Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes not working with . dot namespace separator - values truncated in SQL

Am 23.04.2014 10:17, schrieb Frantisek Kucera: > Dne St 23. dubna 2014 09:53:18, Robert Schetterer napsal(a): >> i have >> separator = / >> why you wanna use different ? > > I don't insist on the dot :-) And I also see "/" as better and more > meaningful > separator. But the dot was default on m

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes not working with . dot namespace separator - values truncated in SQL

Dne St 23. dubna 2014 09:53:18, Robert Schetterer napsal(a): > i have > separator = / > why you wanna use different ? I don't insist on the dot :-) And I also see "/" as better and more meaningful separator. But the dot was default on my systems (Debian, Ubuntu) so I stayed with it until I hit o

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes not working with . dot namespace separator - values truncated in SQL

Am 23.04.2014 09:23, schrieb Frantisek Kucera: > Dne St 23. dubna 2014 09:10:32, Robert Schetterer napsal(a): >> Am 23.04.2014 08:50, schrieb Frantisek Kucera: >>> So I suggest update in the wiki: n.b. If you have dots "." in your usernames (like `name.surname` or `n...@example.com`) it i

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes not working with . dot namespace separator - values truncated in SQL

Dne St 23. dubna 2014 09:10:32, Robert Schetterer napsal(a): > Am 23.04.2014 08:50, schrieb Frantisek Kucera: > > So I suggest update in the wiki: > >> n.b. If you have dots "." in your usernames (like `name.surname` or > >> `n...@example.com`) it is not possible to use dot as a > >> [[Namespaces|n

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes not working with . dot namespace separator - values truncated in SQL

Am 23.04.2014 08:50, schrieb Frantisek Kucera: > P.P.S. Iwas thinking about this again and it is probably not possible to > support this combination: dot separator + shared mailboxes + usernames with > dots (including the domain part). > > So I suggest update in the wiki: > >> n.b. If you have

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes not working with . dot namespace separator - values truncated in SQL

P.P.S. Iwas thinking about this again and it is probably not possible to support this combination: dot separator + shared mailboxes + usernames with dots (including the domain part). So I suggest update in the wiki: > n.b. If you have dots "." in your usernames (like `name.surname` or > `n...@

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes / IMAP folder performance

Am 21.01.2014 18:09, schrieb Sebastian Schlatow: > Am 21.01.2014 17:51, schrieb Robert Schetterer: >> Am 21.01.2014 17:31, schrieb Sebastian Schlatow: >>> Hello, >>> >>> how performant is an IMAP shared folder / mailbox if it contains 2 >>> million mails? Is it possible two have such a quantity of

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes / IMAP folder performance

Am 21.01.2014 17:51, schrieb Robert Schetterer: > Am 21.01.2014 17:31, schrieb Sebastian Schlatow: >> Hello, >> >> how performant is an IMAP shared folder / mailbox if it contains 2 >> million mails? Is it possible two have such a quantity of mails in a >> shared folder? Is it possible to search th

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes / IMAP folder performance

Am 21.01.2014 17:31, schrieb Sebastian Schlatow: > Hello, > > how performant is an IMAP shared folder / mailbox if it contains 2 > million mails? Is it possible two have such a quantity of mails in a > shared folder? Is it possible to search that shared folder for mails in > a fast way? > > Regar

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes and indexes

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 27.11.2012, at 3.24, Sven Hartge wrote: >>> For implementing shared mailboxes between all user servers, I think >>> what would need to be developed is: >> imapc_host = m-st-sh-01.example.com imapc_master_user = %u imapc_user = shared >> >>> Somehow being

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes and indexes

On 27.11.2012, at 3.24, Sven Hartge wrote: >> For implementing shared mailboxes between all user servers, I think >> what would need to be developed is: > >>> imapc_host = m-st-sh-01.example.com >>> imapc_master_user = %u >>> imapc_user = shared > >> Somehow being able to set "imapc_user = %%u"

