various cur dirs and
still some were very out of date. The second script seemed to be
adjusting the dates of the files properly, but I am not sure what
android gmail actually uses to sort.
#!/bin/bash
for i in `ls /home/brian/Maildir/cur/`
do
# Find the date field and then remove up to the first
I've spent days scouring the Internet and trying various solutions on a
problem with my Dovecot installation, so I thought I'd share what I
learned in hopes of saving other people a lot of time. The dedicated
Dovecot hands will know all of the following already. This is for those
of us that h
demic, but I thought I’d ask why this is a limitation?
If there is not a profound security reason to not support this, is this a good
enough use case to consider it?
Thanks! Brian
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
ation failed: Namespace
'': Unknown setting: /var/mail/vmail/myactualdomain.com/brian/mail
mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir:/var/mail/vmail/%d/%n/mail:LAYOUT=fs
You have double "maildir:" keyword.
Regards
Christian
06 ip-10-0-0-244 dovecot: imap(br...@myactualdomain.com):
Error: user br...@myactualdomain.com: Initialization failed: Namespace
'': Unknown setting: /var/mail/vmail/myactualdomain.com/brian/mail
Oct 31 05:31:06 ip-10-0-0-244 dovecot: imap(br...@myactualdomain.com):
Error: Invalid use
Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/export/home/brian/software/dovecot-2.2.15/
src/lib-http'
make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/export/home/brian/software/dovecot-2.2.15/
src'
make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
This creates: -rw--- 1 root 1
At my company we've had a longstanding problem of not being able to send
email from devices outside of our internal network and any specific IP
address that we open the relay to. As it turns out, SASL has never been
set up. I need to set up SASL ASAP but none of the guides I've found
seem to wo
but one of the things I
love about it is that when I need to set up IMAP mail access for a couple users
for someone's home or business, it can be done in less than ten minutes. Create
the system users, change about four lines in the default configuration, and
done.
-brian
Seriously. Stop it. Carry on your personal vendettas with Stan and others in
private, please.
- bdh
On Mar 17, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2013-03-17 10:13 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> On 3/17/2013 5:25 AM, Professa Dementia wrote:
>>
>>> We are very sorry you are not satis
On Feb 26, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.02.2013 23:03, schrieb Charles Marcus:
>> Question: can you use arbitrary ports for secure IMAP/POP/SMTP? I don't
>> see why not. You can use arbitrary ports for secure http...
>
> you still refuse to understand the difference bet
admin has in a real organization. Please take the
non-constructive flaming and cursing somewhere else, as others have suggested.
-Brian
h users that
you're free to bully into submission. If you don't have something useful to
contribute, why not just keep it to yourself?
-Brian
Hi,
I am trying to establish an IMAP mail service accessible using a current
Thunderbird on a laptop.
I used Macports to install Dovecot2 (2.1.5) on an older Snow Leopard Mac
mini with Intel Core Duo (specifically a Macmini1,1). My goal is to be
able to run sieve under dovecot2 and offload t
--- On Sat, 6/23/12, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> From: Timo Sirainen
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Quotas in Version 2
> To: "Brian Spraker"
> Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Date: Saturday, June 23, 2012, 7:51 PM
> On 24.6.2012, at 3.45, Brian Spraker
> wrote:
>
--- On Sat, 6/23/12, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> From: Timo Sirainen
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Quotas in Version 2
> To: "Brian Spraker"
> Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Date: Saturday, June 23, 2012, 7:33 PM
> On 24.6.2012, at 3.29, Brian Spraker
> wrote:
>
--- On Sat, 6/23/12, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> From: Timo Sirainen
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Quotas in Version 2
> To: "Brian Spraker"
> Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Date: Saturday, June 23, 2012, 7:23 PM
> On 24.6.2012, at 3.10, Brian Spraker
> wrote:
>
nt through the Dovecot
Quota Configuration in the wiki but it wasn't any help - as I basically already
have that line in the config file, but it will fail to start Dovecot.
Thank you!
Brian S.
The things you're saying sound mostly applicable to a
small, easily-dictated env.
-Brian
modified it
heavily for interface and to add some features that admins are used to having
in systems where apache is involved (virtual hosts, things like that). I have
it available (GPL) as a vanilla, de-branded package--Chickadee. Website is
currently offline as I've been switching hosts, anyone who's interested can
feel free to drop me a line.
-Brian
cess_limit = 64
}
ssl = no
userdb {
driver = passwd
}
I'd like to get it back to preserving the Received date, any help you
can provide will be appreciated.
