On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 11:32 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 14.03.2013 09:28, schrieb Cesar:
> > dovecot: auth: Error: mysql: Query failed, retrying: MySQL server has gone
> > away: 125 Time(s)(125 Times Wow)For example part of maillog show me:About
> > MySQL auth failed:Mar 10 03:55:05 ga
On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 15:33 +0100, mourik jan heupink wrote:
> destination_recipient_limit
Not sure what happened there but evolution did not like all the chars in
your post when invoking reply... probably time to update this darn
thing, its the last ubuntu POS that hasn't been updated to opensu
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 10:20 +, Daniel Reinhardt wrote:
> I really find the lack of error logging, and the virtual lack of
> documentation for Dovecot very disturbing. I am so close to dropping this
> side project of being able to support multiple domains on a mail server.
I know I came in l
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 03:25 -0700, Professa Dementia wrote:
>
> And just a friendly word of advice: change your attitude or you will
> find your cries fall on deaf ears.
>
> Dem
>
and that shit is helpful how?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 09:13 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 3/17/2013 5:25 AM, Professa Dementia wrote:
>
> > We are very sorry you are not satisfied with the software. Please feel
> > free to return the software for a full refund of all the money you paid.
>
> You do not speak on behalf of Do
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 21:30 -0700, David Benfell wrote:
>
> The standard response is also borne of frustration--a frustration that
> seemingly expects people to worship the ground that developers walk on.
>
One thing that shows a good developer, is one who listens, to the
negatives as well as
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 22:56 -0700, pvsuja wrote:
> Mar 19 09:33:16 mailspace dovecot: imap(suja): Invalid certificate: self
> signed certificate in certificate chain: /C=IN/ST=Karnataka/O=xxx/OU=YYY
> CA/CN=mailserver.domain.com/emailAddress=sys...@domain.com
> Mar 19 09:33:16 mailspace dovecot:
On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 03:28 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> maybe you should explain why not using syslog as
> everybody else
Why do you think you speak for everybody else? Because you sure as hell
don't, so stop pretending to.
WTF is in the air this week, it seems to contain a few self proclai
On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 10:57 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
_deleted usual drivell_
> > Anyone who knows anything about syslog on large production servers knows
> > avoiding it is best practice, it's also about the only thing DJB and I
> > ever agreed on
>
> blablablanla
>
> in large environm
On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 20:12 +0400, Tigran Petrosyan wrote:
> Hi
> We are going to implement the "Dovecot" for 1 million users. We are going
> to use more than 100T storage space. Now we examine 2 solutions NFS or GFS2
> via (Fibre Channel storage).
> Can someone help to make decision? What kind of
On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 21:22 +0100, Matthieu wrote:
> >> Mar 24 19:13:21 hebus dovecot: master: Warning: /tmp is no longer mounted.
> >> See http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Mountpoints
> >> Mar 24 19:13:21 hebus dovecot: master: Warning: /var/tmp is no longer
> >> mounted. See
> >> http://wiki2.dovecot
nope
On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 07:23 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Did anyone else get 13 identical copies of this response from Daniel???
>
> On 2013-03-27 12:47 AM, Daniel Reinhardt wrote:
> > If you are concerned about data being left on a hard drive when it fails
> > and you are returning it t
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 02:27 +, mastertoi...@netzero.net wrote:
> passdb {
> driver = pam
> }
>
> i am still not sure why maildirsize is not updating.thanks
> ___
Because dovecot (dovecot-lda) is not delivering the mails to the
maildir, postfix is.
signature.asc
Description:
Hi David,
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 13:05 -0700, David Benfell wrote:
> doveconf: Warning: service auth { client_limit=256 } is lower than
> required under max. load (3072)
> doveconf: Warning: service anvil { client_limit=256 } is lower than
> required under max. load (2051)
> service auth {
>
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 23:36 -0700, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> I have just come to the realization that password encryption using the
> crypt function in linux, ONLY USES THE FIRST 8 CHARS. I have written
> routines using crypt allowing 16+ chars, and find that anything past 8
> is ignored. Wow.