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes and indexes

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 23.11.2012, at 17.53, Sven Hartge wrote: > BTW. Do you have multiple Dovecot backend servers? Director works > only when you're not using shared mailboxes.. >> >>> You can't reliably do it if the mailboxes are accessed directly via >>> NFS. The current idea to

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes and indexes

On 27.11.2012, at 3.00, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> Now the mentioned quirk: Because all connections on the shared-server >> are made to the same user "shared" and are coming from very few IPs >> (the 1 to X user-servers), you need to set a very high >> mail_max_userip_connections value. >> >> I set

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes and indexes

On 23.11.2012, at 17.53, Sven Hartge wrote: BTW. Do you have multiple Dovecot backend servers? Director works only when you're not using shared mailboxes.. > >> You can't reliably do it if the mailboxes are accessed directly via >> NFS. The current idea to solve this is to use imapc ba

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes and indexes

El 23/11/12 08:07, Timo Sirainen escribió: On 16.11.2012, at 12.11, Angel L. Mateo wrote: We are deploying shared mailboxes in our mail system. We are running 2.1.9 and mail backend is maildir. As described at http://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Shared when shared namespa

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes and indexes

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 23.11.2012, at 13.27, Alessio Cecchi wrote: >> Il 23/11/2012 08:07, Timo Sirainen ha scritto: >>> BTW. Do you have multiple Dovecot backend servers? Director works >>> only when you're not using shared mailboxes.. >> I'm not happy to hear that, so if today we are runn

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes and indexes

On 23.11.2012, at 13.27, Alessio Cecchi wrote: > Il 23/11/2012 08:07, Timo Sirainen ha scritto: >> BTW. Do you have multiple Dovecot backend servers? Director works only when >> you're not using shared mailboxes.. > > I'm not happy to hear that, so if today we are running one dovecot server >

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes and indexes

Il 23/11/2012 08:07, Timo Sirainen ha scritto: BTW. Do you have multiple Dovecot backend servers? Director works only when you're not using shared mailboxes.. I'm not happy to hear that, so if today we are running one dovecot server with shared mailbox enabled and tomorrow we will switch to a

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes and indexes

On 16.11.2012, at 12.11, Angel L. Mateo wrote: > We are deploying shared mailboxes in our mail system. We are running > 2.1.9 and mail backend is maildir. > > As described at http://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Shared when > shared namespace is configured as > > namespace share

Re: [Dovecot] Shared Mailboxes in a multi domain environment

Il 17/09/2012 14:44, Timo Sirainen ha scritto: So, why don't provide a way to restrict shared mailboxes also for dict in SQL? One way could be to add to "user_shares" table a column "domains" which is the same domain of the mailbox'owner and a config option, for acl, like acl_only_for_same_doma

Re: [Dovecot] Shared Mailboxes in a multi domain environment

On 17.9.2012, at 10.09, Alessio Cecchi wrote: > I would like to enable mailbox sharing for my users. I'm using dovecot 2.1.9 > with vpopmail authentication. For security reason shared mailboxes should be > available only for users of the same domain. > > Dovecot's wiki suggest to enable acl lik

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes with dovecot problem service=lib-storage

On 28.3.2012, at 11.57, Tomislav Mihalicek wrote: > Could someone explain what this strings mean in dovecot 2.1.3 debug log? > > Mar 27 11:18:11 cartman dovecot: auth: Debug: master in: USER 1 > te...@example.net service=lib-storage > Mar 27 11:18:11 cartman dovecot: auth: Debug: master in: U

Re: [Dovecot] Shared Mailboxes with VirtualUsers and mail_location retrieved from ldap

and for the time that user001 execute the imap 'list' command, this is the log trace in dovecot: Sep  9 13:09:12 imap1 dovecot: imap(user001): Debug: Namespace : type=shared, prefix=shared.%u., sep=., inbox=no, hidden=no, list=children, subscriptions=no location=maildir:%h/mailSubDir:INDEX=~/

