Hi Jim, On 20.10.22 14:14, Jim Reid wrote:
IMO, it doesn’t say that at all Eliot. A fairer PoV here would be when the IETF gets handed non-IETF problems, it keeps well away (perhaps after a discussion of the merits and/or scope of that problem).
As I wrote, we should discuss this in London, but I don't think that is a fairer point of view. Such a registry would naturally attach to the ALT TLD. Not doing this means half a job done, and nature abhors a vacuum.
Eliot _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
