On Sat, Aug 2, 2025 at 2:44 PM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
>
> I am planning to merge the side tag twice
I don't think this works. The side-tag should get deleted if it's
empty after the first bodhi update is submitted.
And I'm not sure if bodhi lets you submit two updates for the same side-tag ..
On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 11:09 AM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2025-07-31 at 08:12 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> > I'll reply to this thread once I've a side tag ready with the
> > evolution-data-server built in it.
>
> Hi,
> the side-tag is f43-build-side-115950 , you can build into it with:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 10:38 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 4:16 PM Jos de Kloe wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > as suggested on this Directory_Replacement page I tried to solve this
> > problem by adding a little lua scriptlet.
> > Unfortunately it seems not to work fo
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 11:22 AM Michael J Gruber
wrote:
>
> Due to alphabetical ordering, freerdp was rebuilt against the old fuse3
> before fuse3 was rebuilt and introduced the soname change which broke
> fuse3. That broken state was merged by the mass-rebuild. The old
> problem.
The order of
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 2:56 PM Marián Konček wrote:
>
> I can see a benefit of this in case of `/usr/share/licenses/`. I don't
> know what other kinds of files are identical across multiple packages.
This Change Proposal is not about cross-package optimizations - it's
for deduplicating identical
On Sat, Jul 26, 2025 at 10:37 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> I'd rather we show extra care towards Fedora developers who are still
> using Fedora, if there are any. If we make Fedora development overly
> complicated compared to working in a completely different environment or
> distro, people may mi
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 5:03 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 12:07:26PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 15. 07. 25 12:00, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:48:50AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > There is a bug for qemu
On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 6:23 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 11:38 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 10:56 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > So, I'm proposing to remove the support c
On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 10:56 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
wrote:
>
> > So, I'm proposing to remove the support code (and templates, etc.) for
> > this mode of operation from rust2rpm with the next major version, and
> > to replace it with documentation [...]
> Documentation works if people know it ex
Hello Packagers,
Long story short: A not insignificant part of the rust2rpm code base
is dedicated to dealing with non-crate packages (i.e. running rust2rpm
with "--path " for a local Cargo.toml file, instead of pointing
it at a crate from crates.io).
This mode of operation requires special-cased
On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 6:40 PM Germano Massullo
wrote:
>
> Richard Fontana has given his answer to the license question
> https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/668#note_2600398017
>
> I am planning to resume eza packaging soon
I wouldn't say that "I haven't looked closely e
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 1:36 PM Tom Hughes via devel
wrote:
>
> On 09/07/2025 12:16, Jan Stanek wrote:
>
> > I recently ran into build failure in the upcoming nodejs24, on i686
> > architecture (yay!). It seems like some of the sse vector instructions
> > are not defined, on just this arch:
> >
> >
Hi all,
I'm working on updating glycin (the next-gen image loading framework
used by GNOME) from version 1.2.2 to 2.0-alpha.6 in rawhide - other
releases part of the GNOME 49.alpha (loupe, snapshot) already require
this version (and a new gdk-pixbuf backend does too).
With the update from v1 to v
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 12:07 PM Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
wrote:
>
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_support
> Discussion thread -
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f43-change-proposal-drop-i686-support-system-wide/156324
>
> This is a proposed Change for Fed
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 12:09 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 11:50:10AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 11:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > >
> > > Reading through the feedback, wouldn't it be better to take
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 5:14 AM Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> On 6/25/25 9:36 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > I hate to be pessimistic but I think it is premature to say it is "solved"
> > until
> > users use the new Wow64 mode. I'm trying to get the merge in this week.
>
> Rawhide, 10.4-5, i
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 11:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Reading through the feedback, wouldn't it be better to take a second
> look on the previous change:
>
>
> Dne 24. 06. 25 v 12:02 Aoife Moloney via devel-announce napsal(a):
> > Since Fedora 37, leaf packages (i.e. packages that are not depend
On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 11:19 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 10:42:22AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 7:46 PM Eduard Lucena
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello guys,
> > >
> > > As I did it
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 7:46 PM Eduard Lucena wrote:
>
> Hello guys,
>
> As I did it in discussion.fp.o, I need to remind everyone that the latest
> update of Fedora Strategy [1] that one the objectives is to grow our users
> base, so potentially killing gaming goes directly against that strateg
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 3:33 PM Richard Hughes via devel
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 24 June 2025 at 14:19, Chris Adams wrote:
> > anybody can fork something and make a bunch of commits.