Re: [Dovecot] Shared Mailboxes with VirtualUsers and mail_location retrieved from ldap

(I'm sorry for breaking the thread with each mail) On 09/09/2011 10:04 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:18:40AM +0100, mailing lists wrote: >> >> and how to I might configure dovecot to use the mail directory as a >> subdirectory of the home directory? >> >> this way

Re: [Dovecot] Shared Mailboxes with VirtualUsers and mail_location retrieved from ldap

On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:18:40AM +0100, mailing lists wrote: > > and how to I might configure dovecot to use the mail directory as a > subdirectory of the home directory? > > this way all lookups for home (with %%h fetched from ldap) will return the > correct locationand mail will be in (i.e.

Re: [Dovecot] Shared Mailboxes with VirtualUsers and mail_location retrieved from ldap

On 09/08/2011 03:07 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 12:14 +0100, mailing lists wrote: > >> yes, my virtual users have separate directories for home and mail. >> Their locations are stored in ldap attributes (with random generated >> paths), so a flat scheme like /var/maildr/%%u i

Re: [Dovecot] Shared Mailboxes with VirtualUsers and mail_location retrieved from ldap

On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 12:14 +0100, mailing lists wrote: > yes, my virtual users have separate directories for home and mail. > Their locations are stored in ldap attributes (with random generated > paths), so a flat scheme like /var/maildr/%%u isn't valid. Sorry, you're out of luck with that kind

Re: [Dovecot] Shared Mailboxes with VirtualUsers and mail_location retrieved from ldap

Hello, On 09/07/2011 07:22 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 6.9.2011, at 14.27, mailing lists wrote: >> At this point I need shared mailboxes but since user mail/home locations are >> ldap attributes, how is it supposed I must configure this for shared >> mailboxes? >> >> for the users' mail/home

Re: [Dovecot] Shared Mailboxes with VirtualUsers and mail_location retrieved from ldap

On 6.9.2011, at 14.27, mailing lists wrote: > I spend a couple of days configurating a new installation of dovecot 2.0.14 > with virtual accounts and NFS storage for maildir home/mail directories. > > > At this point I need shared mailboxes but since user mail/home locations are > ldap attribu

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes

On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 01:33 +0300, Vasil Mikhalenya wrote: > 1. How to create a public mailbox - with per user seen flag. In my > configuration this flag is shared Currently this is possible only with Maildir (by creating dovecot-shared file). > 2. How to share one user mailbox with other users

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes and acl

On 07/05/2011 18:32, Juan C. Blanco wrote: Hello, I've finally upgrade to dovecot 2.0.12 and I'm doing some test with shared mailboxes and acl. I've read http://wiki2.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Shared and changed the dovecot config as recommended, I'm using Horde/IMP as imap_acl client Seems

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes in dovecot

On 2010-11-02 2:58 AM, Jay Mobile wrote: > i hve a requirement of setting up two folders which should be shared > only to selected users only. > lets assume user A wants to share a folder named shared with user B > only. how can i get this done? That's about as basic as it gets... did you read

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes in dovecot

Jay Mobile wrote on 11/02/2010: Hi, i hve a requirement of setting up two folders which should be shared only to selected users only. Pls note that my users are virtual and reside on mysql db. im using maildir as storage. lets assume user A wants to share a folder named shared with user B o

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes with dovecot.

On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 16:13 +0300, Mihajlin Evgenij wrote: > > mail_location = maildir:/var/spool/vmail/domains/%d/%n/Maildir > namespace { > location = maildir:%%h/Maildir:INDEX=~/Maildir/shared/%%u These don't match. You're now using home dir in one but not the other. > user_attrs = > =hom

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes with dovecot.

