Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for dledford

Infiniband related and should have a backup maintainer at Red Hat, but I will check closer on Friday when I am back at work. Any further news here? Given that these packages are still assigned to dledford, I've filed https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3396 to move forward with the non-respo

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for dledford

On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:48:49 -0400 Peter Martuccelli wrote: > Hi Davide, > > Please work with Dan, Cc'd, on any issues for Doug. ack, I believe most of Doug's packages are Infiniband related and should have a backup maintainer at Red Hat, but I will check closer on Friday when I am back at work

Non-responsive maintainer check for dledford

Hi all, does anybody know how to contact Doug Ledford (FAS: dledford) ? I was about to needinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2321324 and that's when I noticed the account seems to be deactivated in Bugzilla, but they're listed as the primary maintainer for several packages: htt

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for dledford

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 6:22 PM Dan Horák wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:48:49 -0400 > Peter Martuccelli wrote: > > > Hi Davide, > > > > Please work with Dan, Cc'd, on any issues for Doug. > > ack, I believe most of Doug's packages are Infiniband related and > should have a backup maintainer a

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for dledford

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:00:25PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:48:49 -0400 > Peter Martuccelli wrote: > > > Hi Davide, > > > > Please work with Dan, Cc'd, on any issues for Doug. > > ack, I believe most of Doug's packages are Infiniband related and > should have a backup ma

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for dledford

On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 12:57:38PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Il 20/03/25 10:14, Daniel P. Berrangé ha scritto: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 03:22:08PM -0700, Davide Cavalca wrote: > >> On 2025-03-19 14:48, Peter Martuccelli wrote: > >>> Hi Davide, > >>> > >>> Please work with Dan, Cc'd,

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for dledford

Il 20/03/25 10:14, Daniel P. Berrangé ha scritto: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 03:22:08PM -0700, Davide Cavalca wrote: >> On 2025-03-19 14:48, Peter Martuccelli wrote: >>> Hi Davide, >>> >>> Please work with Dan, Cc'd, on any issues for Doug. >> Thanks Peter. My immediate concern is getting mstflint u

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for dledford

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 03:22:08PM -0700, Davide Cavalca wrote: > On 2025-03-19 14:48, Peter Martuccelli wrote: > > Hi Davide, > > > > Please work with Dan, Cc'd, on any issues for Doug. > > Thanks Peter. My immediate concern is getting mstflint updated to 4.31 if > possible, and resolving the ou

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for dledford

On 3/19/25 18:22, Davide Cavalca wrote: On 2025-03-19 14:48, Peter Martuccelli wrote: Hi Davide, Please work with Dan, Cc'd, on any issues for Doug. Thanks Peter. My immediate concern is getting mstflint updated to 4.31 if possible, and resolving the outstanding FTBFS. But regardless of thi

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for dledford

On Thu, Mar 20, 2025, at 3:04 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 3/19/25 16:23, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 6:22 PM Dan Horák wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:48:49 -0400 >>> Peter Martuccelli wrote: >>> Hi Davide, Please work with Dan, Cc'd, on any issues for

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for dledford

On 3/19/25 16:23, Neal Gompa wrote: On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 6:22 PM Dan Horák wrote: On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:48:49 -0400 Peter Martuccelli wrote: Hi Davide, Please work with Dan, Cc'd, on any issues for Doug. ack, I believe most of Doug's packages are Infiniband related and should have a

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for dledford

On 2025-03-19 14:48, Peter Martuccelli wrote: Hi Davide, Please work with Dan, Cc'd, on any issues for Doug. Thanks Peter. My immediate concern is getting mstflint updated to 4.31 if possible, and resolving the outstanding FTBFS. But regardless of this, if Doug is not maintaining these packa

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for dledford

Hi Davide, Please work with Dan, Cc'd, on any issues for Doug. Peter- On Wed, 2025-03-19 at 14:19 -0700, Davide Cavalca wrote: > Hi all, > > does anybody know how to contact Doug Ledford (FAS: dledford) ? I was > about to needinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2321324  > and tha

Non-responsive maintainer check for davidsch

Hello, I've opened a non-responsive ticket for squeekboard, maintained by David Bold [1]. Whilst David was somewhat responsive in earlier PRs, the experience was still a little .. strange. They merged the first batch of two PRs I submitted without *any* direct communication whatsoever (even when

