My concern was that once the case arises (and IMHO 'doing something' was
definitely an option) we can't just make up rules to fit the situation. People
need to know in advance both what the guidelines are and what the response will
be.
Agree with this.
However it is possible that as this comm
+1
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Ville M. Vainio wrote:
> It's not massive change to write up a guideline - the guideline does not
> even need to address what *can* be discussed, but it can address what
> *can't* be discussed, or what tone you need to maintain.
>
> It doesn't need a process
+1 to Ville's post
2014-05-28 13:11 GMT+02:00 Ville M. Vainio :
> It's not massive change to write up a guideline - the guideline does not
> even need to address what *can* be discussed, but it can address what
> *can't* be discussed, or what tone you need to maintain.
>
> It doesn't need a proc
It's not massive change to write up a guideline - the guideline does not
even need to address what *can* be discussed, but it can address what
*can't* be discussed, or what tone you need to maintain.
It doesn't need a process or anything, just write it up and assume people
will adhere to it (and d
On 27/05/14 18:54, christopher.l...@thurweb.ch wrote:
> Hi Stefano
>
> Sorry If I distracted the line of argument with the forum vs. ML vs. TJC
> thing...
>
> To directly answer your / David's question: I have been in the ML since pretty
> early on, and I have never felt "oh I wish this list was
Hi Stefano
Sorry If I distracted the line of argument with the forum vs. ML vs.
TJC thing...
To directly answer your / David's question: I have been in the ML
since pretty early on, and I have never felt "oh I wish this list was
moderated, get me out of here ...". Indeed I have welcomed t
2014-05-27 9:57 GMT+03:00 Stefano Mosconi :
> Just to try to steer the boat back on the original journey this the question
> that David was asking at the beginning:
>
> On 22/05/14 17:18, David Greaves wrote:
>> We need to be careful about over-policing discussions but there is such a
>> thing as
On Tuesday 27 May 2014 09:57:26 Stefano Mosconi wrote:
> It seems that the original topic was a bit forgotten in favor of the forum
> vs. ML vs. TJC (which is a good and intersting topic but no matter what
> tool we use we will have to go back to the main question).
>
> Just to try to steer the bo
It seems that the original topic was a bit forgotten in favor of the forum vs.
ML vs. TJC (which is a good and intersting topic but no matter what tool we use
we will have to go back to the main question).
Just to try to steer the boat back on the original journey this the question
that David
Ham, pineapple and aura cheese. Forever. And lots of garlic.
On the topic. I prefer ml,but it's archive should have indexer.
On Sat May 24 2014 21:55:18 GMT+0300 (EEST), Goulagman wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> As per the tools I think the tools are not so relevant as long as the
> community finds its wa
Pizza with Pineapple - abomination that tops even Kalakukko!
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Thomas Tanghus wrote:
> On Saturday 24 May 2014 21:30 Stefano Mosconi wrote:
> > >> PS This thread is for generic guidelines - please keep any specific
> > >> issues
> > >> out of it.
> > >
> > > I th
On Saturday 24 May 2014 21:30 Stefano Mosconi wrote:
> >> PS This thread is for generic guidelines - please keep any specific
> >> issues
> >> out of it.
> >
> > I think grievances about the community or Jolla should be allowed to a
> > certain degree. Non-relevant personal attacks and/or trolling
Hi,
As per the tools I think the tools are not so relevant as long as the
> community finds its way to discuss. Personally I don't love forums but that
> is only my preference, as I don't like pizza with pineapple.
>
I think it's becoming too personal here. As a fervent defender of pizzas
with pi
On 24/05/2014 16:25, Thomas Tanghus wrote:
On Thursday 22 May 2014 15:18 David Greaves wrote:
There's been enough noise on this mailing list recently that some people
have felt they don't want to participate.
We need to be careful about over-policing discussions but there is such a
thing as und
On Saturday 24 May 2014 15:25 Thomas Tanghus wrote:
> > PS This thread is for generic guidelines - please keep any specific issues
> > out of it.
I forgot to mention that I much prefer a mailing list instead of a forum.
--
Med venlig hilsen / Best Regards
Thomas Tanghus
___
Unsubscribe
Thomas Tanghus schrieb am 15:25 Samstag, 24.Mai 2014:
On Thursday 22 May 2014 15:18 David Greaves wrote:
> There's been enough noise on this mailing list recently that some people
> have felt they don't want to participate.
>
> We need to be careful about over-policing discussi
On Thursday 22 May 2014 15:18 David Greaves wrote:
> There's been enough noise on this mailing list recently that some people
> have felt they don't want to participate.
>
> We need to be careful about over-policing discussions but there is such a
> thing as under-policing too.
>
> How would we (
r,
Iekku Pylkkä
From: devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org [devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org]
on behalf of Martin Kolman [martin.kol...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 10:39 PM
To: devel@lists.sailfishos.org
Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Acceptable Behaviour Guidelin
s.org] on behalf of Ville M. Vainio
[vivai...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 9:45 PM
To: Sailfish OS Developers
Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Acceptable Behaviour Guidelines - you
decide
Some of the discussions here have been borderline illegal;
discouraging such behavior even with absence of
lfishos.org
[devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org] on behalf of Ville M. Vainio
[vivai...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 9:45 PM
To: Sailfish OS Developers
Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Acceptable Behaviour Guidelines - you decide
Some of the discussions here have been borderline illegal;
discou
org [devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org]
on behalf of Ville M. Vainio [vivai...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 10:01 PM
To: Sailfish OS Developers
Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Acceptable Behaviour Guidelines - you decide
I don't think splitting is the solution, as opposed to draw
ep the technological part alive.
>
> thanks, Jarko
>
> --
> *From:* devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org [
> devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org] on behalf of Ville M. Vainio [
> vivai...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, May 23, 2014 9:45 PM
> *To:* Sailfish OS Developers
> *Subjec
M. Vainio [vivai...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 9:45 PM
To: Sailfish OS Developers
Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Acceptable Behaviour Guidelines - you decide
Some of the discussions here have been borderline illegal; discouraging such
behavior even with absence of 'technical' m
Some of the discussions here have been borderline illegal; discouraging
such behavior even with absence of 'technical' moderator tools (like you
have even on barbaric environments like phpbb) is not necessarily a bad
idea.
On May 22, 2014 5:53 PM, wrote:
> Seconded. I could not have put it bette
Seconded. I could not have put it better myself.
Since the early days I have enjoyed the very open nature of this forum
where pretty much anything goes that is vaguely Jolla / Qt / Open
Source / technical.
From my recollection the number of threads that struck me as
"definitely better els
There's been enough noise on this mailing list recently that some people have
felt they don't want to participate.
We need to be careful about over-policing discussions but there is such a thing
as under-policing too.
How would we (community, not Jolla) determine the line? and what measures do we
26 matches
Mail list logo