>
On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 01:09 -0700, David Benfell wrote:
> > Are your certificate chains valid? Simply saying "isn't working" is
> > almost a requirement for a *sigh*
> > log output please, or a better description than "isn't working" ;)
> Yes, the certificate chains were screwed up. And you
There is only one authoritative source who should be writing it if a
book is to be written and we all know who that author should be.
But for what version, as 1.x is in wide usage and will be for a long
time, 2.0 is almost upon us, much of 1.x is not applicable to 2.x , so
should Timo be writing 2
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 22:43 +0100, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> On 2010-03-04 22:59:59 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Do you think I'd break a lot of people's filters if I removed the
> > prefix? :) Anyone strongly for/against removing it? It seems kind of
> > annoying to me whenever I happen to thin
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 03:57 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 3/5/2010 1:17 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
> > of the myriad of lists im' on and have been on for many many years,
> > only nanog and bind lists dont use tags.
>
> postfix doesn't, and I know you're on
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 05:57 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-03-05 5:28 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 03:57 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> >> On 3/5/2010 1:17 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
> >>> of the myriad of lists im' on and have been on fo
perhaps supply a bit more information?
like the output from dovecot -n
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 18:29 -0400, Joe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running dovecot/postfix/amavisd within a jail on freebsd. I have a
> nullfs mounted within the jail that links back to an NFS server.
>
> I am constantly getting
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 21:50 -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> On Mar 25, 2010, at 9:48 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> > Timo Sirainen put forth on 3/25/2010 1:30 PM:
> >> I think the next v2.0 release (rc1?) will include the new changed
> >> default_login_user. I'm still not completely sure what i
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 15:32 +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
> Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
> > On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 20:01 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> >>>>> "dovehole" - you go inside dovecot via a hole, right?
> >>>> That is downright pornographi
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 00:01 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Noel Butler put forth on 3/26/2010 8:12 PM:
>
> > Nice Marco...
> > OK, Timo, we must have a winner here with " dovenull", surely :P
>
> I fear anything with "null" in it will be confusing
Hi,
Firstly its clear you did not remove your existing version installed by
your OS's package manager.
Backup your conf file before doing so.
By default most source installs of any software install into /usr/local/
you might also want to consider make uninstall from your existing source
build dire
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 22:07 +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> Frank Elsner (Mo 12 Apr 2010 19:18:53 CEST):
> > On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:06:34 +0200 Andreas Schulze wrote:
> > > Hello list,
> > >
> > > I use currently a non-dovecot pop3 proxy which has the ability
> > > to scan all passing mails
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 11:25 +0200, Sven wrote:
>
> Noel Butler schrieb:
> > On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 22:07 +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Frank Elsner (Mo 12 Apr 2010 19:18:53 CEST):
> >>
> >>> On
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 07:27 -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:37:04 +1000, Noel Butler
> articulated:
>
> > So, you want postfix to accept the virus, send it to dovecot's
> > deliver which then calls a virus scanner and finds it infected and
> > dele
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 13:21 +0200, Andreas Schulze wrote:
> Am 13.04.2010 20:37 schrieb Noel Butler:
> > So, you want postfix to accept the virus, send it to dovecot's deliver
> > which then calls a virus scanner and finds it infected and deletes it,
> > that makes
Postfix must first "know the user(s)"
therefore this isa postfix issue and not dovecot
dovecot deliver assumes the MTA has verified the user to accept mail
from and does not do further authentication
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 01:00 +0200, fakessh wrote:
> its tha archive to the cross post to postfi
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 03:50 +0200, fakessh wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:53:32 +0200, Pascal Volk
> wrote:
> > On 04/16/2010 01:18 AM fakessh wrote:
> >> how to build a catch-all with dovecot lda
> >> the question then. is not a postfix issue
> >
> > Still a Postfix issue.
> > Dovecot doesn't
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 16:00 -0700, Alex wrote:
> Hello folkz,
> Is it possible to setup in dovecot-sql.conf file to run user_query
> twice if its first run didn't yield any values.
> And likewise don't proceed with the second run if the first user_query
> execution produced the result.