>
> For the sake of all of our sanity, I'd really appreciate if FESCo could
> decide on this one really quickly (e
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 12:07 PM Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
wrote:
>
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_support
> Discussion thread -
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f43-change-proposal-drop-i686-support-system-wide/156324
Note that this was mis-tagged (both
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 5:27 PM Pierre Rogier wrote:
>
> wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/389_Directory_Server_3.2.0
Hi,
I wonder why you pre-announced this yourself?
It should get announced on the devel-announce list shortly anyway.
Fabio
--
___
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 12:45 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> There are no tickets for the agenda, so I'm cancelling today's
> meeting. I'll prepare/chair the next meeting too.
>
> = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
>
> #3416 Change: Deprecate the async-std Rust crate
> https://pagure
On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 1:40 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/3/25 11:48, Michal Domonkos wrote:
> > On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 05:12:41PM +0200, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >> We had recently changed how we handle debuginfo in JDK:
> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-latest-openjdk/pull-request/147
On Tue, Jun 10, 2025, 20:41 Cristian Le via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 10 June 2025 20:15:25 CEST, "Marcus Müller" wrote:
> > - the spec generated by rust2rpm doesn't tell me much; an rpmbuild of
> the result lists about 100 missing dependencies of the kind
> "crate(ba
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 3:05 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 08:22:45PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [28/05/2025 15:24] :
> > >
> > > No, I don't think we'll make the issue public. Among other reasons,
> > > there is a lot of dis
Hi all,
The packaging changes related to the "Modular GnuPG Packaging" Change
[0] have landed in rawhide now:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-233d32eb30
The detailed changes can be viewed in the associated Pull Request [1].
Please let me know if you encounter any issues relate
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 9:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 09:52:14AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2025-05-17 at 09:17 -0700, Brad Smith wrote:
> > > Sometime ago I asked a similar question on matrix (or IRC?) Fedora
> > > Devel and some very kind person provided t
=
# #meeting:fedoraproject.org: fesco
=
Meeting started by @decathorpe:fedora.im at 2025-05-13 17:01:59
Meeting summary
---
* TOPIC: Init Process (@decathorpe:fedora.im, 17:02:21)
* TOPIC: #3385 Change: Java25 A
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2025-05-13 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 1:44 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I have a failure in %configure which only happens on i686:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2710279
It looks like you're hitting this issue:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12726
> > configure: error: C compiler
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 11:55 AM Michal Schorm wrote:
>
> > Is using %{_libdir}/x/y/z necessary? What are the reasons?
>
> In this particular case, it's the MariaDB stack.
>
> The 'libmariadb.so' is in the '%{_libdir}', but then there are some
> plugins, some restricted plugins, some test plugins,
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 11:26 AM Pavol Sloboda wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am currently working on rebasing a package that creates a shared library
> and I want to place it in %{_libdir}/x/y/z. I am using the
> /etc/ld.so.conf.d/%[name}.conf file to do so. My question is:
> Do I have to call ldconfig in
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 6:06 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 1:20 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 7:15 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > >
> > > Dne 03. 05. 25 v 4:33 odp. Chris Adams napsal(a):
> > > > What
Hi all,
The update to magma 2.9.0 that landed in rawhide a few hours ago
bumped the soname for libmagma.so (from `libmagma.so.2.8.0()(64bit)`
to `libmagma.so.2.9.0()(64bit)`) which was not announced or
coordinated with dependent packages.
The only directly impacted package seems to be "python-tor
On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 7:15 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 03. 05. 25 v 4:33 odp. Chris Adams napsal(a):
> > What do you do with bugs that never get addressed in any way? I've got
> > a few bugs that I've been testing and rolling over to newer Fedora
> > releases for years, with little or no ma
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:23 AM Remi Collet wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> See https://github.com/kkos/oniguruma/
>
> => "This project ended on April 24, 2025."
>
> I see some projects using it
> bat
> bfs
> comrak
> git-delta
> jq
> kitutuki
> lino
>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 9:00 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> So today I came to update a package I created a couple of years back
> using rpmautospec - python-pyasyncore . When I created the package, I
> had it use %autochangelog :
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pyasyncore/c/4536a3345
On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 5:05 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Hum, it appears that the method documented here does not work as I
> > would have expected:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_one_to_many_replacement
> >
On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 12:17 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 9:09 PM Björn Persson wrote:
> >
> > > On upgrade to Fedora 43, some non-essential GnuPG utilities will no
> > > longer be available by default, and instead moved to the optional
>
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 9:09 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> > On upgrade to Fedora 43, some non-essential GnuPG utilities will no
> > longer be available by default, and instead moved to the optional
> > `gnupg2-g13`, `gnupg2-utils`, and `gnupg2-wks` packages.