Non-responsive maintainer check for van

Hello, According to https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/android-tools/pull-request/8, it seems like van hasn't been active for at least a year or so. Does anyone have a way to contact him? I'd like to help maintaining android-tools. - Łukasz -- ___ deve

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for ret2libc

Hello I will rebuild, no problem.  Thank you Kevin for CC me. Michal Ambroz -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Kevin Fenzi Komu: Development discussions related to Fedora Kopie: ret2l...@fedoraproject.org Datum: 18. 2. 2025 22:57:20 Předmět: Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for ret2libc

(adding maintainer to cc) On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 03:03:10PM +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote: > Hi, > > we are trying to get a rebuild of rizin [1] but the maintainer doesn't react. > Same applies to the co-maintainer. I've created a non-responsive maintainer &

Non-responsive maintainer check for ret2libc

Hi, we are trying to get a rebuild of rizin [1] but the maintainer doesn't react. Same applies to the co-maintainer. I've created a non-responsive maintainer bugzilla ticket at [2]. Best regards Andreas [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2346253

Re: Non-responsive maintainer sham1

Great to hear from you! And thanks for maintaining the package! -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/p

Re: Non-responsive maintainer sham1

On Tue, 2025-01-14 at 06:47 +, Hong Xu wrote: > This email follows week 0.step 3 in the nonresponsive maintainer > page: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/ > > If anyone knows how to contact  sham1, please let me know. I've sent > an emai

Re: Non-responsive maintainer sham1

Cristian Le wrote: > > If anyone knows how to contact sham1, please let me know. I've sent an > > email to his/her personal email but haven't got a response. The pull > > request has been unreviewed for more than 3 > > weeks:https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/maildir-utils/pull-request/9 > I d

Re: forwarding aliases (was: Non-responsive maintainer sham1)

Kevin Fenzi venit, vidit, dixit 2025-01-16 23:30:34: > Note: we are talking about @fedoraproject.org aliases here. > mailing lists already mitigate this as you note. Indeed. One might wonder what fpo aliases are good for - after all, you have to have a mailbox to forward your alias to, and sendin

Re: forwarding aliases (was: Non-responsive maintainer sham1)

Note: we are talking about @fedoraproject.org aliases here. mailing lists already mitigate this as you note. On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 10:11:22PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > NB, the "From" rewriting with "via devel" is generally only needed > if someone's domain has configured SPF and DMAR

Re: forwarding aliases (was: Non-responsive maintainer sham1)

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 07:03:23PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 04:15:11PM +0100, Cristian Le via devel wrote: > > > On 1/15/25 2:33 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > > > > No, AFAIK the @fedoraproject.org email alias should work for > > > > all u

Re: forwarding aliases (was: Non-responsive maintainer sham1)

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 07:03:23PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > > If it's only SPF, then it should be enough to use the forwarding > server's own domain in the SMTP session, like list servers always do. > SPF asks the receiving server to validate the hostname given in > HELO/EHLO and the return a

forwarding aliases (was: Non-responsive maintainer sham1)

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 04:15:11PM +0100, Cristian Le via devel wrote: > > On 1/15/25 2:33 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > > No, AFAIK the @fedoraproject.org email alias should work for > > > all users who are in CLA+1 or something (so it should work for all > > > members

Re: Non-responsive maintainer sham1

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 04:15:11PM +0100, Cristian Le via devel wrote: > On 1/15/25 2:33 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > No, AFAIK the @fedoraproject.org email alias should work for > > all users who are in CLA+1 or something (so it should work for all > > members of the "packager" group, for exa

Re: Non-responsive maintainer sham1

On 1/15/25 2:33 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: No, AFAIK the @fedoraproject.org email alias should work for all users who are in CLA+1 or something (so it should work for all members of the "packager" group, for example, since signing the CLA is prerequisite for joining the "packager" group). Inde

Re: Non-responsive maintainer sham1

On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 11:33 AM Cristian Le via devel wrote: > > If anyone knows how to contact sham1, please let me know. I've sent an email > to his/her personal email but haven't got a response. The pull request has > been unreviewed for more than 3 weeks: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/r

Re: Non-responsive maintainer sham1

If anyone knows how to contact sham1, please let me know. I've sent an email to his/her personal email but haven't got a response. The pull request has been unreviewed for more than 3 weeks:https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/maildir-utils/pull-request/9 I don't know sham1, but I presume you

