On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 6:40 PM Germano Massullo <germano.massu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Richard Fontana has given his answer to the license question > https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/668#note_2600398017 > > I am planning to resume eza packaging soon
I wouldn't say that "I haven't looked closely enough to say it's not OK" is an endorsement ... From what I can tell, the project was unilaterally relicensed from MIT to EUPL-1.2 *without getting consent from previous contributors*. In general, I don't think that this is OK. Additionally, the thing about dual-licensing in the referenced PR / commit message is also a lie - the project wasn't switched from "MIT" to an "MIT / EUPL-1.2" dual-license - the EUPL-1.2 is now the *only* project license. Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