>
> In the merge request I see "Recommen
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 12:52 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> So, some things I wonder about this process (in no particular order):
>
> If this lightweight process is easier, will not people just use it over
> the normal process? So, it will be harder to see who is completely
> unresponsive. There will
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 4:29 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Though it would probably make sense to change the OpenPGP signature
> > verification macros to only depend on gnupg2-verify (or maybe even sqv
> > or sqopv) when that is the only
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 5:17 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 23. 04. 25 v 10:17 Jiri Vanek napsal(a):
> > Hello!
> >
> > Mikolai have summed up nice sumamry :
> > https://github.com/judovana/java25-chancongratualtionsge
>
>
> https://github.com/judovana/java25-change
>
> This is likely the correct
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 7:47 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Do you have any opinion on which new optional subpackages should or
> > should not get pulled in by default on new installs?
>
> I'm not familiar with all the components either.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 3:50 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 9:37 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 9:09 PM Björn Persson wrote:
> > >
> > > > On upgrade to Fedora 43, some non-essential GnuPG utilities will no
>
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 9:09 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> > On upgrade to Fedora 43, some non-essential GnuPG utilities will no
> > longer be available by default, and instead moved to the optional
> > `gnupg2-g13`, `gnupg2-utils`, and `gnupg2-wks` packages.
>
> In the merge request I see "Recommen
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 1:18 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 03:56:28PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> > On 4/15/25 12:21 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025, 18:14 Stephen Smoogen > > <mailto:ssmoo...@redhat.com>> w
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 10:04 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 06:21:20PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> ...snip...
>
> > The only remaining blocker from official Fedora repos, is - to my knowledge
> > - wine, which pulls in 32-bit multilib libraries on x
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025, 18:32 Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 12:21 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025, 18:14 Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 12:10, Daniel P. Berrangé
&
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025, 18:14 Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 12:10, Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 11:43:38AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> >
>> > Has anyone gone through the effort of removing i686 from a wide reaching
>> > non-leaf package? Any adv
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 12:31 AM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
>
>
> I think the practical effect of the lightweight process will be: new
> contributor likely becomes the de facto maintainer of the package,
> while bug reports continue to be assigned to the non-responsive main
> admin.
>
> Maybe it's b
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 6:19 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:57 AM Milan Crha wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 16:48 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > Common history was always a thing.
> >
> > Hi,
> > are you sure? The `pkcon update` is not part of the `dnf4 history`
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 6:21 AM Rajeesh K V wrote:
>
> > During the upgrade I've noticed this message output in the console:
> > /usr/sbin cannot be merged, /usr/sbin/arptables points to
> > /etc/alternatives/arptables
> > I assume it's related to
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_b
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 6:58 PM Michel Lind wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 11:21 -0500, Michel Lind wrote:
> > On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 10:47 -0500, Michel Lind via Rust wrote:
> > > Dear maintainers,
> > >
> > > Fabio just flagged that below is now broken in Rawhide because
> > > netlink-
> > > pac
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 6:30 PM Milan Zamazal wrote:
>
> I created side tag f43-build-side-109750 and built libcamera there
> (without libpisp for now).
>
> Wim, would you like to rebuild pipewire-plugin-libcamera there when you
> have some time?
>
> libcamera-apps fails to build due to using depr
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 9:32 AM Lukas Javorsky wrote:
>
> > Is the main reason lack of maintainers? Many of these C packages work well
> > on constrained and embedded devices.
>
> Yes, nobody wanted to maintain it and the current maintainer doesn't want it
> either.
Lack of maintainer upstream
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 2:34 PM Marek Blaha wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 1:23 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
> > It looks you are rebasing sdbus-cpp.
> >
> > Then either bundle the old library into the rebased package at build time.