> I have t
bugger sent that direct, please send that output to the list :)
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 09:04 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> Alex,
>
> Please show the output of dovecot -n
>
>
> On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 15:23 -0700, Alex wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the hint.
> >
&g
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 16:14 -0700, Alex wrote:
> auth default:
> mechanisms: plain digest-md5 cram-md5
> passdb:
> driver: sql
> args: /etc/mail/dovecot-sql.conf
> userdb:
> driver: prefetch
> userdb:
> driver: static
> args: uid=51 gid=51
You are using MySQL, so
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 11:02 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
> The Ubuntu package didn't create the directory for these. What
> ownership/permissions are needed for it? Does it need to be owned by the
> dovecot user?
Yes, it needs to be owned by whoever is the user in auth segment, so
long as that us
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 22:35 +0300, Yavuz Maşlak wrote:
> Hello
>
> I use squirrelmail1.4.20, compatible2, change_sql plugin, dovecot, postfix,
> mysql,virtualuser.
>
> I can change my email password successfully on squirrelmail. When I change
> my password the squirrelmail throw me a page whic
Try a different client and see if its the same results
if so, return with your dovecot -n output
Cheers
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 02:56 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Eray Aslan put forth on 5/7/2010 12:44 AM:
> > On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 12:02:33AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >> Anyone have any id
please keep your childish immature sour grapes dummy spits off this
list
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 22:03 +0200, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> You don't really need to wonder that your release cycles 'get longer'
> when you do major feature changes to something you consider to be
> 'beta' (and not alpha)
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 16:17 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 14:38, Bradley Giesbrecht <
> bradley.giesbre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > On May 11, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:59, Gerard Seibert >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> Virtual docum
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 09:05 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 19:25, Noel Butler wrote:
> >
> > %d is derived from the right hand side of a username, dovecot's deliver
> > couldn't care less about verifying the domain, since that is the M
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 14:03 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 14:00, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
>
> > Am 14.05.2010 um 19:51 schrieb Phil Howard:
> >
> > > It is the version packaged in Ubuntu 9.10 …
> >
> > This one is ancient. Also it has configuration syntax changes compared to
>
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 09:28 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 17:48, Noel Butler
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> MySQL makes it such a dream, even with customers adding
> aliases and so
> on, its a simple instruction to my
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 08:54 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
>
> I guess you've been bitten by a proper database solution given
> your apprehension for using one.
>
> It's called experience. I could explain many cases where SQL is
> overkill and overhead. But I don't do mail
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 09:04 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
>
>
> > The reason we moved from qmail/vpopmail CDB to qmail/vpopmail/mysql was
> > for a MASSIVE IMPROVEMENT in performance, then added dovecot in for
> > even more performance improvements, I too was hesitant, but a large
> > university
HUH?
This has nothing to do with dovecot, dovecot gets the message once
postfix is done with it. if its not working, ask on postfix list.
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 18:51 +0200, fakessh wrote:
> hello all reader
> hello list
> hello dovecot network
>
> since I've installed dovecot deliver. e-mails
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 09:48 -0700, David Jonas wrote:
> >>
> >> Is there an obvious way around this? I know I could somehow merge the
> >> changes into the running sqlite db but that undermines the simplicity of
> >> the design I have. Maybe a patch to reopen the db if it's replaced? Or
> >> perh
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 16:10 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-06-09 2:02 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> > Recalling now, I think this issue triggered me to ditch Evolution after
> > 2 days of testing some years ago, and into using the same client
> > everywhere. But YMMV...
>
> Everything I've re
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 21:48 +0200, Johannes Dröge wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am having this error message on some rare emails with more than 6 mb
> or so. Neither the dovecot server nor the filesystem where the maildir
> resides have any quota or are full at the time of delivering.
>
> The mails go
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 08:28 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 21:48 +0200, Johannes Dröge wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am having this error message on some rare emails with more than 6 mb
> > or so. Neither the dovecot server nor the filesystem
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 09:17 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
> They're actually pretty reliable... but for me its more the privacy (or
> lack thereof) issue that keeps me from using them more...