Re: Non-responsive maintainer sham1

(CC sham1) -- Hong -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: h

Non-responsive maintainer sham1

This email follows week 0.step 3 in the nonresponsive maintainer page: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/ If anyone knows how to contact sham1, please let me know. I've sent an email to his/her personal email but haven't got a response. The

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

quest/1 > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Considering this PR is opened just a few days before the Christmas, > >> >> >> a period > >> >> >> when many people are not working (or significantly reduced work) for > >> >> >

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

idering this PR is opened just a few days before the Christmas, a period >> >> when many people are not working (or significantly reduced work) for several >> >> weeks, IMHO 2 weeks is not sufficient time to wait before going for the >> >> non-responsive ma

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wob/pull-request/1 > >> >> > >> >> Considering this PR is opened just a few days before the Christmas, a > >> >> period > >> >> when many people are not working (or significantly reduced work) for > >> >&

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

more than 2 weeks: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wob/pull-request/1 >> >> Considering this PR is opened just a few days before the Christmas, a period >> when many people are not working (or significantly reduced work) for several >> weeks, IMHO 2 weeks is not suffic

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 2:13 PM Chuck Anderson wrote: > The policy as written also says to check the vacation calendar, so if you had > marked yourself "away" on the calendar that would have perhaps avoided > getting to the next step: It can be a very bad idea to publicly document when you are

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

* Richard W. M. Jones: > That could easily because Pagure doesn't reliably send emails out (or > it could be that these emails are sent, but then spam filtered, I'm > not ruling out gmail).. I've missed many PRs because of this. > > I have to ask people to ping me via side channels if a PR is > i

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 at 09:13, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:08:01AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Well, this is a first. 😅 > > > > I had been intentionally away during the Christmas holidays, but also > > wound up getting pretty deeply sick. > > The policy as written also says

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 4:01 AM Hong Xu wrote: > > This email follows week 0.step 3 in the nonresponsive maintainer page: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/#steps > > If anyone knows how to contact ngompa, please let me know. The pull request

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

rking (or significantly reduced work) for > > >several > > >weeks, IMHO 2 weeks is not sufficient time to wait before going for the > > >non-responsive maintainer process. A simple comment on the PR requesting > > >a response is probably a better first step. > > &

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:08:01AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > Well, this is a first. 😅 > > I had been intentionally away during the Christmas holidays, but also > wound up getting pretty deeply sick. The policy as written also says to check the vacation calendar, so if you had marked yourself "a

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

has been unreviewed for more than 2 weeks: > >>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wob/pull-request/1 > >> > >> Considering this PR is opened just a few days before the Christmas, a > >> period > >> when many people are not working (or significantl

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

/wob/pull-request/1 > > > >Considering this PR is opened just a few days before the Christmas, a period > >when many people are not working (or significantly reduced work) for several > >weeks, IMHO 2 weeks is not sufficient time to wait before going for the > >non-respons

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

working (or significantly reduced work) for several weeks, IMHO 2 weeks is not sufficient time to wait before going for the non-responsive maintainer process. A simple comment on the PR requesting a response is probably a better first step. Except it rarely works with Neal unless you ping him via a

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

/src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wob/pull-request/1 > > > > Considering this PR is opened just a few days before the Christmas, a period > > when many people are not working (or significantly reduced work) for several > > weeks, IMHO 2 weeks is not sufficient time to wait before

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

the Christmas, a period > when many people are not working (or significantly reduced work) for several > weeks, IMHO 2 weeks is not sufficient time to wait before going for the > non-responsive maintainer process. A simple comment on the PR requesting > a response is probably a better fi

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

several weeks, IMHO 2 weeks is not sufficient time to wait before going for the non-responsive maintainer process. A simple comment on the PR requesting a response is probably a better first step. Except it rarely works with Neal unless you ping him via a side channel :( -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

, IMHO 2 weeks is not sufficient time to wait before going for the non-responsive maintainer process. A simple comment on the PR requesting a response is probably a better first step. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://l

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

(CC maintainer) -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https:/

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

You can find contact information in the accounts page [1], although Neal's is a huge one, not sure which one is the most relevant to use other than the matrix channel. I have left a comment on the PR with more details on what you can do to contact and make the PR more reviewable, but it genera

Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

This email follows week 0.step 3 in the nonresponsive maintainer page: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/#steps If anyone knows how to contact ngompa, please let me know. The pull request has been unreviewed for more than 2 weeks: https://sr

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for lbazan (Luis Enrique Bazan De Leon)