On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 16:13 +0300, Mihajlin Evgenij wrote: > Hi, first of all for forgive me for my english. > > I have several questions. > 1. There are 2 user/passwd databases in my setup - ldap and mysql. when i > login into one user with telnet 127.0.0.1 143 and share inbox to some users -

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes with dovecot.

Again, what does mean this strings? Aug 26 15:48:03 auth: Debug: master in: USER1 za...@badmltd.dn.ua service=lib-storage Aug 26 15:48:03 auth: Debug: master in: USER2 t...@badmltd.dn.ua service=lib-storage Aug 26 15:48:03 auth: Debug: master in: USER2 t..

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes errors

On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 23:16:38 +0200 Leander S. wrote: > Hi Nikita Koshikov, > > when I googled for my SERVERBUG which I'm having right now I found your > configuration. > I'm trying to make use of the antispam plugin as you do. Unfortunately > I'm always getting a [SERVERBUG] error mesage wit

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes errors

On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:57:08 +0100 Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 16:25 +0300, Nikita Koshikov wrote: > > > Jun 17 15:50:33 dict: Error: sql dict iterate: Invalid/unmapped path: > > shared/shared-boxes/anyone/ > > I think the wiki sql configuration was written/tested by someone wh

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes errors

On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 16:25 +0300, Nikita Koshikov wrote: > Jun 17 15:50:33 dict: Error: sql dict iterate: Invalid/unmapped path: > shared/shared-boxes/anyone/ I think the wiki sql configuration was written/tested by someone who got the same errors, but ignored them.. You need to provide also a

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes

On 2010-05-18 7:16 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 18.5.2010, at 13.10, Matthew Sackman wrote: But ive no idea how to share a mailbox. Thunderbird and most other Clients seem not to support the setacl command. >> Yeah, I found that too. My solution was to learn IMAP, telnet in, >> and run

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes

On 18.5.2010, at 13.10, Matthew Sackman wrote: >>> But ive no idea how to share a mailbox. >>> Thunderbird and most other Clients seem not to support the setacl command. > > Yeah, I found that too. My solution was to learn IMAP, telnet in, and > run the SETACL commands myself. Yes, that's curren

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 08:07:57AM -0300, Marcio Merlone wrote: > Em 14-05-2010 12:45, spamv...@googlemail.com escreveu: > >can anyone give me a hind how to setup shared mailboxes. > >I've already created the shared and private namespace. > > > >But ive no idea how to share a mailbox. > >Thunderbir

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes

Em 14-05-2010 12:45, spamv...@googlemail.com escreveu: can anyone give me a hind how to setup shared mailboxes. I've already created the shared and private namespace. But ive no idea how to share a mailbox. Thunderbird and most other Clients seem not to support the setacl command. so do i have

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes unix permissions

On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:40 +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote: > Everything gets created with the permission I was expecting, except : > > -rw--- 1 doveimap doveshared 8 Mar 31 18:47 > /courriel/meta/doveimap/dovecot-uidvalidity > -rw--- 1 doveimap doveshared 0 Mar 31 18:44 > /courri

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes unix permissions

On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 11:17:26AM +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote: > > and the 'dovecot-shared' file doesn't help (besides, my understanding is > > that > > in 1.2x, it's for backward compatibility reason). Which makes me wonder : does the dovecot-shared file still control, with 1.2x/Maildir/shared

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes unix permissions

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 07:40:29PM +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote: > Hello Timo, > > I'm running dovecot-1.2.11/Maildir and plan to migrate to single UID mailboxes > some day, but for now, I've got "system" users and I'm testing permissions > handling in order to set up shared mailboxes. > > The priv

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes, mkdir_parents problem

On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 14:38 +0100, Leo Unglaub wrote: > > 2010-03-18 10:03:04 IMAP(unglaub): Error: > > mkdir_parents(/var/mails/e-c-o.at/kirchmeir) failed: Permission denied .. > > mail_location: maildir:/var/mail/%d/%n .. > > location: maildir:/var/mails/e-c-o.at/%%n:INDEX=/tmp/%%n /var/mail

