Hi Andrew,

On Oct 20, 2022, at 15:57, Andrew Sullivan <a...@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:

>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 09:40:01PM +0200, Eliot Lear wrote:
>> 
>> They're asking for the registry.
> 
> Who is asking for it?  And more importantly, what will a registry do?  As I 
> pointed out already in this thread, the registry won't be complete, it won't 
> be accurate, and it won't solve in any way the problem of collision.  So what 
> does the registry do such that anyone cares about it?
> 
> Normally, a registry is created when it will help the operation of the 
> protocol.  The problem here is that there's an _anti_-protocol, and therefore 
> it's mystifying to me how a registry helps anything, since there is no way to 
> know whether a registry will actually help or in some cases even hurt.

Yes. This.

I think this is difficult because this working group is chartered to work on 
this related to the DNS. To the arguable extent that any of this relates to the 
DNS, it's surely concerned with the boundary between the DNS and these other 
naming systems, some known and some imagined, not the details of any how any of 
those other naming systems should work.

The operational, DNS concern here is that perhaps some of these other naming 
systems might step on the DNS in a way that causes some problem for someone 
involved in using or operating the DNS. Carefully specifying the boundary is 
surely the limit of what this group should be working on. (Even that is 
debatable. I have argued against it.) If that involves a registry, it's a 
non-extensible, closed-as-soon-as-it's-opened registry of precisely one entry 
which is "ALT", which is to say we clearly don't need a registry at all.

Non-DNS naming system A and non-DNS naming system B may well need to make 
arrangements between themselves about how not to step on each other as well. Or 
perhaps they won't. Either way, I don't think it is any business of this 
working group (or the IETF at all, to be honest) to be involved in those 
arrangements.


Joe
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to