Can you poke him again please. I see no reaction from him. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/projec

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for lbazan (Luis Enrique Bazan De Leon)

Can you poke him again please? I see no reaction on bugreport https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184181 -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for lbazan (Luis Enrique Bazan De Leon)

Luis is still around. I poked him on another channel I have with him. On Sat, Nov 9, 2024 at 9:11 AM Mikel Olasagasti wrote: > Hi > > I have opened a non-responsive maintainer check for lbazan (Luis > Enrique Bazan De Leon)[1]. This email is part of that process. > > Lu

Non-responsive maintainer check for lbazan (Luis Enrique Bazan De Leon)

Hi I have opened a non-responsive maintainer check for lbazan (Luis Enrique Bazan De Leon)[1]. This email is part of that process. Luis Enrique has not responded to the request of updating transifex-client[2]. The package doesn't work anymore and a new Go based one is required. Kind re

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for fab (Fabian Affolter)

Yes, fab in the end merged the change yesterday. I'm not sure the one you are describing is the correct expectation for a maintainer. Everyone can have busy periods, but I think the community needs to figure out how to ensure that we get the correct balance between maintainers expectations and

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for fab (Fabian Affolter)

On 04-09-2024 23:48, Fabio Alessandro Locati via devel wrote: It looks like Fabian was active on python-yarl in July of this year[3], so I hope that everything is well and contact will be possible. Fabian merged both my PRs for python-graphql-core, yesterday. In the past, when I saw a PR not b

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for huzaifas (Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala)

On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 5:29 AM Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: > > Done, > > Let me know if the new permissions work for you! Thank you, commit access is sufficient. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for huzaifas (Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala)

Done, Let me know if the new permissions work for you! On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 3:37 AM Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Huzaifa, > > Now that we've established that I cannot ask for permission, could you > please add me as co-maintainer to goffice and gnumeric? > It

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for huzaifas (Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala)

Hi Huzaifa, Now that we've established that I cannot ask for permission, could you please add me as co-maintainer to goffice and gnumeric? It would help lessen the work for Gwyn in preparing the tangled updates, now and in the future. Thank you in advance, A. --

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for huzaifas (Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala)

On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 9:57 AM Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 3:30 AM Huzaifa Sidhpurwala > wrote: > > > >> > > Great, can you pls ask for permissions there? I can approve it. > > Are you sure it can work this way? For the packages I'm the > maintainer, there is a setting

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for huzaifas (Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala)

On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 3:30 AM Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: > >> > Great, can you pls ask for permissions there? I can approve it. Are you sure it can work this way? For the packages I'm the maintainer, there is a settings panel which allows me to add users or groups and grant them admin access. I

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for huzaifas (Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala)

On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 6:57 AM Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 3:21 AM Huzaifa Sidhpurwala > wrote: > > > > I can grant you co-maintainership of both these pkgs if you want. > > That would be much appreciated, thank you. My FAS name is

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for huzaifas (Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala)

Hello, On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 3:21 AM Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: > > I can grant you co-maintainership of both these pkgs if you want. That would be much appreciated, thank you. My FAS name is alexpl. Best regards, A. -- ___ devel mailing list -- de

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for huzaifas (Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala)

Hi. On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 3:47 AM Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I have just opened a non-responsive maintainer check for huzaifas > (Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala)[1]. > > Does anyone have a way of reaching Huzaifa other than his redhat

Non-responsive maintainer check for huzaifas (Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala)

Hello, I have just opened a non-responsive maintainer check for huzaifas (Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala)[1]. Does anyone have a way of reaching Huzaifa other than his redhat.com address? He does not appear to have any recent package-related activity and it's been a while since he showed up here.

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for fab (Fabian Affolter)

Alessandro Locati via devel wrote: >I have opened a non-responsive maintainer check for fab (Fabian Affolter)[1]. >This email is part of that process. > >Besides the email in their FAS profile (here in CC), does anyone know how to >contact Fabian? > >Fabia has not responded to a S

Non-responsive maintainer check for fab (Fabian Affolter)

I have opened a non-responsive maintainer check for fab (Fabian Affolter)[1]. This email is part of that process. Besides the email in their FAS profile (here in CC), does anyone know how to contact Fabian? Fabia has not responded to a SIGSEGV issue on isync [2] for more than a month, and

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for fbo (Fabien Boucher)