>
eh? you have far more risk of privacy invasion from google (by their own
admission so they know ho
caution OS war related statements within :)
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 07:29 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> We are not in disagreement, we just apparently do things differently. I
> prefer the 'rolling release' type of system that always has *everything*
> reasonably up to date, and gentoo gives me
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 21:49 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> dovecot in mainstream, but hey, he still prefers sendmail over postfix,
> which is fine for system only users, but most of us do a lot more, and
> Claus has told me directly they will never support MySQL so we removed
Just want t
re-sent , this never made it to the list, my anti spam system ate it :)
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 07:07 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>
> That's an interesting position/observation given that RHEL, SLES, and CentOS
> (RHEL derivative) have the largest datacenter footprint in the US by far.
> Acros
On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 03:31 -0700, Brendan McCollam wrote:
> I'm running dovecot 1.0.7 on CentOS 5.5, and I've configured it to work
this version is so old it is essentially unsupported
>
> The response seems to be "nobody keeps their quota in MySQL", but the
Lots of people do, us include
On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 09:53 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 6/19/2010 6:43 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
> > don't use postfix admin,
>
I apparently left out "I" (dont use it), this either way should have
been clear by the rest of my paragraph, unless of course you were
trolling.
On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 14:05 -0700, Brendan McCollam wrote:
> >
> that 1.0.7 is a pretty old release, and you don't have much control over
> what the distro maintainers choose to package.
>
This is the biggest problem most people face. But the freedom of the
Open Source world to use whats we w
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 09:53 +0200, Gerhard Waldemair wrote:
> Am 23.06.2010 um 09:47 schrieb Marcus Linnenkohl:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm new here, and I'm from Germany, so please be patient with me because my
> > English is not so good ;)
> >
> > I am searching for a Step-to-Step Guide to firs
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 16:58 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> On 6/24/2010 4:23 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >> I'd recommend also installing and configuring imapproxy - it can be
> >> beneficial with squirrelmail.
> >>
> > Do you have any about a real world numbers about installation with and
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 02:18 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 25.6.2010, at 1.37, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> > If its running on a SOHO, you probably wouldn't even be able to measure
> > the difference, but for an ISP/Telco or large institution, you will
> > certainly no
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 13:49 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 14:44 +0200, Amon Ott wrote:
>
> > For whatever it is worth, we use imapproxy, because it allows us to use
> > one-time passwords for webmail users. One login, not many.
>
> With large enough auth cache, I think tha
apologies, I sent this direct to Eric not the list ore OP, my bad :)
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 13:46 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote:
>
> > now i would also need to edit the dovecot.conf file
> > could you guide me on what changes do i need to dovecot.conf file ?
>
> Others on this list would be mo
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 01:02 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 26.6.2010, at 0.57, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> > As I mentioned earlier It doesnt with squirrelmail, I tried it on
> > production and the I/O increased a bit, watching logging alone was
> > giving me a
> > h
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 14:27 +0800, Angelo Chen wrote:
> auth default:
> passdb:
> driver: pam
> userdb:
> driver: passwd
>
You're using system accounts so yes, but I'd hope that if server is on
any importance you would be doing more than just backing up that.
/home /etc /var/mai
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 22:28 +0800, Angelo Chen wrote:
> Hi Noel,
>
>
> I use exim4 and it delivers right into ~/.Maildir, so I assume /home contains
> all the emails, right? why we need to back up /etc and /var/mail? Thanks,
>
No real experience with Exim, last time I looked at it was 10 y
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 18:11 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> but if they don't virtual users is
> just as easy/legitimate as system users with no shell access.
I agree, virtual users are not only easier to deal with, it gives you
greater flexibility, but most importantly, better security.
in the
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 04:01 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Anyone who isn't looking at mail logs or log summaries daily and taking action
> on any problems needing attention doesn't count as a mail OP.
That's one of the most ridiculous things I've seen todate.
Do you seriously expect ISP admins
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 06:14 -0400, Jerry wrote:
> I agree. If the system is constructed correctly it certainly does not
> need that sort of attention. There is software available that can
> monitor the system to a high degree of satisfaction. However, Noel, I
> firmly believe that there are OPs (
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 12:12 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >
> > Mail Administration is not complicated, all too many people like to over
> > complicate their setups and only cause themselves work.