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes, mkdir_parents problem

Leo Unglaub gmail.com> writes: > > Hi Friends, > i have a little problem with my Dovecot installation. The normal > installation works very well and now i have to configurate dovecot that > all member from a domain can access all mailboxes from this domain. >mail_location: maildir:/var/mail/%

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes, mkdir_parents problem

Leo Unglaub gmail.com> writes: > > Hi Friends, > i have a little problem with my Dovecot installation. The normal > installation works very well and now i have to configurate dovecot that > all member from a domain can access all mailboxes from this domain. > I configurate the shared namespace

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes basics

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 03:59:02PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > Yes. Ok, I was complicating things then : I was using the "system_groups_user" extra-field and a secondary "doveshared" unix group. But the question now is when to use mail_extra_groups and when to use the "system_groups_user" extr

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes basics

On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 14:56 +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote: > So basically, independently of ACL groups, the idea is to > > . chgrp all maildirs to some unix group (doveshared) > > . chmod 0770 those maildirs > > . add that group to mail_extra_groups > > . so dovecot would be able to acces

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes basics

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 03:40:23PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 14:34 +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote: > > > You lost me again : what's the use of the userdb " acl_groups" extra-field > > then ? > > That only adds user to given ACL groups for ACL plugin's checks. ACL > plugin d

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes basics

On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 14:34 +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote: > You lost me again : what's the use of the userdb " acl_groups" extra-field > then ? That only adds user to given ACL groups for ACL plugin's checks. ACL plugin deals only with virtual permissions, acl_groups has nothing to do with filesys

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes basics

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Thomas Hummel wrote: On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 02:47:45PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: Do you mean your maildirs are all in 0770 doveshared ? But it still gives too much permission in general...Especially if your users can acces

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes basics

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 02:47:45PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > Do you mean your maildirs are all in 0770 doveshared ? But it still > > gives too much permission in general...Especially if your users can access > > their mailboxes outside of IMAP (NFS, CIFS, ...). How do you deal with that >

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes basics

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Timo Sirainen wrote: their mailboxes outside of IMAP (NFS, CIFS, ...). How do you deal with that ? I don't have any other access than IMAP. You don't need to put all users into doveshared group. You just need to set mail_ex

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes basics

On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 11:05 +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:25:45AM +0100, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > > > My idea was to put everybody sharing folders and everybody, who may access > > shared folders, into the same group "doveshared", then leverage the > > Unix permissions

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes basics

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:51:26AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > My idea was to put everybody sharing folders and everybody, who may access > > shared folders, into the same group "doveshared", then leverage the Unix > > permissions, that this group may access the folders. So I do not need to us

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes basics

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:25:45AM +0100, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > My idea was to put everybody sharing folders and everybody, who may access > shared folders, into the same group "doveshared", then leverage the > Unix permissions, that this group may access the folders. So I do not need > to us

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes basics

On 22.3.2010, at 11.25, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Thomas Hummel wrote: > >> Ok, but I still don't quite get it : if you use the same UID, doesn't this >> somehow equates giving something like 777 modes in the system user case ? (I >> mean on an OS level, problems related to suc

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes basics

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Thomas Hummel wrote: Ok, but I still don't quite get it : if you use the same UID, doesn't this somehow equates giving something like 777 modes in the system user case ? (I mean on an OS level, problems related to such loose per

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes basics

On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 22:14 +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote: > Get it. So I guess the recommended method to "make the share mailboxes > visible" > is to talk IMAP (through telnet for instance) and not trying to suppose > anything about the shared-mailbox file format and try to hack it directly, > righ

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes basics

On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 22:09 +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 09:11:32PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > Thanks for your answer Timo. > > > > a) I wonder if TB even support the SETACL command since I don't see how I > > > can > > >modify an ACL through the TB UI. > > > >

