On Mon, 2025-03-10 at 13:27 +0100, Michal Domonkos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to submit a F42 update (rpm-4.20.1-1.fc42) but, in order for the
> build
> to succeed, it requires a new build of gcc which fixes a failure on i686 [1].
> The respective gcc update [2] is, however, currently on hold,
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250310.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250311.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 7
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 173
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 36.02 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Hi all,
It's this time of the year again. Looks like there's quite a few
updates that were submitted to Fedora 41 but not to Fedora 42 and / or
Rawhide.
Some seem to be either caused by confusion about the ongoing freeze,
but a lot are just ... missing. And packit seems to be a major
offender her
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 10:44:48AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > What's going on there? Did the bot bug out? Or is the Red Hat security
> > team shutting down? I'm very confused.
>
> The team isn't shutting down -- I just talked to some people about
> _expanding_ their contributions to Fedora.
On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 07:50:49AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 12:56:21PM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> >
>
> This doesn't really help with the "what". I work at Red Hat and still
> have no idea what Konflux actually is.
[...]
> > ”. In his talk he related some
On 3/10/25 4:54 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 12:44:44PM +, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
wrote:
[...]
== Benefit to Fedora ==
The major theme in 6.0 is increased security and related improvements:
* enforcing signature checking on by default
snip
* support
Am 10.03.25 um 18:31 schrieb Leon Fauster:
Am 10.03.25 um 18:19 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 08:06:45AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 07:41:31PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
We should probably try and get this into Fedora proper, right?
Ideally e
OLD: Fedora-42-20250310.n.0
NEW: Fedora-42-20250311.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 15
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 850.19 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Mar 10, 2025, 23:19 by walt...@verbum.org:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2025, at 3:36 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>> This is an interesting point. Is there a Kubernetes story on (eg)
>> POWER, s390x or RISC-V?
>>
>
> Yes. My employer for example has a Kubernetes downstream product called
> OpenShift
Dne 11. 03. 25 v 11:21 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 08. 03. 25 v 15:11 Colin Walters napsal(a):
On Sat, Mar 8, 2025, at 2:50 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I didn't watch his talk, but this all sounds very vague. And that the
fact that it's "container first" and an internal project first is
wo
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 10:40:02AM +0100, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
(I sent my email before pulling down 'fedora-devel'; I saw there were
other responses that answer one of my questions.)
> > TL;DR, I don't know what this is.
>
> I asked a question about some of the main motivations behind Konflu
Dne 08. 03. 25 v 15:11 Colin Walters napsal(a):
On Sat, Mar 8, 2025, at 2:50 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I didn't watch his talk, but this all sounds very vague. And that the
fact that it's "container first" and an internal project first is
worrying too.
One very important thing to underst
On 3/11/25 8:58 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2025-03-10 at 16:42 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* The most noticeable change is that RPM now refuses to install
packages whose signature hasn't been positively verified, whether due
to being unsigned, missing key or otherwise. This can be worke
On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 at 05:41, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 07:50:49AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 12:56:21PM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>
> attestation report? Something else? I didn't get a direct answer to
> this, but the presenter (Mi
Hi Zbyszek,
I hoped I'd resolve the PRs for MariaDB and MySQL by the beginning of this week,
however I got sick, and I can't continue at this moment.
I carefully considered the options and I selected the path forward I
want to take.
The '%sysuser_create_compat' macros aren't present on RHEL 9 as
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 08:06:45AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 07:41:31PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > We should probably try and get this into Fedora proper, right? Ideally
> > > everything needed by Fedora infrastructure is in Fedora itself, it took
> >
Addendum: a reminder that this meeting is on US/Canada Eastern Time and
will drift for those in European time zones for the next few weeks.
* [Text
Log](https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-03-06/eln.2025-03-06-20.00.log.txt)
* [HTML
Log](https://meetbot.fedo
Hello all,
My name is Julian Anderson, and I'm a sysadmin based in the US!