Brian
t 1.2.9 and postfix 2.7.0 from whatever was with
debian etch. I get a forwarding loop error. I don't know if this is a
dovecot issue or postfix issue so I'm starting here. If anyone has any
ideas or a better place to ask about this please let me know.
Thanks
Brian Mihulka
st told
him to do it himself. Totally different.
I agree that pointing out specific errors is more helpful than a general
request, though it's not always a realistic expectation.
-Brian
hen helpful, respectful folks such
as yourself say to anyone who wants documentation, "LEARN THE CODE AND DOCUMENT
IT YOURSELF! It's a WIKI!"
Ignoring that of course the whole point of documentation is that it (hopefully)
enables people to use software without having to read the source first...
-Brian
Timo Sirainen 2010-11-26 15:15:
> On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 09:03 -0600, Brian Kroth wrote:
> >
> > So, I redid this in Perl to only use IMAP rather than any sudo or find
> > calls. In theory then one doesn't need to worry about the indexes being
> > out of sync. I
Brian Kroth 2010-11-24 13:28:
> Timo Sirainen 2010-11-24 19:04:
> > On 24.11.2010, at 18.59, Brian Kroth wrote:
> >
> > >>> Hi, I'm running version 1.2.15 (so no doveadm)
> > >> You could build Dovecot v2.0 and only use doveadm binary from it.
Timo Sirainen 2010-11-24 19:04:
> On 24.11.2010, at 18.59, Brian Kroth wrote:
>
> >>> Hi, I'm running version 1.2.15 (so no doveadm)
> >> You could build Dovecot v2.0 and only use doveadm binary from it.
> >
> > Does it just issue the command vi
Timo Sirainen 2010-11-24 18:01:
> On 24.11.2010, at 2.55, Brian Kroth wrote:
>
> > Hi, I'm running version 1.2.15 (so no doveadm)
>
> You could build Dovecot v2.0 and only use doveadm binary from it.
Does it just issue the command via IMAP? No direct filesystem
oper
;m wondering if this seems sane?
To other users of dovecot, I'm wondering what, if any sort of
maintenance operations you tend to do in your setups?
Thanks,
Brian
dovecot-maintenance.sh
Description: Bourne shell script
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/usr/local?
TIA
--
Brian DuffellRiscPC600 | VRPC Sa-Adjust RISC OS 6.10 96Mb
Linux PCs on RISC OS network|
imapproxy can only take you from "doesn't work" to "might as well not work",
ime. If at all possible look into a stateful web client.
-bdh
On Oct 6, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Chris Hobbs wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm sure my issues are a result of misconfiguration, but I'm hoping someone
> can point me
after you stabilize your namespaces. Better yet, disable the "show only
subscribed folders" setting and teach your users the magic that is hierarchical
folders. They don't have to see everything at once. :)
-Brian
On Aug 28, 2010, at 10:08 AM, Blaster wrote:
> Charles,
>
Read up on namespace configuration some more.
Dovecot makes the sort of thing you're talking about very easy if you
familiarize yourself with namespaces first. It can overcome most of the
problems caused by historical poor choices in client configuration.
-Brian
On Aug 26, 2010, at 4:
and don't have the time to learn it), but the basic "just
>pick up and delete all mail" would be sufficient.
As suggested by someone else, you can use 'fetchmail' to do that. Normally
it delivers using SMTP, but with appropriate flags I believe it can pipe all
the retrieved mail to stdout. And if these are all separate mailboxes, POP3
will do for your purposes anyway.
Regards,
Brian.
-made test framework for what you want, and I
suspect it would end up looking much like a programming language by the time
you were able to configure all the different tests for processing different
flavours of incoming mail.
Regards,
Brian.
f coding in exim's configure file is not pretty, but it works
well.
With only 50-100 users you'd be fine with a plain text file rather (lsearch)
than a .dat
HTH,
Brian.
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 02:35:20PM +0100, Brian Candler wrote:
> > I have tried with imapsync and able to transfer single mail account to
> > remote server. Is there a way to transfer whole server's mail account using
> > imapsync?
>
> I don't think so, not wi
list_mailbox in 1.2 seems to be quite
different to 2.0, and the patch doesn't apply. (1.2 doesn't have code to
work out 'fname', for instance)
Regards,
Brian.
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 12:25:48PM +0200, Arnold Jäger wrote:
> Apr 07 11:38:45 auth: Info: passwd(user1,10.1.1.99): Password mismatch
> Apr 07 11:38:45 auth: Debug: passwd(user1,10.1.1.99): CRYPT(password1) != 'x'
At a guess, it looks like it's trying to match against the password field in
/etc/p
generalize
it to non-system user environments.