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes basics

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 09:11:32PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > Yes, because SETACL updates also the shared-mailbox file, which contains > information about what mailboxes are visible to who. Without that, > Dovecot would have to look through all users all mailboxes to see if > there happens to b

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes basics

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 09:11:32PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: Thanks for your answer Timo. > > a) I wonder if TB even support the SETACL command since I don't see how I > > can > >modify an ACL through the TB UI. > > It doesn't. Ouch! What known UA does support it ? What's the point of

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes basics

On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 17:27 +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote: > a) I wonder if TB even support the SETACL command since I don't see how I can >modify an ACL through the TB UI. It doesn't. > b) For things to work, I had to set up loose permissions on the maildirs and > the shared-mailbox file. I've

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes basics

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 05:50:44PM +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote: > But isn't a client like Thunderbird (3.0.3) supposed to > > . show me the #shared (even if no one shares mailboxes to me) "folder" > (because of list = yes )? > > . let me share, let's say the .sous.arbo mailbox ? If yes, how

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes do not support subfolders

On December 29, 2009 12:06:06 AM +0100 Nick Rosier wrote: Shared as in user-shared mailboxes. I think it was a mailclient (TB) problem. After subscribing from webmail (roundcube) I'm able to see them. I will do some more testing to see if I can reproduce. Did you read the bottom of

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes do not support subfolders

Frank Cusack wrote: On December 28, 2009 4:44:45 PM +0100 Nick Rosier wrote: Hi, I'm currently running Dovecot 1.2.8 with dbox mailboxes. I've configured the use of shared mailboxes. I'm able to only see the top-level mailboxes: e.g. Inbox LogWatch Trash Sent but not LogWatch/Server1 LogWat

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes do not support subfolders

On December 28, 2009 4:44:45 PM +0100 Nick Rosier wrote: Hi, I'm currently running Dovecot 1.2.8 with dbox mailboxes. I've configured the use of shared mailboxes. I'm able to only see the top-level mailboxes: e.g. Inbox LogWatch Trash Sent but not LogWatch/Server1 LogWatch/Server2 Is this a k

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes using namespaces in 1.2

On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 00:22 +0100, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote: > If Shared/spamrep/ contains cur/, new/ and tmp/, I'd suspect that > dovecot should display Shared/spamrep as a folder but not Shared. Why is > Shared/ also missing the \Noselect attribute? I suppose it's a bug. Two-level namespac

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes using namespaces in 1.2

On 11/23/2009 11:05 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 22:56 +0100, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote: >>> Also do you have >>> a /var/spool/mail/Shared/spamrep/cur/ directory? >> Yes: >> # ls -ld /var/spool/mail/Shared/spamrep/cur >> drwxrws--- 2 nobody spamrep 6 2009-11-23 16:02 >> /va

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes using namespaces in 1.2

On 11/23/2009 11:05 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 22:56 +0100, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote: >>> Also do you have >>> a /var/spool/mail/Shared/spamrep/cur/ directory? >> Yes: >> # ls -ld /var/spool/mail/Shared/spamrep/cur >> drwxrws--- 2 nobody spamrep 6 2009-11-23 16:02 >> /va

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes using namespaces in 1.2

On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 22:56 +0100, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote: > > Also do you have > > a /var/spool/mail/Shared/spamrep/cur/ directory? > > Yes: > # ls -ld /var/spool/mail/Shared/spamrep/cur > drwxrws--- 2 nobody spamrep 6 2009-11-23 16:02 > /var/spool/mail/Shared/spamrep/cur That's the reas

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes using namespaces in 1.2

On 11/23/2009 09:51 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 21:39 +0100, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote: >> 16 list "" "%" >> >> ... and dovecot returns "Shared" without \Noselect: >> >> * LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "Shared" >> >> Is there a way to tell dovecot that this is only the base of m