I have been a very happy EL user for a few years now, and recently I became
interested in updating EPEL builds for some packages I'd gotten used to on
other *nixes, such as neovim. I reached out to asn recently and have be
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025, at 12:16 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 4:44 PM Michel Lind wrote:
>>
>> > * support for signing with Sequoia-sq as an alternative to GnuPG
>>
>> Is this not already supported in the current RPM? I seem to remember dealing
>> with issues due to us usi
Am 10.03.25 um 18:19 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 08:06:45AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 07:41:31PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
We should probably try and get this into Fedora proper, right? Ideally
everything needed by Fedora infrastructure i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2351021
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from F
On 3/10/25 11:30 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:26:12AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 10. 03. 25 v 10:22 dop. Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
Did something change in cpio, or has it always been broken for regular file
to directory replacement too, and our docs were th
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 03:11:48PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just started looking at my emails today and it looks like the OSIDB
> Bzimport bot closed *all* (or at least almost all) open security
> issues in bugzilla as "CLOSED WONTFIX".
>
> What's going on there? Did the bot
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 5:03 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 10:44:48AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > What's going on there? Did the bot bug out? Or is the Red Hat security
> > > team shutting down? I'm very confused.
> >
> > The team isn't shutting down -- I just talked
Fabio Valentini venit, vidit, dixit 2025-03-11 17:01:15:
> Hi all,
>
> It's this time of the year again. Looks like there's quite a few
> updates that were submitted to Fedora 41 but not to Fedora 42 and / or
> Rawhide.
>
> Some seem to be either caused by confusion about the ongoing freeze,
> bu
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 5:12 PM Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
> Fabio Valentini venit, vidit, dixit 2025-03-11 17:01:15:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It's this time of the year again. Looks like there's quite a few
> > updates that were submitted to Fedora 41 but not to Fedora 42 and / or
> > Rawhide.
> >
> >
Hi all,
I just started looking at my emails today and it looks like the OSIDB
Bzimport bot closed *all* (or at least almost all) open security
issues in bugzilla as "CLOSED WONTFIX".
What's going on there? Did the bot bug out? Or is the Red Hat security
team shutting down? I'm very confused.
Fab
On Tue, 2025-03-11 at 15:11 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just started looking at my emails today and it looks like the OSIDB
> Bzimport bot closed *all* (or at least almost all) open security
> issues in bugzilla as "CLOSED WONTFIX".
Not all , I still have many security bugs ope
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 11:26:06AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> It _is_ supposed to be working. Please file problem reports at
> https://gitlab.com/groups/fedora/infrastructure/konflux/-/issues
Oh, I see you found it. :)
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
--
Hi all,
I would like to take over the workrave package.
This message is part of the process described at
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Orphaning_Process/#claiming_ownership_of_an_orphaned_package
--
Łukasz
--
___
deve
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 09:34:24PM +0100, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
> I know you're probably not the right person to ask but you (or others in
> this thread) might know who to ask. Is that instance supposed to be working
> and if so. Do you know where we can report issues if it isn't?
>
> It's throw
On 2025/03/11 17:17, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 5:12 PM Michael J Gruber wrote:
Given the many packit related ones - does packit have a concept of
"follow Fedora release branching" (like COPR), or do packit users have
to update their config after a branch event?
Many projec
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 4:44 PM Michel Lind wrote:
>
> > * support for signing with Sequoia-sq as an alternative to GnuPG
>
> Is this not already supported in the current RPM? I seem to remember dealing
> with issues due to us using sequoia-sq and it being stricter with some non
> compliant sign
On Sat, Mar 8 2025 at 06:27:19 AM -08:00:00, Neal Gompa
wrote:
If I'm answering that question for myself, I would say that the
biggest feature gap that we have from a modern build system like the
Open Build Service is that we as packagers have to do dependency
resolution for building groups of p
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 07:08:07PM +0100, Michal Schorm wrote:
> Hi Zbyszek,
>
> I hoped I'd resolve the PRs for MariaDB and MySQL by the beginning of this
> week,
> however I got sick, and I can't continue at this moment.
I'm sorry to hear that. Hope you feel better soon.
>
> https://src.fe
I would like to be a package maintainer for fedora.