Hi folks, I've orphaned python-gear and python-ws4py. As suggested in [1] I propose this change [2] to retire python-fb-re2. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260410 [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-fb-re2/pull-request/2 -- ___

Non-responsive maintainer check for fbo (Fabien Boucher)

I have opened a non-responsive maintainer check for fbo (Fabien Boucher)[1]. This email is part of that process. Besides the email in their FAS profile (fbouc...@redhat.com), does anyone know how to contact Fabien? Fabien has not responded to FTBFS bugs on python-fb-re2 in F41[2] and F42[3

Non-responsive maintainer check for liquidat

On behalf of KDE SIG, and pursuant to the Fedora non-responsive maintainer policy, I'm trying to reach Roland Wolters (FAS: liquidat), the sole maintainer of audex[1]. audex has been promoted to KDE Gear, and therefore KDE SIG wishes to co-maintain it in order to update it in tandem with the

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for lkundrak

On ti, huhti 30 2024 at 14.07.47 +02:00:00, Miroslav Suchý wrote: plus work related email (added to cc) Thank you! I was able to get a reply in Mastodon. -Tomi -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for lkundrak

Dne 30. 04. 24 v 12:25 odp. Tomi Lähteenmäki napsal(a): Hi, I'm trying to reach the maintainer of phosh [1] and phoc [2]. Allan has tried to reach out for him without success [3] so I created bug [4] for this non-responsive maintainer check. If someone knows how to contact him, please l

Non-responsive maintainer check for lkundrak

Hi, I'm trying to reach the maintainer of phosh [1] and phoc [2]. Allan has tried to reach out for him without success [3] so I created bug [4] for this non-responsive maintainer check. If someone knows how to contact him, please let me know. Best Regards, Tomi Lähteenmäki [1] &

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for aarapov

(Adding Eugene for increased visibility) On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 02:38:01PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote: > Hello Lichen, > > I commented on the issue. Apologies, I didn’t spot it earlier; > https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issue/1695 > > https://pagure.io/user/esyr Eugene Syromiatnikov, s

Non-responsive maintainer check for aarapov

Hello devel-list! Does anyone know how to contact @aarapov, the maintainer of dmidecode? Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275034 I haven't seen any activity recently, and there is a find-inactive-packagers ticket: https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issue/1695 Dmideco

Re: Non-responsive maintainer landgraf for package aunit.

Pavel Zhukov wrote: > I see you have received review of the MR . Emails have been answered by > Bjorn too. If you don't have time to maintain Aunit, then please give me or Dennis access to the package so we can take care of it. Björn Persson pgpFCmfiDkSCT.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital sign

Re: Non-responsive maintainer landgraf for package aunit.

Hi Pavel, Thanks for your response. > I see you have received review of the MR . Yes, indeed. I'm grateful that Bjorn was willing to have look at the PR despite not being a co-maintainer of the package. > Emails have been answered by Bjorn too. Yes, but I got no reply from you as the sole mai

Re: Non-responsive maintainer landgraf for package aunit.

I see you have received review of the MR . Emails have been answered by Bjorn too. -- Pavel On Thu, Mar 28, 2024, at 20:17, Dennis van Raaij wrote: > Hi, > > I've been trying to contact package maintainer Pavel Zhukov (landgraf). > > I submitted a proposal to update package 'aunit' some mont

Non-responsive maintainer landgraf for package aunit.

Hi, I've been trying to contact package maintainer Pavel Zhukov (landgraf). I submitted a proposal to update package 'aunit' some months ago [1] but received no response from its maintainer, Pavel Zhukov. This proposal supersedes an earlier one for which I received no response either. I tried to

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for dagostinelli

nd [3]. [3] is the bug for this non-responsive maintainer check for dagostinelli. I can also (co-)maintain the package as it is a dependency of neovim soon. Best regards Andreas [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fswatch [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270266

Non-responsive maintainer check for dagostinelli

Hi, I'm trying to reach the maintainer of fswatch [1]. fswatch will be a dependency of neovim 0.10 and I would like to get it updated to be prepared for the release. It looks like the maintainer is unresponsive. I've open the bugs [2] and [3]. [3] is the bug for this non-responsive

Non-responsive maintainer check for lcts

Hello! Does anyone know how to contact @lcts, the maintainer of rear? Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256943 I see no activity in dist-git, Koji or Bugzilla for more than a year. There is currently an urgent bug in rear which must be fixed. Otherwise, the tool is practically un