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes using namespaces in 1.2

On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 21:39 +0100, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote: > 16 list "" "%" > > ... and dovecot returns "Shared" without \Noselect: > > * LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "Shared" > > Is there a way to tell dovecot that this is only the base of my > namespaces and that it should include a \Nosele

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes using namespaces in 1.2

On 11/23/2009 07:27 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 19:19 +0100, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote: >> Nov 23 19:10:15 strike dovecot: IMAP(leo): Namespace: type=shared, >> prefix=Shared/spamrep/, sep=/, inbox=no, hidden=no, list=yes, >> subscriptions=no > > See if using type=publi

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes using namespaces in 1.2

On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 19:19 +0100, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote: > Nov 23 19:10:15 strike dovecot: IMAP(leo): Namespace: type=shared, > prefix=Shared/spamrep/, sep=/, inbox=no, hidden=no, list=yes, subscriptions=no See if using type=public works better. type=shared namespace is kind of a specia

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes using namespaces in 1.2

On 11/23/2009 06:28 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 17:03 +0100, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote: >> However now that I've upgraded to 1.2.8, I cannot create subfolders >> anymore. The server responds with "NO Invalid mailbox name: >> test/testsub". The hierarchy separator for the n

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes using namespaces in 1.2

On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 17:03 +0100, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote: > However now that I've upgraded to 1.2.8, I cannot create subfolders > anymore. The server responds with "NO Invalid mailbox name: > test/testsub". The hierarchy separator for the namespaces is / because I > am mixing maildir and m

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes and INBOX

On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 17:50 +0100, Keith Edmunds wrote: > namespace: > type: shared > separator: / > prefix: security/ > location: > maildir:/home/securitymailbox/Maildir:INDEX=~/Maildir/securitymailbox Well, fine, if everyone really wants to have these one-mailbox namespaces, this enables

Re: [Dovecot] Shared Mailboxes (symlink) and kmail: known issues? [partly solved]

On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 19:07 +0100, Wilhelm Meier wrote: > Other question: is it save with respect to dovecot to remove > the "T"-flagged messages in the maildir, e.g. per inotify? Yes, this > is a hack, I know. Yes, it's safe. Although if you're using quota it's not updated then. signature.as

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes support status

On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 14:11 +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 08:57:40PM +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote: > > > > I guess part of the answer is in the diffences between shared and public > > > namespaces handling. > > > > yes and imap_acls > > My understanding of rfc2342 and d

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes support status

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 08:57:40PM +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote: > > I guess part of the answer is in the diffences between shared and public > > namespaces handling. > > yes and imap_acls My understanding of rfc2342 and dovecot is that : personnal namespace == private malboxes == mailboxes o

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes support status

Thomas Hummel schrieb: > Hello Timo, > > I'm running dovecot-1.1.8 and I'm about to play with namespaces and shared > mailboxes. > > I've read on the list that the Kolab people did contribute to that, and I read > at http://dovecot.org/doc/NEWS-1.2 > > "+ Full support for shared mailboxes and

Re: [Dovecot] Shared Mailboxes (symlink) and kmail: known issues? [partly solved]

Am Dienstag 20 Januar 2009 schrieb Timo Sirainen: > On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 07:21 +0100, Wilhelm Meier wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Am Montag 19 Januar 2009 schrieb Timo Sirainen: > > > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 18:32 +0100, Wilhelm Meier wrote: > > > > kmail instead seems to have some problems: if I save a ma

Re: [Dovecot] Shared Mailboxes (symlink) and kmail: known issues?

On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 07:21 +0100, Wilhelm Meier wrote: > Hi, > > Am Montag 19 Januar 2009 schrieb Timo Sirainen: > > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 18:32 +0100, Wilhelm Meier wrote: > > > kmail instead seems to have some problems: if I save a mail into > > > the shared-folder, the other users are seeing t

Re: [Dovecot] Shared Mailboxes (symlink) and kmail: known issues?