> > I.e. in sdbus-cpp.spec do:
> >
> > BuildRequires: sdbus-cpp
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:31 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> =
> # #meeting:fedoraproject.org: fesco
> =
>
> Meeting started by @decathorpe:fedora.im at 2025-04-01 17:01:10
Forgot to include links to the min
=
# #meeting:fedoraproject.org: fesco
=
Meeting started by @decathorpe:fedora.im at 2025-04-01 17:01:10
Summaries for individual topics provided by decathorpeLLM. 😉
Meeting summary
---
* TOPIC: Roll Call (@decath
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2025-04-01 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
Hi all,
I ran a last check for package downgrades from Fedora 41 to 42, and
submitted a last batch of four updates that were obviously just missed
by the package maintainers. With the Final Freeze starting tomorrow,
they would need some testing and positive karma to land in the F42 GA
repositories
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 2:17 PM Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> A while back I updated the mingw-qt5 packages to 5.15.16 in the
> f42-build-side-103601 side tag, but then apparently forgot to submit the
> update. Now it looks like the side-tag is expired, and while the builds
> are still around, I c
Hi all,
I've been working on the Rust dependencies for GNOME 48 (both updating
existing packages and submitting new ones through review). There's now
only three reviews left that block updates for loupe (Image Viewer)
48.0, snapshot (Camera) 48.0, and glycin (sandboxed image loader)
1.2.0:
- rust
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 5:01 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> It's this time of the year again. Looks like there's quite a few
> updates that were submitted to Fedora 41 but not to Fedora 42 and / or
> Rawhide.
>
> Some seem to be either caused by
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 11:14 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 09:13:44PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > cmake-3.31.6-1.fc43 /
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2665333
> > is the latest cmake-3.x build and koji shows it doesn't have any tag
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 6:00 PM Richard Hughes via devel
wrote:
>
> On Monday, 17 March 2025 at 16:45, Gary Buhrmaster
> wrote:
> > git commit —allow-empty -m 'Rebuild for foolib 3.14'
>
> Yes, I guess that works -- thanks. On doing so, I got:
>
> DEBUG util.py:459: Problem: package git-core-2.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 12:37 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 6:41 PM Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Fabio is going to handle builds. Thank you, Fabio!
>
> I have rebuilt all packages in the list except for three:
>
> - telegr
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 6:41 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
>
> Fabio is going to handle builds. Thank you, Fabio!
I have rebuilt all packages in the list except for three:
- telegram-desktop is in rpmfusion and needs to be handled there,
after this update lands.
- chromium fails to build on ppc6
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 4:51 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 02. 01. 25 v 7:08 odp. Steve Grubb napsal(a):
>
> Hello,
>
> I would recommend a change to the testing description. See below...
>
> On Tuesday, December 24, 2024 11:01:11 AM EST Aoife Moloney via devel-
> announce wrote:
>
> Wiki - htt
Hi all,
I'm going to update cargo-c to the latest version (0.10.11) in Fedora,
EPEL 10, and EPEL 9-Next very soon.
This version of cargo-c will be required for compiling any Rust crates
that rely on the Rust 2024 Edition, which is supported in Rust 1.85+
(already stable in Fedora 40+, and pending
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 8:32 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> I'm pretty concerned that we have no automation to catch these
> problems. Would we have even noticed if not for you manually checking
> and complaining here on devel@?
Probably not. Which is why I do this kind of thing twice a year :)
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 4:44 PM Michel Lind wrote:
>
> > * support for signing with Sequoia-sq as an alternative to GnuPG
>
> Is this not already supported in the current RPM? I seem to remember dealing
> with issues due to us using sequoia-sq and it being stricter with some non
> compliant sign
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 5:12 PM Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
> Fabio Valentini venit, vidit, dixit 2025-03-11 17:01:15:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It's this time of the year again. Looks like there's quite a few
> > updates that were submitted to Fedora 41 b
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 5:03 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 10:44:48AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > What's going on there? Did the bot bug out? Or is the Red Hat security
> > > team shutting down? I'm very confused.
> >
> > The team isn't shutting down -- I just talked
Hi all,
It's this time of the year again. Looks like there's quite a few
updates that were submitted to Fedora 41 but not to Fedora 42 and / or
Rawhide.
Some seem to be either caused by confusion about the ongoing freeze,
but a lot are just ... missing. And packit seems to be a major
offender her
Hi all,
I just started looking at my emails today and it looks like the OSIDB
Bzimport bot closed *all* (or at least almost all) open security
issues in bugzilla as "CLOSED WONTFIX".
What's going on there? Did the bot bug out? Or is the Red Hat security
team shutting down? I'm very confused.
Fab
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 8:25 PM Quentin Deslandes wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> My name is Quentin Deslandes, I'm a software engineer based in France.
>
> My day-to-day job is to develop bpfilter
> (https://github.com/facebook/bpfilter),
> which I recently submitted the package for. bpfilter is a tool
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 6:35 PM Ben Beasley wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2025, at 12:28 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > RPM poorly handles changing symlinks to directories (or vice versa?). This
> > shortcoming can be mitigated with an RPM scriptlet, but scriptlets are frown
> > by OSTree distribution syste
On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 11:17 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> I still think we should always require a changelog entry, so that that
> the reason for the rebuild is always explicit.
