Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bcp-05: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bcp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- After IESG discussion, I'm updating my comment: I support Lars' DISCUSS. What's curious here is that this seems to be trying to elevate the status of DNSSEC without actually doing that. It feels like the wrong way to go about it. But maybe there are some precedents here I don't know about. I'm happy to be guided if there's history I'm missing. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
