On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 09:11:32PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: Thanks for your answer Timo.
> > a) I wonder if TB even support the SETACL command since I don't see how I > > can > > modify an ACL through the TB UI. > > It doesn't. Ouch! What known UA does support it ? What's the point of supporting only GETACL ? I guess this means that if users run this client, shared mailboxes have to be managed by an administrator, right ? > Yes, they're basically the same. But in that context "easier for virtual > users" means "easier if all your users use the same uid", since most > people use the same uid for virtual users.. (I don't think wiki confuses > these two things?) Ok, but I still don't quite get it : if you use the same UID, doesn't this somehow equates giving something like 777 modes in the system user case ? (I mean on an OS level, problems related to such loose permission are the same and, if in 777, permissions are no longer a problem for dovecot) ? Thanks. -- Thomas Hummel | Institut Pasteur <hum...@pasteur.fr> | Pôle informatique - systèmes et réseau
