On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 at 05:41, Kashyap Chamarthy <kcham...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 07:50:49AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 12:56:21PM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > > attestation report? Something else? I didn't get a direct answer to > this, but the presenter (Mike McLean) said he was there to share how > _he_ is using Konflux to build RPMs. > > Fair enough, but my question remains: did the Konflux project consider > the option of investing this effort into Koji to produce the artifacts > they need? Maybe it was already considered and ruled out due to valid > As far as I know Mike Mclean is part(most?) of the Koji development team. This seems similar to the X/Wayland debate. The same people who are working on Wayland are the ones who maintain X but it gets asked why Wayland is getting resources and X isn't.. because the people working on both have decided to focus on one. Mike has decided to focus on helping Konflux. In the end, I think Konflux is getting more resources overall because it is meant to solve multiple problems which could be sold as services. Koji/brew was really meant to solve a problem: allow multiple developers to batch build RPMs using a central resource system. That just turns out to be part of the technical problems in building an distribution 'ecosystem'. -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