Re: Non responsive maintainer check for marxin

ainers. I am a new maintainer and I don’t want to create polemics, I am here to hear and learn, but if I don’t participate in the discussion is more hard to learn. In any case, I apologize again if I was impolite. It's all good. This thread is regarding the non-responsive maintainer check

Re: Non responsive maintainer check for marxin

I would like to apologize if it seems that I’m being rude asking for a review in this thread. My point of view is that if the package is a dependency and no one is looking on it, it would be a priority to keep it up to date. I don’t know if merging it would be possible, since the maintainer is not

Re: Non responsive maintainer check for marxin

On 04-01-2024 23:05, Priscila Gutierres wrote: I bumped python-pebble to the latest version. Can someone please review this PR? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pebble/pull-request/3 Reviewing the PR is not a problem. However, who would merge it, once approved? That needs a proven pac

Re: Non responsive maintainer check for marxin

I bumped python-pebble to the latest version. Can someone please review this PR? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pebble/pull-request/3 On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 5:05 PM Sandro wrote: > On 02-01-2024 20:28, Priscila Gutierres wrote: > > Does any package depend on python-pebble? > > I coul

Re: Non responsive maintainer check for marxin

Thank you ! Em ter., 2 de jan. de 2024 às 17:05, Sandro escreveu: > On 02-01-2024 20:28, Priscila Gutierres wrote: > > Does any package depend on python-pebble? > > I could not find anything running repoquery --whatrequires python-pebble > > You need to query for `python3-pebble`. > > $ dnf rep

Re: Non responsive maintainer check for marxin

On 02-01-2024 20:28, Priscila Gutierres wrote: Does any package depend on python-pebble? I could not find anything running repoquery --whatrequires python-pebble You need to query for `python3-pebble`. $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires python3-pebble Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:03 ago o

Re: Non responsive maintainer check for marxin

Does any package depend on python-pebble? I could not find anything running repoquery --whatrequires python-pebble On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 2:56 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi folks, > > Would anyone know how to contact @marxin? They only maintain the one > package, python-pebble, but it doesn't look

Non responsive maintainer check for marxin

Hi folks, Would anyone know how to contact @marxin? They only maintain the one package, python-pebble, but it doesn't look like they've been active in a while. The package did not see to have been updated at all since the initial import: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227456 and th

Non-responsive maintainer check for Samuel P (survient)

Hi, this email is part of the non-responsive maintainer policy for the wsdd package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253133 It would be nice to update the package to the latest upstream: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175523 I proposed a pull request for it two months

Non-responsive maintainer check for David Howells (dhowells)

Hi, This email is part of the non-responsive maintainer policy for the keyutils [1] package (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249374). The package is several versions out-of-date, 1.6.3 being the latest one, released in 2020. The last activity by the maintainer on the package was

Non-responsive maintainer check for eneville

Hi all, Does anybody know if eneville is still contributing to Fedora and / or how to reach them? c.f. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246443 I see no activity in dist-git, bodhi, koji, or pagure.io in the last 365 days. Their packages seem to have been unmaintained for a while, an

Bug 2246344 - Non-responsive maintainer check for hno

Hello, Please anyone knows about any other channel to contact hno - Henrik Nordstrom ? I have not heard from him for like a year and I would like to take over the primary admin role for the radare2 package so the bugs get primarily assigned to me. This is part of the non-responsive

Re: Non-responsive maintainer Daiki Ueno

Hello, Peter Oliver writes: > As per the non-responsive package maintainer process > (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/), > does anyone know how to contact Daiki Ueno? fedora-active-user isn’t > working for me at the moment, so I haven’t be

Non-responsive maintainer Daiki Ueno

As per the non-responsive package maintainer process (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/), does anyone know how to contact Daiki Ueno? fedora-active-user isn’t working for me at the moment, so I haven’t been able to check his activity withi

Re: Non-responsive maintainer mkulik

Il 13/09/23 11:58, Filip Janus ha scritto: > Hi all, > mkulik is the main admin of pg_auto_failover component, and I can't reach > him. So I would like to start the process of moving the main admin role to > me(I am an admin now but the default assignee is mkulik due to the main admin > role).

Non-responsive maintainer mkulik

Hi all, mkulik is the main admin of pg_auto_failover component, and I can't reach him. So I would like to start the process of moving the main admin role to me(I am an admin now but the default assignee is mkulik due to the main admin role). Here is the mandatory BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >