On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 12:20 PM Łukasz Wojniłowicz
wrote:
>
> On 25-01-08 12:07, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 12:04 PM Łukasz Wojniłowicz
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 25-01-08 09:08, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> >On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 6:10 AM David Sommerseth via devel
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
>
On 25-01-08 12:07, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 12:04 PM Łukasz Wojniłowicz
wrote:
On 25-01-08 09:08, Neal Gompa wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 6:10 AM David Sommerseth via devel
> wrote:
>>
>> On 08/01/2025 11:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> > On 08. 01. 25 10:27, Daniel P. Berrangé wr
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 12:04 PM Łukasz Wojniłowicz
wrote:
>
> On 25-01-08 09:08, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 6:10 AM David Sommerseth via devel
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 08/01/2025 11:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> > On 08. 01. 25 10:27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, Jan 08
On 25-01-08 09:08, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 6:10 AM David Sommerseth via devel
wrote:
On 08/01/2025 11:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 08. 01. 25 10:27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:01:33AM -, Hong Xu wrote:
>>> This email follows week 0.step 3 in th
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 2:13 PM Chuck Anderson wrote:
> The policy as written also says to check the vacation calendar, so if you had
> marked yourself "away" on the calendar that would have perhaps avoided
> getting to the next step:
It can be a very bad idea to publicly document
when you are
* Richard W. M. Jones:
> That could easily because Pagure doesn't reliably send emails out (or
> it could be that these emails are sent, but then spam filtered, I'm
> not ruling out gmail).. I've missed many PRs because of this.
>
> I have to ask people to ping me via side channels if a PR is
> i
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 at 09:13, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:08:01AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Well, this is a first. 😅
> >
> > I had been intentionally away during the Christmas holidays, but also
> > wound up getting pretty deeply sick.
>
> The policy as written also says
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 4:01 AM Hong Xu wrote:
>
> This email follows week 0.step 3 in the nonresponsive maintainer page:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/#steps
>
> If anyone knows how to contact ngompa, please let me know. The pull request
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 9:03 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 11:04:16AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 08. 01. 25 10:27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > >On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:01:33AM -, Hong Xu wrote:
> > >>This email follows week 0.step 3 in the nonresponsive
>
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:08:01AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Well, this is a first. 😅
>
> I had been intentionally away during the Christmas holidays, but also
> wound up getting pretty deeply sick.
The policy as written also says to check the vacation calendar, so if you had
marked yourself "a
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 6:10 AM David Sommerseth via devel
wrote:
>
> On 08/01/2025 11:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 08. 01. 25 10:27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:01:33AM -, Hong Xu wrote:
> >>> This email follows week 0.step 3 in the nonresponsive
> >>> maintaine
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 11:04:16AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 08. 01. 25 10:27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:01:33AM -, Hong Xu wrote:
> >>This email follows week 0.step 3 in the nonresponsive
> >>maintainer page:
> >>https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/P
On 08/01/2025 11:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 08. 01. 25 10:27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:01:33AM -, Hong Xu wrote:
This email follows week 0.step 3 in the nonresponsive
maintainer page:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_ma
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 11:04:53AM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé venit, vidit, dixit 2025-01-08 10:27:33:
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:01:33AM -, Hong Xu wrote:
> > > This email follows week 0.step 3 in the nonresponsive
> > > maintainer page:
> > > https://docs.fedorap
Daniel P. Berrangé venit, vidit, dixit 2025-01-08 10:27:33:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:01:33AM -, Hong Xu wrote:
> > This email follows week 0.step 3 in the nonresponsive
> > maintainer page:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/#stesp
>
On 08. 01. 25 10:27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:01:33AM -, Hong Xu wrote:
This email follows week 0.step 3 in the nonresponsive
maintainer page:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/#stesp
If anyone knows how to c
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:01:33AM -, Hong Xu wrote:
> This email follows week 0.step 3 in the nonresponsive
> maintainer page:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/#stesp
>
> If anyone knows how to contact ngompa, please let me know. The p
(CC maintainer)
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https:/
You can find contact information in the accounts page [1], although
Neal's is a huge one, not sure which one is the most relevant to use
other than the matrix channel.
I have left a comment on the PR with more details on what you can do to
contact and make the PR more reviewable, but it genera
19 matches
Mail list logo
