Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 12:56 -0500 schrieb Doug Ledford:
> There should be room for human judgment to
> play a role.
One of the most sensible comments I read!
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Am Sonntag, den 07.03.2010, 01:49 +0100 schrieb Michał Piotrowski:
> Let's consider a situation - I'm developing a project in php 5.2. This
> project might work fine on php 5.3 - I don't know I didn't tested it
> yet. I'm depending on 5.2 version. Testing this code for a new php
> will take some ti
Am Sonntag, den 07.03.2010, 12:18 +0200 schrieb Debarshi Ray:
> > Others may be eager to test their software with 5.3, but can not spend
> > the time to make a system update to F12.
>
> All Koji builds are done using the same packages in the repository.
> eg., if Fedora has GCC x.y then GCC x.y is
> > My basic point here is that the poll, while imperfect, is the best
> > indication we have available so far.
>
> So? From a scientific process perspective, bad data is bad data. And
> if all you have is bad data, then you really have no data at all.
>From a social science point of view (and
Am Montag, den 08.03.2010, 12:34 -0500 schrieb Will Woods:
> Our current users'
> expectations are already set by their past experience with Fedora. If
> they're still Fedora users, they're willing to accept - and *have*
> accepted - whatever we're currently doing.
+1 Amen.
Therefore we should b
Am Mittwoch, den 10.03.2010, 00:09 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> I've orphaned "taglib" in response to the hostilities found in the
> FESCo meeting log. Most likely Rex Dieter will pick it up, but I want
> to let the list know as there are other dependencies on it.
Hm, I could find anything sp
Am Mittwoch, den 10.03.2010, 00:46 + schrieb Peter Boy:
> Am Mittwoch, den 10.03.2010, 00:09 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> > I've orphaned "taglib" in response to the hostilities found in the
> > FESCo meeting log. Most likely Rex Dieter will pick it up, but I
Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 18:46 -0600 schrieb Mike McGrath:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > I've orphaned "taglib" in response to the hostilities found in the
> > FESCo meeting log. Most likely Rex Dieter will pick it up, but I want
> > to let the list know as there are oth
> There are nearly no facts, so everyone is just
> guessing and many people are just ignoring objections.
That is true, indeed.
But do we really need detailed statistics to make a good decision?
All of us have an experience with Fedora over the last years. And I
*guess* ( :-) ) most or even a
Am Freitag, den 12.03.2010, 15:31 -0600 schrieb Matthew Woehlke:
> Thomas Janssen wrote:
> > I have read all this mega-threads and i haven't found just a single
> > argument why it's good for Fedora to change away from what we are.
>
> +10 to that!
Indeed!!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
Am Sonntag, den 14.03.2010, 19:33 +0100 schrieb Mathieu Bridon:
> Some others arrive and say hi, their first update (the 300MB one you
> get when installing 2 months after release) breaks something, they
> leave (some will not even finish downloading such a huge amount and
> leave).
>
> Finally, e
te:
>> Taken. :)
>
> Is there really a need for it? Given that tomcat has good support for
> java "keystore", even keystores with poorly passphrased keys, is there
> really a need for this package?
>
>
—
Dr. Peter Boy
Universität Bremen
Mary-Somerville-Str.
Hi Martin,
Am Donnerstag, den 31.01.2013, 13:28 +0100 schrieb Martin Sourada:
> Also, since Apache took over OpenOffice.org and put it out of
> incubation, it seems the development has been progressing rather well
> and in a different direction than LibreOffice. While both started from
> the sam
Am Montag, den 04.02.2013, 13:34 +0100 schrieb Michael Stahl:
> how exactly does LibreOffice "depend" on OpenOffice, and what do you
> mean by "OpenOffice" in this context?
As I understood the discussion at Linux Day last year the LibreOffice
rebase is not only about changing Licence headers but s
t; To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives
to come.
