On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 15:32 +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote: > Timo Sirainen ha scritto: > > On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 20:01 +1000, Noel Butler wrote: > >>>>> "dovehole" - you go inside dovecot via a hole, right? > >>>> That is downright pornographic. "dovehole" - "lovehole"? > >>>> > >>>> "dovenest" isn't totally horrible (close), but "dovehole" is ... > >>>> just not > >>>> right at all. > >>> dovetail > >> +1 > > > > Tail just doesn't make much sense to me. Also it's not completely free > > of pornographic associations either. :) > > > > So my last idea: doveless. "It's less of a dovecot process." To me it > > seems closer to perfect as anything I've seen so far. > > I don't remember if 'dove-nil', 'dovenil' or 'dovenull' were suggested > by anyone. If not please consider them. >
Nice Marco... OK, Timo, we must have a winner here with " dovenull", surely :P
<<attachment: stock_smiley-10.png>>