> >
> > I've had more than one CEO in the past say to me that they like to see
> > key NOC staff d
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 18:16 -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> > (I wrote a script to convert from vpopmail structure to a better
> > structure when we moved from that mess to postfix/dovecot/mysql a few
> > years back, that conv
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 21:43 -0700, Frank Cusack wrote:
> On 7/1/10 9:59 AM +0200 Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> > I do _not_ argue about security here. I really wonder why some distros
> > still allow ssh-access by default for every user and some don't. Even a
> > virtual-user based setup requires system
This has NOTHING to do with Dovecot
I am an Australian, and are on other appropriate lists for such
discussions such as our communist dictatorship ALP govt power tripping,
but I'm afraid all you have done here, is SPAM, please do not do this
again.
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:21 +1000, Ryan Hallowa
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 09:26 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Noel Butler put forth on 7/1/2010 4:46 PM:
>
> < snipped the juvenile stabs >
>
> > oh but as a parting shot, with all that mail we get, little spam, scams
> > or viruses gets to our users, that says we are
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 08:42 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Noel Butler :
> > *sigh*
> >
> > are you really this stupid or just trolling ?
>
> Seriously, I think you should all go offlist with your insults. Stop stealing
> other peoples attention with your
It is anticipated to be next week or so, pending bug reports on rc3
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 12:37 +0100, Guy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Been having a look at the roadmap on the wiki for Dovecot 2.0 and I was
> wondering how that's progressing? Are you able to offer a guesstimate on how
> far it is from stab
I know this unnecessary lookups question is really a postfix one, but
I'm curious if anyone else sees the behaviour of
postfix continuing looking up users after it clearly have got its answer
that it is "not a local domain" response.
(this msg is an extract from what I sent to WV some time ago,
:)
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:50 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> I know this unnecessary lookups question is really a postfix one, but
> I'm curious if anyone else sees the behaviour of
> postfix continuing looking up users after it clearly have got its answer
> that it is "not a
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 14:48 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 09:38 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> > Can you confirm the Server Settings?
> >
> > Type: IMAP
> > Server Name: dovecot.org
> > Port: 143
> > Username: anonymous
> > Connection Security: None
> > Auth method: Password
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 13:31 -0600, CJ Keist wrote:
>
> For our new mail server I'm looking to switch to the Maildir format.
> Some years ago I remember reading that it was not recommended to run
> Maildir format over NFS. Now I'm looking at several posts that seem to
> indicate that Maildir
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 16:27 -0400, Patrick Domack wrote:
> .
>
> Looking at the new methods for v2.0, still on the fence though with them.
>
Yeah, know what ya mean, I've decided, if it aint broke, dont break
it :)
<>
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 09:17 -0600, CJ Keist wrote:
> All,
> Thanks for all the information. I think I'm leaning towards
> locally attached fiber disk array. Couple of advantages I see, one it
> will be faster than NFS, second it will allow us to separate user home
> directory disk quotas
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 15:18 -0700, Maxwell Reid wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> > Noel Butler put forth on 8/6/2010 4:29 PM:
> >
> > > Actually you will not notice any difference. How do you think all the
> > > big boys do i
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 00:27 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Care to elaborate on this point? The NFS server sits in user space. All
> cluster filesystem operations take place in kernel space.
>
helll 2001 is calling you, NFS has been in kernel for many
years now.
it seems I'm missin
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 06:21 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Simply being wrong does not a troll make, however...
No , what makes one a troll is the amount of constant crap emitted from
a person over many mediums.
> It was pointed out to you a couple of months ago on the spam-l list that
spam
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 14:06 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Since my old config had this:
>
> protocols = imap imaps pop3 pop3s
>
> ssl_cert_file = /usr/share/ssl/certs/imapd.pem
> ssl_key_file = /usr/share/ssl/certs/imapd.pem
>
> then the convert script should have added
>
> ssl = yes
>
> Just t
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 10:22 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> a
> >
> No - I'm saying that an upgrade that does exactly the same thing as the
> earlier version should "just work" without having to research cryptic
> error messages you get after the new software fails to load. What I'm
> saying is tha
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 12:28 -0400, Jerrale G wrote:
>
> *Timo Sirainen and Charles Marcus*
>
eh Charles Marcus is not a developer, he has nothing to do with Dovecot
other than he is a participant of this list
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 16:43 +, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
> > eh Charles Marcus is not a developer, he has nothing to do
> > with Dovecot
> > other than he is a participant of this list
>
> Yeah, but I will have to give Charles some credit.