Am Dienstag 20 Januar 2009 schrieb Wilhelm Meier: > Hi, > > Am Montag 19 Januar 2009 schrieb Timo Sirainen: > > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 18:32 +0100, Wilhelm Meier wrote: > > > kmail instead seems to have some problems: if I save a mail > > > into the shared-folder, the other users are seeing this new

Re: [Dovecot] Shared Mailboxes (symlink) and kmail: known issues?

Hi, Am Montag 19 Januar 2009 schrieb Timo Sirainen: > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 18:32 +0100, Wilhelm Meier wrote: > > kmail instead seems to have some problems: if I save a mail into > > the shared-folder, the other users are seeing this new mail > > almost immediately. But if I delete(!) a mail from

Re: [Dovecot] Shared Mailboxes (symlink) and kmail: known issues?

On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 18:32 +0100, Wilhelm Meier wrote: > kmail instead seems to have some problems: if I save a mail into the > shared-folder, the other users are seeing this new mail almost > immediately. But if I delete(!) a mail from the shared-folder, the > list of the other kmails remains

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes in 1.2 question

Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 13:11 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> So it's still missing the "users who have mailboxes shared to you" >> discovery missing. > > http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2006-October/017082.html lists some > options for how to implement tha

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes in 1.2 question

On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 13:11 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > So it's still missing the "users who have mailboxes shared to you" > discovery missing. http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2006-October/017082.html lists some options for how to implement that. I guess the dictionary way would work, although

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes in 1.2 question

On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:28 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 10:03 +0200, Sascha Wilde wrote: > > It seems to work now for subscribing and selecting (and therefor for > > lsub and fetch) -- but LIST still bails out: > > > > l2 list "" "*" > > * LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "INBOX" >

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes in 1.2 question

Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 10:03 +0200, Sascha Wilde wrote: >> It seems to work now for subscribing and selecting (and therefor for >> lsub and fetch) -- but LIST still bails out: >> >> l2 list "" "*" >> * LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "INBOX" >> * LIST (\HasNoChil

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes in 1.2 question

On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 10:03 +0200, Sascha Wilde wrote: > It seems to work now for subscribing and selecting (and therefor for > lsub and fetch) -- but LIST still bails out: > > l2 list "" "*" > * LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "INBOX" > * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "INBOX/Calendar" > * LIST (\HasNoChildre

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes in 1.2 question

Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 17:39 +0200, Sascha Wilde wrote: >> Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > On Oct 8, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Sascha Wilde wrote: >> > >> >> s002 subscribe "users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/blablabla" >> >> s002 NO [TRYCREATE] Mailbox do

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes in 1.2 question

Robert Schetterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sascha Wilde schrieb: >> Yes, look at http://hg.intevation.de/kolab/dovecot-1.2_acl-branch as >> announced... ;-) > Hi Sascha, > why you need an extra branch for that ? This is our working repository. The ACL extensions by Matvey aren't ready for

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes in 1.2 question

Sascha Wilde schrieb: > Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Oct 6, 2008, at 7:24 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote: >>> users after imap search, otherwise you always need some admin ( >>> perhaps >>> with shell permissions ) for editing subcriptions and acls which not >> Actually the SUBSCRIB

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes in 1.2 question

On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 17:39 +0200, Sascha Wilde wrote: > Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Oct 8, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Sascha Wilde wrote: > > > >> s002 subscribe "users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/blablabla" > >> s002 NO [TRYCREATE] Mailbox doesn't exist: users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ > >> blablab

Re: [Dovecot] shared mailboxes in 1.2 question

Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Oct 8, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Sascha Wilde wrote: > >> s002 subscribe "users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/blablabla" >> s002 NO [TRYCREATE] Mailbox doesn't exist: users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ >> blablabla > > I think this should have worked, I'll look into it. IMO the o

  1   2   >