On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 12:20 PM Łukasz Wojniłowicz
<lukasz.wojnilow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 25-01-08 12:07, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 12:04 PM Łukasz Wojniłowicz
> ><lukasz.wojnilow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 25-01-08 09:08, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> >On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 6:10 AM David Sommerseth via devel
> >> ><devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On 08/01/2025 11:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> >> > On 08. 01. 25 10:27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:01:33AM -0000, Hong Xu wrote:
> >> >> >>> This email follows week 0.step 3 in the nonresponsive
> >> >> >>> maintainer page: 
> >> >> >>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/#stesp
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> If anyone knows how to contact ngompa, please let me know. The pull
> >> >> >>> request has been unreviewed for more than 2 weeks: 
> >> >> >>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wob/pull-request/1
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Considering this PR is opened just a few days before the Christmas, 
> >> >> >> a period
> >> >> >> when many people are not working (or significantly reduced work) for 
> >> >> >> several
> >> >> >> weeks, IMHO 2 weeks is not sufficient time to wait before going for 
> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> non-responsive maintainer process. A simple comment on the PR 
> >> >> >> requesting
> >> >> >> a response is probably a better first step.
> >> >> > Except it rarely works with Neal unless you ping him via a side 
> >> >> > channel :(
> >> >>
> >> >> I've pinged him on his Mastodon account.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >Well, this is a first. 😅
> >> >
> >> >I had been intentionally away during the Christmas holidays, but also
> >> >wound up getting pretty deeply sick.
> >> >
> >> >But yes, direct email or Matrix message works pretty effectively.
> >> >Bugzilla mail is something I check periodically, not asynchronously.
> >>
> >> Your review request at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318522 
> >> must have been lost then.
> >
> >Yeah, though I do get notified specially when someone sets themselves
> >as a reviewer, which hasn't happened in that bug.
>
> I don't understand. I set myself as the Assignee of this bug, and set
> the status to ASSIGNED.
>
> You mean that "fedora-review" set to "?" is for setting oneself as a reviewer?

Yep, that. It's also required when approving a review to set it to "+".



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to