Plz reply and ask for whatever other info you need.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2350109
My review request
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pramodvu1502/systemd-cron/
My copr
https://github.com/systemd-cron/systemd-cron
Up
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 11:44 AM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 8 2025 at 06:27:19 AM -08:00:00, Neal Gompa
> wrote:
> > If I'm answering that question for myself, I would say that the
> > biggest feature gap that we have from a modern build system like the
> > Open Build Service is tha
On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 at 02:52, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 12:56:21PM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> >
> > A few weeks back I started a discussion about accidental secrets,
> > using Konflux as an example. Now that FOSDEM has come and gone, I’d
> > like to take the topic f
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2025/03/10 21:40:
Michal Domonkos wrote on 2025/03/10 21:27:
Hello,
I'd like to submit a F42 update (rpm-4.20.1-1.fc42) but, in order for the build
to succeed, it requires a new build of gcc which fixes a failure on i686 [1].
The respective gcc update [2] is, however, cur
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250310.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250311.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 38
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250308.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250309.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 84
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:5.64 MiB
Size of u
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 4:54 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 12:02:52PM -, Filip Bartmann wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I update Fedora 41 to Fedora 42 prerelase and I have some problems, notably
> > * in GDM are not listen non wayland sessions
>
> That might be becaus
I'm pretty concerned that we have no automation to catch these
problems. Would we have even noticed if not for you manually checking
and complaining here on devel@?
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an e
On 2025-03-10 08:43, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
I wasn't able to actually view any of these pages because the spinners
just keep spinning. I assume this demo instance is so drastically
under-resourced as to be effectively broken. But just from looking over
the menu items, I'm pretty confused. It
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-03-05/fedora-coreos-meeting.2025-03-05-16.30.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-03-05/fedora-coreos-meeting.2025-03-05-16.30.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fe
OLD: Fedora-42-20250308.n.0
NEW: Fedora-42-20250310.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Mon, 2025-03-10 at 19:48 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 11:56:43AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > Having tried to dive into Konflux for a bit, I think the major problem is
> > that it keeps getting referred to in the wrong format. It isn't a koji
> > repla
Hello,
I'd like to submit a F42 update (rpm-4.20.1-1.fc42) but, in order for the build
to succeed, it requires a new build of gcc which fixes a failure on i686 [1].
The respective gcc update [2] is, however, currently on hold, due to the
pending F42 freeze.
Creating a side-tag and tagging the new
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 01:00:38PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2025-03-08 at 11:31 -0800, Michel Lind wrote:
> > If this is both too heavy to evaluate on recent hardware, and also not
> > reproducibly deployable, it seems to currently be in a state where it has
> > all the drawbacks o
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 11:56:43AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> Having tried to dive into Konflux for a bit, I think the major problem is
> that it keeps getting referred to in the wrong format. It isn't a koji
> replacement, it is a Fedora Build System replacement.
Yes, 100%. But I think this
Hi all,
anyone willing to help unretire Workrave, and do a review at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2351398
I can try swap reviews.
--
Łukasz
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-
> * The most noticeable change is that RPM now refuses to install
> packages whose signature hasn't been positively verified, whether due
> to being unsigned, missing key or otherwise. This can be worked around
> by supplying `--nosignature` on the command line, or more permanently,
> changing the
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 8:32 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> I'm pretty concerned that we have no automation to catch these
> problems. Would we have even noticed if not for you manually checking
> and complaining here on devel@?
Probably not. Which is why I do this kind of thing twice a year :)
Hi all,
I'm going to update cargo-c to the latest version (0.10.11) in Fedora,
EPEL 10, and EPEL 9-Next very soon.
This version of cargo-c will be required for compiling any Rust crates
that rely on the Rust 2024 Edition, which is supported in Rust 1.85+
(already stable in Fedora 40+, and pending
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250311.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250312.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 26
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On 2025-03-09 13:00, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2025-03-08 at 11:31 -0800, Michel Lind wrote:
If this is both too heavy to evaluate on recent hardware, and also not
reproducibly deployable, it seems to currently be in a state where it
has all the drawbacks of Kubernetes but none of the bene
56 matches
Mail list logo
