A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : The ALT Special Use Top Level Domain
Authors : Warren Kumari
Paul Hof
On 20.10.22 12:05, Brian Dickson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 1:16 AM Eliot Lear wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > First, I would like us to continue to consult on the registry matter at
> > least through the London IETF, and would ask the chairs for some time in
> > London for this purpose. I would
On Oct 20, 2022, at 04:16, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
>
> As a matter of practicality, a registry surely will be form.
Wikipedia is a great reference to list them all.
Even the costs of maintaining the page is decentralized without a single
authority that has ownership over the page content. It’s
Hi Andrew,
On Oct 20, 2022, at 15:57, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 09:40:01PM +0200, Eliot Lear wrote:
>>
>> They're asking for the registry.
>
> Who is asking for it? And more importantly, what will a registry do? As I
> pointed out already in this thread, the registry
On 10/20/22 15:05, Brian Dickson wrote:
I fear those challenges mean that GNS simply won't be possible to properly have
registry entries, and without GNS, or possibly using GNS as an alternative
namespace example, the registry makes no sense.
Here's the problem that the GNS draft includes (a
Hi,
[ObDisclaimer]
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 09:40:01PM +0200, Eliot Lear wrote:
They're asking for the registry.
Who is asking for it? And more importantly, what will a registry do? As I
pointed out already in this thread, the registry won't be complete, it won't be
accurate, and it won't
On 20.10.22 21:13, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
Hi Eliot,
Still employed and still not speaking for them, I have a question:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 10:15:22AM +0200, Eliot Lear wrote:
As a matter of practicality, a registry surely will be form.
What evidence do you have for this assertion?
T
Hi Eliot,
Still employed and still not speaking for them, I have a question:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 10:15:22AM +0200, Eliot Lear wrote:
As a matter of practicality, a registry surely will be form.
What evidence do you have for this assertion? As a practical matter, after
all, if a registr
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 1:16 AM Eliot Lear wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First, I would like us to continue to consult on the registry matter at
> least through the London IETF, and would ask the chairs for some time in
> London for this purpose. I would also be available for side meetings
> with any interes
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bcp-05: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Sounds like some people want .alt to be the internet police. Nobody wants it
except like 5 people not the entire world.
> On 10/20/2022 8:01 AM EDT Eliot Lear wrote:
>
>
> Hi Vittorio
>
> On 20.10.22 13:19, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> > But IANA is not the registry for everything under the
On Oct 20, 2022, at 5:02 AM, Lars Eggert via Datatracker
wrote:
> --
> DISCUSS:
> --
>
> ## Discuss
>
> ### "Abstract", paragraph 1
> ```
> This document d
On Oct 20, 2022, at 12:07 AM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker
wrote:
>
>> On 19 Oct 2022, at 22:54, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 19, 2022, at 6:38 AM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker
>> wrote:
>>> --
>>> COMMENT:
>>> ---
On Oct 19, 2022, at 11:01 PM, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
wrote:
> --
> COMMENT:
> --
>
> I'm not sure how I feel about this being a BCP. If it's more of
Joe,
On 20.10.22 14:44, Joe Abley wrote:
To be clear, Eliot, you're not suggesting that these topics shouldn't be
discussed here, right?
It's a working group mailing list. Of course things can be discussed
here. My issue is that we are suffering from that lack of high bandwidth.
Eliot
On Oct 20, 2022, at 08:26, Eliot Lear wrote:
> On 20.10.22 14:14, Jim Reid wrote:
>> IMO, it doesn’t say that at all Eliot. A fairer PoV here would be when the
>> IETF gets handed non-IETF problems, it keeps well away (perhaps after a
>> discussion of the merits and/or scope of that problem).
>
Hi Jim,
On 20.10.22 14:14, Jim Reid wrote:
IMO, it doesn’t say that at all Eliot. A fairer PoV here would be when the IETF
gets handed non-IETF problems, it keeps well away (perhaps after a discussion
of the merits and/or scope of that problem).
As I wrote, we should discuss this in London,
> On 20 Oct 2022, at 13:01, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
> ducking that says that when the IETF faces tough problems, others must step
> in.
IMO, it doesn’t say that at all Eliot. A fairer PoV here would be when the IETF
gets handed non-IETF problems, it keeps well away (perhaps after a discussion
o
Linda, thank you for your review. I have entered a Discuss ballot for this
document based on my own review.
Lars
> On 2022-10-4, at 1:18, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. Th
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bcp-05: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https
Hi Vittorio
On 20.10.22 13:19, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
But IANA is not the registry for everything under the sun, it is the registry
for things that fall under the purview of the IETF and are part of IETF
standards. If we agree that names under .alt do not belong to and at the IETF,
then it m
> Il 20/10/2022 10:15 CEST Eliot Lear ha scritto:
>
> As a matter of practicality, a registry surely will be form. It is
> simply a matter of whether the IANA will host it. If the IANA does not
> host it, then by shifting it elsewhere this group is actually weakening
> the IANA function, a
Hi,
First, I would like us to continue to consult on the registry matter at
least through the London IETF, and would ask the chairs for some time in
London for this purpose. I would also be available for side meetings
with any interested party, before or during the IETF. If people would
lik
> On 19 Oct 2022, at 22:54, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>
> On Oct 19, 2022, at 6:38 AM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker
> wrote:
>> --
>> COMMENT:
>> --
>>
>>
24 matches
Mail list logo