-Brian
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 04:59:11AM -0700, minim wrote:
> Is it possible to configure MTA to deliver to remote servers?
Certainly. For any complex mail delivery requirements, I'd say that exim is
your friend. You can set up routers and transports to do whatever you like.
This is out of the scope
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:13:02PM +0800, jac...@umac.mo wrote:
> I constantly encounter 'dovecot-auth', 'login-imap', 'login-pop3' and
> 'imap' processes consume 100% CPU.
> I run 'ps' and found those hanged up processes were running for a long
> time.
Have you tried attaching strace to them?
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 11:48:55PM -0700, minim wrote:
> I have to take two copy of incoming mails on different servers(local &
> remote). I am using plain server without any panel on it and using sendmail,
> pop3 server Dovecot.
>
> Is there a way(any configurations) to take a remote backup for
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 11:16:04AM +0100, Daniel Gomes wrote:
> >P.S. Unrelated, but I hope you're aware that Ubuntu 7.10 went out of support
> >on Apr 18th last year? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
>
> Thanks for the heads up! We (and by "we" I mean "me") are slowly
> upgrading our servers for
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:03:46PM +0100, Brian Candler wrote:
> If you want it, set this in dovecot.conf:
>
> disable_plaintext_auth = no
and you may also need:
auth default {
...
mechanisms = plain login
...
gistry IMAP capabilities" (without the quotes). First hit is
what you want; follow each RFC reference for more details.
Capabilities which begin with "X" are non-standard, and you'll have to
search for them separately.
For a general description of the CAPABILITY syntax see RFC3501 (sec 6.1.1
and 7.2.1)
HTH,
Brian.
ily sniffed. The above config removes this policy.
Or: try making an encrypted (imaps) connection, like this:
openssl s_client -connect 127.0.0.1:993
HTH,
Brian.
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 06:50:28PM +0100, Brian Candler wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 10:21:35AM +0100, Andy Smith wrote:
> > Update on this problem,
> > seems the only issue I had was that the telnet method of verifying
> > IMAP authentication that works on Courier
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 10:21:35AM +0100, Andy Smith wrote:
> Update on this problem,
> seems the only issue I had was that the telnet method of verifying
> IMAP authentication that works on Courier just doesnt work with
> Dovecot.
What did you use? What did you see in response? Correct syntax is
estarting dovecot after each change of course. Then see how the
authentication goes. If it works consistently with one and fails
consistently with the other, then clearly it's not an issue with failover.
Regards,
Brian.
ifferently.
Regards,
Brian.
P.S. Unrelated, but I hope you're aware that Ubuntu 7.10 went out of support
on Apr 18th last year? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
re is Dovecot LDA with Sieve filtering, which can do a very limited
series of actions just before the mail gets added to the mailbox, but I
don't think that's what you want)
> What would store the information necessary for the reply routing?
That could be in a flat file, or a .db file, or custom attributes in an LDAP
database, or SQL, or ...
Regards,
Brian.
connect
using non-SSL IMAP on port 993? Maybe it only supports STARTTLS for SSL,
in which case you'd use this on port 143.
HTH,
Brian.
ot;INBOX.testfolder"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.Trash"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.junk"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.Sent"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.Drafts"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.Spam"
a OK List completed.
a examine INBOX.INBOX
a NO Mailbox doesn't exist: INBOX
Would you say there any benefit in doing this, or should I just stick to the
simpler config given on the wiki?
Regards,
Brian.
t dovecot -n shows only that one namespace you
> defined with the exact settings you intended.
Yes, it was fine.
However, I've now found the problem using ktrace. The homedir attribute in
LDAP is
/mail/0/6/37/30/brian%dev.example.com/
but when I do 'examine inbox' I see it has be
;m supposed to be doing here?
The other relevant setting is:
mail_location: maildir:%h
but I've not changed this; as I say, this works just fine without meddling
with namespaces.
Many thanks,
Brian.
tat mtime though.
I've tried adding some extra debugging but it seems a variety of situations
are occurring:
Mar 25 15:49:36 freebsd-dev dovecot: IMAP(br...@dev.example.com): Our dotlock
file /mail/0/6/37/30/brian%dev.example.com/dovecot-uidlist.lock was deleted
(kept it 1 secs) file_dotloc
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 04:31:56PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Mar 25 10:22:23 freebsd-dev dovecot: IMAP(br...@dev.example.com): Our
> > dotlock file /mail/0/6/37/30/brian%dev.example.com/dovecot-uidlist.lock was
> > overridden (locked 0 secs ago, touched 0 secs a
for more information. [2010-03-25 10:22:23]
- 6 stalled for 16 secs in command: 11 EXPUNGE
All sorts of errors reported in maillog, including:
Mar 25 10:22:23 freebsd-dev dovecot: IMAP(br...@dev.example.com): fscking index
file /mail/0/6/37/30/brian%dev.example.com/dovecot.index
Mar 25 10:22:23
exim) to accept incoming mail, and
to deliver it into the appropriate mailbox. exim is very flexible and can
be configured with all sorts of policy for validating e-mail addresses.
