On Mon, Mar 10, 2025, at 12:16 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 4:44 PM Michel Lind <mic...@michel-slm.name> wrote:
>>
>> > * support for signing with Sequoia-sq as an alternative to GnuPG
>>
>> Is this not already supported in the current RPM? I seem to remember dealing 
>> with issues due to us using sequoia-sq and it being stricter with some non 
>> compliant signatures on third party packages signed with other cryptographic 
>> libraries
>
> Are you maybe mixing up signature verification (which uses rpm-sequoia
> since a few releases back) and actually producing signed RPMs?
>
Ah, that’s it, thanks

-- 
 _o) Michel Lind
_( ) identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
     README:     https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Salimma#README
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to