> I've crossed swords with him before and, without wanti
CharlesMarcus
LOL, you kinda contradicted yourself here charlie boy
and personal RBL? yup, but its not just used by me, its used by a few if
you read the link, a few involving millions of emails a day, but
shouldnt be a problem giving the geographical locations...
and lied? list msgs caught in sp
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 08:54 +1000, Edward avanti wrote:
> Halo,
> Please can you explain why this is advantage over a hardware load balancer.
it is no advantage over a dedicated hardware solution, but director does
not do the exact same thing.
> I fail to see advantage if anything it add in mo
hers sit there with one or two users on it.
I really thought we got over the NFS corruption stuff when Daniel wrote
Maildir ... *sigh*
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 22:28 -0700, Brandon Davidson wrote:
> Noel,
>
> On 8/26/10 9:59 PM, "Noel Butler" wrote:
>
> >> I fail
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 04:04 -0700, Brandon Davidson wrote:
> To each their own. If your setup works without it, then fine, don't use
> it... but I don't see why you feel the need to disparage it either. It's
I'll some it up put well by someone who mailed me offlist...
mx-in-1 gets the connectio
10-08-28 at 13:11 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 04:04 -0700, Brandon Davidson wrote:
>
>
> > To each their own. If your setup works without it, then fine, don't use
> > it... but I don't see why you feel the need to disparage it either. It&#
On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 09:18 +0200, Cor Bosman wrote:
> Noel, I think you just dont quite understand the problem the director is
> solving.
>
> The issue is that NFS is not lock-safe over multiple servers. We have 35
> imap servers accessing a central NFS cluster. (we have over a million
> mailbo
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 07:16 +1000, Edward avanti wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>
> > On 8/31/2010 10:22, Ariel Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > Oh, and Timo, I don't think we are just "a couple of NFS users". Maildir
> > > and NFS are not as uncommon as
> > > you'd thin
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 07:22 +1000, Edward avanti wrote:
> why you reply with 7 page of rubbish?
nasty, he was trying to explain it, even though you (i, and some others)
feel its irrelevant , perhaps this subject could have bene modified to
remove director :)
By a quick skim of this (I didnt ge
FFS Gerard keep your self appointed net copping to hte other usual
lists, even though on one of them (MailSCaner) you were told by JF that
anyone can post in anyway they want, including top post. your not a
moderator here, stop playing one.
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 18:19 -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Fr
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 22:36 -0700, Tim Traver wrote:
>
> As I read down the thread, I realized that many of the posters were
> pointing out that it shouldn't be used because postfix or qmail can
> deliver without problems. But in doing that, you lose the performance
> gain (and in my case the us
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 09:50 +0200, Cor Bosman wrote:
> Hi Noel,
>
> > I do take exception to be told this issue can be fixed, but NFS users
> > are not worth it, which is essentially what he told us, I dare say if
>
> I guess he told you this in private? The way i understand it the
yep, we ha
Tim,
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 12:26 -0700, Tim Traver wrote:
> yes, there is no change on the delivery performance, as dovecot-lda is
> just a delivery program to the Maildir just like any other. The thing
> that it does different is update the dovecot uidlist and update the
> index with a new mail
On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 01:24 -0400, Aladdin wrote:
>
> mail_location:
> maildir:/var/mail/%d/%n:CONTROL=/var/mail/%d/%n:INDEX=/var/mail/%d/%n:INBOX=
> /var/mail/%d/%n
>
This looks wrong- maildir:/var/mail/%d/%n it should be
maildir:/var/mail/%d/%n/Maildir
and it appears strange that yo
201 - 300 of 457 matches
Mail list logo