Here's an example of the sort of thing you can do
http://psg.com/~brian/software/authbounce/configure-authbounce
ch dumber about caching, and also at the moment the majority of the
userbase are on POP3 anyway.
Regards,
Brian.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 06:15:20PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > In courier-imap I could create a '.loginexec' file which is executed when
> > the user logs in, and gets deleted if it completes successfully. I'm trying
> > to find something similar for Dovecot.
>
> How about: http://wiki.doveco
has already
taken place (whether the target maildir already exists?)
* autocreate only creates empty mailboxes
Any of these might be a starting point for developing my own plugin, but
does anyone here know of an existing one which would do the job?
Thanks,
Brian.
On Feb 27 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Brian Hayden put forth on 2/25/2010 3:10 PM:
particularly if the subscriptions file is in an unreliable state (as it
sounds like yours is--as most of them almost always are).
I guess I'm lucky so far Brian. I've had no subscription proble
of Outlook Express/Vista "Mail" have
a configuration option for "Show only subscribed folders". In
Thunderbird it's on by default.
-Brian
ration correct if you're
judging the user-visible side by a client using legacy subscriptions,
particularly if the subscriptions file is in an unreliable state (as
it sounds like yours is--as most of them almost always are).
-Brian
root" to return values from LSUB, some
don't. Some further have inconsistent (both internally and vis a vis
other contents) models for how they further interpret these in light
of NAMESPACE values. Etc. Etc.
It's just a mess.
-Brian
On Feb 24, 2010, at 2:13 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 24.2.2010, at 22.08, WJCarpenter wrote:
This use of subscriptions is a terrible abuse of IMAP. Like most
terrible abuses, it's a-ok to choose for yourself if you're an
advanced user, but anyone who has done support for a broad user
bas
bookmarks, or if you only ever use one client, and the client doesn't
do anything stupid with them. I can't speak for others, but in a large
university environment that rules out most users with most clients.
-Brian
ased
on them leads only to floods of "Where is all my mail you screwed up
my life" interactions.
-Brian
Pascal:
On 1/2/2010 7:02 AM, Pascal Volk wrote:
On 01/02/2010 05:23 AM Brian Schang wrote:
Now I want to make my setup more robust and have these messages
delivered to a maildir namespace.
I have configured the LDA within the Postfix master.cf file:
dovecot unix - n n
location = maildir:~/MailLists
subscriptions = yes
}
I'm having a hard time specifying the "Lists/" namespace in my userdb
passwd-file:
test:{PLAIN}linux:2000:200::/home/brian::userdb_mail=maildir:Lists/test
I can't get the userdb_mail portion to work. For this
le sign (in our case, whether /var/mail/user was a real file or
a symlink to ~/Maildir), and setting namespace environment variables
based on that.
-Brian
tings, click advanced, and clear the checkbox on "Server supports
folders that contain sub-folders and messages".
It's a consequence of mbox, but the "problem" is with Thunderbird's
persistent interface mis-features in the name of "configurabiilty".
--
Br
At the UofMN we tried some things like this that didn't seem to quite do
the trick, so in the end we just built on a Solaris 10 machine with proper
unsetenv and ran that binary on 9. Might work for 8 too. Not recommended,
but :)
--
Brian Hayden
Minnesota Supercomputing Institute
University of Minnesota
that fork-execs two separate instances of
deliver with different config files, possibly). I'm sure there are other
solutions too...
-Brian
On Nov 19 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
3. Don't use mbox. :)
Heh! We're on that route, but there are a lot of complicating factors
(including lots of users who have to be handled very delicately through a
conversion).
--
Brian Hayden
UMN OIT Internet Services
ewritten to add the appropriate header fields.
I sent in a bug report with dovecot -n output and etc a couple of weeks
ago; that info still holds.
-Brian Hayden
University of Minnesota
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.6.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dov
the box (as does any non-idiotic IMAP server). I'd
double-check the Thunderbird config for your test Dovecot account against
one that you know will create subfolders on your UW server. They worked
exactly the same when we tested this functionality during our conversion
from UW.
--
Brian Hayden
UMN OIT Internet Services
y thoughts, Timo? We're hesitating to go live with the 1.1x series for
this reason. We could just convert affected folks to Maildir, but we're
not really ready for that conversion on a large scale yet.
