functions.
That way org-export.el (which will
Bastien writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I've released Org 7.9.
>
> http://orgmode.org/org-7.9.zip
> http://orgmode.org/org-7.9.gz
> http://orgmode.org/org-mode-download.html
>
The second link seems dead to me. Maybe it should read 'org-7.9.tar.gz'?
--
Moritz Ulrich
Achim Gratz writes:
> However, one of the last-minute changes to the build system was to add a
> friendlier way to include stuff from contrib,
I wish it could be even friendlier, with e.g. `make install-contrib'
:)
--
Bastien, The Stubborn Git
Hi Rasmus,
Rasmus writes:
> It seems doc.html on worg ins't up to date. At least a couple of the
> links weren't working for me (the anchor didn't exists). E.g. orgtbl
> to unicode.
http://orgmode.org/worg/doc.html only document hooks, commands and
options. Putting all functions and variable
Eric Schulte writes:
> Will the new ELPA package include org-element.el and org-export.el, or
> would those require separate packaging?
The ELPA archive does not include aynthing from contrib/. So, org-element is
included, but not org-export.
However, one of the last-minute changes to the build
Will the new ELPA package include org-element.el and org-export.el, or
would those require separate packaging?
Thanks,
Bastien writes:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
>
>> I'm using Org from Elpa (which is neat). When I updated and refreshed
>> Org, I got the following
Maybe try wrapping all paths in quotes and try again. On Fri, 24 Aug 2012,
Rainer Thiel wrote:
> Is there a way to install Org 7.9 under Windows Vista?
>
> I have written the following local.mk in the Org installation directory:
>
> -->
> # Name of your emacs binary
> EMACS = emacs.exe
>
> # W
Congrats to the Org-team! Great work as always!
It seems doc.html on worg ins't up to date. At least a couple of the
links weren't working for me (the anchor didn't exists). E.g. orgtbl
to unicode.
BTW: It should technically be possible to run org-e-ascii
(unicode-version) on tables when send
Is there a way to install Org 7.9 under Windows Vista?
I have written the following local.mk in the Org installation directory:
-->
# Name of your emacs binary
EMACS = emacs.exe
# Where local software is found
prefix = C:/Program Files/Emacs
# Where local lisp files go.
lispdir= $(prefix)/si
thanks a lot!
Je Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 05:48:42PM +0200 Bastien skribis:
> Hi all,
>
> I've released Org 7.9.
>
> http://orgmode.org/org-7.9.zip
> http://orgmode.org/org-7.9.gz
> http://orgmode.org/org-mode-download.html
>
> After 1885 commits since Org 7.8, it was about time.
>
> See the
Hi Rainer,
Rainer Thiel writes:
> Those are the very setting that I used to put in the Makfile in
> previous Org versions. Now cygwin make fails with the following
> output:
Actually double *thanks* for reporting this.
The utils/ directory was not included in previous .zip and .tar.gz
archive
Hi Thomas,
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
> I'm using Org from Elpa (which is neat). When I updated and refreshed
> Org, I got the following error:
>
> Loading /Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/Resources/lisp/org/org-w3m.elc...done
> Loading /Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/Resources/lisp
Aloha Bastien,
Congratulations on seeing Org to 7.9. Many thanks to Nicolas, Achim,
Eric, Max and the rest for their many contributions.
I'm using Org from Elpa (which is neat). When I updated and refreshed
Org, I got the following error:
Loading /Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/Resources/lisp
Hi Rainer,
Rainer Thiel writes:
> Those are the very setting that I used to put in the Makfile in
> previous Org versions. Now cygwin make fails with the following
> output:
Looks like you don't have the "utils/" directory.
The old "UTILITIES/" directory has been renamed to "utils/".
Please
OMG what a long list of changes!
Kudos to everyone involved and Bastien for coordinating the release!
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 05:48:42PM +0200, Bastien wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've released Org 7.9.
>
> http://orgmode.org/org-7.9.zip
> http://orgmode.org/org-7.9.gz
> http://orgmode.org/org-mo
Hi all,
I've released Org 7.9.
http://orgmode.org/org-7.9.zip
http://orgmode.org/org-7.9.gz
http://orgmode.org/org-mode-download.html
After 1885 commits since Org 7.8, it was about time.
See the list of changes here:
http://orgmode.org/Changes.html
I cannot thank all the contributors
74 matches
Mail list logo