Whether modularity is good news or a nightmare, it is a fact in EL 8. Troy
obviously being familiar with it might be the best to make it work as smooth as
possible. Besides I remember him as very supportive from Scientific Linux
(sadly gone with EL8)so I'd appreciate it.
—
D
aken
into account. See https://pagure.io/fedora-server/issue/32
<https://pagure.io/fedora-server/issue/32>
It is best to ask Stephen Gallagher of Server WG. He also solved a similar
problem with Cockpit previously at the time in minutes, without causing
collateral damage (as others did,
> Am 23.03.2023 um 13:17 schrieb mkol...@redhat.com:
>
> On Wed, 2023-03-22 at 16:15 +0100, Peter Boy wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Am 22.03.2023 um 12:59 schrieb mkol...@redhat.com:
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Recently we have been looki
> Am 21.04.2023 um 15:37 schrieb Emmanuel Seyman :
>
> * Fulko Hew [20/04/2023 21:18] :
>>
>> Can you say the same for Discourse?
>
> ... leave a lot to be desired. So much so that
You put it very nicely. I have been desperately trying to follow new posts
under the tag #server via email noti
> Am 21.04.2023 um 16:15 schrieb Solomon Peachy via devel
> :
>
> You kinda just demonstrated my point -- "hanging out at
> and feel the vibe" is going to take time, attention, and distruption.
> My total available time/attention is fixed, which means this "hanging
> out" will have to come
> Am 21.04.2023 um 14:27 schrieb Chris Adams :
>
> I can't
> automatically keep copies and archive them. For example, I can in
> seconds tell you when my first post here was
This is an extremely important criterion to consider when renewing our
communications tools.
I can arrange information
And we need to look specifically at the impact on servers in virtualized
environments, where memory is usually greatly reduced for cost reasons.
I am currently strongly against introducing this change for Server Edition. At
the moment I don't see any benefit for a server operation throug
natively:
* I would create an empty basic file
* You would use the pagure online editor to edit the content.
Looking forward to your contribution!
And I will be happy to help you overcome the first obstacles.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone:
ovided
>> place to do something like that?
>
> The wiki might be another place:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Project_Wiki
Not really. Fedora decided some time ago to migrate all documentation from wiki
to Antorra CMS pages. This is not uncontroversial and everyone
manage compat packages or parallel use of different major versions
(as, for example, the Java runtime environment has managed to provide perfectly
for decades), then modularisation would probably no longer be needed.
With Fedora Server, we are not only aiming at the home lab, but
LP4AOQWIE3AHWCKC/
> [2]: https://pagure.io/cloud-sig/issue/345
>
Would be interesting to have a proof of concept, e.g. a server VM image.
However, when I look at the ARM SBC UEFI, some improvement would be desirable.
At the moment, there is only a crumpled UEFI image flying across the sc
> Am 21.05.2023 um 16:06 schrieb Neal Gompa :
>
> On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 9:58 AM Peter Boy wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 21.05.2023 um 15:36 schrieb Neal Gompa :
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I was chatting with Marcin Juszkiewicz about U-Boot o
> Am 24.05.2023 um 20:30 schrieb Chris Murphy :
>
> I'm pretty sure we no longer have a program manager?
What’s that about?
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST /UTC+2)
Fedora Server Edition Workin
ch group owners
>> in case of problems?
>>
> Yes. Should also have a list of group members.
>> Thoughts?
A big yes for documentation. But to get attention and to get included in the
Fedora flow it has to be docs, and definitely not a wiki!
Docs team can / will / is willing
like you are even minimally
familiar with Java. A little expertise would really be beneficial for devel
mailing list.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST /UTC+2)
Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora
> Am 31.05.2023 um 20:27 schrieb Demi Marie Obenour :
>
> On 5/31/23 13:08, Peter Boy wrote:
>> .. ..