-Brian
#x27; in each of these to
something else.
The mbox file still ended up with 'X-Status' written in it, and I can't for
the life of me find any other code that might write that string. Timo?
Anyone?
--
Brian Hayden
UMN OIT Internet Services
It's a sort of clumsy
analogy but in the end that's more or less what it amounts to.
--
Brian Hayden
UMN OIT Internet Services
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 01:44:35PM +0100, Frank Kintrup may have written:
>
> Has anyone already made debian packages for one of the
> 1.1.x releases of Dovecot?
I would recommend grabbing my source package, grabbing the tarball of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:26:05AM -0700, Andrew Falanga may have written:
>
> In an ideal world, perhaps, no one would setup a mail server unless they
> knew how to. The trouble is, this position doesn't take into account that
> we *DON'T* live in a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Compiled only for i386 with source package available.
deb http://debian.delink.net/ etch-delink main
deb-src http://debian.delink.net/ etch-delink main
Cheers,
- --
Brian T Glenn
http://www.delink.net/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
I am running 1.1.beta11 because I was having locking and coruption
issues with indexes and mailbox on the latest release version. Some of
my previous corrupted indexes caused an issue with 1.1.beta11:
Dec 20 21:25:40 ra dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Raw backtrace:
imap [0x47ef81] -> imap
Maybe that is the issue... I only have 1 server right now for
retrieving mail I will try v1.1
-
Brian Taber
Owner/IT Specialist
Diverse Computer Group
Office: 774-206-5592
Cell: 508-496-9221
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 10:31
I have a few clients that have more than one user in the same mailbox.
I have my setup using fctrl for mailbox and index locking. My mail is
stored on a network file system (gluster) and my indexes are stored on
the local drive. I have a few issues:
- My users mailboxes have issues where me
= 842B BC47 E158 4DF1 A385 AA52 EAFD 7923 E88E
B53D
uid delink.net Internet Services (Debian Signing Key)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sub 2048g/0CAB6F5C 2007-12-01
Thanks,
- --
Brian T Glenn
http://www.delink.net/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU
pd are available
from the delink.net repository. Add the following line to
/etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://debian.delink.net/ sarge-delink main
Any problems with the package should be reported to me offlist. Just
remove the tag from the left hand side of my email address above.
Thanks,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:05:59PM +0200, Moritz Mertinkat may have written:
> Hi there,
>
> i'm looking for Debian sarge dovecot packages (yes, still running sarge).
> Anyone here that has a backported package?
I will likely be building one soon. It will be in the same location as I
put in the
- --
http://www.delink.net/
Ok, so he's got a cellphone in one hand and latte in the other, I know
what he's using to steer, but what is that soccer mom using, a strap-on?
- Brian Kantor in the monastery
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linu
command syntax, rather
than a 'generic' EXECUTE command, so that clients could *absolutely*
know (as they do now from the CAPABILITIES string) whether or not the
feature they want is supported.
Cheers,
- Brian
e it in the official dovecot packages,
rather than as an add-on developed by another group. The efforts of
others who have added manageSIEVE support as a bolt-on are appreciated,
but an official version would be preferable.
Regards,
- Brian
re,
> and it isn't going anywhere. When you let it bother you - it only
> bothers *you*...
>
Easy, to posters and html-only mail goes straight in the bin.
And if you think I'm a net-Nazi, I can introduce you to people who can
peel the paint off a tank at 100 yards just b
an address that doesn't add it. It's clearly obvious that the
disclaimer is meaningless lawyer-speak in the context of a mailing
list post.
The OP should arrange to use another mail posting route such as a
webmail address, this sort of thing is poor manners and should be
resisted before this crap
Hi Georgie
Just testing!
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
"Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud;
after a while you realize you are muddy and the pig is enjoying it."
GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 15:16:49 -0500
Steven F Siirila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RC31 is screaming for version 1 to be released: 31 == 1 binary. :)
You're suggesting that 1.0 will be full of variable overflow bugs then?
;-)
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot u
Dovecot development and user community isn't
either.
Why does Free software have to follow the precepts of the suits?
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
"Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud;
after a while you realize you are muddy a
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:02:09 -0700
Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is why I'm still using 0.99.
Which Timo describes as being so old as to be effectively a different
program..
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
"Arguing with an enginee
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 03:46:40AM +0300, Timo Sirainen may have written:
>
> b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)
I'd really prefer using type b versioning as then there is no ambiguity
when attempting to build packages for dovecot. There are many examples
in the Debian re
100 matches
Mail list logo