>
> (In the normal case, there should never be a need for "trivial"
> rebuilds, and rebuilds should be for
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 5:13 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 21. 02. 25 12:41, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 1:17 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> With the recent discussions about provenpackagers in Fedora, I r
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 1:17 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> With the recent discussions about provenpackagers in Fedora, I recently got an
> idea.
>
> One of the common needs for provenpackagers is to simply "bump and rebuild" a
> set of dependencies.
>
> All packagers are already able to b
On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 2:21 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Otherwise I plan to retire any Rust packages that are
> - library-only / source-only and
> - have been unused leaf packages for 365+ days and
> - have no documented reason for why they are still needed
> before the F42
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:25 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> The scriplets were chose, as they are always noticed. And I would sleep more
> easily, if I would know that people moved non system jdk to temurins rather
> sooner then late.
But .. they're just not.
People will only see them if they run `
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:48 PM Tom Rix wrote:
>
> I am glad the gcc change came in before the branch.
> But I would rather it have come into rawhide after the branch so the last
> weeks before the branch could have been spent on testing for F42 rather than
> scrambling to kludge/fix a lot of #
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 10:56 PM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Why is updating a Fedora 41 system with java-11-openjdk installed
> getting deprecation notices for a Fedora 42 change? I got:
>
> The java-11-openjdk package is deprecated and may no longer receive
> updates. Since f42 install adoptium-
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025, 05:20 Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 6:16 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 11:37 PM Richard Shaw
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > It seems to be the only reason for FTBFS. A single test is failing.
>>
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 11:37 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> It seems to be the only reason for FTBFS. A single test is failing. Upstream
> has no interest in supporting 32bit anymore, which I think makes sense.
>
> For posterity here are the potential affected packages:
>
> $ fedrq whatrequires-src -
On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 2:51 PM Ben Beasley wrote:
>
> It seems like the inclusion of rust-smallvec on this list might have
> been an error, since "fedrq wr rust-smallvec*-devel" gives a very large
> number of results that aren’t subpackages of rust-smallvec itself.
You are correct, this should ha
Hi all,
In an effort to keep the stack of Rust crate packages in good shape in
Fedora, I'm regularly checking for library-only packages that have
been unused for extended periods of time (usually 365+ days, i.e. two
full release cycles).
Dropping packages like this reduces the maintenance effort
On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 1:26 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
wrote:
>
> We're currently in the middle of F42 branching + related freeze.
>
> > All builds that will be running at that time for the rawhide will be
> > canceled and can be resubmitted by maintainers after the branching.
> >
> > All rawhide up
On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 9:19 PM Łukasz Wojniłowicz
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> according to
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Package_review_policy/#submitter_not_responding
>
> "When the submitter of a review ticket has not responded to comments for one
> month, a comment is added to the tic
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 9:18 PM Sérgio Basto via devel
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I will start a mass rebuild [1] in a side-tag, very soon, please let me
> know we have any objection that prevent to proceeding.
>
> Best regards,
>
> [1]
> dnf repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires "libjxl*" --qf
> "%{re
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 4:11 PM Eike Rathke wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Monday, 2025-01-27 19:03:35 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> > In an effort to avoid the large amount of breakage during the mass
> > rebuild that happened with GCC 15 and Go 1.24 landing only *hours
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 8:02 PM Michal Schorm wrote:
>
> Does this RFC include an obligation for the 'major toolchain upgrades'
> Fedora Change owners to rebuild the dependent packages ?
No, but this is already happening to some degree.
For example, test builds with GCC snapshots were actually ha
Hi all,
For reference, this has been discussed at the last FPC meeting:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-01-23/fpc.2025-01-23-17.00.log.html
And I filed a corresponding RFC with FESCo here:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3347
In an effort to avoid the larg
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:32 AM Ian McInerney via devel
wrote:
>
> Were the FTBFS bugs filed differently this time? It appears that there were
> actually two FTBFS bugs filed against Audacity
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2339522 and
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 7:26 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 4:40 PM Stephen Gallagher
> > wrote:
> > > It's possible that I'm in the minority here, but I honestly don't think
> > > anything shou
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 4:40 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 12:24 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>
>> On 24. 01. 25 22:13, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > Note that side tags aren't the only issue. Sometimes a maintainer
>> > commits a bump to git but doesn't build it in a side
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 2:27 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 12:36:33PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Wouldn't the config-file-as-separate-source-file approach would be
> > more or less backwards compatible,
> > whereas creating
1 - 100 of 1275 matches
Mail list logo