>> Did you ever develop in Java? It doesn’t sound like you are even minimally
>> familiar with Java. A little expertise would really be beneficial for devel
>
t advantage that all practically essential Java versions, and
even 1.8, are available. This also corresponds to the "spirit" of Java as
"enterprise grade“
And if the proposed change ensures that, then +1
(And from my impression so far, it does. Nevertheless remaining a bit
uncom
m to
include LibreOffice (https://en.opensuse.org/Features_15.4) Would be probably
an alternative more similar to Fedora.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST /UTC+2)
Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora
least some lessons will be learned from this rather rushed
> decision. At least that is what it appears to be.
Well, my lesson was years ago to drop Fedora desktop from my systems - too
bulky, too bloated, too unreliable for my liking. A nice toy, but nothing for
serious productive work.
--
Pe
it for years.
>
> I'm thinking about orphaning all my packages (more than 70) too.
No need to overreact. As you wrote, we „have been using it for years“, and for
good reason.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CE
going forward.
I See, that outside of a professional level, you no longer want to deal with
RHEL / CentOS. But why Fedora? It’s „sponsored by Red Hat“, yes, but is not
subject to the same commercial and interest-based decisions (at least as far as
I know). What's wrong with co
h.org/?page_id=1183
What a coincidence, actually found this in my ePub library (though still
unread, sorry :-) ).
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST /UTC+2)
Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora Docs tea
> Am 29.06.2023 um 18:15 schrieb David Both :
>
> @Peter Boy:
>
> I would truly appreciate your step-by-step guide. That would be
> incredibly helpful. I'm sure I can figure out connecting it with
> SendMail. There is lots of information out there but - as I s
> Am 08.12.2022 um 01:42 schrieb Adam Williamson :
>
> Hi folks! Today I woke up and found
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151495 , which diverted me
> down a bit of an "installer environment size" rabbit hole.
>
> ...
many thanks for your efforts! I very much appreciate it kee
Yesterdays update showed a warning in logwatch of a Fedora Server instance
(F36, plain standard installation, nothing fancy, just httpd and a
systems-container):
- dnf-rpm Begin
Packages Updated:
fedora-release-36-20.noarch -> fedora-release-36-2
> Am 20.12.2022 um 09:37 schrieb Samuel Sieb :
>
> On 12/20/22 00:12, Peter Boy wrote:
>> Yesterdays update showed a warning in logwatch of a Fedora Server instance
>> (F36, plain standard installation, nothing fancy, just httpd and a
>> systems-container):
>&
a year from now, when no one has the change
proposal in mind anymore? Is there at least a descriptive error message?
(Unfortunately, we have too many undocumented (or at any rate factually
invisibly documented) features in our distro )
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
willing to review an updated article.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2)
Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora docs team contributor and board member
Java developer and enthusiast
[1]
https
article only mentions that migration to other hardware is limited
to the exact processor model. I haven't worked on this topic for a long time,
but "in the past" the hardware proximity of the VMs led to general performance
losses of the overall system. But that may no longer
sec or 2 min, but the shutdown itself. And server
admins are terribly conservative (and cautious) people, never change a working
system unless there is a clear advantage. And this proposal brings no advantage
at all for servers, only potential problems.
It is a good idea to make the timeout configurabl
> Am 28.12.2022 um 13:00 schrieb Ralf Corsépius :
>
>
>
> Am 28.12.22 um 11:49 schrieb Peter Boy:
>> It is a good idea to make the timeout configurable. But the default timeout
>> for servers must remain unchanged.
>
> My problem is not "defined time
global timeout.
Yeah, *probably* fine, maybe not. We don’t know, just guess. And as the saying
goes: better safe than sorry.
And the 2 mins are empirically obviously a safe solution.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CES
> Am 28.12.2022 um 15:23 schrieb Neal Gompa :
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 9:13 AM Peter Boy wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Am 28.12.2022 um 13:34 schrieb Neal Gompa :
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 7:25 AM Frank Crawford
>>> wrote:
&g
> Am 30.12.2022 um 06:59 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia :
>
>> Am 28.12.22 um 11:49 schrieb Peter Boy:
>>>
>>> It is a good idea to make the timeout configurable. But the default
>>> timeout for servers must remain unchanged.
>>
>> My probl
t after all. This particular message is
>> handled
>> in the DDX-independent bits though (shared code for Xorg, Xwayland,
>> etc.), the option AllowSwappedClients only exists for Xorg since the
>> other X server don't have an xorg.conf.
>
> Could the error message
> Am 30.12.2022 um 19:45 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia :
>
> We need to be cautious about
> not being able to personally picture why someone would use an existing
> default and overriding it casually, and inflicting our new logic on
> the unsuspecting existing userbase.
+1!
station-specific change. Maybe we can change systemd
> defaults and Fedora Server could install a configuration override?
You are welcome to do the work on such a configuration override. If you can
guarantee to successfully complete this task in time, that's OK. Our work
sche
, the customers, are upset and fear considerable disadvantages.
Only someone who is not responsible for TBs of data and thousands of users can
talk like this. The least you have to do is test and check what effects it has
and prove that the concern is unjustified.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.
> Am 17.01.2023 um 22:30 schrieb Chris Murphy :
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023, at 11:51 AM, Peter Boy wrote:
>>> Am 16.01.2023 um 13:23 schrieb Lennart Poettering :
>>>
>>> Just to say this cleary btw: when we introduced the time-out initially
>
al network
interfaces and various parts of systemd. One of them is systemd-resolved and
specifically split DNS resolving.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2)
Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora docs tea
refore, surely not
"everyone" wants to turn off systemd-networkd. These are very special cases.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2)
Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
> Am 31.01.2023 um 23:39 schrieb Adam Williamson :
>
> Hey folks!
>
> I've sort of happened into doing some maintenance of fedora-comps over
> the last few years. Something that bugs me while working on this is how
> many "shopping list" groups we still have. I'm talking about things
> like the
Tested server dvd and work fine on bare metal, but was greeted with:
…
…
Reached target basic.target
dracut-initqueue Unknown device:"/dev/run/install/repo//images/install.img": No
such device
dracut-initqueue: 'Unknown device "/sys/":No such device
No problems. but I think it's a bit unfortunat
Does someone know WIKI user >>lhirlimann<< and how to get in contact? I would
like to talk about some of his/her contributions.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2)
Fedora Server Edition Working Group m
keeping it as a ROM. That is much more trustworthy for me.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST /UTC+2)
Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora Docs team contributor and board member
Java developer and enthusiast
___
Is there something wrong with the Java-Devel list?
I can send a message to the list and get no reject or error, but is never shows
up, at least it looks like that.
Or did I miss something?
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1
>>> color bash prompt in gnome-terminal]
>>
>> I am overall in favor of this change, thanks for working on this Jens
>> and for keeping it simple!
>
> Me too!
And me too. :-)
And it would be nice to get some color issues fixed in one step, e.g. light
ye
ot a python developer, but maybe I can help otherwise (testing,
documentation,…)
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST /UTC+2)
Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora Docs team contributor and board member
Jav
> Am 14.09.2023 um 14:50 schrieb Fabio Valentini :
>
> Personally, I find the Pagure UI (and GitHub) to be much cleaner and
> easier to navigate than the UX mess that is GitLab …
+++1
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone
ere are several avenues to find out (just grab a
> developer subscription for example).
>
> I just find that this is generally just a mental exercise, but not
> something people do or need to do on a regular basis, and does not
> prevent any use, study, sharing or enjoyment of the
t ….
There are 10 lines showing the same message:
** (process:2431): Warning **: 13:01:21-525: expected enumeration type void,
bit got PyBlockDevPlugin instead
The Installation works, but showing error messages before the user,
specifically new ones, hadn’t done anything, is a were bad show and is
e page so we know what to do with it next?
>
> Are there _actual_ problems there, i.e., something that doesn't work
> anymore?
Can I take that as „I had a look over the text and found no incorrect or
outdated information about dracut“?
In that case I would want to change the "last
ted tool
availability prone to errors.
I would like to go even further and also separate distribution default code and
locally installed code in the /usr tree. OpenSuse has developed a good proposal
for this some time ago.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproj
nfidence in the reliability and usability of
our Fedora.
We should improve this and make reports of problems clearer.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2)
Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora Docs team c
e to be in any way as
significant as the decision about KDE and Xorg. And does not represent a
disruption, but rather an evolution.
Would really like to discuss with you about recent 90 degree turns (I’m not
aware of any in the last 2-3 years) and how to avoid it.
--
Peter Boy
h
> Am 01.02.2024 um 16:47 schrieb Steve Cossette :
>
> On 2024-02-01 10:27 a.m., Peter Boy wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, a bit off-topic here, but nevertheless:
>>
>>> Am 01.02.2024 um 15:14 schrieb Steve Cossette :
>>>
>>
>>
> Will do!
Th
ists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply
Perhaps this is
another reason to think about appropriate strategies.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2)
Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora Docs team contributor and board m
(historical and political science) basis.
But this is way off-topic, sorry.
On-topic is how these discussions and decisions affect Fedora distribution as a
whole. And that worries me.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CE
Does anyone know how I can configure ImageFactory / OZ to use a BIOS VM for
image generation? Unfortunately I haven't found any documentation on this.
For explanation:
ImageFactory uses a temporary VM to create a virtual machine disk image.
At least since F36 it uses UEFI for this. If you w
> Am 22.08.2022 um 18:12 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé :
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 12:03:21PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:57 AM Peter Boy wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Does anyone know how I can configure ImageFactory / OZ t
> Am 22.08.2022 um 18:03 schrieb Neal Gompa :
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:57 AM Peter Boy wrote:
>>
> …..
> libvirt supports UEFI VMs just fine too. That said, you probably would
> want to make it a hybrid boot system to support both.
>
> You can see
> Am 13.09.2022 um 15:38 schrieb Jiri Vanek :
>
> Hello!
>
> My rpi based home base server died rpi NAS keep running:).
> I would very like to replace it with little bit better thing - in work, I
> have https://softiron.com/blog/news_20160624/ , unluckily, It seems that
> similar machines -
> Am 16.09.2022 um 13:43 schrieb Stephen Snow :
>
> Have you looked at the Khadis boards? They're available through Digikey
> canada at
> https://www.digikey.ca/en/products/filter/single-board-computers-sbcs-computer-on-module-com/933?s=N4IgjCBcoLQdIDGUBmBDANgZwKYBoQB7KAbRACYAGANgBYQBdAXxaA
The
With branch 20221012 as well as 20221014 I get with Fedora Server on BIOS boot
Hardware several AVC events like
type=AVC msg=audit(1665848517.93:288): avc: denied { sys_admin } for pid=1635
comm="systemd-gpt-aut" capability=21
scontext=system_u:system_r:systemd_gpt_generator_t:s0
tcontext=syst
When creating a new VM on Fedora Server I get 2 AVCs, which I didn’t noticed in
F36:
SELinux is preventing virtlogd from using the execmem access on a process.
type=AVC msg=audit(1665815361.392:451): avc: denied { execmem } for pid=2086
comm="virtlogd" scontext=system_u:system_r:virtlogd_t:s0-s0
> Am 17.10.2022 um 10:44 schrieb Zdenek Pytela :
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 6:03 PM Peter Boy wrote:
> With branch 20221012 as well as 20221014 I get with Fedora Server on BIOS
> boot Hardware several AVC events like
>
> type=AVC msg=audit(1665848517.93:28
I just tested installation of the various Fedora Server Edition installation
media as of F37 rc 1.6.
Arm image, Server KVM image and Server standard install (DVD) installed kernel
6.0.6-300.fc37. Only net install installed kernel 5.19.16-301.fc37 (which was
installed by rc 1.4 or 1.5 if I remem
> Am 04.11.2022 um 23:08 schrieb Adam Williamson :
>
> On Fri, 2022-11-04 at 22:33 +0100, Peter Boy wrote:
>> I just tested installation of the various Fedora Server Edition installation
>> media as of F37 rc 1.6.
>>
>> Arm image, Server KVM image and Server
> Am 12.11.2022 um 10:07 schrieb James Read via devel
> :
>
> Hey folks,
>
> I'm joining this list as a hobbyist developer
Welcome as well
> ( OliveTin - http://olivetin.app .
looks nice an really useful, specifically to handle urgend cases from rem
That sounds pretty much like an April Fool's joke (and an abuse of the change
proposal process). A pity in a way, but perhaps better this way, given the
miserable debate about Wayland / X11 recently.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone:
n-
> adventure, …
And let's not forget that we set special requirements for an edition and an
edition working group behind it, which should (and does) ensure ongoing
maintenance and user orientation in the long term (even if the latter
unfortunately too often takes a back
nd safeguarding criteria are a model for success and one of
our differentiation criteria.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2)
Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora Docs team contributor and board member
Jav
ed on Flock last year, you
would know that the numbers for Workstation were declining, whereas the numbers
for Server raised steeply and for CoreOS and IoT steadily up.
To put it in your (Kevin Kofler’s) words (it’s NOT my wording!):
Why should we see any relevance in a declining Workstation i
> Am 05.04.2024 um 14:16 schrieb Kevin Kofler via devel
> :
>
> Peter Boy wrote:
>>>
>>> . . .
>>
>> This is an absolute no-go! It would break everyone’s usage of Fedora
>> Workstation
>
> It would be a major change, yes. Though not
facilitate permanent use and that the
Unison project had been discontinued. This is obviously wrong, fortunately.
Even if the developer group is obviously very small.
I hope you are successful with this project. I would like to make Unison one of
the essential features of Fedora Server.
Pe
ely, not the complete disk). Most importantly you should preserver the
respective partition numbers. And find out what else to adjust (e.g. the
uuids). That will we a lot of work, I guess.
[a]
https://serverfault.com/questions/963178/how-do-i-convert-my-linux-disk-from-mbr-to-gpt-with-uefi
e every 6 months as well.
> Yes, this is only relevant for remote-upgrades, but Fedora is a very good
> server distribution and widely spread ;)
Wholehearted Agreement :-)
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2
ic programs to
> connect to the legacy machines, while maintaining general system
> security.
>
> Anyway, -1 from me.
>
> Rich.
Anyway, -1 from me, too
For exactly that reason.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC
current release.
>
> Where can you get current F40 + KDE Spin isos?
>
> Arn
I think, you should download from
https://fedoraproject.org/spins/kde/
and use FMW with the downloaded image or use balenaEtcher to write to the USB
stick
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Use
> Am 24.06.2024 um 17:23 schrieb Arnie T via devel
> :
>
>> I think, you should download from
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/spins/kde/
>>
>> and use FMW with the downloaded image or use balenaEtcher to write to the
>> USB stic
- Deal with the message "… authenticity of host … can't be established.“
2. Use optional functionality
- SSH CA
—- What do you achieve
—- How to configure
- dnssec
—- What do you achieve
—- How to configure
We could do that by creating a Quick Doc article or by adding a section to th
27;re not part of it, then the efforts fail.
These are all excellent ideas. Do you also have an idea on how to get this
going (except "it would have to be someone ....“)? The current packagers are
booked up maintaining the software, I suspect. Additional people are needed,
and cooperation between
> Am 18.05.2022 um 16:36 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> :
>
> On 18/05/2022 11:27, Peter Boy wrote:
>> We didn’t lost Eclipse, we switched from RPM to another distribution method.
>> The same with Netbeans.
>
> No RPMS in Fedora repositories => Fedora lo
work
involved with an alternative,
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2)
Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora docs team contributor
Java developer and enthusiast
___
1 - 100 of 230 matches
Mail list logo
